Around 1,000 doctors urge MPs to vote against ‘unsafe' assisted dying Bill
Around 1,000 doctors have written to MPs urging them to vote against the assisted dying Bill describing it as 'simply not safe'.
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will return to the House of Commons for debate on Friday, with MPs expected to consider further amendments.
But in a letter, published this week, doctors from across the NHS have urged lawmakers to listen to those 'who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill'.
They warn the Bill 'poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'.
In its current form the proposed legislation, which applies only to England and Wales, would mean terminally ill adults with only six months left to live could apply for assistance to end their lives, subject to the approval of two doctors and an expert panel.
Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medics would be obliged to take part in assisted dying.
Doctors already had an opt-out but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers.
Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years.
The letter to MPs said: 'As experienced medical professionals who regularly work with dying patients and who have reviewed the worldwide evidence on assisted dying, it is our opinion that this Bill poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce, and we urge you to vote against it.
'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups.
'This Bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe.
'This is the most important piece of healthcare legislation for 60 years and we urge you to listen to the doctors who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill.'
Sir Ed Davey welcomed the letter on Monday, telling Sky News he had 'real concerns'.
'I have voted against this assisted dying legislation, as I did on previous occasions,' the Liberal Democrat leader said.
'I have real concerns about the pressure on individuals, that they will put on themselves, if they think they are a burden on their family, so I welcome this letter.'
He added: 'I hope, as time has gone on, as the arguments have been better exposed, that MPs will switch sides and join the side that I and many MPs are on.'
But Sir Chris Bryant said he would be voting in favour.
The technology minister told Sky News: 'The Government doesn't have a formal position at all and individual members are free to choose how they vote.
'I'm not going to hide my own personal preference. I abstained on the first time round, I decided I wasn't going to vote because I wanted to hear the debate.
'I have listened to a lot of the debate. Of course, I don't want anybody to feel that they are a burden on society and that should lead them towards taking their own life, but I also have heard the cries of people who are absolutely miserable, and that's why I will be voting for the Bill.'
Some of the Bill's opponents have urged MPs to focus on improving end-of-life care rather than legislating for assisted dying.
Ahead of last month's Commons debate on the Bill, two royal medical colleges raised concerns over the proposed legislation.
The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said it believes there are 'concerning deficiencies', while the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) said it has 'serious concerns' and cannot support the Bill.
Opinions among members of the medical profession remain varied, with TV doctor Hilary Jones describing assisted dying for the terminally ill as 'kind and compassionate', adding that he would help a patient to end their life if the law was changed.
The GP, often seen on ITV's Good Morning Britain and the Lorraine show, told the PA news agency he believes medicine will go 'back to the Dark Ages' if proposed legislation being considered at Westminster is voted down.
While Friday is expected to see debate on further amendments to the Bill, it is thought a vote on the overall legislation might not take place until the following Friday, June 20.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
16 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Younger women could have cervical screening every five years instead of three
The changes mean that, from next month, women aged 25 to 49 in England who are negative for human papillomavirus (HPV) will receive screening invites every five years. The move has been recommended by the UK National Screening Committee and is based on analysis from King's College London showing five-yearly screening is just as safe as three-yearly, with the same number of cancers found. HPV is a sexually-transmitted group of viruses which cause no symptoms. Around 13 high-risk types of HPV are known to cause 99.7% of all cervical cancers. As at present, any woman who has HPV or has a recent history of HPV will continue to be invited to more frequent screenings to check the virus has cleared and, if not, to check for cell changes in the cervix. In a written statement to Parliament, health minister Ashley Dalton said the new change 'increases the opportunities to test and recall women and people with a cervix who have HPV, while extending the cervical screening intervals from three to five years in England for individuals who have a negative HPV test. 'This will bring England's cervical screening intervals in line with those of Wales and Scotland.' She said the NHS screening programme in England provides all women between the ages of 25 and 64 'with the opportunity to be screened routinely to detect HPV infection or cervical abnormalities at an early, more treatable stage'. She added: 'The aim of the programme is to reduce the number of women who develop invasive cervical cancer and reduce the number who die from it.' Ms Dalton said testing negative for HPV means the chances of developing cancer within five years are very small, as it can take around 10 years or more from the time HPV is detected to developing cervical cancer. She added: 'Those who test positive for HPV are already being followed up with yearly testing. 'This is important to ensure that individuals are monitored for any early signs of cervical abnormalities and provided the necessary treatment.' Experts have been concerned about falling numbers of women under 50 attending cervical screening, with around a third in England not taking up their invitations. Dr Sue Mann, NHS national clinical director for women's health, said: 'Taking a more personalised approach to cervical screening will help ensure everyone eligible can make the most of these life-saving services, while sparing women appointments that they don't need. 'The NHS is following robust evidence on how often women need to be safely screened, and by putting invitations and reminders straight in women's pockets on their phones, we're making it easier than ever to take up screening appointments. 'Make sure you come forward for your screening when you're invited, even if it was weeks, months or years ago. If you think you are due but have not yet had an invitation, speak to your GP practice.' Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'We welcome this change to cervical screening in England, which is the result of years of vital research to make screening more effective and has shown it is safe to extend the time between tests. 'Screening, alongside the roll out of the HPV vaccine – which Cancer Research UK scientists helped develop – have seen cervical cancer rates drop by around a quarter since the early 1990s, and we look forward to even more progress. 'If you notice any unusual changes for you, do not wait for a screening invitation – speak to your doctor.' Athena Lamnisos, chief executive of the Eve Appeal, said: 'We want every eligible person to feel empowered to attend a vaccination and cervical screening appointment when they are invited so we can achieve the brilliant ambition of eliminating cervical cancer.'
Powys County Times
16 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Powys cabinet backs role in Home Office asylum housing pilot
Taking part in a Home Office pilot scheme to support asylum seekers would give Powys County Council greater control over where people are placed, a meeting has heard. The council's cabinet has officially voted to express an interest in being part of a pilot scheme which would see the Government handing over cash to help boost Powys' housing stock. In exchange housing would be leased to the Home Office for 10 years, then returned to Powys wider social housing stock. The plans, which will involve a non-binding expression of interest alongside neighbouring councils Carmarthenshire and Monmouthshire, will have no impact on people currently on the housing waiting list, the meeting heard. Speaking at the meeting, the council's deputy leader Cllr Matthew Dorrance said: 'Currently the existing UK Government offering Clearsprings ready homes, procures accommodation within the authority for people seeking asylum. 'We don't have any control over that process; it does not include us in the sourcing of accommodation for asylum seekers and that will continue. 'Bringing a new scheme forward and collaborating with other authorities in the rural sector will give us greater control over the council accommodation that is used.' Cllr Dorrance said this would include the 'location and the support structure' put around the asylum seekers that are brought into Powys. Cllr Dorrance said: 'This scheme will enable the local authority to access UK Home Office funding that will provide us with capital resources for additional homes. 'What this proposal will enable us to do is add to the social housing stock. 'Because at the end of the 10 year period the homes we build using this external home office money will then become housing stock available to be used through the housing register." He said this would have no impact on those people already on the housing waiting list. Former council leader and now cabinet member for a more prosperous Powys, Cllr James Gibson-Watt (Liberal Democrat) welcomed the proposal. Cllr Gibson-Watt said: 'It's very important that this is about asylum not immigration, people who come to this country fleeing very dreadful situations.' He stressed that the UK under various treaties and conventions have an obligation to accommodate asylum seekers and process their claims in a 'fair way.' 'I'm very enthusiastic that the council should participate in this,' said Cllr Gibson-Watt. The cabinet voted unanimously to express their interest in being part of the scheme. Powys council's Reform UK group leader Cllr Iain McIntosh complained after the meeting that he had not been given the opportunity to object. A council spokesman explained that there is 'no provision' under the council constitution that allows leaders of opposition groups to speak at cabinet meetings on any item they wish to. A council spokesman said: 'Section nine of the Home Office Asylum Dispersal Pilot report states that here are no community specific implications for particular wards arising from this report. 'Therefore, the business of today's cabinet meeting was transacted in line with the council's constitution.'
Daily Mirror
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Major change to smear tests as women 'spared appointments they don't need'
Cervical cancer screenings will be less common for women aged 25 to 49 if they are shown to be low risk - low risk individuals will be able to wait five years between smear tests A major change to cervical cancer screening will mean younger women can have the smear test less often. Women aged 25 to 49 will no longer have to be tested every three years if their previous test shows no signs of the human papillomavirus (HPV), which is linked to cervical cancer. These women deemed at low risk will be able to wait five years between smear tests after the Joint Commission on Vaccination and Immunisation advised that this is safe. The change will come into force from next month. Dr Sue Mann, NHS national clinical director for women's health, said: 'Taking a more personalised approach to cervical screening will help ensure everyone eligible can make the most of these life-saving services, while sparing women appointments that they don't need.' Two people a day still die from cervical cancer in the UK and the disease claimed the life of Celebrity Big brother star Jade Goody in 2009. The move follows a recommendation by the UK National Screening Committee the five-year interval brings younger women into line with the approach already used for women aged 50 to 64 in England. Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: "We welcome this change to cervical screening in England, which is the result of years of vital research to make screening more effective and has shown it is safe to extend the time between tests. Screening, alongside the roll out of the HPV vaccine have seen cervical cancer rates drop by around a quarter since the early 1990s, and we look forward to even more progress. "Beating cervical cancer means beating it for all, and we're committed to a future where almost no one develops this disease. If you notice any unusual changes for you, do not wait for a screening invitation - speak to your doctor." Currently cervical screening involves a medical professional inserting a soft brush to take a sample of cells from the cervix. In recent years cervical cancer rates have dropped for women in their 20s who received the HPV vaccine, but have increased for women aged 30 to 44. NHS England data shows that during 2023/24 only 68.8% of 25 to 64-year-olds were screened within the recommended period of time, compared to 68.7% the previous year. Embarrassment is thought to be a major reason uptake of screening is not higher and rates have fallen in recent years. The NHS has this week rolled-out digital invitations and reminders for cervical screening via the NHS App, as part of a new 'ping and book' service. Eligible women will first receive a notification through the app to alert them to book a screening appointment, followed by a text message if the app notification isn't opened. Letters will remain in place for those who need them. Dr Mann added: 'The NHS is following robust evidence on how often women need to be safely screened and by putting invitations and reminders straight in women's pockets on their phones, we're making it easier than ever to take up screening appointments.' Currently all women aged 25 to 64 are invited by letter to cervical screening to check the health of their cervix. It is not a test for cancer but looks for abnormal cells to help prevent cancer. A small sample of cells is taken from the cervix and checked for certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV) that can cause changes to the cells of your cervix. These are called "high risk" types of HPV. If these types of HPV are found, the sample is checked for any changes in the cells of your cervix. These can be treated before they get a chance to turn into cervical cancer. Cervical cancer causes 685 deaths a year in England. The move to five-year intervals for younger women brings England into line with Scotland and Wales. Louise Ansari, chief executive of Healthwatch England, said: "We welcome this change, which confirms that most women will not need to attend screening so frequently. 'Healthwatch research last year showed many women can find it an uncomfortable experience, and sometimes difficult to schedule in around their busy lives. Reducing the number of times they need to attend, alongside sensitive and empathetic approaches by health professionals, will make these important appointments easier to manage.' Women due for screening will still be invited at the interval in which they were advised of at the time of their last test. Only those who attend cervical screening on or after 1 July, and meet the clinical criteria, will have their next test due date set at five years. The NHS aims to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040 and is also rolling out the option of DIY swab kits. The World Health Organisation's definition of eliminating cervical cancer is to have an incidence rate of below 4 per 100,000 women.
