
Barnes & Noble Widow to Auction $250 Million Art Collection
For decades, a small but mighty painting by the artist Piet Mondrian has greeted visitors in the grand vestibule of the Park Avenue apartment where the Barnes & Noble founder, Leonard Riggio, entertained guests. But the book mogul's death last year prompted his widow, Louise, to think about downsizing; many of the artworks that she and her husband collected would need to go.
'This is tough for me to say goodbye to old friends, but I will not put them in storage,' she said of the artworks. 'They need to be seen.'
On Thursday, Christie's said it would offer nearly 30 artworks with a total estimated value in excess of $250 million in their upcoming spring sales, including works by Magritte, Picasso, Giacometti and Warhol. The Mondrian from the family's vestibule is expected to be the auction's top lot with a high estimate that is expected to top the $51 million record for a similar painting set in 2022.
The announcement capped an intense bidding war between the auction house and its rival, Sotheby's, which took the unusual step of bringing in Pace Gallery as a third-party partner in an attempt to woo Riggio, according to two senior advisers close to the negotiations. (Sotheby's and Pace declined to comment.)
'We have a longstanding relationship with Christie's,' Riggio said, adding that the financial aspects of the deal were more appealing than what other companies provided. (Christie's declined to say what favorable terms it offered, though auction houses will often guarantee a minimum price for artworks to attract sellers.)
The art market has suffered a significant decline in sales over the last few years, leading to industrywide layoffs and nervous sellers. The Riggio collection will test the market's strength, coming after the chaos of the presidential election but in the midst of uncertainty over how American tariffs might affect the global art trade.
It will also test the mettle of a new chief executive; early this month, Bonnie Brennan was promoted into the leadership position after more than 12 years with the company.
'There is a depth and breadth to what the Riggios collected,' Brennan said in an interview, recalling how Leonard would personally attend the major auctions, waving his paddle in the air to purchase multimillion-dollar artworks. 'They are true collectors.'
The art being offered at Christie's provide a more intimate view of the Riggio family's collecting habits, which are more closely associated with monumental and minimalist works. The couple have been major supporters of the Dia Art Foundation for decades, and the couple's home in Bridgehampton, N.Y., includes an outdoor sculpture by Richard Serra that can be seen from space satellites.
But the artworks from the Riggio apartment in Manhattan belonged to an earlier period of collecting, one that Louise, in the interview, described as having a personal touch. 'We bought quietly,' she recalled. 'It was instinct. Art tells a story and we liked being part of that story.'
Riggio had a passion for art history, using the rooms of her home to showcase the collection. For example, one René Magritte painting offered in the sale, from his 'Empire of Light' series, used to hang above the fireplace in the family's den, near works by Max Ernst and Ashile Gorky. The living room had examples by Pablo Picasso, Alberto Giacometti and Fernand Léger, while the dining room was home to abstract expressionist works by Willem de Kooning, Jackson Pollock and others.
Still mourning the loss of her husband after nearly 45 years of marriage, Riggio said that there are some artworks from the apartment that she is not yet willing to sell. The last piece that he bought for her was a Van Gogh drawing of a little girl with a baguette under her arm. And for a birthday some years back, he presented her with a battered box signed as a gift from their dog, Cookie.
'I'm thinking it is going to be a funny picture or a shirt,' she recalled. 'It was a Degas."
The collection was full of those personal memories. 'It was about our love and our time together,' Riggio said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
13 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump signs Executive Order to ‘unleash American drone dominance'
President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order to 'ensure continued American leadership in the development, commercialization, and export of unmanned aircraft systems – otherwise known as drones,' the White House announced. 'The Order directs the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to expand drone operations by enabling routine 'Beyond Visual Line of Sight' drone operations for commercial and public safety missions, and to accelerate the development, testing, and scaling of American drone technologies, including advanced air mobility and autonomous operations. The Order establishes an electric 'Vertical Takeoff and Landing' integration pilot program to accelerate the deployment of safe and lawful vertical operations in the United States, selecting at least five pilot projects to advance applications like cargo transport and medical response,' the White House stated. Companies working on drones or low-altitude urban aircraft known as eVTOLs include AeroVironment (AVAV), Joby Aviation (JOBY) and Archer Aviation (ACHR). Confident Investing Starts Here:
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump-Musk feud: Are electric vehicles and Tesla at the heart of the breakup?
The President of the United States of America and one of the world's most influential billionaires are at odds after months of collaboration. The confrontation escalated Thursday with Elon Musk saying Trump would have lost the election without him in a post on X. President Donald Trump in turn referred to his former senior advisor as "the man who lost his mind" in a Friday morning ABC News phone interview. Republican Trump allies are now also speaking out against Musk. Musk's breakup with the administration has been public and is well-documented, with Trump and the Tesla CEO trading calculated jabs like pro boxers. The underlying reason behind the sudden intense feud is a serious cause of concern for some American car buyers. "Clean Coal" has been a popular buzzword for not one but two presidential campaigns for Donald Trump. So, Elon Musk's initial choice to stand beside a global warming skeptic as the CEO of a clean energy and automotive company was puzzling to say the least. At first, Musk's involvement with the administration was seen by many as mutually beneficial, since the CEO could potentially reap the benefits of government contracts for Tesla and SpaceX. The general public quickly soured to the idea of the eccentric CEO playing a key role in the administration. By April 8, Tesla stock had nosedived 41.50% from its January 2 share price. Tesla dealers have been attacked and vandalized while other Americans have staged peaceful protests against Musk's involvement in government and role at the Department of Government Efficiency. So, why would a guy who once wore a "Trump Was Right About Everything" hat suddenly publicly oppose his new bill? The short answer is, the two don't see eye to eye on the automotive industry's most controversial powertrain option. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill could decimate Tesla. President Donald Trump's stance and actions against EV adoption in America includes: Supporting the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, which suggests phasing out a federal EV tax credit that would benefit thousands of Tesla buyers Claiming former President Joe Biden's EV mandate "would kill 40% of the auto industry's jobs", according to Ordering the shut down of many federal electric vehicle chargers and pausing massive federal EV fleet purchases, according to Elon Musk (and Tesla's) stance and actions for EV adoption in America: Elon Musk bio says "Tesla's mission has been to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy" Musk claimed "the world does need electric cars" during a 60 Minutes interview and factory tour, asserting that Tesla has a crucial role in the future of EVs Tesla has collaborated with Ford, GM, Stellantis, Rivian, Volkswagen, Honda, Acura, Hyundai, Kia, Toyota and more to provide Tesla Supercharger access to EVs, making them easier to charge for American drivers Tesla stock recently plummeted in response to the feud between Trump and Musk. The President has also threatened Musk's government contracts amidst the dispute. The bill appears to be the focal point of the rift, but the two clearly have different ideas on what America's future should be. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk may have been able to join forces over their mutual stances on certain conservative points and a hatred of bureaucracy, but their White House tag team was short-lived. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill directly undermines some of the actions Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency have taken since the two united. Trump is 78 years old and expresses a desire to bring America back to a golden age of manufacturing before globalism outsourced American jobs and created a reliance on foreign trade. He also speaks about returning the country to an age where mining and drilling for fossil fuel production were prioritized over environmental concerns. Musk, on the other hand, is a 53-year-old futurist who strives to make humans a multi-planetary species and has made a fortune from innovation and technological disruption. At a glance, the issue seems to be about the One, Big, Beautiful Bill attacking Tesla's bottom line but the two polarizing figures are fundamentally different in terms of future aspirations. Based on Trump's falling out with several former members of the first Trump administration and Musk's known adversarial nature in the private sector, this could be the end for, arguably, the most fascinating duo of 2025. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump vs Elon Musk: Could Tesla, EVs be at the art of the feud?
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mass deportations from Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill could quietly cost U.S. over $1.4 trillion
Mass deportations enabled by the Trump administration's Big, Beautiful Bill spending and tax package could cost the U.S. over $1 trillion in the coming years, as the administration is already reportedly struggling to fund its rapidly expanding immigration crackdown. The package, which the House of Representatives passed last month, directs $168 billion towards immigration and border law enforcement agencies. That spending, combined with the economic impact of removing scores of immigrants and more granular changes, like a potential decline in revenues thanks to the possible deterrent effect of new fees on migrants, could cost the U.S. over $1.4 trillion over the next decade, according to an analysis from the libertarian Cato Institute. David Bier, director of immigration studies at the Institute, argued on X on Friday that the bill is an 'absolute explosion of cash unparalleled in American history,' spending that could be better used on other public safety investments. 'The fiscal cost of mass deportation will equal the cost of all federal law enforcement spending over the next decade,' Bier wrote. 'Imagine how many rapes, murders, thefts, etc. could be solved with this money. We could have a much, much safer society spending this money on ANYTHING ELSE.' Even without the Big, Beautiful Bill, the administration is already rapidly burning through immigration funding. As of March, Immigration and Customs Enforcement was reportedly $2 billion short of maintaining its current pace of operations through the end of the fiscal year, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, the architect of much of the administration's immigration agenda, has brushed off such concerns, arguing last week on X that, 'Anyone serious about limited government and improving America's financial health would understand that ending mass migration is the prerequisite for every other problem we wish to solve.' Immigration analysts aren't the only ones concerned about the fiscal impact of the reconciliation package. As part of the acrimonious split between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the Tesla billionaire lambasted the Big, Beautiful Bill as an 'outrageous, pork-filled, disgusting abomination' that added too much spending to the federal balance sheet.