
The tick-borne disease turning MAGA-supporters vegan
'As I sit here eating my sad, mushy oatmeal with only organic strawberries and maple syrup, I'm disappointed that it isn't bacon and eggs or a big juicy steak,' laments Tiffany, a young mum from deepest Kentucky writing on Facebook.
'I've tried the plant-based meats and they are so horrible. I feel so cheated – I'd kill for a hamburger,' adds Paula, her profile photo showing her dressed in full camouflage while out riding a horse.
Both women are part of a US online community for people living with Alpha-Gal Syndrome (AGS) – a tick-borne illness colloquially known as the 'red meat allergy'.
The number of cases has exploded in recent years, with warmer temperatures caused by climate change bringing ticks to new areas and helping them to survive all year round. More than 30,000 Americans are now thought to be infected every year, up from around 4,000 only 15 years ago.
The syndrome, mainly caused by the bite of lone-star ticks, leads to a life-threatening allergy to certain animal products including beef, pork, lamb, and dairy. With few treatment options available, those diagnosed are forced – often begrudgingly – to adhere to a strict, plant-based diet.
Most cases have been detected in MAGA strongholds like Tennessee, Texas, and Kentucky – places where red meat is a way of life and veganism is treated with the same scepticism as the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop.
'I had someone tell me he felt less Southern because he couldn't have barbecue,' said Dr Scott Commins, an allergist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where he currently treats around 3,500 AGS patients.
The disease is triggered when a tick bites a human and transmits a sugar known as alpha-gal into the bloodstream. Ticks pick up alpha-gal when they feed on mammals like mice, rabbits, or deer – animals in which the sugar occurs naturally.
If the tick later bites a human, it can inject those sugars through its saliva. Because humans don't naturally produce alpha-gal, the immune system sees it as a threat and starts producing antibodies to fight it.
The dietary complications arise because alpha-gal is also found in red meat and some dairy products; so once the immune system is primed, eating foods like beef, pork, or lamb can trigger an allergic reaction, typically between four to six hours after eating.
The most common symptoms include hives, headaches, and stomach problems. In more severe cases, patients can go into anaphylactic shock, a potentially fatal allergic reaction that requires immediate treatment with an EpiPen.
Not everyone who gets bitten will develop the allergy, but for those who do, even a small amount of red meat can trigger a reaction.
'You might eat a hamburger at six in the evening and feel fine – then wake up at midnight covered in hives. That delayed response makes the condition difficult to diagnose,' Dr Commins said.
The US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) estimates that around 450,000 Americans in total are now living with AGS.
'The range of these ticks is completely expanding. So what was at one point a southeastern US tick is now all the way up on our east coast to the Cape Cod area, like Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket, but then also West to the Central US,' Dr Commins said.
While most people naturally recover within three to five years, many will be continually reinfected because of exposure to ticks due to their work or way of life, he said.
'I would say probably only 15-20 per cent of my patients recover because they spend a lot of time outdoors – either working on farms or riding horses, doing hobbies that take them outside – and it may take nothing more than one tick bite every other year to keep the immune system producing that allergic response to Alpha gal,' he said.
On average, it takes around seven years for a person to be formally diagnosed, due in large part to a lack of awareness among doctors and the public.
The outlook – ironically, given his penchant for burgers – has only been made worse by the Trump administration's recent slashes to the CDC's workforce and budget.
'We've been working on trying to raise awareness with the CDC to create a campaign for patients and then also for healthcare providers, but that's now been put on hold,' said Dr Commins.
There are some new and promising treatment options, however.
The Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) approved a new drug, Xolairz, in February of 2024 that is showing promising results among AGS patients.
The drug is taken every month via an injection, and works by blocking immunoglobulin, an antibody involved in allergic reactions.
'It's pricey, but it really does seem to work well to block reactions to red meat that occur accidentally and keeps people safer,' said Dr Commins.
The main way to prevent and control AGS, however, is targeting tick populations.
'We haven't really done much to try and target ticks and drive down population numbers,' said Dr Commins.
'We have interventions with mosquitoes and other kinds of disease-vectors. We don't yet know much about the lone star tick and it's really under researched.'
Meanwhile the apparent spread of veganism in MAGA country has already been taken up by conspiracy theorists, who smell a government plot to put them off their meat.
'Do you think Covid vaccinations helped this explode? It taught our bodies to attack and put our immune system into overdrive. I have always gotten bit by ticks. Why now?' writes Greg, another unwilling vegan whose grill is now gathering dust.
Paula suggests smoking an aubergine, instead.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Bernie Sanders and RFK Jr. find rare common ground over pharmaceutical ads on TV: ‘Sick and tired'
Wegovy, Farxiga, Vraylar ... the stream of drug ads on TV has gotten so pervasive that they're bringing together an unlikely pair of politicians to take them on. Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who caucuses with Democrats, is backing an effort pushed by Trump Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to ban pharmaceutical ads on TV. Sanders introduced the End Prescription Drug Ads Now Act alongside fellow independent Senator Angus King of Maine. They both caucus with the Democrats. If passed, the legislation would ban prescription drug ads from TV, radio, print, digital platforms, and social media. Those critical of the ads argue that they push the price of healthcare even higher, even as they don't help to improve the care patients receive. Supporters of the ads say that they can increase patients' understanding of the care available. However, most wealthy nations, apart from the U.S. and New Zealand, ban pharmaceutical ads, Newsweek noted. Kennedy has yet to comment on the legislation, which Sanders and King revealed on Thursday. They noted that the pharmaceutical industry spent more than $5 billion on TV ads last year, adding that many of the drugs advertised cost more in the U.S. than they do in countries where pharmaceutical ads are banned. "The American people are sick and tired of greedy pharmaceutical companies spending billions of dollars on absurd TV commercials pushing their outrageously expensive prescription drugs," said Sanders, calling the U.S. policy of allowing such ads an "international embarrassment." Anna Bahr, Sanders' director of communications, told Newsweek that the senator's office has contacted Republicans about joining the bill. She noted that the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries have lobbied to prevent the banning of such ads. Bahr told Newsweek: "Over the past 25 years, the drug companies have spent $8.5 billion on lobbying. Today, they have some 1,800 well-paid lobbyists in Washington, D.C. – including former leaders of the Republican and Democratic parties.' "Unbelievably, that is more than three lobbyists for every member of Congress. During that same period, they have provided over $700 million in campaign contributions. And they are equal opportunity contributors. They contribute heavily to both Republican and Democratic candidates,' she added. Kennedy and Elon Musk have both openly backed the idea of banning pharmaceutical ads. "Let's get President Trump back in the White House and me to DC so we can ban pharmaceutical advertising," he wrote on X on November 3 last year. As he campaigned for president, Kennedy said he would sign an executive order on his first day in office banning pharmaceutical ads. Also in November 2024, Musk wrote on X: "No advertising for pharma." "The widespread use of direct-to-consumer advertising by pharmaceutical companies drives up costs and doesn't necessarily make patients healthier,' King said in a statement. 'The End Prescription Drug Ads Now Act would prohibit direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceutical drugs to protect people. This bill is a great step to ensure that patients are getting the best information possible and from the right source: their providers and not biased advertisements." Several Democratic senators have signed on to co-sponsor the legislation, including Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy, Vermont Sen. Peter Welch, Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley, and Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, Sanders' office has stated.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The shocking cancer link behind a common cosmetic procedure that puts millions at risk
Some women who get breast implants could be up to 16 times more likely to develop a deadly blood cancer, a government-funded study suggests. Around one in 500 women — the equivalent of 34million in the US — have a genetic mutation that appears to raise the risk of tumors forming in scar tissue around breast implants. Known as breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), the cancer develops when the rough surface of textured breast implants triggers inflammation that damages DNA and causes cells to mutate into cancer cells. Most patients survive if the implants are removed, but if left undetected it can spread elsewhere in the body and become deadly. Dr Paula Ghione, lead researcher and lymphoma specialist at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, said: 'If we look at the absolute numbers [seen in this study], it's still fairly rare. 'But the important thing to note is that when we look at women with this genetic predisposition, there is a big jump in the percentage with this lymphoma.' Of the 300,000 US women who get breast implants every year, nine in 10 have smooth implants, which have not been associated with an increased cancer risk. The women at risk of BIA-ALCL are those with mutations to their BRCA genes — sometimes dubbed the 'Angelina Jolie gene' — which significantly increases a woman's risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. In 2023, the latest data available, the FDA reported 1,264 cases of BIA-ALCL and 63 deaths in the US. For their study, published in the journal Blood Advances, researchers followed 3,000 breast cancer survivors at MSKCC who had breast implants after a double mastectomy. Double mastectomies are meant to stop breast cancer from spreading to other parts of the body. Of those, 520 were tested for BRCA mutations. About eight percent of patients, 43, who were tested for BRCA mutations ended up being carriers. After following the women for 12 years on average, the researchers found those with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations had a 16-fold increased risk of BIA-ALCL. They also found women with BIA-ALCL were 'significantly' more likely to have BRCA mutations. Dr Gione said: 'Our findings show that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are a significant risk factor for developing this type of lymphoma, confirming earlier suggestions of a possible role. 'It's possible that implant-associated lymphoma is yet another cancer that can arise because of these genetic mutations.' Breast implants with textured surfaces, which can feel like sandpaper, are thought to create space where bacteria can accumulate and form biofilms, or collections of micro-organisms. These harmful biofilms can trigger an inflammatory response, which damages DNA and causes cells to mutate into cancer cells. Silicone in some implants may also lead to inflammation. Because the risk of BIA-ALCL is so low, the FDA doesn't recommend having textured implants removed unless women experience symptoms, which include pain, lumps, swelling or unexpected changes in breast shape. Dr Ghione said: 'The implants that are put in place now are theoretically safe; however, there are still a lot of women who are living with textured breast implants, so it's important that women know what implants they have and talk with their doctor and remember to report this surgery as part of their medical history.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Detroit Lions legend and Heisman winner Barry Sanders reveals major health crisis
Barry Sanders, the Pro Football Hall of Famer and Heisman Trophy winner, suffered a heart attack last year, he has now revealed. Speaking with CBS Sports, Sanders said he's used the experience as an opportunity to get healthier. 'It's definitely made me healthier and happier,' Sanders told CBS. 'Being the kind of athlete that I was, I would see people walking and I would wonder, like, 'What kind of workout is that?' But there's a thing called a heart healthy workout, where you're just getting your heart rate up a little bit over a certain period of time, and that's just really good for your heart.' MORE TO FOLLOW...