logo
Voters in Hamilton chose hope over despair and more Scots will do the same next year

Voters in Hamilton chose hope over despair and more Scots will do the same next year

Daily Record3 days ago

Scottish Labour has once again defied the odds. Last Thursday we proved the pollsters, the commentators and the bookies wrong by winning the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election.
This is a fantastic victory for our new MSP Davy Russell and a win for the local community. This area now has a dedicated local champion representing them in the Scottish Parliament and demanding better from this failing SNP government.
But this result has significance for the whole of Scotland. The people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have laid the first stone in the path to a Scottish Labour government in 2026.
They have set the terms of the Scottish Parliament election and made it absolutely clear that it will be a direct choice between the SNP and Scottish Labour.
A third decade of SNP government or a new direction with Scottish Labour. John Swinney as First Minister or me. That is the choice on the table – everything else is just noise.
We saw a preview of the SNP's deflection tactics over recent weeks, as the SNP talked up Reform for their own political gain. John Swinney's now-infamous claim that the by-election was between Reform and the SNP has aged like milk.
It was a shameful to misinformation campaign that did nothing but embolden Reform. But the truth is the SNP is reaching for desperate spin like this because it has nothing else to say.
Scotland has almost one in six Scots on an NHS waiting list. 10,000 children in temporary accommodation. And violence rife in our classrooms - it's no wonder the SNP cannot stand on its own record.
After 18 years in government the SNP is fresh out of ideas. It has no vision for the future and no hope to offer Scots. This is a tired government that has grown out of touch and run out of steam.
But this is not as good as it gets. Our country has so much talent, so much potential and such extraordinary natural resources. The people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse saw right through the SNP's dishonest campaign and issued a damning indictment on their record in government.
They rejected Reform's poisonous attempts to stoke fear and hopelessness in an attempt to divide us. Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse voted for a new direction.
They chose the politics of hope over the politics of despair. Next year - when the rest of Scotland gets a chance to have their say - I have no doubt that they will do the same.
Too many voters feel helpless
While I will be celebrating this important win, I will also be reflecting on what people are telling us. I had hundreds of conversations over the course of this campaign.
I spoke to people of all ages and backgrounds, and there was one consistent message ringing out clearly: the status quo isn't good enough.
People feel a sense of hopelessness – they can't rely on public services, the economy doesn't work for them, and politics feels detached from their lives.
I won't turn my back on those people. I recognise that the UK Labour government must go further and faster to deliver the change people are so desperate to see, but that is just one part of the answer here in Scotland.
From our NHS to our schools to our housing system, the SNP is responsible for so much of what is broken. I will work tirelessly to demonstrate that things can be better with a Scottish Labour government.
The truth is John Swinney and the SNP have been in charge for nearly two decades – if they had the answers we would have seen them by now. Meanwhile, Reform feed on hopelessness and despair – they don't want you to believe that things can improve.
Only one party will fight the Scottish Parliament elections on a positive vision for Scotland's future and that is Scottish Labour.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PETER HITCHENS: The private school pupils refused NHS care show we're becoming a People's Republic by stealth - ruled by blank-eyed bureaucrats
PETER HITCHENS: The private school pupils refused NHS care show we're becoming a People's Republic by stealth - ruled by blank-eyed bureaucrats

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

PETER HITCHENS: The private school pupils refused NHS care show we're becoming a People's Republic by stealth - ruled by blank-eyed bureaucrats

We are becoming a People's Republic by stealth. The warnings are increasingly urgent, but is anyone listening? Last weekend The Mail on Sunday reported a deeply disturbing fact. An NHS bureaucrat had refused therapy to a young boy, saying, 'We are unable to see this child as we do not provide a service to school-age children who attend an independent school. We are only commissioned to provide a service to the mainstream schools.'

Firm linked to bra tycoon Michelle Mone begins court battle over dodgy Covid kit
Firm linked to bra tycoon Michelle Mone begins court battle over dodgy Covid kit

Scottish Sun

time4 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Firm linked to bra tycoon Michelle Mone begins court battle over dodgy Covid kit

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A FIRM linked to bra tycoon Michelle Mone has begun a court battle to keep £122million it received for dodgy Covid protection kit. UK health chiefs are suing PPE Medpro — which Baroness Mone, 53, and her husband Doug Barrowman, 60, both from Glasgow, had denied for years they were involved with 3 A firm linked to bra tycoon Michelle Mone will appear in court Credit: Corbis 3 The bra tycoon and husband Doug Barrowman Credit: Getty 3 Michelle Mone ahead of the State Opening of Parliament Credit: PA The High Court in London was told 25million surgical gowns had been rejected as unsuitable for the NHS as it was deemed 'non-sterile' with 'invalid technical labelling'. It was later revealed that Baroness Mone had lobbied Tory ministers on behalf of the consortium. Both deny wrongdoing, as do Medpro over gowns supplied in 2020. Paul Stanley KC, for the Department of Health and Social Care, said 'initial contact with the firm came through Baroness Mone' and she remained 'active throughout'. But he added her communications were 'not part of this case', which was 'about compliance'. PPE Medpro won two contracts worth over £200million via the UK Government's 'VIP lane' procurement process. TELLY HOST'S SHOCK By Matt Bendoris BBC host Laura Kuenssberg has revealed the interview that 'sticks' with her the most is when Michelle Mone confessed to being a liar. Scots bra tycoon Mone spent two years fiercely denying through an army of lawyers any involvement with the firm PPE Medro, which had earned over £200million worth of Government contracts to supply face masks and surgical gowns during the Covid pandemic. But in 2023 it was revealed that the Tory life peer and her three adult children had received £29million from the company via her second husband Doug Barrowman. That led to a 'Prince Andrew-style' TV showdown with the politics presenter on her weekly show Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. Appearing alongside Barrowman, 60, Baroness Mone, 53, made the jaw-dropping confession: 'I can't see what we've done wrong. Lying to the press is not a crime.' Read more HERE It was later revealed Mr Barrowman had received more than £65million in profits from the contracts. And he confirmed he transferred £29million from the firm into a trust benefiting Baroness Mone and her three children. Neither the Tory peer nor her husband are expected to give evidence during the trial. The UK Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract plus transport and storage expenses. Trial continues. Carol Vorderman reignites feud with ex-pal Michelle Mone in furious rant on This Morning Meanwhile Mone's ex-lawyer has denied telling her to lie about links to a scandal-hit firm. Jonathan Coad insisted the Scots bra tycoon's allegation that he did was 'not true'. Baroness Mone, 53, blamed him for her three-year refusal to confirm her connection to PPE Medpro — given £200million for Covid protection kit and now being probed by cops. Mr Coad, 67, said: 'I did not advise her she should keep her involvement secret. "The suggestion she did so by taking the advice of her lawyers is just not true. "To have Baroness Mone make allegations against me of serious impropriety was potentially very damaging."

How can ‘sanction' mean two opposing things?
How can ‘sanction' mean two opposing things?

Spectator

time4 hours ago

  • Spectator

How can ‘sanction' mean two opposing things?

Sir Keir Starmer said 'he could 'not imagine' the circumstances in which he would sanction a new referendum' on Scottish independence, the Times reported the other day. The Mirror said Amazon 'has agreed to sanction businesses that boost their star ratings with bogus reviews'. So we find sanction being used with completely opposite meanings: 'give permission' and 'enact a penalty to enforce obedience to a law'. The latter sense was extended after the first world war to cover economic or military action against a state as a coercive measure. That is the use we daily find applied to action, or the lack of it, against Russia. The diverging meanings both go back to the Latin noun sanctio, deriving from the verb sancire 'to render sacred', hence 'inviolable'. Such a sanctio came to mean a decree, as in that obscure beast of history, the pragmatic sanction, which looks neither pragmatic or like a sanction. The phrase had a good run for its money, though, labelling a decree attributed to St Louis of France against the Papacy in 1268 and a decree by Charles III of Spain in 1759, granting the crown of the Two Sicilies to his son. I would describe as an anxiety dream the thought of having to write about either. Here, pragmatic meant 'to do with affairs of state', a development of the ancient Greek word that, via Latin, also gives us practical. In English pragmatic acquired the meaning 'practical' only in the mid 19th century, allowing the Americans C.S. Peirce and William James to harness pragmatism to describe a kind of philosophy. As for sanction, it is now also deployed to label the removal or reduction of social benefits. In February this year, 5.5 per cent of claimants were being sanctioned. There is, too, the architect of Dublin's Heuston station (often misprinted as Euston station): Sancton Wood (often misprinted as Sanction Wood).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store