New bakery initiative by Sharjah will feed 20,000 people in Gaza
Daily bread and meals will be provided to 20,000 people affected by the war on Gaza through a new bakery initiative launched by Sharjah Charity International.
Implemented in collaboration with Operation Chivalrous Knight 3, the project aims to support children, the elderly, and displaced families amid worsening food insecurity and the risk of famine in the region. The initiative comes at a monthly cost of AED750,000.
According to Abdullah Sultan bin Khadem, Executive Director of Sharjah Charity International, the organisation has previously drilled 12 wells and operated field kitchens to help meet humanitarian needs in Gaza.
Meanwhile, under international pressure, Israel allowed 100 aid trucks carrying flour, baby food, and medical supplies into Gaza on Wednesday, according to the Israeli military. It follows an 11-week blockade that severely restricted the flow of essential goods.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the government would consider a temporary ceasefire to facilitate the return of hostages but affirmed plans to continue the military campaign in Gaza.
Despite the limited entry of aid — 98 trucks on Monday and Tuesday — many supplies have yet to reach local bakeries, markets, and hospitals.
Aid officials report that Gaza's soup kitchens and food distribution networks remain critically undersupplied.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Washington Post update on Gaza aid group killings article sparks online backlash
A recent correction by the Washington Post regarding its reporting on a deadly incident at a Gaza aid distribution site has ignited a firestorm of criticism and accusations of pro-Israel bias on social media. On 1 June, at least 32 Palestinians were killed and over 200 wounded after Israeli troops opened fire on civilians gathered at two US-Israeli food distribution points in Rafah and central Gaza, according to local officials and eyewitnesses. The original headline of the Post article on the deaths read: "Israeli troops kill over 30 near U.S. aid site in Gaza, health officials say". The Post shared the article on X in a post that said: "At least 31 people were killed Sunday morning in southern Gaza, according to the Strip's Health Ministry, when Israeli troops opened fire on crowds making their way to collect aid". On 3 June, the Post issued a notice on X, saying it had deleted the earlier X post and edited the article because it "didn't meet Post fairness standards". "The article failed to make clear if attributing the deaths to Israel was the position of the Gaza health ministry or a fact verified by The Post," the newspaper said. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "The Post didn't give proper weight to Israel's denial and gave improper certitude about what was known about any Israeli role in the shootings," it added. An archived version of the article indicates that an Israeli military statement about being "currently unaware of injuries caused by" the army was included in the second paragraph. — The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) June 3, 2025 Among other changes, the newest version includes a categorical rejection of gunfire claims by the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which called them "completely false". 'Obsequious apology' While some social media users welcomed the note from the Post, others accused the newspaper of reinforcing biases in western media coverage of Israel's ongoing assault on Gaza. "So we in Gaza get to be killed and then the media cannot be sure who killed us simply because Israel denied responsibility? So we are killed but no one killed us? That simple?" asked Palestinian writer and Pulizer Prize winner Mosab Abu Toha. "Why do you not ask Israel to provide videos from that site showing the world how their soldiers fired 'warning shots' in the heads and chests of starved people?" Investigative journalist Laila al-Arian said: "This correction only came because Palestinians are dehumanized and deemed untrustworthy, while the Israeli government—engaged in mass slaughter and repeatedly caught lying to the media—is taken at its word." Absolutely reprehensible journalism. There were thousands of Palestinian civilian witnesses to the massacre who could easily corroborate the report. Of course the criminal denies their crime, it should not be given 'more weight.' — eli n. (@elinachos) June 4, 2025 Several people accused the Post of "cowardice" and of "backing down" from what they said was a more accurate version of the story. "We apologize for initially telling the truth," said one user sarcastically in reponse to the newspaper's post. "The Washington Post is now reporting, about Sunday's massacre: 'While three witnesses said the gunfire came from Israeli military positions, the Israel Defense Forces denied the allegations...' And that led to the obsequious apology below," said another. So you made the rare mistake of accurately reporting, got yelled at and retracted it. Cause clearly you guys never cared about fairness and that's why you've been doing Israel's propaganda for years. — B L A K E L E Y™℠©® LLC (@_iamblakeley) June 4, 2025 Others accused the paper of capitulating to pressure from political and other figures. Some pointed to an X post from White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt quoting the Washington Post's update: "We told you we'd hold the Fake News accountable." "The White House all but confirms that it pressured the 'correction' from the Washington Post," wrote one journalist. The White House all but confirms that it pressured the "correction" from the Washington Post. If you are at the Post and know what happened, I'm on Signal at harb.12 — Ali Harb (@Harbpeace) June 3, 2025 Others pointed to a recent post from pro-Israel billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman calling on Jeff Bezos, the owner of the Washington Post, to investigate what he said was the publication of a "false story", prompting further accusations of bowing to pressure. I had to read this 3 times to make sure it wasn't a parody account. Nope. Just a formerly reputable publication bowing to institutional pressure, in an embarrassingly ineloquent manner I would add. Stumbling over words left, right( and centre. — Carmen Alvarez (@maybeitscarma) June 4, 2025 The X post comes amid a string of Israeli attacks on Palestinians seeking aid at distribution points run by the newly established GHF, which the UN and aid organisations have accused of militarising humanitarian aid. Israeli gunfire has resulted in over 100 deaths and hundreds wounded since the initiative's launch, according to the Gaza-based Government Media Office. On Wednesday, Tom Fletcher, the UN's aid chief, said that recent "horrifying scenes" of Palestinians being killed by Israeli forces while trying to access food aid were the result of "deliberate choices". "The world is watching, day after day, horrifying scenes of Palestinians being shot, wounded or killed in Gaza while simply trying to eat," Fletcher said in a post on X. "This is the outcome of a series of deliberate choices that have systematically deprived two million people of the essentials they need to survive."
Dubai Eye
2 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
US-backed Gaza aid group halts distribution on Wednesday
The US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) will not give out any aid on Wednesday as it presses Israel to boost civilian safety beyond the perimeter of its distribution site. The move follows a deadly incident on Tuesday in which 27 Palestinians seeking aid near the GHF food site were killed by Israeli forces. The Israeli military said the group was perceived as a threat. The International Committee of the Red Cross reported dozens more were injured. The International Committee of the Red Cross stated that dozens were injured. The GHF said the incident was "well beyond" its site. The GHF said it has asked the Israeli military to "guide foot traffic in a way that minimizes confusion or escalation risks" near military perimeters; develop clearer guidance for civilians; and enhance training to support civilian safety. "Our top priority remains ensuring the safety and dignity of civilians receiving aid," said a GHF spokesperson. An Israeli military spokesperson warned civilians against moving in areas leading to GHF sites on Wednesday, deeming them "combat zones". Palestinians who collected food GHF boxes on Tuesday described scenes of disorder, with no-one overseeing the handover of supplies or checking IDs, as crowds jostled for aid. The UN Security Council is also set to vote on Wednesday on a demand for a ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas and humanitarian access across Gaza, where aid has trickled amid chaos and bloodshed after Israel lifted an 11-week blockade on the enclave where famine looms. "It is unacceptable. Civilians are risking – and in several instances losing – their lives just trying to get food," UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said on Tuesday, adding that the aid distribution model backed by the US and Israel was "all a recipe for disaster, which is exactly what is going on". That model is run by the newly created GHF, which started operations in the enclave a week ago and said on Tuesday that it has given out more than seven million meals from three so-called secure distribution sites. GHF Interim Executive Director John Acree urged humanitarians in Gaza, "Work with us and we will get your aid delivered to those who are depending on it." US Veto? The UN and other aid groups have refused to work with the GHF because they say it is not neutral and the distribution model militarizes aid. GHF uses private US security and logistics companies to get aid to the distribution sites. It is the latest in a string of efforts to get more aid into the enclave, where experts say the entire population of some 2.1 million people is at risk of famine. Jordan last year spearheaded humanitarian air drops, while the U.S. briefly installed a floating aid pier, but it was beset by challenges. The UN has long-blamed Israel and lawlessness in the enclave for hindering the delivery of aid into Gaza and its distribution throughout the war zone. Israel accuses Hamas of stealing aid, which the group denies. Israel said on Tuesday that three of its soldiers had been killed in fighting in northern Gaza. Gaza health officials said at least 18 more Palestinians were killed in other military strikes in the territory on Tuesday. Reuters could not independently verify the reports in northern and southern Gaza. The 10 elected members of the UN Security Council have asked for the 15-member body to vote on Wednesday on a draft resolution that demands "an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties." The draft text, seen by Reuters, also demands the release of all hostages held by Hamas and others, and the immediate lifting of all restrictions on the entry of aid and its safe and unhindered distribution, including by the UN, throughout Gaza. "The time to act has already passed," Slovenia's UN Ambassador Samuel Zbogar told Reuters. "It is our historical responsibility not to remain silent." As US President Donald Trump's administration tries to broker a ceasefire in Gaza, it was not immediately clear if Washington would veto the draft text. A spokesperson for the US mission to the UN said, "We cannot preview our actions currently under consideration." A resolution needs nine votes in favor and no vetoes by the permanent members - the US, Russia, China, Britain or France - to pass. The war on Gaza has raged since 2023 after Hamas killed 1,200 people in Israel in an October 7 attack and took some 250 hostages back to the enclave, according to Israeli tallies. Israel responded with a military campaign that has killed over 54,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities.
Dubai Eye
2 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Israel strikes Syria after projectiles fired, holds Sharaa responsible
Israel has carried out its first airstrikes in Syria in nearly a month, saying it hit weapons belonging to the government in retaliation for the firing of two projectiles towards Israel and holding interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa responsible. Damascus said Israeli strikes caused "heavy human and material losses", reiterating that Syria does not pose a threat to any regional party and stressing the need to end the presence of armed groups and establish state control in the south. Israel had not struck Syria since early May - a month marked by U.S. President Donald Trump's meeting with Sharaa, the lifting of U.S. sanctions, and direct Syrian-Israeli contacts to calm tensions, as reported by Reuters last week. Describing its new rulers as jihadists, Israel has bombed Syria frequently this year. Israel has also moved troops into areas of the southwest, where it has said it won't allow the new government's security forces to deploy. The projectiles Israel reported fired from Syria were the first since longtime Syrian ruler Bashar al-Assad was toppled. The Israeli military said the two projectiles fell in open areas. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said he held the Syrian president "directly responsible for any threat and fire toward the State of Israel". A Syrian foreign ministry statement said the accuracy of the reports of shelling towards Israel had not yet been verified. "We believe that there are many parties that may seek to destabilize the region to achieve their own interests," the Syrian foreign ministry added, as reported by the state news agency. A Syrian official told Reuters such parties included "remnants of Assad-era militias linked to Iran, which have long been active in the Quneitra area" and have "a vested interest in provoking Israeli retaliation as a means of escalating tensions and undermining current stabilization efforts". Several Arab and Palestinian media outlets circulated a claim of responsibility from a little-known group named "Martyr Muhammad Deif Brigades," an apparent reference to Hamas' military leader who was killed in an Israeli strike in 2024. Reuters could not independently verify the statement. The Syrian state news agency and security sources reported Israeli strikes targeting sites in the Damascus countryside and Quneitra and Daraa provinces. Local residents contacted by Reuters said Israeli shelling targeted agricultural areas in the Wadi Yarmouk region. They described increased tensions in recent weeks, including reported Israeli incursions into villages, where residents have reportedly been barred from sowing their crops. An Israeli strike also hit a former Syrian army base near the city of Izraa, a Syrian source said. Israel has said its goals in Syria include protecting the Druze, a religious minority with followers in both countries. Israel, which has occupied the Syrian Golan Heights since the 1967 Middle East war, bombed Syria frequently during the last decade of Assad's rule, targeting the sway of his Iranian allies. The newly-appointed U.S. envoy to Syria said last week he believed peace between Syria and Israel was achievable. Around the same time that Israel reported the projectiles from Syria, the Israeli military said it intercepted a missile from Yemen. Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis said they targeted Israel's Jaffa with a ballistic missile. The group says it has been launching attacks against Israel in support of Palestinians during the Israeli war in Gaza.
