UK ‘to ask Kosovo' to take failed asylum seekers in overseas ‘return hubs plan'
The UK is reportedly set to ask Kosovo to take failed asylum seekers as part of plans to open overseas 'return hubs' for migrants.
Kosovo has been put on a list of nine countries that are seen as potential locations for the hubs, The Times has reported.
The 'returns hubs' would house asylum seekers after they have exhausted all their rights to appeal for sanctuary in the UK. They would then be deported back to their home country from these hubs.
Kosovo's president, Vjosa Osmani, has already said that the country would be open to discuss housing the UK's failed asylum seekers.
She said last week: 'There's been no formal talks with the UK on this issue. It hasn't been raised so far. We would be open to discussing it, however I can't say more than that because I don't know the details.
'I cannot give an answer on a request that hasn't been made so far'.
The prime minister of North Macedonia, Hristijan Mickoski, also said last week that his country had not yet been formally approached by the UK for the scheme.
According to The Times, North Macedonia, Kosovo, Serbia and Bosnia-Herzegovina are on the shortlist of countries that the UK is eyeing up. There are also reportedly some countries outside of Europe on the list.
The paper reported that the UK wants to have begun talks on the scheme before a meeting of western Balkan leaders in London in autumn.
Almost 22,000 people were recorded using the Western Balkans to travel irregularly into Europe last year, according to the Foreign Office.
Foreign secretary David Lammy travelled to Kosovo and Serbia in early April. He said parts of the western Balkans 'have become a major transit route for irregular migration and serious organised crime'.
Sir Keir Starmer raised the idea of 'returns hubs' during the European Political Community Summit in Tirana, Albania. He told reporters that such hubs were not 'a silver bullet in and of themselves', but would be 'a very important additional tool in our armoury'.
He said he had had 'discussions about return hubs' with leaders at the summit. However Albanian prime minister Edi Rama ruled out being a host to the UK scheme, saying an equivalent measure introduced for the Italian government was a one-off.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Europe's establishment can no longer ignore immigration
European politics is becoming repetitive. Fuelled by concern over migration, a Right-wing party surges in the polls, and the political establishment immediately sets about working out how to deal with the symptom without addressing the cause. Having entered a coalition in the Netherlands, Geert Wilders appears to have come to the conclusion that the Dutch establishment is currently drawing from this exact playbook, and has collapsed the government as a result of its unwillingness to back his revised plans on migration and failure to deliver existing pledges. It is another sorry entry in a long series. In Germany, some politicians are calling for an outright ban on Alternative fur Deutschland, with the intelligence agencies now authorised to use surveillance in an attempt to gather information on the party. In France, Marine Le Pen has been banned from standing in the next election. And in Britain, 15 years of consecutive votes for lower migration, with manifesto pledges and verbal promises to deliver the same, have resulted in the precise opposite as politicians drunk on inflated fiscal forecasts have sought to shirk hard decisions. There is every prospect that Sir Keir Starmer's recent tough talk will turn out to be yet another attempt to pay lip service to concerns on migration without introducing meaningful reforms. The scale of the changes triggered by our open doors policy, however, means pressure will continue to build. Should politicians continue to defy the public, they should not be surprised if they pay a heavy price at the ballot box.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Explainer: Court blow to Germany's new government on asylum: what happens now?
BERLIN, June 3 (Reuters) - A court ruling that Germany could not simply return to Poland three asylum seekers who entered the country in May dealt a blow to the signature migration policy of Chancellor Friedrich Merz's new government: turning illegal migrants back at the borders. Here is a closer look at a court case and its consequences: Police in May sent back to Poland three Somalis who crossed Germany's eastern border by train and requested asylum. With the help of asylum rights organisation Pro Asyl, they challenged this in a Berlin court. On Monday, a Berlin court issued an emergency injunction saying Germany had broken the law. Under the European Union's so-called Dublin rules - hitherto honoured mainly in the breach - refugees can only claim asylum in the first EU country they enter. The Berlin court said that before sending them back, authorities should have started the "Dublin process" of establishing which country was responsible for assessing their asylum claim, whether or not that was Poland. Germany only has land borders with other EU countries and Switzerland meaning that, in principle, nobody who arrives by land is eligible for asylum in the country. During his election campaign, Merz promised to crack down on migration on his government's first day in office. Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, a fellow conservative, announced the policy of returning asylum seekers at the border. Following the ruling, he said the court's decision applied only in this particular case, set no precedent, and that the government would continue turning away asylum seekers crossing the land borders. This is true in a narrow sense: the ruling only applies to the three Somalis and does not bind any other judges. Other judges are bound by the same laws, however, so there is no reason to think they will rule differently. "The German government will lose every single case on this point, all the way up to the European Union's court," migration policy expert Gerald Knaus told Stern magazine. While migration is a signature issue for Merz and Dobrindt, their Social Democrat coalition partners are less comfortable with it. Justice Minister Stefanie Hubig said in a tight-lipped statement that "the court's ruling must be followed". Legal experts say that, to be successful, German authorities would have to reject migrants before they enter the country's territory - something for which they would need neighbouring countries' cooperation. But Poland is no less racked by migration debates than Germany. Prime Minister Donald Tusk's government has just been dealt a heavy blow by Sunday's election victory of a right-wing candidate for whom reducing the number of migrants was a key topic. In the short term, it is likely to be difficult to get neighbouring countries, all of which feel more exposed to migration pressure than Germany, to accede to Dobrindt's demands. Perhaps not. The far-right Alternative for Germany was quick off the mark in condemning the "failure" of the new government's migration policy. But the next major regional election is almost a year away and overall migration levels, initially driven up by the Syrian civil war and Russia's invasion of Ukraine, have been on a downward trend for several years, independent of any policies adopted by individual EU countries.
Wales Online
3 hours ago
- Wales Online
Billions, millions or nothing at all? What will Rachel Reeves provide for rail in Wales at the spending review?
Billions, millions or nothing at all? What will Rachel Reeves provide for rail in Wales at the spending review? More pain than gain is expected for most departments from this year's spending review. But there are hopes of extra cash for rail projects in Wales It is now expected funding will come to Wales in the spending review for rail (Image: Matthew Horwood ) On June 11, Chancellor Rachel Reeves will stand in the House of Commons and spell out the UK Government's spending plans for the coming years. While we are told the final details are still being worked out, there is now chatter within Welsh Labour ranks a sizeable amount of money will be allocated to spend in Wales on rail projects. Rail isn't fully devolved to the Welsh Government. Managing the Wales and Borders franchise is devolved to ministers in Cardiff Bay, and the Core Valleys Lines are now owned and operated here. But rail infrastructure planning and funding is still managed by Network Rail from Westminster and funding is not divided up fairly between England and Wales. WalesOnline had campaigned for that to change and some kind of fair funding mechanism, whether through devolution or another means, put in place. However that looks unlikely to happen. Instead of action to address the fundamental problem, there is now a growing expectation that Rachel Reeves will announce some extra money to spend on rail projects in Wales over the period of this spending review. This has been brewing for some time. There was an orchestrated release of letters in January, with an admission from the UK Government that rail in Wales had been historically underfunded. You can read that here. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The Welsh Government's transport minister then set out plans for developing services in north Wales, including for electrification of the mainline - the most ambitious of which need UK Government investment. Article continues below Then a report in Politico last week quoted "government figures" saying that Wales would receive "billions" of capital investment for rail in the spending review. However, Labour sources in both governments have dampened expectations, saying the sum is unlikely to be as much as "billions" but there is an acceptance that something is coming, and it will be sizeable. Politically, the Welsh Government need a big gift from UK Labour given the Senedd election is less than a year away, and polls show Labour is in for a tough time here. The most recent poll showed Labour slipping to third, way behind Plaid Cymru and Reform UK, you can see that here. UK Labour is also aware that Eluned Morgan, Wales' First Minister, has been openly criticising her counterparts in London and something is needed to unite the camp. A big cheque for something she can explain to voters in a pithy way on the back of a leaflet would be most welcome. She told plenary on June 3 that she was "hopeful" of "movement" on rail funding in the spending review. "I've made the case very clearly," she said. Wales' transport Ken Skates has made no secret of the fact he wants to see investment in rail and it is expected the investment would be for stations in south Wales. As a solution to congestion on the M4, and the abandoned relief road, proposals were made by the South East Wales Transport Commission report for increased rail services between Cardiff and the River Severn. What are known as the Burns proposals - the report's architect was Lord Burns - include upgrading the relief lines between Cardiff and the Severn Tunnel, and the development of five 'Burns stations' in Cardiff East, Newport West, Somerton, Llanwern and Magor and Undy. Mr Skates has previously said these stations would be "absolutely transformational" for Newport and the surrounding areas, and it is these stations that spending review money is widely expected to cover. But it isn't quite that simple. Whatever figure may be pledged next week, it is a matter for voters whether they think a pledge for funding - given serious physical progress is impossible before polling day - is enough to persuade them to cross in the box for Labour rather than someone else. However, the bigger question is whether any funding which comes on June 11 is enough to right the decades-long underfunding of Welsh railways and whether there are any longer-term commitments about ensuring Wales does not miss out when there are major spending commitments on rail in England. The latest row about railways which is gaining traction thanks to opposition Lib Dem MP David Chadwick and Plaid Cymru's leader Rhun ap Iorwerth is over a new rail line planned between Oxford and Cambridge. The £6.6bn line will see no tracks laid in Wales but, because it will be funded from the England and Wales pot, there are fears that it will suck up a significant part of Network Rail's budget and leave less to spend in Wales. This is all because the Barnett formula - the system where the devolved nations a fair share of the cash being spend in England - does not apply to rail in Wales. It does for Scotland and Northern Ireland but not Wales. This issue has been most acutely felt because of the HS2 scheme, which is taking up such an enormous part of that England and Wales transport pot that there were calls for it to be funded separately and Wales given a share. There was precedent for this, as it happened with the Crossrail scheme, but despite the route being entirely in England and evidence showing the scheme will have a net negative impact on the Welsh economy, UK governments led by by Labour and the Tories have consistently refused. Both Mr Chadwick and Mr ap Iorwerth have said the Oxford to Cambridge line is "worse than HS2" because the argument used for Wales not gaining any financial consequential payment from HS2 was that it would have improved services to Crewe which would have made journeys between north Wales and London quicker. There is no suggestion from anyone the Oxford to Cambridge line would improve any services for people in Wales. However, the argument isn't quite that simple. Politicians can argue about specific projects like a new rail line in Oxford and Cambridge all they want, but the issue is that the devolution settlement isn't fair. It isn't clear and the way decisions are made about what funding - if any - will come to Wales isn't transparent. The system which determines rail funding isn't fair, even Wales' transport minister admits that. Ken Skates has said today: "The system used for paying for rail improvements puts Wales and Borders within a wider network which has historically disadvantaged us," he said. "Previous governments have failed to change that, but the current UK Government has acknowledged that it short changes Wales. Past Ministers could have delivered a fair funding settlement, but failed to. Instead, they backed HS2 with no fair funding for Wales," he continued. He says it is in "stark contrast" that Labour in London has admitted Wales has been underfunded. His critics will say that admission is nice, some millions to make some improvements are helpful but this UK Labour government has to take its chance to right the historic wrong on a wider scale. Labour's former deputy transport minister, Lee Waters, has today told the BBC: "The signs are encouraging that we'll get more rail funding from the imminent spending review but we need to fix the system so that this doesn't keep happening. It's no good recognising the problem in opposition and then not sorting it when you get a chance in government." Article continues below
