The crusade on people who use drugs continues in West Virginia
Lawmakers in West Virginia have introduced bills to ban some harm reduction programs. In New Hampshire, the overdose prevention van operated by the New Hampshire Harm Reduction Coalition offers a syringe exchange, fentanyl test strips, safety kits, wound care and other supplies. (Hadley Barndollar | New Hampshire Bulletin)
The alt-right crusade against marginalized populations continues this legislative session. Senators and delegates alike have introduced hundreds of bills since the beginning of the session, many of them attacking LGBTQIA+, women, justice-involved, the unhoused, and of course, people who use drugs. Amongst the slew of anti-trans, anti-abortion and anti-homeless legislation, many drug policy bills spark great concern among harm reductionists, people in recovery and people who use drugs.
Let's begin in the House of Delegates with House Bill 2251 sponsored by Del. Doug Smith, R-Mercer, which would mandate drug testing for applicants for cash assistance. West Virginia attempted to do this before with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) in 2017 and it was extended to 2022. The program apparently only helped one person during its implementation.
Programs like these are known to be costly, wasteful, and harmful to families. It stereotypes low-income folks as drug users and doesn't provide a safe space for those with a substance use disorder to get help. Many states have already implemented guidelines such as these and they are never successful.
Del. David Kelly, R-Tyler, introduced HB 2365, which would create the crime of exposing people to fentanyl. Most of us know by now that overdose by fentanyl exposure is a myth and is consistently perpetuated by law enforcement. Creating a bill such as this would overcriminalize people who use drugs and make them even more fearful of law enforcement. It would add more penalties for drug use and possession, making it even more difficult for people who use drugs to get out of active use and piece their lives back together.
Moving forward, Del. Geno Chiarelli, D-Monongalia, didn't disappoint with his introduction of HB 2378, which would prohibit syringe service programs from operating in the state. This comes after his successful campaign against pipes last session, which led to pipes being prohibited from being distributed at certified harm reduction programs.
This year, he wants to ban syringe service programs altogether, and this undoubtedly has much to do with his attempt to go undercover to the syringe program in Morgantown and act like a participant. He used that experience and his experience as a methadone counselor to wage a war against drug users in the Mountain State.
He also wants to impose a life sentence on fentanyl dealers with HB 2380 and ban camping in municipalities with HB 2382. Most fentanyl dealers are low-level dealers who sell the drug to support their own habit or pay their bills, they are not kingpins who are out to get everyone hooked on the drug. This is more overcriminalization of drug users and their need to participate in survival work. The camping bill is more concerning because he is not the only one who has submitted a bill to ban camping. The attack on the unhoused has piqued in Charleston and Morgantown, with Morgantown actually passing a camping ban and Charleston introducing one.
Sen. Eric Tarr, R-Putnam, is always a main source of contention in the legislature and he continues to be with his two bills Senate Bill 203 and SB 204. Senate Bill 203 would prohibit syringe service programs, similar to Chiarelli's House bill. Tarr introduced the same bill last year (and years prior) and fortunately, it didn't gain traction in the committees and never made it to the Senate floor. However, with a delegate also introducing the same legislation, there is twice the chance of it making it out of committee and onto the floor. We can only hope this year is the same as last and neither bill makes it on the agenda.
Senate Bill 204 would essentially outlaw methadone programs. It is unknown what influenced Tarr to introduce this bill, repeatedly, given the evidence behind medication for substance use disorder. This is not the first time he has introduced this bill, but if it makes it out of committee and to the Senate floor it's scary to think that it would most likely pass.
One bill that I can support for once is SB 219 introduced by Sen. Mike Woelfel, D-Cabell, which will declassify cannabis possession as a misdemeanor to a civil violation. This would decrease the amount of criminalization of people who use drugs and free up the criminal justice system from non-violent offenses. Prohibition is the main causal factor behind the harms caused by illicit drug use and decriminalizing and legalizing drugs is the first big step into mitigating that.
Project Mayday is tracking numerous bills this session, but will mainly advocate the drug policies. We hope that we come out the other side unscathed, but we need solidarity from other groups and individuals to fight the fight. People who use drugs deserve compassion and they deserve life. It is our job to make that happen.
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed belong solely to Tasha Withrow, and not necessarily to her employer, organization, committee, the State of West Virginia or other group or individual.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
House Republicans push for universal open enrollment in public schools; Senate skeptical
This year, House Republicans are pushing to make open enrollment mandatory across the state, advocating for a law that would require all school districts to accept students from outside their district if they have capacity. (Photo by Dave Cummings/New Hampshire Bulletin) In 2009, New Hampshire lawmakers passed a law intended to be transformational. The new law allowed public school boards to vote to accept students from any school district in the state. Prospect Mountain High School in Alton chose to adopt that policy of 'open enrollment.' To the school's superintendent, Timothy Broadrick, it was a survival move in an era of declining enrollment. 'I can tell you from our direct experience that if you wish to have a functional public school choice system in the state of New Hampshire, this is necessary,' he said at a Senate hearing in April. But nearly two decades later, Prospect Mountain is the only school in the state to choose the open enrollment option. This year, House Republicans are pushing to make open enrollment mandatory across the state, advocating for a law that would require all school districts to accept students from outside their district if they have capacity. Though the idea has seen resistance in the Senate this year, the House doubled down last week. The chamber added a last-minute amendment to an unrelated piece of legislation, Senate Bill 210, sending the universal open enrollment idea to the Senate one more time. The Senate has voted multiple times this year to hold similar proposals for further study. And representatives of public schools are urging lawmakers to put the brakes on the idea, arguing it could create chaos for school districts. But on Thursday, senators will vote on whether to accept the House's proposal and send it to Gov. Kelly Ayotte, reject it entirely, or request further negotiations with the House through a committee of conference. The amendment in SB 210 would require that public school districts post monthly reports to their websites listing the number of vacancies in each school. It would allow parents to apply to send their children to school districts, without paying application fees. And it would require the receiving district to accept the student as long as there is space, with exceptions possible if the student was expelled from the previous district or has a documented history of disciplinary issues or chronic absenteeism. The bill would require the district in which the student lives to pay the receiving district at least 80% of the per-pupil annual cost at the receiving district; under the bill, the Department of Education would set the exact amount. To House Republicans, the bill would be another step forward for the school choice movement, whose supporters believe parents should have more options for their kids' education than the public school district in the town where they live. Rep. Glenn Cordelli, who authored a similar bill earlier this year, argues open enrollment policies would create more opportunity. 'We hear that public schools are open to all students, but that's not true,' he said at a hearing in April. 'We practice ZIP code discrimination when it comes to public schools that children can attend.' Cordelli contends that making the policy mandatory would force public school districts to compete for students, knowing they could lose them to other districts. That, he says, could inspire schools to try new teaching approaches to attract students. Broadrick agrees with that idea. 'My school boards, along with our high school faculty and myself, welcome an opportunity to compete with charter schools, with private schools and with other public schools, to show families that we are worthy of their choice,' he said. But others are warning the Senate not to vote to make open enrollment mandatory, arguing it would be unfair for both wealthy and under-resourced districts. 'You're basically forcing one school district to subsidize a different school district,' said Barrett Christina, executive director of the New Hampshire School Boards Association, in testimony to the Senate in April. 'The voters in one town are going to be subsidizing the school district in another town.' Brian Winslow, chairman of the Northwood School Board, said if universal open enrollment passed, it would be difficult for school boards to set budgets, not knowing if they will be receiving students or losing them. 'This just would represent an unfunded additional charge to Northwood students that may balance out (or that) may not balance out,' he said. Observers believed the House's proposal had stalled this year after the Senate voted to retain House Bill 714 and removed similar language from the House-passed budget. But with the potential re-emergence of the issue — both in SB 210 and in the coming negotiations between the House and Senate over the budget policy bill, House Bill 2 — the New Hampshire School Administrators Association is urging restraint. In a press release Tuesday, the association issued a bulleted list of issues it has with implementation of SB 210, including how special education funding would be coordinated between districts receiving students, how the new law would affect existing tuition agreements between school districts, and how school districts could budget for increases or decreases in students throughout the year. 'A district that sees a sudden increase of students during the school year will face two choices: Cut existing services to stay within approved spending, or call a special meeting to raise taxes. Similarly, a district that sees a sudden decline in enrollment will face a decrease in revenue and simultaneous increase in expenses,' the association said in a statement. The Senate has expressed skepticism about the bill, and in particular about implementing it in time for the 2025-2026 school year. When an earlier version of the bill, House Bill 741, was heard before the Senate in April, nine people registered support and 752 people registered as opposed, according to a Senate hearing report. The Senate later voted to re-refer the bill to the Senate Education Committee, allowing the committee to work on the bill until January, when it must make a decision. Cordelli argues the bill would address advocates' longstanding concerns about keeping public dollars in public schools. But he argues that providing choice is important. 'The status quo was not working in many places,' he said. 'The education freedom that we have been talking about is not available only for private schools or home schooling. It should be available for public schools as well, so that the child can have the education opportunity that best meets their individual needs.' Prospect Mountain's open enrollment status has sparked a legal dispute with the Pittsfield School District, after Prospect Mountain accepted four Pittsfield students and asked the Pittsfield School District to pay tuition. The Pittsfield School District has argued it did not authorize the students to go to Prospect Mountain and should not have to pay the tuition; the New Hampshire State Board of Education ruled in May 2024 that they must. Pittsfield School District filed an appeal of the State Board's ruling to the state Supreme Court in August 2024; in November, the court indicated it would take up the appeal. The court has not yet scheduled oral arguments, but could decide to waive oral arguments and issue a written decision from the briefs. It has not yet issued a decision. In the meantime, lawmakers did pass a separate bill this year, House Bill 771, that clarifies that school districts must pay tuition to open enrollment school districts under the current law. That bill is awaiting House approval of changes made by the Senate.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
McKay seeking second term as state senator
CUMBERLAND — Maryland state Sen. Mike McKay is seeking a second term. McKay, a Republican who represents District 1 — comprised of Allegany, Garrett and a portion of Washington counties — launched his reelection campaign Tuesday during an event that featured about 250 supporters at the Western Maryland Railway Station. 'Town by town, handshake by handshake, we'll listen, we'll lead, and we'll make sure working families have a real voice in Annapolis,' McKay said. His remarks were also posted to social media. McKay has been a state senator since 2023. He was a member of the state House of Delegates, representing District 1C, from 2015 to 2023, and an Allegany County commissioner from 2010 to 2014. He is the only candidate to file so far in the race. The primary election is June 20, 2026.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
A short history of long ballots in Virginia
Voters in suburban Henrico's Short Pump precinct cast their ballots in 2018. (Photo by Ned Oliver/Virginia Mercury) With six candidates on the ballot, the June 17 Democratic contest for lieutenant governor is the second most-crowded statewide primary in modern Virginia history. If history is any guide, a congested primary can generate uncertainty and makes it possible that someone can claim the nomination with considerably less than a majority of votes cast. Here's a quick review of five statewide primaries since 1997 where the nominee won less than 40%. The races are listed in chronological order. Political newcomer Gil Davis made a splash by representing a former Arkansas state employee who filed a sexual harassment claim against then-President Bill Clinton. A week before the primary, state Sen. Ken Stolle released a TV ad attacking Davis, who was shown, drink in hand, talking to a client about her desire to pose naked in Playboy magazine. As it turned out, Stolle should have saved his fire for his Senate colleague, Mark Earley of Chesapeake. The party's ascendent anti-abortion base carried Earley to victory in a four-way race. Davis finished last. Mark Earley 35.8% Jerry Kilgore 24.6% Ken Stolle 20.8% Gilbert Davis 18.8% Source: Virginia Department of Elections Database In the 1997 general election, Republicans rode gubernatorial candidate Jim Gilmore's 'No Car Tax!' slogan to their first-ever trifecta of statewide offices. In the attorney general race, Earley captured 57.5% of the vote to defeat Democrat Bill Dolan. With a quiet second place finish in the GOP primary, Jerry Kilgore of Scott County in far Southwest Virginia put himself in line to become the party's consensus attorney general choice in 2001. Gil Davis never ran for office again, but one of his law associates, Bill Stanley, won a special election to the state Senate in January 2011. In the second year after the millennium, the candidates with the best name ID were two members of the House of Delegates. Alan Diamonstein, at 69, was part of the party's old guard that had just lost its majority in the House of Delegates. Jerrauld Jones was a skilled lawmaker who headed the Legislative Black Caucus. Richmond Mayor Tim Kaine, with his yard signs an unusual green and yellow, was only one year younger than Jones, but presented himself as a new generation of Democratic leadership. Kaine, the son-in-law of former Republican Gov. Linwood Holton, rang up big majorities in the Richmond area. Tim Kaine 39.7% Alan Diamonstein 31.4% Jerrauld Jones 28.9% Source: Virginia Department of Elections Database In the general election, Kaine landed just north of a majority (50.3%) in a three-way race against little-known Republican legislator Jay Katzen (48.1%) and Libertarian Party candidate Gary Reams (1.6%). Many Democrats had expected Charlottesville state Sen. Emily Couric to be their nominee. But Couric — a rising star who was as telegenic as her sister, Katie, the Today Show host — withdrew in July 2020 after a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Emily Couric died three weeks before Election Day. It's hard to imagine a statewide Democratic primary where the populous suburbs of Northern Virginia do not play the kingmaker. But that is essentially what happened in June 2001, when Democrats went to the polls to select nominees for lieutenant governor and attorney general. Without a single candidate from Northern Virginia, turnout was driven by candidates from Richmond and Tidewater. In the lieutenant governor's race, twice as many votes were cast in Henrico County (7,528) than in Loudoun and Prince William combined (3,012). Downstate candidates — state Del. Whitt Clement of Danville and state Sen. John Edwards of Roanoke — put up dazzling favorite-son margins in their respective home bases, but the turnout worked to the advantage of Donald McEachin, a state legislator from Henrico who won majorities in core urban cities like Richmond, Hampton and Newport News. Donald McEachin 33.6% John Edwards 29.5% Whitt Clement 26.9% Sylvia Clute 10.0% Source: Virginia Department of Elections Database In the general election, McEachin lost his bid to become the first Black attorney general in Virginia history. McEachin's social justice agenda was ignored by Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mark Warner, who ran a centrist campaign with crossover appeal to gun-loving, NASCAR-crazy rural Virginia. McEachin managed only 39.9% of the vote, falling below Mary Sue Terry's previous record for the all-time worst performance by a Democrat in a statewide general election. From the standpoint of geography and ideology, the four candidates who sought the lieutenant governor nomination in 2005 seemed handpicked to splinter the state's Democratic coalition. Leslie Byrne and Chap Petersen were from Northern Virginia, Viola Baskerville was from Richmond and Philip Puckett was from Southwest Virginia. They ran the gamut from unabashed liberal (Byrne), diligent policy wonk (Baskerville), contrarian (Petersen) and conservative (Puckett). None were slouches; all were legislators who could point to achievements. In the end, party loyalists opted for Byrne, a familiar name who had served in both chambers of the state legislature and one term in the U.S. House, making her the first woman from Virginia to serve in Congress. Leslie Byrne 32.9% Viola Baskerville 26.1% Chap Petersen 21.7% Philip Puckett 19.4% Source: Virginia Department of Elections Database In the general election, Republicans nominated state Sen. Bill Bolling of Hanover County and figured they would make quick work of Byrne, arguably the most left-leaning statewide Democrat nominated since populist Henry Howell in the 1970s. Even though Bolling held a 2-to-1 ratio fundraising advantage, Byrne made it a close race. The final tally was Bolling 50.1%, Byrne 49.3%. This wide-open race with eight candidates — a record number for a statewide primary — narrowed in late April when then-Gov. Ralph Northam endorsed Hala Ayala. She was a little-known state legislator from Prince William County who had been swept into the House of Delegates as part of a massive anti-Trump backlash in 2017. Her story of financial struggle as a woman of color who lacked health care when her first child was born resonated with party faithful still celebrating Medicaid expansion in Virginia. Her multiethnic lineage (a father with Northern African roots who emigrated from El Salvador and a mother who was Irish and Lebanese) offered something for an increasingly diverse Virginia electorate. Hala Ayala 37.6% Sam Rasoul 24.3% Mark Levine 11.2% Andria McClellan 10.6% Sean Perryman 8.1% Xavier Warren 4.1% Elizabeth Guzman* 4.1% *Withdrew from race, but her name appeared on the ballot Source: Virginia Department of Elections Database The general election was a historic one in which Virginia would elect its first female lieutenant governor – and the first woman of color. The GOP nominated Winsome Sears, a native of Jamaica who emigrated as a child to the United States with her family. Sears won 50.7% of the vote as part of a GOP sweep of the three statewide offices. Also of note: Democratic Del. Mark Levine took the risky path of running in two primaries on the same day – one for lieutenant governor and the other to retain the party's nomination for his legislative seat in Alexandria. He lost both.
