Cost and complexity of EVs puts independent rental firms at risk of closure
Electric vehicles could spell the end of independent vehicle rental companies, a leading family-owned UK firm has warned, amid a wider backdrop of waning demand for EVs generally among hire companies.
Kendall Cars, a rental group with 14 branches in the south-east and a fleet of 1500 vehicles, says businesses like it are closing partly because of the high insurance costs associated with electric cars.
Group managing director Mark Kendall said: 'Like a lot of smaller hire companies we self-insure our cars to keep our rates low, but EVs are high risk, and a lot of hire companies are giving up because they calculate that as their proportion of EVs increases, they won't be able to afford to cover them.
'The national rental firms are stepping in by ignoring the retail market and renting the vehicles to business customers, who put them on their company insurance. But rental firms like ours can't survive by ignoring retail customers.'
Underlying Kendall's comments is a lack of enthusiasm in general for EVs among rental firms, which are also worried about the high cost of installing chargers and limited rental demand.
His prediction that firms will close won't please car makers, which sell thousands of cars to the rental sector and regard it as a convenient safety net when other areas of the market are depressed. For example, in 2024 there were 228,000 rental vehicles on the road, an increase of 21% since 2020.
'Rental has always been a release valve for car makers wishing to sell cars, and although there is some [demand] for EVs, it remains low,' said Adam Forshaw of UK rental and leasing trade body BVRLA. The main issue for his members is installing chargers. 'This is expensive for rental firms and there are no financial or tax incentives for their customers to choose an EV over a petrol or diesel car,' he said.
Kendall agrees that charging his EVs is a costly headache. He said: 'We've just installed four expensive charge points at our Wimbledon branch but, elsewhere, when customers return our EVs with very little charge – as many do – we have to drive to a charge point, which costs us time and money.'
He added: 'To encourage customers to recharge their cars, we've had to impose a £50 surcharge when the battery's return level is below 50%.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The 100-year saga of one man's attempt to pay off the national debt
Gaspard Farrer may be just a footnote in history, but he will be remembered fondly by Rachel Reeves. A £585m fortune held by the wealthy banker, who died aged 85 almost 100 years ago, has finally been donated to the public purse after a seven-year legal battle. Mr Farrer, a former partner at the now-defunct Barings Bank, is thought to have left £500,000 in 1927 as a gift to the nation in response to the UK's huge national debt after the First World War. But rules stipulated that the so-called National Fund, established in 1927, could only be made available when it was enough to pay off the national debt in full. It means that for years, the fortune has been locked away from successive governments. However, a 2022 High Court ruling ordered the funds to be released – a decision upheld after the fund's trustees lodged an appeal. They were finally paid to the Debt Management Office (DMO) in the financial year ending in April, according to a Freedom of Information request seen by The Telegraph. The DMO offers a little-known scheme that allows taxpayers to voluntarily contribute to paying off the national debt. Last year, donations reached a record £585,112,933 – almost entirely due to the payment of the 1927 National Fund. It was one of 16 donations – three of which were left in wills and 13 were one-off payments. In the nine years prior, just £175,000 per year on average has been donated to the scheme. The legal wrangling for Mr Farrer's money began under Theresa May's government which successfully used a niche legal argument to prise open the savings pot. The bid to tap into the pot used cy-près jurisdiction – meaning 'as near as possible' – which is applied primarily to charitable trusts whose original purpose became impossible to fulfil. The funds were being looked after by Zedra Fiduciary Services who acted as the defendant in the case. The Telegraph contacted representatives for Zedra for comment. The cash is now on the Exchequer's balance sheet, but will make just a 0.02pc dent in Britain's £2.7 trillion national debt, which has grown to the same size as the entire economy. The funds were originally set aside as a £500,000 investment in assets, including gilts, by a donor who remained anonymous for decades. After the government of the day lodged its legal bid to obtain the money in 2018, Mr Farrer's identity was at last revealed. The fund quietly grew in value for years until its transfer to the Treasury was revealed in a request made to the DMO by accountancy firm RSM. The documents confirmed it had received Mr Farrer's fortune. Chris Etherington, partner at RSM, said: 'It is generosity of a level that the Chancellor could not have expected. It could provide some inspiration as to how additional revenues could be generated for the Exchequer.' 'No prospect of the fund ever paying off national debt' When Mr Farrer's donation was first made, Sir Winston Churchill said the money was 'inspired by clear-sighted patriotism and makes a practical contribution towards the ultimate – though yet distant – extinction of the public debt.' But doubts have grown over the years that the money would ever actually fulfil its original purpose. John Glenn, a former culture minister, said in response to a parliamentary question in 2018 that 'there is no realistic prospect of the fund ever amounting to a sum sufficient to pay off the whole of the national debt'. Mr Farrer's donation was held in the form of a charitable trust and was on paper one of the most well-endowed of its kind in the country. John Picton, a reader in law at the University of Manchester, said using the fund to pay off national debt would be a 'missed opportunity' to donate to more worthy causes. He added: 'It's a missed opportunity because the fund could have been kept in charity. I think it's unimaginative, personally.' Mr Picton suggested the money could go towards a charitable fund for the Armed Forces, or to support the work of the country's museums and art galleries. He said: 'In Gaspard Farrer's time, the national debt was associated with war debt and paying it off had a patriotic motivation and that's long lost.' 'But now the national debt, rather than having patriotic sentiments attached to it, is just a large number we all live with and grows throughout time. It's unthinkable now that people would want to voluntarily pay to reduce it.' Mr Farrer's only other surviving legacy is his 11,438 square foot mansion in Kent. He commissioned the legendary architect Sir Edwin Lutyens to design the property, which was built in 1911. The eight bedroom house was recently placed on the market for £3.5m.
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Did late-season slide hinder Forest's recruitment?
When I look at Nottingham Forest and the market that they were in at the beginning of this past season compared with the market they are potentially in now, I still think it would be the same whether they had qualified for the Champions League, Europa League or Conference they got into Europe's top-tier competition, I don't think they would have been able to attract anyone more high you could say it has hindered them as they may have to sell more high-profile players to fund signings, but from the perspective of players in the market, I don't think it is massively I think about player attraction, I feel, for example, if Newcastle ended up in the Europa League instead of the Champions League, they would have probably been able to draw a higher-profile player than Forest could have done if they had got in the Champions with Chelsea, if they didn't get that Champions League place, they still would have been able to draw a higher-profile player than Forest just because of the club and how much time has been spent in those European spots in recent the attraction would have been there of Champions League football, but I don't believe the market would be any different to what they would have looked at had they finished first to Williams was speaking to BBC Sport's Nicola Pearson
Auto Blog
29 minutes ago
- Auto Blog
Tesla Refreshes Model X And S With Subtle Upgrades And Steeper Prices
But do the changes go far enough? Top Model X Is Once Again A Six-Figure Car Now that the Model 3 and Model Y have been thoroughly updated, Tesla has turned its attention to its older flagship models, the Model X and Model S. Both models are now available to order, with updates made to their designs, range, suspensions, and more. The updates aren't as comprehensive as those made to the cheaper Model Y and Model 3, but they should be enough to sustain interest in these models. Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:00 / 0:09 Audi A5 replaces A4: So, what's changed? Watch More Quieter And More Aerodynamic As with its cheaper models, Tesla has once again focused on NVH. The new Model S and Model X are claimed to be quieter inside, with a reduction in wind and road noise, along with a better Active Noise Canceling system. Visually, not much has changed inside, but there is new dynamic ambient lighting on the doors and dashboard. Source: Tesla There are other changes that should make these EVs more refined highway cruisers. New bushings and an updated suspension create a smoother ride. Furthermore, there are also adaptive driving beams and visibility is improved, thanks to a new front fascia camera – all the better to spot the new Tesla driverless robotaxis. The biggest Teslas were hardly uncomfortable before, so the cumulative effect of these updates should make them even nicer to drive, especially over longer distances. Improved Range For Model S, New Wheels, Better Model X Interior Space Tesla Model S in Frost Blue with Velarium wheels — Source: Tesla Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The Model S Long Range will now be able to cover 410 miles on a full charge, making it the longest-range Tesla yet. If ultimate range is a top priority, the Lucid Air still has a commanding lead, as it can hit 512 miles. As usual, the wheel sizes affect range. The new 19-inch Magnetite wheels on the Model S are needed for the 410-mile range. With the striking 21-inch Velarium wheels, the range drops to 380 miles. The Plaid has the same wheel sizes, with respective ranges of 368 and 328 miles. Speaking of the Model S Plaid, it gets new body styling, including a sportier lower front fascia and a rear spoiler. Tesla claims these changes have improved high-speed stability. Source: Tesla The Model X gets 20-inch Perihelix wheels or 22-inch Machina wheels, but no apparent increase in range. Somehow, Tesla has freed up more third-row and cargo space in the Model X, but by how much isn't clear. Both EVs have a new color called Frost Blue Metallic, which costs $2,500. Small Changes, Big Price Increase None of these changes are especially monumental, but that doesn't mean pricing hasn't gone up. Every Model X and Model S derivative is now $5,000 more expensive. These are the new prices: Model S All-Wheel Drive: $84,990 Model S Plaid: $99,990 Model X All-Wheel Drive: $89,990 Model X Plaid: $104,990 For less than the Model X Plaid, you can get the Cyberbeast, a much newer model with comparable performance, much better towing capabilities, and tech like steer-by-wire. That's assuming you don't need the Model X's third row, of course. While the changes are perhaps not that interesting, Tesla doesn't sell nearly as many Model X and Model S units as it does for its cheaper models, so the company probably did not want to invest too much in updating these EVs. About the Author Karl Furlong View Profile
