Saint John industrial park expansion focuses on medium, light industry, staff says
Very few exceptions for heavy-industrial uses, Saint John growth director says
In order to ease residents' concerns, city staff say the controversial Spruce Lake Industrial Park expansion will be mostly for light and medium industry.
There will be "very few exceptions for heavier uses," said David Dobbelsteyn, the city's director of growth and community support services.
"And those are primarily to allow for larger manufacturing of modern uses."
City staff and Lorneville residents are fast approaching a pivotal public hearing on May 12, when councillors will make a decision on the controversial plan aimed at attracting businesses to the region.
According to earlier iterations of the plan, the city wanted to create a new zone — called the Spruce Lake industrial zone — which would allow light, medium and heavy industrial uses, without specifying sectors and without a focus on light and medium industry.
Medium-industrial zones are generally for operations where nuisances like noise and odours can stay within the site boundaries. Heavy-industrial zones accommodate larger operations, where these impacts will be more far reaching and need to be further away from residential areas. Light industries generally don't have those impacts.
WATCH | Residents reject changes to controversial industrial park expansion plan:
Media Video | CBC News New Brunswick : City shifts away from heavy industry, adds green focus to industrial park expansion
Caption: Saint John has revised its controversial plan to expand the Spruce Lake Industrial Park. The city says the area will largely be for light and medium industry, with a shifted focus on green and clean sectors.
Open Full Embed in New Tab Loading external pages may require significantly more data usage than loading CBC Lite story pages.
The most recent version of the plan — released as a draft on the city's Shape Your City website — emphasizes "green and clean" sectors and de-emphasizes heavy-industrial uses with only some exceptions.
"So let's say we were to have a semiconductor factory that was interested in moving from Silicon Valley in California and expanding to Saint John," Dobbelsteyn said.
"That's a clean and green industry. It's no emissions whatsoever. We'd be interested in that."
Planning language complications
For the plan to move forward, the city needs council approval to change the municipal designation of 420 hectares of the area to "employment area and heavy industry."
This — when announced in July — drew significant pushback from members of the Lorneville community who fear the potential hazards of living near a heavy-industrial site and the impacts it would have on surrounding ecosystems and residential areas.
In draft reports, city staff say pushback stems from misinterpreting and misunderstanding the language in the city's municipal plan and zoning bylaw — specifically around the phrase "heavy industry."
Complications come from the city's municipal plan — a long-term planning roadmap distinct from zoning bylaws — which only recognizes light and heavy industry. Anything considered "medium" would fall under heavy industry in the city's long-term plan.
"Due to the limitation of the existing language in the Municipal Plan, the expansion area of the Spruce Lake Industrial Park must similarly be designated as Heavy Industrial even though the majority of uses [in the area] are intended to be medium or light industrial uses," the staff report says.
Dobbelsteyn said the Spruce Lake industrial zone will be the most heavily regulated industrial zone in the city.
"All of the industrial uses that Saint Johners would colloquially understand with heavy industry, whether that's a refinery or pulp mill, scrap and metal shredding — none of that is going to be permitted in the Spruce Lake Industrial Park," he said.
Heavy industrial developments will still be permitted in the park, as long as they aren't explicitly prohibited — as scrapyards and emitting industries will be. Those with processes considered volatile — like ones that involve acid, for example — would require a risk assessment.
Residents reject changes
Lorneville community members, who have a protest planned on Sunday afternoon, say they feel their concerns were not heard in the eight months of discussions with the city.
"Although the intention may be greener energy, the option is still there for heavy industrial development. It's not excluded. So the fear is still there of heavy-industrial development within 150 metres of our houses," said community representative Leah Alexander.
Buffer zones would start at 150 metres from the industrial park. Industrial buildings would need to be 250 metres away from residences, and a volatile industrial site would need 500 metres of separation.
Alexander said the buffer still amounts to being substantially less than the city's municipal plan guidelines, which recommends a 1.5-kilometre buffer between heavy industry and residential areas.
In the report, staff say the municipal plan's guidelines — which are not bylaws — were created with larger operations, such as refineries, in mind.
Dobbelsteyn said a difference of opinion doesn't mean staff aren't listening.
He said the city is "trying to find reasonable compromises that benefit the needs of residents, but also the needs of our business community, and that's one of those challenges."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Ikea is recalling thousands of garlic presses sold in Canada
Ikea is asking Canadian customers who bought a specific kind of garlic press to stop using it because small metal pieces could detach and potentially be eaten. The Swedish home furnishing giant is recalling its Chinese-made black 365+ Vardefull garlic press. Affected customers can visit an Ikea Canada store and return the product for a full refund without requiring a receipt or any other proof of purchase, Alicia Carroll, public relations leader with Ikea Canada, wrote in an email to on Wednesday. A 'production error' caused the problem after it conducted an 'internal investigation,' according to Ikea on its website Wednesday. 'IKEA apologizes for any inconvenience this recall may cause,' it wrote, noting that customer safety is a top priority and all its products are tested and comply with applicable standards and legislation. How to identify affected products The product was sold in Canada with the article numbers 305.781.89 and 201.521.58. In other countries, it was sold under article number 601.636.02. Ikea recall logo marking Ikea recall logo marking The products have date stamps from 2411 to 2522, with the first two digits indicating the year and the last two digits being the week of the year. Carroll said the article number and date stamp would be found on the original packaging, or the affected products can be identified by a marking on the upper handle. How many products are affected? Ikea reported that 10,712 affected products were sold in Canada, according to Health Canada's advisory online about the recall. It said they were sold from April 2024 to May 2025. Ikea has received no reports of incidents or injuries in Canada as of June 9, according to the recall. Globally, the company received three reports of incidents involving minor hand injuries, such as a scratch or a splinter. Ikea advises customers to spread the word about the recall, particularly if they know whether it was lent or sold to someone else. 'Please note that the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act prohibits recalled products from being redistributed, sold or even given away in Canada,' Health Canada added. Health Canada encourages customers to report any health and safety incidents related to using this product or any other items by filling out the Consumer Product Incident Report Form. Where to get more information Not sure whether you have an affected product? If that's the case, Ikea says you can still return any black 365+ Vardefull garlic press and get a refund. Visit or phone IKEA toll-free at 1-800-661-9807 for more information.


Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Alberta Premier grilled on province's coal policy at rowdy, angry town hall
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and three of her ministers got an earful on Wednesday night from southern Alberta locals at a rowdy, hours-long town hall to discuss the province's coal policy. About 500 people, dressed in cowboy hats, belt buckles, and jeans, packed a community hall in Fort Macleod, Alta., for an event marked by heckling, competing applause and placards. 'If we are not prepared to look and find middle-ground solutions to allow for industries to proceed while reducing our environmental footprint, you're going to find that different industries become the next on the hit list,' Smith said through a chorus of protesting voices and verbal jabs. 'Banning industries is just not something we are going to do.' The premier and her ministers of energy, environment and agriculture took questions and were shouted down on several occasions by attendees as they defended changes to the province's coal policy. Many in the crowd held small placards reading 'lie' and 'false,' raising them each time they disagreed with a statement. There was a notable group that came in support of the province's coal policy, frequently applauding the ministers and shooting back at other crowd members. Many attendees carried notebooks and pens, keenly taking notes throughout. The town hall came weeks after the Alberta Energy Regulator, or AER, granted an Australia-based coal company permission to start a controversial coal exploration on the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains. Northback Holding Corp.'s project at Grassy Mountain was initially rejected in 2021 when a panel ruled that the likely environmental effects on fish and water quality outweighed the potential economic benefits. Alberta regulator approves controversial coal exploration applications at Grassy Mountain Late last year, the project was exempted from the Alberta government's decision to ban open-pit coal mines because Northback's application was considered an 'advanced' proposal. The issue has been polarizing in southern Alberta, where the debate has primarily revolved around the economic implications of development against environmental effects. A non-binding referendum in Crowsnest Pass saw 70 per cent of voters saying they'd support the nearby coal project. Despite frequent pushback over the two-and-a-half-hour event, Smith rarely chose to get into back-and-forth discussions with attendees. She defended the province's approach to coal developments, pitching responsible development that prioritizes environmental standards. Smith also frequently cited a lawsuit by five coal companies that say they're owed $15 billion by the province in lost revenues and sunk costs. She argued again on Wednesday that she had taxpayers in mind when the province lifted its moratorium on coal mining and development on the eastern slopes. 'If we do nothing, then we are told we'll likely lose those cases and have to pay ($15 billion).' An energetic Brian Jean, the province's energy minister, frequently challenged the boisterous crowd and at times trotted offstage to hand his business card to those asking questions. 'I live in the oilsands. You can't tell me what I'm concerned about and what I'm not concerned about. I'm very concerned about our earth and our planet,' he said. Coal mines on Alberta's eastern slopes are poisoning fish populations, study says Several questions returned to a new study by Alberta government scientists, yet to be peer reviewed, which recently said old coal mines on the eastern slopes are poisoning fish and any further coal mining there would result in 'population collapse' of fish species in a nearby lake. Asked about the report, Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz said the province is looking into the issue and is waiting for it to be confirmed by the peer-review process. She said further studies to be released later this year are being conducted. 'We want to understand what is happening there so that we can prevent that from happening in the future.' The premier also jousted with protesters while speaking to reporters before the town hall. When a group gathered behind her and started yelling, she turned around and asked them to let her finish the interview. 'I'm looking for a little bit of courtesy,' she said. The event was scheduled to last two hours, but Smith asked to take questions for an extra 30 minutes after the clock had run out.


Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Xtract One Technologies Inc. Announces $7 Million 'Bought Deal' Public Offering
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO THE U.S. NEWSWIRE OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES BASE SHELF PROSPECTUS IS ACCESSIBLE AND PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE ON SEDAR+ WITHIN TWO BUSINESS DAYS TORONTO, June 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- June 11, 2025 – Xtract One Technologies Inc. (TSX: XTRA) (OTCQX: XTRAF) (FRA: 0PL), a leading technology-driven threat detection and security solution that prioritizes the patron access experience by leveraging AI, (the " Company" or " Xtract One") is pleased to announce that it has entered into an agreement with Ventum Capital Markets (the " Underwriter") pursuant to which the Underwriter has agreed to purchase 18,000,000 units (the" Offered Securities") from the treasury of the Company, at a price of $0.39 per Unit (the ' Issue Price ') and offer them to the public by way of prospectus supplement for total gross proceeds of $7,020,000 (the " Offering"). Each Unit will consist of one common share of the Company (each a ' Common Share ') and one common share purchase warrant (each full warrant, a ' Warrant ' and collectively the ' Warrants '). The Company has granted the Underwriter an option to purchase up to an additional 15% of the Offered Securities at the Issue Price. The Over-Allotment Option may be exercised in whole or in part to purchase Offered Securities as determined by the Underwriter upon written notice to the Company at any time up to 30 days following the Closing Date (the ' Over-Allotment Option '). The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Offering for working capital and general corporate purposes. The Offered Securities will be offered (i) by way of a prospectus supplement to the base shelf prospectus of the Company dated February 6, 2024 (the ' Base Shelf Prospectus ') to be filed in all provinces and territories of Canada, except Quebec (the ' Prospectus Supplement '); (ii) may be distributed in the United States to Qualified Institutional Buyers (as defined in Rule 144A under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ' U.S. Securities Act ')) pursuant to an exemption under Rule 144A; and (iii) may be distributed outside Canada and the United States on a basis which does not require the qualification or registration of any of the Company's securities under domestic or foreign securities laws. This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to sell any of securities in the United States. The securities have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act or any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to U.S. Persons unless registered under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or an exemption from such registration is available. The Offering is expected to close on or about June 18, 2025, or such other date as the Company and the Underwriter may agree, and is subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval of the securities regulatory authorities and the Toronto Stock Exchange. Access to the Prospectus Supplement, the Base Shelf Prospectus and any amendments thereto are provided in Canada in accordance with securities legislation relating to procedures for providing access to a shelf prospectus supplement, a base shelf prospectus supplement and any amendment to such documents. The Base Shelf Prospectus is, and the Prospectus Supplement will be (within two business days from the date hereof), accessible through SEDAR+ at An electronic or paper copy of the Prospectus Supplement, the Base Shelf Prospectus and any amendment thereto may be obtained, without charge, from Ventum Financial Corp., or email at ecm@ by providing the contact with an email address or address, as applicable. About Xtract One Xtract One Technologies is a leading technology-driven provider of threat detection and security solutions leveraging AI to deliver seamless and secure experiences. The Company makes unobtrusive weapons and threat detection systems that are designed to assist facility operators in prioritizing- and delivering improved 'Walk-right-In' experiences while enhancing safety. Xtract One's innovative portfolio of AI-powered Gateway solutions excels at allowing facilities to discreetly screen and identify weapons and other threats at points of entry and exit without disrupting the flow of traffic. With solutions built to serve the unique market needs for schools, hospitals, arenas, stadiums, manufacturing, distribution, and other customers, Xtract One is recognized as a market leader delivering the highest security in combination with the best individual experience. For more information, visit or connect on Facebook, X, and LinkedIn. About Threat Detection Systems Xtract One solutions, when properly configured, deployed, and utilized, are designed to help enhance safety and reduce threats. Given the wide range of potential threats in today's world, no threat detection system is 100% effective. Xtract One solutions should be utilized as one element in a multilayered approach to physical security. For further information, please contact: Xtract One Inquiries: info@ Media Contact: Kristen Aikey, JMG Public Relations, 212-206-1645, kristen@ Investor Relations: Chris Witty, Darrow Associates, 646-438-9385, cwitty@ Forward-Looking Information This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws. All statements that are not historical facts, including, without limitation, statements regarding the anticipated completion of the Offering, intended use of proceeds from the Offering, future estimates, plans, programs, forecasts, projections, objectives, assumptions, expectations or beliefs of future performance, are 'forward-looking statements'. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as 'plans', 'expects' or 'does not expect', 'is expected', 'estimates', 'intends', 'anticipates' or 'does not anticipate', 'believes', or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results 'may', 'could', 'would', 'might' or 'will' be taken, occur or be achieved. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be materially different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the Company's limited operating history and lack of historical profits; risks related to the Company's business and financial position; fluctuations in the market price of the Company's Common Shares; that the Company may not be able to accurately predict its rate of growth and profitability; the failure of the Company and/or the Underwriter to satisfy closing conditions to the Offering; whether the Over-Allotment Option will be exercised; the failure of the Company to satisfy certain TSX additional listing requirements in respect of the Offered Securities; the failure of the Company to use any of the proceeds received from the Offering in a manner consistent with current expectations; reliance on management; the Company's requirements for additional financing, and the effect of capital market conditions and other factors on capital availability; competition, including from more established or better financed competitors; and the need to secure and maintain corporate alliances and partnerships, including with research and development institutions, clients and suppliers. These factors should be considered carefully, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Although the Company has attempted to identify important risk factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other risk factors that cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements. The Company has no intention to update any forward-looking statement, even if new information becomes available as a result of future events, new information or for any other reason, except as required by law.