
Revealed: Labour's welfare cuts will take people out of work
Photo byThe government's disability benefit cuts would force people out of work or to reduce their working hours, according to new research by the Money and Mental Health Policy Institute – the charity led by Martin Lewis, the consumer champion.
Labour's plans to tighten assessments for the personal independence payment (PIP) will affect around 800,000 claimants. The benefit, designed to help people with disabilities and chronic mental and physical conditions live an independent life, is currently paid to more than 3.6 million people.
Ministers insist their welfare reforms will bring more people 'back into work'. But nearly two thirds of working people receiving PIP surveyed by the charity said they would need to reduce or give up work without the payments. Reasons cited include the impact losing the benefit would have on their mental health, and practical considerations such as covering the transport costs of travelling to work.
'PIP pays for [my] private therapy… which keeps my mental health at a functioning level,' one respondent told the researchers. 'Without these I doubt I could even manage the permitted work hours (14 hours per week) that I do.'
'PIP has allowed me to get a job where I work 12 hours a week,' another claimant said. 'This has helped with getting me out of my house and helped with my depression… PIP allows me to go to my job, get to appointments, get out to see family and friends.'
People losing their PIP who were surveyed said they expect to significantly reduce their spending – including 77 per cent saying they would have to limit their spending on public transport, 87 per cent on private transport (such as taxis), 82 per cent on clothing and other essentials, 81 per cent on personal care, and 70 per cent on child-related costs – all essential parts of a functioning work life.
The income shock of losing PIP under the proposed reforms would cause a 'terrifying triple whammy' of financial hardship, worsening mental health and reduced capacity to work for many people with mental health problems, according to the researchers. Claimants surveyed stand to lose £3,850-£5,750 a year if the cut goes ahead. Nearly all – 97 per cent – of respondents said the PIP changes would have a 'significant negative impact' on their mental health.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
'The government says its welfare reforms will help more people move into work. But you don't do that by depriving people of a critical financial lifeline that helps them stay well,' said Helen Undy, chief executive of the Money and Mental Health Policy Institute. 'Our analysis shows that these changes would actually result in many people with mental-health problems who have a job cutting their hours or leaving the workplace altogether. We urge the government to ditch these plans.'
Adding ever-more restrictions to the welfare system to boost employment sounds logical, but it doesn't play out this way in the real world. As I have written before, the Department for Work and Pensions' fixation with cranking up 'conditionality' (the requirement to meet certain demands to avoid having your benefits docked) over successive governments has had little effect on working hours. While the number of claimants subject to conditionality has more than doubled since 2013, the evidence for its effect on working hours is 'inconclusive', according to the Resolution Foundation, a living standards think tank.
Instead, with each harsher measure, working and non-working people are losing the support they need to live full and functional lives. A former DWP adviser once told me that, at best, 'harsh and prescriptive conditionality… pushes people into low-paid and insecure work, which is a poor outcome for them but also means they're likely to continue to need support to top up their incomes'.
Martin Lewis, known as the Money Saving Expert, has spent his career pursuing value for money. He knows a false economy when he sees one.
A government spokesperson said: 'The majority of people who are currently getting PIP will continue to receive it. Our reforms will help sick or disabled people move out of poverty and into good, secure jobs, while ensuring the social security system will always be there for those who will never be able to work.
'We are consulting on how best to support those impacted by the new eligibility changes, and have also announced a review of the PIP assessment, working with disabled people and key organisations representing them to consider how best to do this.'
[See also: How the weather changed on the 'cruel' two-child benefit cap]
Related
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
31 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Sarwar says surprise by-election win could help Labour back to power at Holyrood
Mr Sarwar and his party celebrated in the early hours of Friday morning after Labour's Davy Russell was elected as the new MSP for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, winning the seat from the SNP. With the votes showing a swing of more than 7% from the SNP to Labour, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said on Friday the result showed people have 'voted for change'. The by-election had been held following the death earlier this year of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie. When the votes were counted, Mr Russell polled 8,559, SNP candidate Katy Loudon took 7,957 votes, while Reform's Ross Lambie secured 7,088. And although Mr Russell was elected with fewer votes than Labour secured in the seat in the 2021 Scottish Parliament election, the SNP's support fell from just over 46% of all ballots then to 29.35% in the by-election. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice insisting they were 'delighted' with coming third – despite speculation prior to the count that they could come in second or may even pull off a surprise victory. Labour's win came after Scotland's First Minister John Swinney – who made numerous campaign visits to the area – had declared the contest to be a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Nigel Farage's Reform. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice (centre) insisted the party was 'delighted' after coming in third (Jane Barlow/PA) But speaking at a media event in Hamilton on Friday morning, Mr Sarwar accused the SNP leader of running a 'disgraceful' campaign. Mr Sarwar also insisted the by-election could 'help lead the way' to him becoming Scotland's next first minister in the May 2026 Holyrood elections. The Scottish Labour leader said he believed the victory to be 'even more significant' than the party's win in the nearby Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election in October 2023 – which he said had been key in helping to secure Labour's general election win in July last year. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (centre) is hoping to become Scotland's next first minister (Robert Perry/PA) Mr Sarwar declared: 'I think in some ways this by-election result is even more significant than the Rutherglen by-election result two years ago. 'It is right to say, I believe, the result in Rutherglen helped lead the way in helping to elect a UK Labour Government and I also believe the by-election result here will help lead the way to elect a Scottish Labour government next year.' Looking ahead to that election, Mr Sarwar told the PA news agency: 'I want us to gain scores of seats across the country so we can remove this SNP government from office.' Anas Sarwar and new MSP Davy Russell celebrated the party's win in Hamilton with supporters on Friday (Robert Perry/PA) He went on to accuse Mr Swinney of running a 'disgraceful campaign' in the by-election, saying that despite the SNP having been in power for 18 years, 'the best he had to offer was 'vote SNP to stop Farage''. And while Reform UK came in third in the by-election, Mr Sarwar said Mr Farage's party could not win the Scottish Parliament elections. He insisted: 'Nigel Farage is not standing to be first minister. 'It is a straight choice – it is either going to be John Swinney, or it's going to be me.' The Scottish Labour leader continued: 'The choice is stark next year. Our Parliament is not about protests, our election is not about protest, it is about choosing a government here in Scotland. 'The choice is stark – a third decade of the SNP with John Swinney as first minister or a new direction for Scotland with me as first minister.' However, Mr Tice told BBC Radio 4's that the result in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse was 'truly remarkable'. He said: 'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP, so it's an incredible result.' Mr Swinney, meanwhile, said the SNP was 'clearly disappointed' with the result. The party leader said Labour had 'won by an absolute landslide' in Rutherglen and Hamilton West – noting the SNP 'came much closer' this time round. But he added: 'The people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have made clear that we still have work to do. 'Over the next few days, we will take time to consider the result fully.'


Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How the ground war won it for Labour
It was the ground war 'wot won it' for Labour in the Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall by-election, thanks to the hundreds of foot soldiers drafted in to pound the pavements in support of their candidate. And Davy Russell, the well-liked candidate in question, proved to be a tremendous bonus in a contest fought on old-fashioned terms and in which the media – especially the broadcasters – failed to set the agenda. His win will put a smile on the face of Scottish Labour and end the gloom of the last six months, in which the huge gains in last July's general election have disappeared and have even possibly been reversed by the SNP. Scottish Labour still has masses to do – but in this part of what used to be a traditional heartland, it showed it is up for a fight in next May's Scottish Parliament election. It can't just sit back and enjoy Reform UK hammering the Scottish Tories – Nigel Farage's party is taking lots of votes off Labour too. In this contest, Labour strategists highlighted what they claimed were Reform's 'dog whistle' tactics on race and its suggestion that the Barnett formula, which helps pay for Scotland's public services, might be scrapped. Mr Farage dismissed these claims as smears, but his critics believe that they helped 'crash his own campaign' and convince traditional Labour supporters to stay loyal. The result was a shock for the SNP, but the party can blame it on its tactics – the stupid talking up of Reform's chances and sending Nicola Sturgeon to canvass in the constituency where her policies caused a decline. There is no comfort in this result for the Scottish Tories. They scraped home with 6 per cent of the vote, just enough to save their deposit. It's difficult to know where they go from here – except perhaps to hope that the early signs of a civil war inside Reform will continue to fester. One overriding aspect of this campaign has been that Scottish Labour won in spite of, and not because of, its relationship with UK Labour and Sir Keir Starmer's Government. Too many of the Government's policies have proved hugely unpopular with the voters, as Sir Keir seems to have recognised. He was only 10 miles from Hamilton five days ago, launching his new defence policy in Glasgow. However, he wisely stayed away from the by-election campaign and nobody seems to have noticed. On a significant, but lighter, note I reckon that if ground wars clinched the Labour victory, 'star wars' played a part, too. In an area where not everyone supports Glasgow Rangers Football Club – although they tend to keep quiet about the fact – and where light blue and orange are favourite colours, Labour won tributes from just about the two biggest personalities you could imagine. Sir Alex Ferguson may have been manager of a hugely successful Manchester United, but in this constituency it's the fact that he had played for the 'Gers' that makes him a star. And the honours list for Graeme Souness includes 54 Scottish international caps and numerous other accolades – the most important in these parts, being a no-nonsense former player-manager of Rangers. Sir Alex was fulsome in his praise for Labour's candidate. He said that the surprise winner in this fiercely-fought local election was 'a man of integrity, determination, and deep commitment to his community'. He might have added, but didn't, that Mr Russell was also an occasional stand-in for the King, serving as a deputy lord lieutenant for Lanarkshire. But when it comes to Mr Souness, who was reputed to have never avoided a tackle, he didn't ignore Mr Farage in his support of Mr Russell. Resorting to that well-known Scottish insult, which is one short of calling someone a 'liar', he said the Reform leader was a 'chancer' who didn't care about Scotland. Yes, I know that my old friend Sir John Curtice could produce a long list of stats to provide a better explanation of Labour's win, but who's to say that, with a majority of just over 600 between first and second and less than 1500 votes between the first three, that personalities such as Sir Alex and Mr Souness didn't sway the voters. After all, few opponents argued successfully with them in their playing days.


The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Badenoch insists Tories are still the main opposition to Labour
Reform's rise in the polls has led Sir Keir Starmer to regard Nigel Farage's party as Labour's main opposition in the current Parliament, despite having only five MPs. Kemi Badenoch laughed off suggestions that Reform UK are now the main opposition party to the Labour Government (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Answering questions after a speech on Friday, Mrs Badenoch dismissed Reform as a 'protest party' and said claims it was the real opposition were 'nonsense'. Describing Reform as 'another left-wing party', she said: 'What they're trying to do is talk this situation into existence. 'Labour is going to be facing the Conservative Party at the next election and we're going to get them out.' The Conservatives' electoral struggles come as the party continues to languish in third place in most polls while Mrs Badenoch's personal ratings show widespread dissatisfaction with her performance. Ms Badenoch has so far failed to arrest the Conservatives' slide down the polls since last year's general election drubbing (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Meanwhile, senior Tory and former leadership candidate Sir James Cleverly appeared this week to split from Mrs Badenoch on her claim that achieving net zero by 2050 was 'impossible'. Speaking on Friday, she maintained that she would be able to turn things around, saying: 'I've always said that things would be tough, in fact in some cases would likely get worse before they get better. 'There is a lot that needs doing, but I am of very, very strong confidence that the public will see that the party has changed and that we are the only credible alternative to Labour.' WATCH LIVE: The system is rigged. It's time to rewrite the rules of the game 👇 — Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) June 6, 2025 Her remarks followed a speech at the Royal United Services Institute in Westminster in which Mrs Badenoch launched a commission tasked with examining how leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) would work. While she stopped short of formally committing to leaving the convention, she said it was 'likely' that Britain would 'need to leave'. She said: 'I won't commit my party to leaving the ECHR or other treaties without a clear plan to do so and without a full understanding of all the consequences.'