Former Trump official slams UN reform efforts as 'eight and a half years late'
FIRST ON FOX: The United Nations' UN80 Task Force is examining multiple suggested methods for reorganizing the institution, according to a leaked, confidential document shared with Fox News Digital. The six-page paper cites multiple inefficiencies and areas of improvement needed to combat "geopolitical shifts and substantial reductions in foreign aid budgets" which are "challenging the legitimacy and effectiveness of the organization."
The effort is "eight and a half years late," Hugh Dugan, former National Security Council Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for International Organization Affairs, told Fox News Digital: "If [Secretary-General António] Guterres really comprehends that the system needs a major overhaul, he should step down and facilitate an early U.N. Secretary-General election." Dugan said that "the person with the fresh mandate" should overhaul the U.N.
Watchdog Org Calls For Sanctions Against Un Appointee Accused Of Antisemitism
The UN80 Task Force document notes that "overlapping mandates, inefficient use of resources, and inconsistent delivery of services" are among the problems with proliferating agencies, funds and programs, and notes ways to integrate, consolidate, and coordinate among reformed entities to maximize the benefit for those who rely on the U.N.
As another means of reducing outlays, the task force also recommended reducing the quantity of high-level posts, establishing single entities to coordinate Peace and Security, Humanitarian Affairs, and Human Rights, and "reduc[ing] the number of U.N. development system entities."
Dugan said the document "looks more like a whiteboard stream of consciousness approach that you find on the first day of a business retreat." He said that it lacks mention of human resource improvements, finding ways of recruiting "the very best in the world," or "identifying performance measurements or metrics against the leaders of the organization, branches, [or] offices."
Read On The Fox News App
Dugan said that the task force is also missing the important confidence-building measures needed to increase buy-in from members, to keep them "impressed and enthusiastic" about U.N. programs. "They're assuming that they are the leaders that are the right people at the right time." Dugan said this is "a real shortcoming."
"I don't think they have the confidence of the world community or the talents or the resources to hold out another year and a half under this regime of Secretary Guterres," Dugan said. Rather than utilize the "Noah's Ark management mentality" of attempting to "weather the storm," Dugan said that the U.N. must "get very creative very quickly with what they have at hand."
Dugan noted that the U.N. has gone through a "fall-off in relevance" with its lack of involvement in "real world dynamics between member states." He urged the organization to identify "the multilateral collateral, meaning we've got to identify what's good, and then we have to get rid of what's damaged after eight years."
Doge Usaid Budget Cuts Hit Un In 'Worst Liquidity Crisis Since Its Establishment'
In response to concerns shared by Dugan, Stéphane Dujarric, spokesperson for U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, said that the memo "is the result of an exercise to generate ideas and thoughts from senior officials on how to achieve the Secretary-General's vision" and is one "of the three work streams that we are working on."
Dujarric pointed to a speech Guterres delivered in March when introducing the UN80 Initiative, in which he called for an "ambitious reform agenda to strengthen how we work and deliver." Guterres said this involves increasing transparency and accountability, being more effective and cutting costs, and decentralizing decisions to serve those who rely on the U.N.
Dujarric also mentioned a speech Guterres gave eight years ago in September 2017, when he lamented the Byzantine bureaucracy that hampers progress at the U.N., and said that he was "pursuing sweeping management reform – to simplify procedures and decentralize decisions, with greater transparency, efficiency and accountability."
For Dugan, Guterres' failure to attempt those "sweeping" reforms prior to 2025 is an indication that regime change is needed. He reiterated that "the Secretary-General's 'Trust me' window dressing is no longer convincing us to pay full retail."
U.S. contributions to the U.N. may also take a hit. In April, a White House Office of Management and Budget passback to the State Department indicated the desire to end funding for international organizations, including the U.N.
Other countries are also falling short with contributions. In March, Guterres' spokesperson Farhan Haq told Fox News Digital that member states' non-payment of dues had forced the closure of one staff entrance to the U.N. headquarters in New York City at the time.
Original article source: Former Trump official slams UN reform efforts as 'eight and a half years late'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
5 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Nations are meeting to drum up trillions to combat poverty — but the US isn't going
Advertisement U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed said Wednesday that despite 'the headwinds' and high geopolitical tensions, there is hope the world can address one of the most important global challenges — ensuring all people have access to food, health care, education and water. 'This conference is an appeal to action,' Spain's U.N. Ambassador Hector Gomez Hernandez said, 'and we have the extraordinary opportunity to send a very strong message to defend the international community's commitment to multilateralism.' High-level delegations, including more than 70 world leaders, are expected in Seville, Mohammed said, along with several thousand others from international financial institutions, development banks, philanthropic organizations, the private sector and civil society. At its last preparatory meeting on June 17, the United States rejected the 38-page outcome document that had been negotiated for months by the U.N.'s 193 member nations and announced its withdrawal from the process and from the Seville conference. Advertisement The rest of the countries then approved the document by consensus and sent it to Seville, where it is expected to be adopted by conference participants without changes. It will be known as the Seville Commitment — or Compromiso de Sevilla in Spanish. The document says the leaders and high-level representatives have decided to launch 'an ambitious package of reforms and actions to close the financing gap with urgency,' saying it is now estimated at $4 trillion a year. Among the proposals and actions, it calls for minimum tax revenue of 15% of a country's gross domestic product to increase government resources, a tripling of lending by multilateral development banks, and scaling up private financing by providing incentives for investing in critical areas like infrastructure. It also calls for a number of reforms to help countries deal with rising debt. U.N. trade chief Rebeca Grynspan told a news conference Friday that 'development is going backward' and the global debt crisis has worsened. Last year, 3.3 billion people were living in countries that pay more interest on their debts than they spend on health or education — and the number will increase to 3.4 billion people this year, she said. And developing countries will pay $947 billion to service debts this year, up from $847 billion last year. She spoke at a press conference where an expert group on debt appointed by U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres presented 11 recommendations that they say can resolve the debt crisis, empower borrowing countries and create a fairer system. Advertisement While the U.S. objected to many actions in the outcome document, American diplomat Jonathan Shrier told the June 17 meeting: 'Our commitment to international cooperation and long-term economic development remains steadfast.' He said, however, that the text 'crosses many of our red lines,' including interfering with the governance of international financial institutions, tripling the annual lending capacity of multilateral development banks and proposals envisioning a role for the U.N. in the global debt architecture. Shrier also objected to proposals on trade, tax and innovation that are not in line with U.S. policy, as well as language on a U.N. framework convention on international tax cooperation. The United States was the world's largest single funder of foreign aid. The Trump administration has dismantled its main aid agency, the U.S. Agency for International Development, while drastically slashing foreign assistance funding, calling it wasteful and contrary to the Republican president's agenda. Other Western donors also have cut back international aid. The U.N.'s Mohammed said the U.S. withdrawal from the conference was 'unfortunate,' stressing that 'many of the recommendations you see cannot be pursued without a continuous engagement with the U.S.' After Seville, 'we will engage again with the U.S. and hope that we can make the case that they be part of the success of pulling millions of people out of poverty.'
USA Today
12 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump rejects new claims Iran's nuke program survived: 'Whole place was destroyed'
Iran's nuclear program was severely hit by U.S. bomb strikes but did not face "total damage" and the program could be up and running again within months, the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog chief said Sunday. President Donald Trump had a different take on the results of the strikes at the nuclear progam's primary site, telling Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures" that "it's just thousands of tons of rock in that room right now. The whole place was destroyed." However, the Washington Post reported Sunday that the U.S. has intercepted communication between senior Iranian officials remarking that the attack was less devastating than had been expected. The Post cites four people familiar with the classified intelligence circulating within the U.S. government. And the Tehran Times reported that "the core of Iran's nuclear program remains operational." Rafael Mariano Grossi, head of the U.N.-sponsored International Atomic Energy Agency, said his agency was not making military evaluations but was using "logic" in determining that Iran's nuclear program could be up and running fairly soon. "They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that," Grossi said on CBS News' "Face the Nation." "But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there." Status of Iran nukes: Few thought airstrikes could 'obliterate' Iran's nuclear program. Then Trump said they did. Trump, Grossi disagree on future of Iran program Grossi said he expects Iran will continue with a nuclear program, "the contours of which are still to be seen" and will hopefully be part of negotiations. Again, Trump disagreed. "It was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before, and that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions at least for a period of time," Trump said. "The last thing they want do right now is think about nuclear. They have to put themselves back into condition and shape." Did Iran rescue some of its enriched uranium? Grossi acknowledged that some of the uranium already enriched by Iranian scientists could have been destroyed as part of the attack. But some could have been moved, he said. Trump had a different opinion again, telling Fox News that moving the uranium is "very hard to do, very dangerous to do, it's very heavy." Iran didn't believe the U.S. would actually try to bomb nuclear sites and "didn't know we were coming," Trump said. Grossi described Iran as a "very sophisticated country" in terms of nuclear technology. "You cannot disinvent this," Grossi said. "You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have." That should work as an incentive to reach an agreement, Grossi said. And the agreement should include an inspection system "that will give everybody ... the assurances that we can, we can definitely turn the page." Iran insists it must be allowed to enrich uranium Iran will remain firm in its demand that talks must begin with an explicit recognition of its sovereign right to enrich uranium on its own soil, the Tehran Times reported. Trump was adamant that Iran would not develp nuclear weapons under his watch. "Iran cannot have nuclear weapons," he said in explaining his reasons for bombing the sites. "They wanted this for years and they were weeks away from getting it." Why did the US strike Iran nuke facilities? Trump ordered the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities − Operation Midnight Hammer − effectively joining a war that Israel started on June 13 when it began bombing Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure. Israel said it helped the U.S. coordinate and plan the strikes. Trump said all three sites were "totally obliterated." A Pentagon assessment was less definitive, and Iran says its nuclear program will hardly skip a beat. The actual damage and the impact on Iran's program could become more clear in coming days.
USA Today
16 hours ago
- USA Today
Iran could be enriching uranium in 'a matter of months,' UN nuclear chief says
Iran's nuclear program was severely hit by U.S. bomb strikes but did not face "total damage" and the program could be up and running again within months, the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog chief said Sunday. President Donald Trump had a different take on the results of the strikes at the nuclear progam's primary site, telling Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures" that "it' i's just thousands of tons of rock in that room right now. The whole place was destroyed." Rafael Mariano Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said his agency was not making military evaluations but was using "logic" in determining that Iran's nuclear program could be up and running fairly soon. "They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that," Grossi said on CBS News' "Face the Nation." "But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there." Status of Iran nukes: Few thought airstrikes could 'obliterate' Iran's nuclear program. Then Trump said they did. Trump, Grossi disagree on future of Iran program Grossi said he expects Iran will continue with a nuclear program, "the contours of which are still to be seen" and will hopefully be part of negotiations. Again, Trump disagreed. "It was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before, and that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions at least for a period of time," Trump said. "The last thing they want do right now is think about nuclear. They have to put themselves back into condition and shape." Did Iran rescue some of its enriched uranium? Grossi acknowledged that some of the uranium already enriched by Iranian scientists could have been destroyed as part of the attack. But some could have been moved, he said. Trump had a different opinion again, telling Fox News that moving the uranium is "very hard to do, very dangerous to do, it's very heavy." Iran didn't believe the U.S. would actually try to bomb nuclear sites and "didn't know we were coming," Trump said. Grossi described Iran as a "very sophisticated country" in terms of nuclear technology. "You cannot disinvent this," Grossi said. "You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have." That should work as an incentive to reach an agreement, Grossi said. And the agreement should include an inspection system "that will give everybody ... the assurances that we can, we can definitely turn the page." Trump was adamant that Iran would not develp nuclear weapons under his watch. "Iran cannot have nuclear weapons," he said in explaining his reasons for bombing the sites. "They wanted this for years and they were weeks away from getting it." Why did the US strike Iran nuke facilities? Trump ordered the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities − Operation Midnight Hammer − effectively joining a war that Israel started on June 13 when it began bombing Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure. Israel said it helped the U.S. coordinate and plan the strikes. Trump said all three sites were "totally obliterated." A Pentagon assessment was less definitive, and Iran says its nuclear program will hardly skip a beat. The actual damage and the impact on Iran's program could become more clear in coming days.
