Record 54 Indian Institutes In QS Rankings 2026; IIT Delhi Tops National List
In a significant leap for Indian higher education, the QS World University Rankings 2026, released early this morning, saw nearly half of the listed Indian institutions improve their positions, with the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IIT Delhi) emerging as India's top-ranked institute. The global list continues to be led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), marking its 14th consecutive year at the top.
IIT Delhi emerges as India's top-ranked university
IIT Delhi surged ahead of its peers this year, securing the 123rd position globally, up from 150 in 2025 and 197 in 2024. This makes it the highest-ranked Indian institution in the QS 2026 rankings. The institute recorded strong performance across several key metrics: it ranked 50th worldwide in Employer Reputation, 86th in Citations per Faculty, and 142nd in Academic Reputation.
Following closely, IIT Bombay, which was the top Indian institute in last year's rankings, dropped to the 129th position this year from 118 in 2025. IIT Madras recorded one of the most impressive improvements among Indian institutions, jumping 47 places to secure the 180th spot, up from 227 in 2025.
India's expanding global footprint in higher education
This year, India has 54 universities featured, making it the fourth most represented country globally-trailing only the United States, the United Kingdom, and Mainland China. Eight Indian institutions entered the list for the first time, the highest number of new entries from any country, reflecting India's growing academic visibility on the global stage.
Other premier Indian institutes include IIT Kharagpur (215), IISc Bangalore (219), and Delhi University (328). Private institutions such as BITS Pilani (668) and OP Jindal Global University (851-900) have also either maintained or improved their positions.
Global Rankings: MIT maintains the lead, Asian universities climb
Globally, MIT continues its dominance, followed by Imperial College London in second place and Stanford University in third. The United States remains the most represented country, with 192 institutions-many of which have improved their rankings this year.
Asia's strong performance continued, with Peking University holding steady at 14th, Tsinghua University rising to 17th, and Fudan University jumping nine places to reach 30th. Hong Kong SAR and Ireland were recognised among the most improved education systems.
Europe also showed a positive outcome-particularly Italy, where Politecnico di Milano entered the global top 100 for the first time, ranking 98th.
Ranking Methodology: New Focus on student diversity
This edition of the rankings included over 1,500 universities from more than 100 locations. A notable addition this year is the International Student Diversity (ISD) metric, introduced as an unweighted indicator. It captures both the proportion and national spread of international students-a step toward recognising globally inclusive campus environments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
17 minutes ago
- India Today
Is ChatGPT making us dumb? MIT study says students are using their brains less
ChatGPT is making students dumb! Or rather, making them use their brains less. A new study by MIT's Media Lab around the impact on human cognition, particularly among students, found that using generative AI tools like ChatGPT for academic work and learning could actually lower people's critical thinking and cognitive engagement over this study researchers observed 54 participants aged 18 to 39 from the Boston area, and divided them into three groups. Each group of students was then asked to write SAT-style essays using either OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google Search, or no digital assistance at all. During this process, researchers monitored brain activity among users through electroencephalography (EEG), scanning 32 different brain regions to evaluate cognitive engagement during the findings were concerning. The group of students using ChatGPT showed the lowest levels of brain activity. According to the study, these students 'consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioural levels.' In fact, the study found that over the course of several essays, many ChatGPT users became increasingly passive, often resorting to just copying and pasting text from the AI chatbot's responses rather than refining or reflecting on the content in line with their own thoughts. Meanwhile, the students who worked without any digital tools showed the highest brain activity, particularly in regions associated with creativity, memory, and semantic processing. 'The task was executed, and you could say that it was efficient and convenient,' Nataliya Kosmyna, one of the authors of the research paper. 'But as we show in the paper, you basically didn't integrate any of it into your memory networks.'Long term impact suspectedadvertisementResearchers concluded that while AI can help students' quick productivity, it can also impact long-term learning and brain development. Meanwhile, the essay-writing group that used no tools reported higher levels of satisfaction and ownership over their work. In this group, the EEG readings also showed greater neural connectivity in the alpha, theta, and delta frequency bands, areas that are often linked to deep thinking and creative the group using Google Search showed relatively high levels of brain engagement, suggesting that traditional internet browsing still stimulates active thought processes. The difference further shows how AI users tend to rely entirely on chatbot responses for information instead of thinking critically or using search further understand and measure retention and comprehension, researchers also asked the students to rewrite one of their essays. And this time the tools were swapped. Students who earlier used ChatGPT were now asked to write without assistance, and the group which used their brain were asked to use AI. The results of this swapping further reinforced the earlier findings. The users who had relied on ChatGPT struggled to recall their original essays and showed weak cognitive re-engagement. Meanwhile, the group that had initially written without the online tools showed increased neural activity when using ChatGPT. This finding further confirms that AI tools can be helpful in learning, but only when used after humans complete the foundational thinking themselves.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is ChatGPT making us dumb? MIT brain scans reveal alarming truth about AI's impact on the human mind
It's quick, it's clever, and it answers almost everything—no wonder millions around the world rely on ChatGPT. But could this digital genie be dulling our minds with every wish we make? According to a startling new study by scientists at MIT's Media Lab, the answer may be yes. Researchers have now found that excessive use of AI tools like ChatGPT could be quietly eroding your memory, critical thinking, and even your brain activity. Published on arXiv, the study titled 'The Cognitive Cost of Using LLMs' explores how language models—especially ChatGPT—affect the brain's ability to think, learn, and retain information. Brain vs Bot: How the Study Was Done To examine what they call the 'cognitive cost' of using large language models (LLMs), MIT researchers tracked 54 students over a four-month period using electroencephalography (EEG) devices to monitor brain activity. The participants were divided into three groups: one used ChatGPT, another relied on Google, and the last used no external help at all—dubbed the 'Brain-only' group. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World by Taboola by Taboola While the AI-powered group initially showed faster results, the long-term findings were more sobering. Students who depended on ChatGPT for essay writing exhibited poorer memory retention, reduced brain engagement, and lower scoring compared to their peers. As the researchers noted, 'The LLM group's participants performed worse than their counterparts in the Brain-only group at all levels: neural, linguistic, and scoring.' — rohanpaul_ai (@rohanpaul_ai) Google Wasn't Great, But Still Better Than ChatGPT Interestingly, students who used Google showed moderate brain activity and generated more thoughtful content than those who leaned on ChatGPT. Meanwhile, those in the Brain-only group had the highest levels of cognitive engagement, producing original ideas and deeper insights. In fact, even when ChatGPT users later attempted to write without assistance, their brain activity remained subdued—unlike the other groups who showed increased engagement while adapting to new tools. You Might Also Like: Narayana Murthy says AI was five times faster at what took him hours; shares how techies should use it This suggests that habitual ChatGPT usage might not just affect how we think, but whether we think at all. A Shortcut with a Hidden Toll The study also points to how this over-reliance on AI encourages mental passivity. While ChatGPT users reported reduced friction in accessing information, this convenience came at a cost. As the researchers explained, 'This convenience came at a cognitive cost, diminishing users' inclination to critically evaluate the LLM's output or 'opinions'.' The team also raised red flags about algorithmic bias : what appears as top-ranked content from an AI is often a result of shareholder-driven training data, not necessarily truth or value. This creates a more sophisticated version of the 'echo chamber,' where your thoughts are subtly shaped—not by your own reasoning, but by an AI's probabilistic guesses. What This Means for the AI Generation As AI tools become more embedded in our everyday tasks—from writing emails to crafting essays—this study is a wake-up call for students, educators, and professionals. While tools like ChatGPT are powerful assistants, they should not become cognitive crutches. You Might Also Like: 'Neuralink babies'? Scale AI's Alexandr Wang says he is waiting for Elon Musk's brain chips before having kids The researchers caution that as language models continue to evolve, users must remain alert to their potential mental side effects. In a world where convenience is king, critical thinking might just be the first casualty.
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Hotel room in Vietnam for just ₹159 per night? Social media post raises eyebrows, netizens say ‘too good to be true'
An Indian traveller has gone viral on social media after revealing that he managed to find a hotel room in Vietnam for only ₹ 159.02 — taxes included. The budget-friendly booking, made at Leaf Hotel Phu Quoc, was shared on X (formerly Twitter), where it quickly drew widespread attention and surprise. The room was a Superior Double or Twin at the hotel, offering amenities such as free Wi-Fi, parking, 24-hour check-in, luggage storage, and a choice between a queen bed or two singles. The room, as per the listing, accommodates up to two adults and measures 18 square metres. What shocked users most was the breakdown of the pricing. The original cost for one night was listed as ₹ 578.24. After a 75% discount, the price dropped to ₹ 144.56, with an additional ₹ 14.46 in taxes and fees — bringing the total to ₹ 159.02. The platform clarified that payment would be collected in local currency — 48,000 Vietnamese Dong — and all VAT was included. Screengrab from the viral post. The post sparked a flood of reactions online. Many were amazed at the affordability, while others speculated on how such a low rate was possible. One user commented, 'Checked myself again and again, Very strange, 159 - 28.62 OTA commission = 130.38 including taxes, which is not possible even to bear Operations cost for room, might be a revenue management mistake or ego issues with other hotels. Time will tell.' Another remarked, 'It's a pay at the property booking high chance tell will refuse to allow check in for this rate.' 'Itne pe to coffee bhi na mile,' joked a user, pointing out how the rate was cheaper than a cup of coffee. Someone else added, 'Too many hotels in Phu Quoc. Hence race to bottom.' Whether it was a technical error, a marketing ploy, or a rare travel hack — the ₹ 159 hotel booking has certainly caught the internet's eye.
