logo
GOP Tax Bill Would Cut Gender-Affirming Care From Medicaid For All Ages

GOP Tax Bill Would Cut Gender-Affirming Care From Medicaid For All Ages

Yahoo24-05-2025

Marley Gotterer was recovering from surgery at home in New York when she first heard that House Republicans had passed a massive domestic policy package in the wee hours of Thursday morning.
She had prepared for nearly two years for her facial feminization surgery, a series of surgical procedures. She met with surgeons, therapists and case managers at Amida Care, a nonprofit health plan for LGBTQ+ Medicaid recipients and those living with HIV.
Her surgery, which was fully covered under Medicaid, has already made a huge difference in her life and for her mental health. She now feels an instant lightness when she sees herself in the mirror. She said she caught a glimpse of herself on a video call with friends and asked if someone had put a beauty filter on.
'I had intense gender euphoria and I felt at home in myself,' the 27-year-old comedian said. 'I feel like there's this new start in life that I'm excited about and hopeful for.'
But that hope has now been tempered.
The bill the House passed — called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — outlines some of the largest cuts to Medicaid in U.S. history while proposing a $4 trillion tax cut for the ultra-wealthy. The bill would bar Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program from covering gender-affirming care for adults and minors alike, and would prohibit health plans offered under the Affordable Care Act from covering such care as an essential health benefit.
If the dramatic tax bill becomes law, it could jeopardize access to care for hundreds of thousands of trans adults and minors. Around 185,000 transgender adults rely on Medicaid as their primary source of health insurance, according to a report released this month by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law. Another study found that nearly 25% of trans adults are on Medicaid.
Research shows that transgender people are also more likely to be uninsured, underemployed and experiencing food insecurity compared to their cisgender peers, often due to high rates of employment discrimination and harassment in the workplace.
The Republican tax bill initially proposed slashing Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming care for minors only. But hours before the final vote, House Republican leadership issued 42 pages of amendments with last-minute changes, including striking the phrase 'for minors' from the ban on transition coverage under Medicaid, effectively extending it to people of all ages.
The bill could also codify changes to the Affordable Care Act that the Trump administration first unveiled in March. At the time, the White House issued a rule change for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that would remove gender-affirming care from the list of essential health benefits in insurance plans.
Under the ACA, which President Barack Obama signed into law in 2010, health insurance plans are currently required to cover care that falls into 10 categories of essential health benefits, including emergency services, maternity care, mental health, pediatric care and prescription drugs.
All together, this omnibus bill's changes to Medicaid and the ACA could have a significant effect on hundreds of thousands of trans adults in the U.S. and an unknown number of trans youth. The Senate is expected to make some major changes to the bill by July, but LGBTQ+ advocates don't foresee Republican senators backtracking on the provisions related to transgender care.
Currently, Medicaid programs in 27 states and the District of Columbia have policies that explicitly include coverage for transgender-related health care, according to the Movement Advancement Project.
If President Donald Trump signs some version of this bill into law, it would force states to shoulder the cost of coverage for trans health care, said Ames Simmons, a lawyer and senior teaching fellow at Duke University School of Law.
But given the scope of the bill's other cuts — including to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — Simmons is not optimistic that states would be able to help recoup all of these social safety nets.
'If we think broadly about trans people being more likely to be low-income for many reasons, like histories of employment discrimination, which if you don't have a job in our country, it's harder and more expensive to get health insurance,' he said.
'I think it's not at all a realistic option to think that trans people who are no longer able to get Medicaid coverage for the treatment of gender dysphoria would easily be able to find coverage elsewhere on the private market,' he added.
Honey Pluton, a 31-year-old trans man and bartender in New York City, said he can't wrap his head around what it would mean to lose access to his hormone therapy, which he now gets through Medicaid.
'I don't even know how much it would cost a month,' he said, noting that he would do whatever he could to ensure that he could continue care. 'Thinking about adding another expense seems intimidating outside of how it impacts me financially. It's just an existential threat.'
Beyond specific cuts to gender-affirming care, the bill also takes aim at Planned Parenthood and clinics that provide abortion care. This could spell trouble not only for patients seeking abortions but for trans and nonbinary patients who use Planned Parenthood's transgender care services.
In 2021, over 35,000 patients sought hormone replacement therapy at Planned Parenthood locations nationwide, Dr. Bhavik Kumar, the medical director of primary and trans care at Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, told NPR.
Since returning to office in January, Trump has taken many steps to curtail trans people's access to gender-affirming care. Within the first few weeks of his presidency, he signed an executive order announcing the government will only recognize two immutable sexes, barred trans women and girls from playing on female sports teams, blocked trans people from serving in the military, and threatened to pull millions of dollars in federal funding from hospitals and organizations that serve LGBTQ+ people and people living with HIV.
Dr. David Johns, the executive director of the National Black Justice Collective, called the new GOP tax bill a calculated effort to try to erase trans people from public life.
'The same bill slashes Medicaid and SNAP benefits, guts civil rights and disability enforcement, and strips millions of Americans—disproportionately Black, Brown, poor, disabled, and queer—of access to basic health services,' Johns said in a statement. 'This isn't about fiscal responsibility. It's about using trans lives as a political wedge to force through a budget that serves billionaires and punishes the most vulnerable.'
Gun Silencers, Tanning Beds And Other Weird Stuff Tucked Into The GOP's Tax Bill
The Massive Change Tucked In The GOP Tax Bill That No One's Talking About
Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Faces Uphill Battle In The Senate

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Trump's troop deployment in LA a prelude to martial law?
Is Trump's troop deployment in LA a prelude to martial law?

Boston Globe

time9 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Is Trump's troop deployment in LA a prelude to martial law?

Neither did Hegseth announced that National Guard members and the Marines will stay in Los Angeles for Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up At a Advertisement This is a Trump made-for-TV spectacle of authoritarianism disguised as law and order. It's likely a prelude to martial law. Rob Bonta, California's attorney general, is Advertisement Protests were sparked last week after Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials conducted several workplace raids in Los Angeles, including a But what began as boisterous but peaceful protests against Trump's anti-immigrant scheme which now demands 'If I didn't ''SEND IN THE TROOPS,'" Trump said Tuesday on social media, Los Angeles 'would be burning to the ground right now,' before he disparaged Bass and Newsom. Yes, there has been looting, and some cars have been burned and vandalized. But Trump is lying about the extent of lawlessness. Trump is following his bad policies with even worse provocations that could portend a modern-day Kent State tragedy with soldiers firing live bullets at protesters. But for Trump, the more chaos, the better. As a White House official said, 'We're happy to have this fight.' To some extent this fight to suppress dissent has been boiling in Trump for five years. During nationwide demonstrations after the police murder of George Floyd in 2020, Trump, then in his first term, asked members of his Cabinet whether protesters could be shot. 'He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak, and 'us' meant him,' Mark Esper, Trump's former defense secretary, Advertisement Esper recalled Trump saying to now-retired General Mark Milley, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ''Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' … It was a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue just hung very heavily in the air.' Ultimately, Trump was talked out of it. That won't happen this time, with an administration packed with people whose only loyalty is to him, not to the Constitution or rule of law. After Tom Homan, Trump's bloviating border czar, If not for the ICE arrest of But not now. Everything in Trump's second administration is designed to codify his authoritarianism. If Trump can convince enough people, especially among his white base, that he alone represents the thin orange line between civilization — as Advertisement Right now, the administration claims the military is in Los Angeles to protect federal buildings and assets — theoretically. Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act, but neither has he ruled out unleashing US troops on protesters. With his draconian policies, Trump has lit the fuse for what could be a long and difficult summer of protests. With an occupying military force in this nation's second largest city, he has declared war against America itself. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at

Trump promised not to send in military to tamp down on NYC protests — if NYPD keeps demonstrators in line
Trump promised not to send in military to tamp down on NYC protests — if NYPD keeps demonstrators in line

New York Post

time10 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump promised not to send in military to tamp down on NYC protests — if NYPD keeps demonstrators in line

President Trump promised NYPD brass over the weekend that he will not send in the military or National Guard to tamp down on anti-ICE protests in New York City — as long as cops keep the demonstrators in line, The Post has learned. Trump's pledge was made to Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and NYPD Chief of Department John Chell as the pair palled around with the president at his New Jersey golf club. Sources with knowledge of the meeting said Trump had voiced concerns over the destructive mass protests engulfing Los Angeles and them being replicated in the Big Apple. Advertisement But Chell reassured the president that any demonstrations in the city would not get out of hand, the sources said. Kaz Daughtry and John Chell though didn't tee it up with the commander in chief. Linkedin/john-chell The two Big Apple police officials met with Trump on Sunday. Linkedin/john-chell Advertisement Trump then told the two he didn't believe the National Guard would be necessary in New York City. It came after he ordered an initial 2,000 National Guard troops to LA Saturday amid the raging protests over federal immigration enforcement raids. Since then, the Trump administration has in total dispatched roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to the city– sparking an emergency request by California Gov. Gavin Newsom Tuesday for a federal court to block the deployment. On Monday, Mayor Eric Adams and his police commissioner, Jessica Tisch, decried the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles and issued a stern warning to New Yorkers to not follow suit. 'The escalation of protests in Los Angeles over the last couple of days is unacceptable and would not be tolerated if attempted in our city,' Adams said. Advertisement Tisch added that 'any attacks against law enforcement will be met with a swift and decisive response from the NYPD.' Earlier Monday, dozens of protestors calling for an end to the ICE raids were arrested at Trump Tower after refusing to leave the Manhattan high-rise. The meeting between Trump and Adams' allies raised eyebrows in New York City political circles — after Daughtry and Chell posted photos on social media from the Bedminster club. 'Great day on the links today with POTUS, #45-#47 – Donald J. Trump. Good conversation with a few laughs and a great lunch. Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and I were grateful for the invite,' Chell wrote. Advertisement Sources said the two Big Apple officials didn't actually tee it up with the prez, despite the photos showing them chatting with him on the links. Still, Adams defended the outing on Tuesday, telling reporters, 'A lot of great deals have been made on the golf course.' 'I thank the two of them for doing it,' he said. 'Many of you who play golf know that great decisions are made on the golf course.' Both Chell and Daughtry also joined the mayor at Trump's inauguration earlier this year.

IQVIA Holdings (NYSE:IQV) Sees 11% Share Price Rise Over Last Week
IQVIA Holdings (NYSE:IQV) Sees 11% Share Price Rise Over Last Week

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

IQVIA Holdings (NYSE:IQV) Sees 11% Share Price Rise Over Last Week

IQVIA Holdings experienced a 10% rise in share price over the last week, correlating with its recent developments, notably the dosing of the first patient in the RENEW Phase 2 trial and its strategic alliance with Sarah Cannon Research Institute to optimize oncology trials. These initiatives likely provided a positive sentiment boost, aligning well with the broader market momentum, as indices such as the S&P 500 also reached new highs. The market's anticipation over US-China trade talks and overall strong corporate earnings have supported the upward trend, further enhancing IQV's market performance. We've identified 1 warning sign for IQVIA Holdings that you should be aware of. Uncover 18 companies that survived and thrived after COVID and have the right ingredients to survive Trump's tariffs. The recent 10% rise in IQVIA Holdings' share price has been influenced by important developments like the dosing in the RENEW Phase 2 trial and a key alliance with Sarah Cannon Research Institute. These initiatives are expected to potentially drive revenue growth, particularly as the strategic alliance optimizes oncology trials. The company's past performance, with total returns of 10.45% over five years, suggests modest growth in investor value. However, compared to the US Life Sciences industry's one-year return of 27% decline, IQVIA's recent rise highlights positive market sentiment. These initiatives, combined with FDA reforms and NVIDIA collaboration, may lower operational costs and have a favorable impact on earnings forecasts. Analysts predict revenue to grow by 5.2% annually over the next three years, which is somewhat cautious compared to the general expectations for the life sciences sector. The recent share price movement to US$146.2 remains below the consensus price target of US$216.31, indicating potential for future appreciation if the projected growth in revenue and earnings materializes. Click here to discover the nuances of IQVIA Holdings with our detailed analytical financial health report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:IQV. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store