
Panel considers exception to new ban on child marriage
Jan. 28—A former military bride from San Diego came to Concord Tuesday to urge the New Hampshire Legislature to reject a proposal to allow 17-year-olds to marry if one member of the couple is active-duty military.
The bill (HB 433) would create an exception to the state's newly enacted ban on marriage under the age of 18.
Former Army Spc. Brittany Wright told lawmakers she suffered years of abuse after her parents forced her to become a teen bride.
"Child marriage gave my abuser, an adult man who, at the time was in the military, the power to groom, arrest and rape me when I was 14 years old," Wright told the House Children and Family Law Committee Tuesday.
"I escaped at 18 and the divorce left me homeless with no one to turn to for help, except the greatest military force this world has ever known."
Joining the Army, Wright said, she earned her GED and served in the military police corps for seven years.
But Rep. Harry Bean, R-Gilford, a former Army reservist, said he got married at 16, and by 18, he and wife, Phyllis, already had two children.
"Marriage under the age of 18 works if the two people are committed and the parents know their children," said Bean, 70, the grandfather of eight and great-grandfather of six who has been married nearly 54 years.
Rep. Margaret Drye, R-Plainfield, said what influenced her sponsorship of HB 433 was having two sons deployed to Iraq with the Marines.
All branches of the service recruit at age 17 and many recruits at that age have been through basic training.
"I have never heard a 17-year-old soldier be called a 'child' soldier," Drye said.
Under her bill, the 17-year-old not in the military would need written consent from a parent or guardian to get married.
Rep. Katy Peternel, R-Wolfeboro, said the armed forces are finding it difficult to meet their recruiting targets in recent years.
"This is very beneficial for our military," Peternel said.
The ban on under-18 marriage just took effect on Jan. 1. Rep. Cassandra Levesque, D-Barrington, worked for nearly five years on the legislation that made New Hampshire one of only 11 states that outlaw marriage without exception for anyone under 18.
Levesque sat on the committee that heard the bill Tuesday.
"Do you think we should give (the ban) some time to take effect?" Levesque asked Drye, the sponsor of HB 433.
Emma Sevigny, behavioral health policy coordinator with New Futures, a health advocacy group, also opposed the exception, pointing to studies that conclude child marriage was more likely to lead to domestic abuse and mental health challenges.
'Inherently dangerous'
"Child marriage is inherently dangerous," Sevigny said. "This legislation would roll back the progress that we have made."
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee Chairman Terry Roy, R-Deerfield, said it made sense to him as someone who reported for basic training at 17 in 1986.
"To be clear, I don't think getting married at 17 is a great idea. If we could I'd outlaw it until you turn 35," Roy quipped.
The exception could be helpful for a soldier who learns upon entering the military that his 17-year-old girlfriend is pregnant. Marriage would grant her and the unborn child critical medical and prenatal care, Roy said.
"Don't see this as chipping away at your work; this is a very fine exception," Roy told Levesque.
klandrigan@unionleader.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Majority of Americans disapprove of Trump admin, but he leads on immigration: new poll
Majority of Americans disapprove of Trump admin, but he leads on immigration: new poll Show Caption Hide Caption Trump salutes Army during military parade, fireworks light up DC sky President Donald Trump saluted the U.S. Army on it's 250th birthday with a military parade and live music. WASHINGTON – A majority of Americans say they disapprove of Donald Trump's second term – with even some Republicans hitting the president – as immigration remains his strongest policy issue. A new NBC News Decision Desk Poll, conducted along with SurveyMonkey, found that 45% of Americans approve of the way Trump is handling his job as president, while 55% disapprove. Those figures remain unchanged from an NBC News survey in April. Trump's rating differ along party lines. Among Republicans, 89% approve of the president's second term in office, compared to eight percent of Democrats and 35% of Independents. Approximately 12% of Republicans said they disapprove of the president's job, compared to 92% of Democrats and 65% of Independents. Republicans were five percentage points less likely to report that they strongly support the president's administration, compared to the survey results from April. Much of that shift came from respondents who say they identify with the president's MAGA – Make America Great Again – movement. The survey also found an intensity gap among Republicans and Democrats over how they feel about the Trump administration's actions. Pollsters asked respondents to pick one emotion from a list of responses: Thrilled, happy, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, angry and furious. Fifty-one percent of Democrats agreed that they feel "furious" about the Trump administration, compared to 23 percent of Republicans who agreed. GOP survey respondents also shifted seven percentage points away from feeling "thrilled" about Trump from earlier surveys: 25% of Republicans said they felt thrilled over Trump's actions in the latest poll, compared to 32% who said the same in April. Still, only one percent of Republicans said they felt furious over Trump's actions. The latest survey was conducted among 19,410 adults nationwide between May 30 and June 10. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.1 percentage points. Trump leads on immigration issue Trump has focused much of his presidency on advancing his immigration agenda, including deporting thousands of migrants to countries such as Colombia, Mexico and El Salvador. During his 2024 campaign, the sweeping deportations became his signature promise to voters. Now, Trump is leading on the issue. According to the survey, 51% of Americans approve Trump's handling of border security and immigration, while 49% disapprove. The survey was conducted as Trump had sent in National Guard troops to quell protests against immigration enforcement in the Los Angeles area, against California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's wishes. Additional protests against the Trump administration's immigration actions have broken out across the country. On the economy, approximately 45% of Americans reported that "their personal financial situation" is about the same as it was last year, and 34% said it has gotten worse. Approximately 21% said their finances have improved over the last year, results that didn't see a major shift from NBC's April survey.


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Deployed to Meet an ‘Invasion,' Marines Were Once Invaders of Mexico
As they have sought to justify sending 700 active-duty U.S. Marines to Los Angeles, President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have described the demonstrators in the city as carrying foreign flags with the intention of continuing an 'invasion' of the United States. To some Angelenos, the notion that their city was being invaded by Mexico might sound like a fantastical twist on the history of U.S.-Mexico military relations. After all, U.S. Marines were among the invaders in the 19th-century war between Mexico and the United States that forced Mexico to give up more than half of its territory — including what is now the state of California. 'Mexican Americans have a saying here, 'They didn't cross the border, the border crossed them,'' said Gaspar Rivera Salgado, director of the Center for Mexican Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles. In the historical memory of Mexicans and Mexican Americans, he added, the American invasion is remembered. The year was 1847, and the United States and Mexico were in the middle of a heated conflict that had begun the previous year under President James K. Polk, during an American push for westward expansion and white dominance. American troops landed near the port city of Veracruz on Mexico's eastern coast, alongside the ocean basin that Mr. Trump has sought to rename the Gulf of America. About 12,000 soldiers, including about 400 Marines, unloaded supplies, weapons and horses and laid siege to the city for 20 days, until it fell. The operation gave the American troops a base from which to advance westward to Mexico City. And there, on a cold and foggy morning that September, hundreds of U.S. Marines were among the 7,000 military men who descended on a rundown castle known as Chapultepec. They pushed past the Mexican defenses there with bayonets and cannons, and used ladders to scale the castle's stone walls. Inside, they expected to encounter more Mexican soldiers, but all they found were 132 military cadets. Few Americans today remember the Battle of Chapultepec, but in Mexican children's history books, the bravery of the young men is the stuff of lore. A garrison commander is said to have given the cadets orders to fall back, but six of them did not retreat — they fought bravely to the death. The Battle of Chapultepec let to the capture of Mexico City that essentially ended the war. Five months later, on Feb. 2, 1848, Mexico and the United States signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which carved a jagged new border, nearly 2,000 miles long. That border, modified further by the Gadsden Purchase six years later, became the backdrop for immigration battles past and present. The Marine Corps memorializes the Marines who fell in the Veracruz campaign. On their navy-blue trousers, Marines wear a scarlet stripe in their honor, a symbol of their bravery, and their blood.


Atlantic
3 hours ago
- Atlantic
Photos: A Military Parade in D.C.
Yesterday, the American public witnessed one of the most extravagant and unusual displays of patriotic pageantry in recent memory: an Army festival and military parade in the nation's capital. Nearly 7,000 soldiers, 28 Abrams tanks, 50 helicopters, 34 horses, two mules, and a single dog marched through a cloudy and drizzling Washington, D.C. The event, a celebration of the Army's 250th anniversary, also fell on President Donald Trump's 79th birthday—and took place against a backdrop of fierce immigration crackdowns and nationwide protests against the administration. While millions demonstrated across the country, crowds in the capital appeared lower than expected as thunderstorms threatened in the forecast.