logo
Trump decried crime in America, then gutted funding for gun violence prevention

Trump decried crime in America, then gutted funding for gun violence prevention

Yahoo2 days ago

Violent crime was already trending down from a covid-era spike when President Donald Trump presented a picture of unbridled crime in America on the campaign trail in 2024. Now his administration has eliminated about $500 million in grants to organizations that buttress public safety, including many working to prevent gun violence.
In Oakland, California, a hospital-based program to prevent retaliatory gun violence lost a $2 million grant just as the traditionally turbulent summer months approach. Another $2 million award was pulled from a Detroit program that offers social services and job skills to young people in violent neighborhoods. And in St. Louis, a clinic treating the physical and emotional injuries of gunshot victims also lost a $2 million award.
They are among 373 grants that the U.S. Department of Justice abruptly terminated in April. The largest share of the nixed awards were designated for community-based violence intervention — programs that range from conflict mediation and de-escalation to hospital-based initiatives that seek to prevent retaliation from people who experience violent injuries.
Gun violence is among America's most deadly public health crises, medical experts say.
Among programs whose grants were terminated were those for protecting children, victims' assistance, hate-crime prevention, and law enforcement and prosecution, according to an analysis by the Council on Criminal Justice, a nonpartisan think tank. The grants totaled $820 million when awarded, but some of that money has been spent.
'Not only are these funds being pulled away from worthy investments that will save lives,' said Thomas Abt, founding director of the Violence Reduction Center at the University of Maryland, 'but the way that this was done — by pulling authorized funding without warning — is going to create a lasting legacy of mistrust.'
The Justice Department 'is focused on prosecuting criminals, getting illegal drugs off the streets, and protecting all Americans from violent crime,' according to a statement provided by agency spokesperson Natalie Baldassarre. 'Discretionary funds that are not aligned with the administration's priorities are subject to review and reallocation, including funding for clinics that engage in race-based selectivity.'
The Council on Criminal Justice analysis of the terminated grants found that descriptions of 31% of them included references to 'diversity,' 'equity,' 'race,' 'racial,' 'racism,' or 'gender.'
Baldassarre's statement said the department is committed to working with organizations 'to hear any appeal, and to restore funding as appropriate.' Indeed, it restored seven of the terminated grants for victims' services after Reuters reported on the cuts in April.
But the cuts have already prompted layoffs and reductions at other organizations around the country. Five groups filed a lawsuit on May 21 to restore the grants in their entirety.
Joseph Griffin, executive director of the Oakland nonprofit Youth Alive, which pioneered hospital-based violence intervention in the 1990s, said his organization had spent only about $60,000 of its $2 million grant before it was axed. The grant was primarily to support the intervention program and was awarded for a three-year period but lasted just seven months. The money would have helped pay to intervene with about 30 survivors of gun violence to prevent retaliatory violence. He's trying to find a way to continue the work, without overtaxing his team.
'We will not abandon a survivor of violence at the hospital bedside in the same way that the federal government is abandoning our field,' he said.
The cuts are also hitting St. Louis, often dogged by being labeled one of the most dangerous cities in America. The city created an Office of Violence Prevention with money available under former President Joe Biden, and various groups received Justice Department grants, too.
Locals say the efforts have helped: The 33% drop in the city's homicide rate from 2019 to 2024 was the second-largest decrease among 29 major cities examined by the Council on Criminal Justice.
'I don't think there's any doubt that there's some positive impact from the work that's happening,' said University of Missouri-St. Louis criminologist Chris Sullivan, who received a grant from the Justice Department to assess the work of the city's new Office of Violence Prevention. That research grant remains in place.
But the Justice Department slashed two other grants in St. Louis, including $2 million for Power4STL. The nonprofit operates the Bullet Related Injury Clinic, dubbed the BRIC, which provides free treatment for physical and mental injuries caused by bullets.
The BRIC had about $1.3 million left on its grant when the award was terminated in April. LJ Punch, a former trauma surgeon who founded the clinic in 2020, said it was intended to fund a mobile clinic, expand mental health services, evaluate the clinic's programs, and pay for a patient advisory board. The BRIC won't abandon those initiatives, Punch said, but will likely need to move slower.
Keisha Blanchard joined the BRIC's advisory board after her experience as a patient at the clinic following a January 2024 gun injury. Someone fired a bullet into her back from the rear window of a Chevy Impala while Blanchard was out for a lunchtime stroll with a friend from her neighborhood walking group. The shooting was random, Blanchard said, but people always assume she did something to provoke it. 'It's so much shame that comes behind that,' she said.
The 42-year-old said the shooting and her initial medical treatment left her feeling angry and unseen. Her family wasn't allowed to be with her at the hospital since the police didn't know who shot her or why. When she asked about taking the bullet out, she was told that the common medical practice is to leave it in. 'We're not in the business of removing bullets,' she recalled being told. At a follow-up appointment, she said, she watched her primary care doctor google what to do for a gunshot wound.
'Nobody cares what's going to happen to me after this,' Blanchard recalled thinking.
Before she was referred to the BRIC, she said, she was treated as though she should be happy just to be alive. But a part of her died in the shooting, she said. Her joyful, carefree attitude gave way to hypervigilance. She stopped taking walks. She uprooted herself, moving to a neighborhood 20 miles away.
The bullet stayed lodged inside her, forcing her to carry a constant reminder of the violence that shattered her sense of safety, until Punch removed it from her back in November. Blanchard said the removal made her feel 'reborn.'
It's a familiar experience among shooting survivors, according to Punch.
'People talk about the distress about having bullets still inside their bodies, and how every waking conscious moment brings them back to the fact that that's still inside,' Punch said. 'But they're told repeatedly inside conventional care settings that there's nothing that needs to be done.'
The Justice Department grant to the BRIC had been an acknowledgment, Punch said, that healing has a role in public safety by quelling retaliatory violence.
'The unhealed trauma in the body of someone who's gotten the message that they are not safe can rapidly turn into an act of violence when that person is threatened again,' Punch said.
Community gun violence, even in large cities, is concentrated among relatively small groups of people who are often both victims and perpetrators, according to researchers. Violence reduction initiatives are frequently tailored to those networks.
Jennifer Lorentz heads the Diversion Unit in the office of the St. Louis Circuit Attorney, the city's chief prosecutor. The unit offers mostly young, nonviolent offenders an opportunity to avoid prosecution by completing a program to address the issues that initially led to their arrest. About 80% of the participants have experienced gun violence and are referred to the BRIC, Lorentz said, calling the clinic critical to her program's success.
'We're getting them these resources, and we're changing the trajectory of their lives,' Lorentz said. 'Helping people is part of public safety.'
Punch said the BRIC staffers were encouraged during the Justice Department application process to emphasize their reach into St. Louis' Black community, which is disproportionately affected by gun violence. He suspects that emphasis is why its grant was terminated.
Punch likened the grant terminations to only partially treating tuberculosis, which allows the highly infectious disease to become resistant to medicine.
'If you partially extend a helping hand to somebody, and then you rip it away right when they start to trust you, you assure they will never trust you again,' he said. 'If your intention is to prevent violence, you don't do that.'
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Boeing's $444 Million Gamble: Will One Judge Shatter the Deal That Saves It From Criminal Trial?
Boeing's $444 Million Gamble: Will One Judge Shatter the Deal That Saves It From Criminal Trial?

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Boeing's $444 Million Gamble: Will One Judge Shatter the Deal That Saves It From Criminal Trial?

Boeing (NYSE:BA) just made a move that could wipe a years-long legal headache off its booksbut only if a federal judge signs off. The company has reached a tentative deal with the U.S. Department of Justice that would let it avoid prosecution for misleading regulators over the 737 Max crashes in 2018 and 2019. The agreement, revealed in a securities filing, includes $444.5 million in compensation to victims' families and allows Boeing to withdraw its earlier guilty plea. On paper, it looks like a clean break. In reality? It's anything but done. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with BA. That's because the families of the crash victims aren't letting this slide. They've challenged the agreement, arguing it's far too lenient and strips them of their right to a real reckoning. The judge overseeing the case, Reed O'Connor, has already disrupted prior deals over lack of transparency and weak oversight. He's now giving families until June 18 to file formal objections, and the DOJ and Boeing will have just one week to counter. It's a tight windowand a tense one. This legal saga dates back to a deferred prosecution deal from 2021, when Boeing paid $2.5 billion and promised reform. That plan nearly ran its courseuntil January 2024, when a 737 Max door blew off midflight and reignited public and prosecutorial fury. Now, Boeing's shot at resolution depends entirely on one courtroom. If the deal sticks, it could help the company reset its reputation and rebuild investor trust. But if it collapses, Boeing could be staring at a full-blown criminal trialwith all the volatility that brings. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Merz says US in 'strong position' to stop Putin, Trump says 'let them fight for a little while'
Merz says US in 'strong position' to stop Putin, Trump says 'let them fight for a little while'

Fox News

time14 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Merz says US in 'strong position' to stop Putin, Trump says 'let them fight for a little while'

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told President Donald Trump he is in a "strong position" to stop Russia's war in Ukraine, to which the president suggested maybe the world needs to "let them fight for a little while." "America is again in a very strong position to do something on this war and ending this war," Merz said, while also referencing the U.S.'s role in ending World War II on the eve of the anniversary of D-Day, which marked the turn of events that led to the defeat of Nazi Germany. "So let's talk about what we can do jointly, and we are ready to do what we can." Merz called for more pressure to be placed on Russia in coordination with European allies. Trump responded by providing an analogy of two kids fighting, and suggested perhaps it was "too early" to break up the fight between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. "Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy – they hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart, they don't want to be pulled," Trump said. "Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart." Trump said he gave that analogy to Putin in his call with him on Wednesday and said he told the Kremlin chief "maybe you're going to have to keep fighting and suffering a lot." Reporters asked Merz, who has been an ardent supporter of Ukraine and recently lifted Germany's existing strike bans, if he agrees with Trump that "fighting it out" was the way to proceed. "I think we both agree on this war and how terrible this war is. And we are both looking for ways to stop it very soon," Merz said. "I told the president before we came in that he is the key person in the world who can really do that now by putting pressure on Russia, and we will have this debate later on again, how we can proceed jointly between the Europeans and the Americans. "I think we are all… having the duty to do something on that now, to stop it after three and a half years, which is really terrible," he added, making it clear without directly contradicting the president that he did not agree with Trump. "We are on the side of Ukraine, and we are trying to get them stronger and stronger just to make Putin stop this war. This is our approach," Merz added.

Is Official US Economic Data Getting Less Reliable?
Is Official US Economic Data Getting Less Reliable?

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Official US Economic Data Getting Less Reliable?

President Donald Trump's federal hiring freeze has forced the Bureau of Labor Statistics to cut back on collecting consumer price information. Economists have raised concerns that key data on inflation and other important measures of the economy will become less accurate because of Trump's policies. Earlier, the Trump administration disbanded expert panels that advised the BLS, raising further concerns about the quality of economic data.A key government agency has cut back on the amount of data it collects, raising concerns among experts about the accuracy of the information used to track inflation, unemployment, and other facets of the Bureau of Labor Statistics said this week it had cut back on the price surveys it uses to determine the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The agency said it cut back sample collection across the country and stopped data collection entirely in Buffalo, New York, Lincoln, Nebraska, and Provo, Utah. "These actions have minimal impact on the overall all-items CPI, but they may increase the volatility of subnational or item-specific indexes," the BLS said in a statement. "BLS makes reductions when current resources can no longer support the collection effort." Any problems with the inflation data could be widely felt across the economy. The inflation rate is closely watched by policymakers at the Federal Reserve who set the nation's monetary policy; by bond traders who determine the price of 10-year treasurys; and by major companies who use the information to make business decisions. Many federal benefits, including SNAP food aid and Social Security payments, are directly tied to the Consumer Price BLS is one of the federal agencies affected by President Donald Trump's freeze on hiring federal employees, which was instituted shortly after he took office. An internal BLS report said staffing shortages were the reason for cutting back data collection, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday, citing an email the agency sent to economists. Trump has requested further cuts to the agency. His budget proposal would cut the BLS budget by 8% in 2026 from 2025 levels, if approved by Congress. 'The CPI temporarily reduced the number of outlets and quotes it attempted to collect due to a staffing shortage in certain CPI cities,' beginning in April, the email read, according to the Journal. 'These procedures will be kept in place until the hiring freeze is lifted, and additional staff can be hired and trained.'The cutbacks forced the BLS to use less hard data and more guesswork to produce the inflation data for April, the Journal reported. To measure the inflation rate, the BLS collects about 100,000 prices each month, with employees across the country visiting stores, making phone calls, or going online to check prices. About two-thirds of the data in the survey comes from in-person visits. Experts look to the BLS's massive surveys as the "gold standard" of economic addition to cutting back on its consumer price survey, the BLS said it will stop monitoring wholesale prices in 34 different industries including cookware, greeting cards, toys, and power tools. That data is used to create the Producer Price cutbacks raised alarms about the reliability of BLS data, according to a report by Bloomberg.'The reduced number of price quotes will likely reduce the reliability of the CPI as a measure of inflation and increase the volatility in the monthly CPI prints,' UBS economists led by Alan Detmeister said in a report obtained by Bloomberg. The cutback on data collection is just the latest red flag about the accuracy of the Trump administration's economic statistics. Jed Kolko, former Under Secretary for Economic Affairs at the Department of Commerce, wrote a blog post in April detailing several major threats to public trust in government statistics, including budget cuts. In March, Trump disbanded two outside advisory panels that helped the BLS produce its statistics. Kolko noted that expertise will be hard to replace.A survey of academic economists in March by the Chicago Booth School of Business showed that experts overwhelmingly believed the staff cutbacks at statistical agencies and the elimination of the advisory panels would lead to a "substantial reduction in the reliability of government economic data." Read the original article on Investopedia

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store