
Amnesty: Human rights at risk worldwide
AI Image
According to the UK-based human rights organization
Amnesty International
, we are at a "critical juncture" when it comes to universal human rights worldwide. Its report underlines religious, patriarchal and racist assaults on the system of human rights conventions, universal human rights,
international humanitarian law
, and international courts agreed upon by states after the crimes of the Nazis and World War II.
"Unprecedented forces are hunting down the ideals of human rights for all, seeking to destroy an international system forged in the blood and grief of World War Two and its Holocaust," writes Agnes Callamard, International Secretary General of Amnesty International (AI), in the foreword to her organization's annual report. Amnesty International assesses the human rights situation in a total of 150 countries every year.
Increasing violence against civilians and minorities
Amnesty's annual report identifies three main ongoing trends. Firstly, civilians are coming under increasing pressure in war zones like Sudan, Gaza, Ukraine and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
The Highest Earning College Majors—2025 Edition
Best Paying Degrees | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
"The rules that are supposed to apply in conflicts, the red lines that the international community has set itself, are being more and more disregarded," Julia Duchrow, the secretary general of Amnesty's German section, told DW.
Secondly, minorities in particular were at risk in many countries, particularly people from LGBTQ+ communities, refugees and dissidents.
And, thirdly, states were increasingly failing to take action to counter this crisis in human rights. This was particularly true of states that once were committed to universal human rights, such as the US.
"The US government is acting as an accelerant in this human rights crisis, putting billions of people worldwide at risk," said Duchrow.
She added that sanctions against the International Criminal Court and the US' withdrawal from the
UN Human Rights Council
were tantamount to taking an ax to international law.
Israel and Gaza once again in focus
The human rights NGO also once again draws particular attention to the war in Gaza, in which tens of thousands of people have been killed. The current conflict broke out after the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, which is classified as a terrorist organization by Germany, the US and the EU among others, launched an attack in Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel retaliated by launching a military operation in Gaza.
Amnesty International accuses Israel of committing "genocide" against Palestinians.
"States watched on as if powerless, as Israel killed thousands upon thousands of Palestinians, wiping out entire multigenerational families, destroying homes, livelihoods, hospitals and schools," the report reads.
The organization made a similar argument in an almost 300-page report in December 2024.
The accusation of genocide is controversial. The Israeli government vehemently rejects it, and some international law experts have also called the use of the term into question. German-British expert Stefan Talmon has described the legal argumentation of Amnesty's report as flawed. On the other hand, other organizations such as
Human Rights Watch
have also accused Israel of "acts of genocide," such as deliberately starving the civilian population in Gaza.
Sudan: A humanitarian disaster
The crisis in Sudan also features in this year's annual report. The country has been embroiled in a civil war for more than two years, with devastating consequences for the civilian population, and tens of thousands of victims, according to the UN. More people have been displaced in Sudan than anywhere else in the world, says Amnesty International
The former US government accused the rebel group involved of "genocide." Amnesty International refers instead to violence on both sides and calls for an arms embargo. However, Germany's AI Secretary General Duchrow did not rule out the possibility that the NGO could, in future, also conclude that genocide has been committed in Sudan.
Criticism of Germany
Germany also comes in for criticism for a series of changes relating to the rights of immigrants and refugees. Amnesty International lists the expansion of authorities' powers of entry to premises, search and detention, and the further increased risk of unlawful detention for asylum seekers in Germany. The NGO also points specifically to the resumption of deportations to Afghanistan and Syria, the suspension of asylum applications for Syrians, and the restoration of Schengen border checks without "reasonable suspicion."
AI also condemns the "excessive use of force in the policing of protests by climate activists and supporters of Palestinians' rights.
Call to reflect on human rights
Amnesty is calling for a return to the rules-based order of human rights and for governments to respect human rights and international law. According to Duchrow, this would include respecting and complying with international arrest warrants such as the one against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. She also believes that reform of the UN Security Council is necessary.
But the Secretary General of Amnesty Germany also mentioned some positive developments.
"We see positive developments time and again, alongside the negative ones," Duchrow said. "Human rights have a powerful impact on the people who take to the streets. That is why we are calling on governments to put human rights at the heart of their policies. But of course, it also requires commitment from everyone; it depends on all of us."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip
LONDON, - British finance minister Rachel Reeves will hold a meeting with Chinese vice premier He Lifeng during his visit to Britain this week for trade talks with the United States, a British government source said on Sunday. China's foreign ministry said He would be in Britain between June 8 and June 13 when there will be talks in London with three of U.S. President Donald Trump's top aides to try to resolve a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. The British government source said Reeves would host He for a bilateral meeting during the trip, although there were no details on when the talks would be held. The British finance minister met He during a visit to China in January, part of British attempts to improve ties with Beijing, one of the main policy goals of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government. However, many British lawmakers remain sceptical of China amid regular accusations of espionage by spies working for Beijing, and plans for a new large Chinese embassy in London remains a divisive subject, with the opposition Conservative Party saying it must be blocked. The Chinese government wants to build the embassy at Royal Mint Court, a historic site near the Tower of London, which would be its largest in Europe but its requests for planning permission have been rejected by the local council, and the government will make a final decision. The Sunday Times reported that a senior U.S. official had said Washington was "deeply concerned" about the plans, due to its proximity to London's financial hubs and three significant data centres, and approval could impact UK-U.S. trade talks. "These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process," British technology minister Peter Kyle told Sky News on Sunday.


Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Pakistani army acts as custodian of ideologies, religion: Former diplomat DP Srivastava
Former Indian diplomat D.P. Srivastava stated that Pakistan's Army challenges the concept of sovereignty by acting as a custodian of ideologies and religion, rather than focusing on national frontiers like the military forces of other nations. Srivastava also slammed the radical Islamist ideology in Pakistan, which pits the nation against its neighbouring countries, including India. In an interview with IANS, the former diplomat also talked about Pakistani Army's Field Marshal General Asim Munir's April 16 speech, just days before the Pahalgam terror attack, in which 26 innocent people lost their lives at the hands of terrorists belonging to The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Pakistan-based terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba. He hailed Operation Sindoor and said that it reflected a major shift in India's security doctrine. He also commented on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's G7 invite. The following are the excerpts from the interview: IANS: Could you tell us something about your book "Pakistan -- Ideologies, Strategies and Interests"? D.P. Srivastava: My postings took me to Karachi, Pakistan, and the early 1990s. I dealt with Pakistan, among other issues, in the UN division of the Ministry of External Affairs for eight years in the '90s, and during this, I dealt with Kashmir talks to the Pokhran nuclear test and Kargil. The inspiration for the book came from my posting to Karachi, where I heard the phrase 'Nazaria-e-Pakistan', which means the ideology of Pakistan. This is the very phrase used by Gen Munir, who mentioned this in his speech on April 16, days before the Pahalgam terror attack. My book traces the interpretation of ideology and elite interest in the making of Pakistan's domestic and foreign policy. IANS: What is the ideology of Pakistan? Gen Asim Munir mentioned "superior ideology" and the two-nation theory in his speech on April 16. What is this ideology? D.P. Srivastava: The ideology of Pakistan remains vague due to various influential factors within the country. In 1972, two provincial governments were dismissed, and the principal opposition party, the National Awami Party, was banned after the Supreme Court of Pakistan stated that the party was contrary to the ideology of Pakistan. Notably, this occurred before the formation of the country's new constitution, indicating that the ideology preceded the Constitution in Pakistan. There are different views of what this ideology is. Iqbal, who is known as the best explainer of Pakistani ideology, said that in Islam, religion and state are integral to each other, so he ruled out the idea of secularism, and he also opposed the idea of nationalism. Iqbal also stressed the concept of Umma, which is pan-Islamism, and these are the concepts at the root of Pakistan's current trouble where the jihadi groups do not accept the supremacy of the Parliament, the sovereignty of which, is also challenged by the Army. The jihadi philosophy has always pitted Pakistan against its neighbours, including, what they call "the Hindu India, Shia Iran, and Sunni Afghanistan". IANS: What is the mindset of the Pakistan Army? D.P. Srivastava: To understand the mindset Pakistan Army, one should go back to Gen Asim Munir's April 16 speech, where he reminded his Pakistani audience that they belong to a superior ideology. What is this ideology, one may ask? (Former Pakistani President) Ayub Khan described it as Islam. It is very strange that the Pakistani army chiefs talk about ideology and Islam. In other nations, the armies protect the national frontiers, while in Pakistan, the army has become a custodian of ideologies and religion. Seems like Gen Munir has assumed the priest and a general. The Pakistani army has institutionalised its role in the running of the government, where the civilian parties have taken the backseat. This mindset is also reflected in the neglect of socioeconomic indicators. Pakistan's army regards itself as the state, and it has this mindset has led to excessive defensive expenditure to the neglect of economic indicators. IANS: How do you see Operation Sindoor? Is it part of a larger strategic shift in India's security policy against Pakistan-sponsored cross-border terrorism? D.P. Srivastava: Operation Sindoor represents a strategic shift in India's security doctrine, as the Prime Minister has underlined. Pakistan has used the threat of escalation to the nuclear level in the case of India's conventional response to subconventional threats like terror attacks. This time, however, there was no statement from the Pakistani side about nuclear escalation during Operation Sindhoor. So Pakistan's bluff has been called, that it cannot escalate a local conflict or deter India from a military response to a terror attack, and this is a major shift in the paradigm. It also sends a message to the global community that India will exercise its right of self-defence, and we have the strength to do so. We did that in a very responsible manner. We avoided escalation. The escalation came mostly from the Pakistani side. India's initial strike was only against the terror camps. We avoided hitting any Pakistani, civil or military installation. It was Pakistan which attacked Indian Air Force bases, and that forced India to attack Pakistani military installations, and that brought Pakistan quickly to its knees. The Pakistani DGMO called his Indian counterpart, begging for a ceasefire. This message has also gone home and has been understood well by the international community. IANS: Prime Minister Modi has accepted an invitation by Canadian PM Mark Carney to the G7 Summit. Do you think this will help mend the strained India-Canada ties? D.P. Srivastava: The Prime Minister has accepted the invitation to go to the G7 summit. So the focus will be on global issues, not on bilateral relations. But, of course, when the leaders meet, they discuss the entire range of issues, and this will be a good opportunity to bring the bilateral relations back on an even keel. We had good relations with Canada, and I believe, there's a better understanding of the Indian position in the new government there, about the impact of terrorism. And, I think the new government is unlikely to use these incidents as an electoral card. So we hope that this visit will bring about a clearer understanding between the two countries.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
‘You will not make it to Gaza': Israel vows to block Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg
Greta Thunberg, a climate activist, is among 12 activists aboard the Madleen, which is operated by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition read more Climate activist Greta Thunberg boards the Madleen boat before setting sail for Gaza along with activists of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, departing from the Sicilian port of Catania, Italy. AP Israel vowed Sunday to block an aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists from reaching Gaza. Defense Minister Israel Katz stated that Israel will not permit any breach of its naval blockade on Palestinian territory, emphasizing that it was intended to stop Hamas from bringing in weapons. 'I have instructed the military to prevent the Madleen flotilla from reaching Gaza,' Israel Katz said in a statement from his office. 'To the antisemitic Greta and her fellow Hamas propagandists — I will say this clearly: You should turn back, because you will not make it to Gaza,' he said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Thunberg, a climate activist, is among 12 activists aboard the Madleen, which is operated by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition. As the war between Israel and Hamas enters its 21st month, the organisers of the Madleen's voyage said on Saturday that they had arrived in Egyptian waters and were getting close to Gaza. The activists had said they planned to reach Gaza's territorial waters as early as Sunday. Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament who is of Palestinian descent, is among the others onboard. She has been barred from entering Israel because of her opposition to Israeli policies toward the Palestinians. The Madleen sailed out of Italy on June 1 with the aim of bringing humanitarian relief and lifting the Israeli bloackade on Palestinian territory. 'Israel will not allow anyone to break the naval blockade of Gaza, which is aimed at preventing weapons from reaching Hamas – a murderous terrorist group holding our hostages and committing war crimes,' Katz said. 'Israel will act against any attempt to break the blockade or support terror groups – by sea, air or land,' he added. An attempt last month by Freedom Flotilla to reach Gaza by sea failed after another of the group's vessels was attacked by two drones while sailing in international waters off Malta. The group blamed Israel for the attack, which damaged the front section of the ship. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Israel and Egypt have imposed varying degrees of blockade on Gaza since Hamas seized power from rival Palestinian forces in 2007. Critics of the blockade say it amounts to collective punishment of Gaza's roughly 2 million Palestinians. Israel sealed Gaza off from all aid in the early days of the war ignited by the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, but later relented under U.S. pressure. In early March, shortly before Israel ended a ceasefire with Hamas, the country again blocked all imports, including food, fuel and medicine. Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, in the Oct. 7 attack and abducted 251 hostages, more than half of whom have since been released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Hamas is still holding 55 hostages, more than half of them believed to be dead. Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which has said women and children make up most of the dead. It doesn't say whether those killed are civilians or combatants. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The war has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and displaced around 90% of the territory's population, leaving people there almost completely dependent on international aid. With inputs from agencies