Exclusive: Anthropic hits $3 billion in annualized revenue on business demand for AI
SAN FRANCISCO, May 30 (Reuters) - Artificial intelligence developer Anthropic is making about $3 billion in annualized revenue, according to two sources familiar with the matter, in an early validation of generative AI use in the business world.
The milestone, which projects the company's current sales over the course of a year, is a significant jump from December 2024 when the metric was nearly $1 billion, the sources said. The figure crossed $2 billion around the end of March, and at May's end it hit $3 billion, one of the sources said.
While consumers have embraced rival OpenAI's ChatGPT, a number of enterprises have limited their rollouts to experimentation, despite board-level interest in AI. Anthropic's revenue surge, largely from selling AI models as a service to other companies, is a data point showing how business demand is growing, one of the sources said.
A key driver is code generation. The San Francisco-based startup, backed by Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab and Amazon.com (AMZN.O), opens new tab, is famous for AI that excels at computer programming. Products in the so-called codegen space have experienced major growth and adoption in recent months, often drawing on Anthropic's models.
This demand is setting Anthropic apart among software-as-a-service vendors. Its single-quarter revenue increases would count Anthropic as the fastest-growing SaaS company that at least one venture capitalist has ever seen.
"We've looked at the IPOs of over 200 public software companies, and this growth rate has never happened," said Meritech General Partner Alex Clayton, who is not an Anthropic investor and has no inside knowledge of its sales.
He cautioned that these comparisons are not fully precise, since Anthropic also has consumer revenue via subscriptions to its Claude chatbot. Still, by contrast, publicly traded SaaS company Snowflake took six quarters to go from $1 billion to $2 billion in such run-rate revenue, Clayton said.
Anthropic competitor OpenAI has projected it will end 2025 with more than $12 billion in total revenue, up from $3.7 billion last year, three people familiar with the matter said. This total revenue is different from an estimated annualized figure like Anthropic's. Reuters could not determine this metric for OpenAI.
The two rivals appear to be establishing their own swim lanes. While both offer enterprise and consumer products, OpenAI is shaping up to be a consumer-oriented company, and the majority of its revenue comes from subscriptions to its ChatGPT chatbot, OpenAI Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar told Bloomberg late last year.
OpenAI has not reported enterprise-specific revenue but said in May that paying seats for its ChatGPT enterprise product have grown to 3 million, from 2 million in February, and that T-Mobile (TMUS.O), opens new tab and Morgan Stanley (MS.N), opens new tab are among its enterprise customers.
In the consumer race, Anthropic's Claude has seen less adoption than OpenAI. Claude's traffic, a proxy for consumer interest, was about 2% of ChatGPT's in April, according to Web analytics firm Similarweb.
Anthropic, founded in 2021 by a team that departed OpenAI over differences in vision, closed a $3.5 billion fundraise earlier this year. That valued the company at $61.4 billion. OpenAI is currently valued at $300 billion.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Selling your home? Don't forget to stage your GARDEN: From a neat trick with paint to whether metal or wood is better, how to add value for less
If you're poised to put your home on the market, you're likely to have given it a declutter and deep clean, as well as refreshed any tired paintwork. But you may not have given the garden as much attention as you should –which experts say is a big mistake.
Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Audio Surveillance Exposed: The Hidden Threats Lurking in Your Home and Beyond
Imagine sitting in the privacy of your own home, discussing sensitive matters with a trusted friend. Unbeknownst to you, a tiny device hidden in the room or even the microphone of your smartphone is capturing every word. This isn't the plot of a spy thriller—it's the unsettling reality of modern acoustic surveillance. As technology advances, so do the methods used to exploit it, turning everyday sounds into a goldmine of information. From laser microphones that eavesdrop through windows to malware that hijacks your smart devices, the tools of acoustic spying are becoming more sophisticated and invasive, raising urgent questions about privacy in an increasingly connected world. In this exploration, Benn Jordan uncovers the seven most concerning levels of acoustic spying techniques and the risks they pose to individuals, businesses, and governments alike. You'll learn how seemingly innocuous devices like smart assistants and laptops can become gateways for surveillance, and why advancements in artificial intelligence and miniaturization are making these threats harder to detect. But it's not all doom and gloom—understanding these techniques is the first step toward protecting yourself. By the end, you may find yourself rethinking how secure your conversations really are. Understanding Audio Spying Everyday Devices: A Gateway for Spying Modern devices, including smartphones, laptops, and smart home systems, are particularly vulnerable to acoustic spying. Many of these devices are equipped with microphones that can be remotely accessed by malicious actors. Common vulnerabilities include: Malware: Cybercriminals can deploy malware to activate a device's microphone without the user's knowledge, allowing them to eavesdrop on conversations and gather sensitive information. Cybercriminals can deploy malware to activate a device's microphone without the user's knowledge, allowing them to eavesdrop on conversations and gather sensitive information. Smart Assistants: Devices like virtual assistants, designed for convenience, can be exploited if their security settings are weak or improperly configured. This can turn a helpful tool into a potential surveillance device. These risks highlight the importance of securing your devices and being cautious about granting microphone access to apps and services. By understanding these vulnerabilities, you can take steps to protect your privacy and reduce the likelihood of unauthorized surveillance. 7 Concerning Levels Of Acoustic Spying Techniques Watch this video on YouTube. Learn more about digital surveillance by reading previous articles we have written. Privacy and Security Risks The risks associated with acoustic surveillance extend far beyond the invasion of personal privacy. For businesses and organizations, the stakes are even higher. Sensitive discussions, trade secrets, and strategic plans can be intercepted through sound capture, leading to financial losses, competitive disadvantages, or even reputational damage. On a personal level, acoustic spying can result in identity theft, blackmail, or other forms of exploitation. The omnipresence of sound in daily life makes it a particularly challenging medium to secure. Conversations, ambient noise, and other audio signals are often unavoidable, creating opportunities for surveillance. This underscores the need for robust security measures to protect both individuals and organizations from the far-reaching consequences of acoustic spying. Technological Advancements in Surveillance The rapid pace of technological advancement has significantly enhanced the effectiveness of acoustic spying techniques, making them more precise and harder to detect. Key developments include: Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI-powered algorithms can process vast amounts of audio data, identifying patterns, keywords, or even specific voices with remarkable accuracy. This capability allows for targeted surveillance on an unprecedented scale. AI-powered algorithms can process vast amounts of audio data, identifying patterns, keywords, or even specific voices with remarkable accuracy. This capability allows for targeted surveillance on an unprecedented scale. Miniaturization: Advances in miniaturization have resulted in recording devices that are smaller and more discreet than ever before, allowing high-quality audio capture in virtually any setting. Advances in miniaturization have resulted in recording devices that are smaller and more discreet than ever before, allowing high-quality audio capture in virtually any setting. Enhanced Sound Capture: Improved hardware and software technologies can pick up audio even in noisy or challenging environments, further expanding the reach of acoustic surveillance. These advancements illustrate the growing sophistication of surveillance technologies and their potential to compromise privacy on a global scale. As these tools become more accessible, the risks associated with their misuse continue to rise. Ethical and Legal Challenges Acoustic surveillance presents complex ethical and legal challenges. While it can be justified in certain contexts, such as law enforcement or national security, the potential for misuse is significant. Surveillance conducted without proper oversight or consent often crosses ethical boundaries, raising questions about the balance between security and individual rights. Legal frameworks governing acoustic spying vary widely across jurisdictions, and the rapid evolution of technology often outpaces the development of relevant laws. This creates a gray area where ethical considerations must guide responsible use. Striking a balance between using surveillance for legitimate purposes and protecting privacy remains a critical challenge for policymakers and society as a whole. How to Protect Yourself from Acoustic Spying Safeguarding yourself and your organization from acoustic surveillance requires a proactive approach. Effective measures include: Secure Your Devices: Use strong, unique passwords and keep your software updated to address potential vulnerabilities. Use strong, unique passwords and keep your software updated to address potential vulnerabilities. Use Physical Barriers: Employ microphone blockers or covers to prevent unauthorized sound capture by your devices. Employ microphone blockers or covers to prevent unauthorized sound capture by your devices. Limit Microphone Access: Be selective about granting apps and services access to your device's microphone, and regularly review your privacy settings. Be selective about granting apps and services access to your device's microphone, and regularly review your privacy settings. Encrypt Communications: Use encryption tools for sensitive conversations to ensure they remain private and secure. By adopting these practices, you can reduce the risks associated with acoustic spying and better protect your privacy and security in an increasingly connected world. Media Credit: Benn Jordan Filed Under: Gadgets News, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Loan plan in Republican bill could worsen doctor shortage, experts warn
Doctors' associations, medical schools and student advocates warn that a proposal in the Republican-led budget bill being considered by Congress restricts graduate federal student loans and could worsen a national shortage of doctors. The new Republican proposal would limit federal student loans for 'professional programs' – such as medical school – to $150,000, eliminate a federal graduate loan program and put limits on loan forgiveness. Medical students rely heavily on federal student loans to finance lengthy and expensive educations, particularly since 2006, when Congress broadly lifted caps on borrowing limits to allow for the full cost of tuition and living expenses. 'Our organization is very concerned about this,' said Dave Bergman, a spokesperson for the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM). He said about four in five students who attend osteopathic medical schools, which grant the doctor of osteopathy or 'DO' designation, use Grad Plus loans and many depend on student loan forgiveness. The changes are part of the 1,100-page Republican-led reconciliation bill dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that Donald Trump sees as core to his second term in office. The legislation passed the House last week and is now being considered by the US Senate. 'When there is a stated goal from these policymakers to increase the physician workforce, to increase the number of primary care physicians and expand access in rural and underserved areas – these policies just don't align with those priorities,' said Bergman. 'It's a really bad workforce decision.' The Association of American Medical Colleges estimates the US will face a shortage of between 37,800 and 124,000 physicians by 2034, with specialties such as primary care, psychiatry and geriatrics especially affected. Advocates warn the curtailing or eliminating federal student loan programs could drive low-income students away from pursuing medicine as a career, make loans harder to repay, or push students into the arms of expensive private lenders, advocates told the Guardian. In turn, these changes could also worsen the flight of doctors from lower paid specialties, especially family medicine, primary care and pediatrics, which tend to have lower match rates than higher paid specialties such as cardiology, experts said. 'I, along with many others, worry that these changes will make medical school unaffordable, turn loan repayment into a pipe dream for residents, and worsen physician shortages – especially in primary care and underserved areas,' wrote recent medical school graduate Kaley Parchinski in a Stat editorial. An analysis by the Urban Institute, which studied the proposal when it was first introduced by Republican North Carolina representative Virginia Foxx in 2024, found the limits could affect more than 60% of students pursuing medicine and other health professions. 'At a time when our country urgently needs more doctors – especially in underserved areas – this bill would create new financial and logistical barriers that disproportionately harm low-income students,' said Dr Shannon Udovic-Constant, president of the California Medical Association, in a statement. The limits on graduate education would join limits on student loans seeking four-year degrees in a way that critics warn could make completing college more difficult for low-income students. Sara Partridge of the Center for American Progress said the changes risk 'creating or exacerbating [shortages] in essential and medical and healthcare fields, and reducing pathways to high-paying, in-demand career fields for students in underrepresented backgrounds'. The federal government has guaranteed student loans as a form of financial aid since 1965, part of a program called the Federal Family Education Loan program. These loans are a major payor for American medical schools, whose tuition costs have increased dramatically in cost since the mid-20th century, in line with other forms of higher education. Because of the long training requirements for doctors, aspiring physicians often graduate with large debt burdens, and how to decrease that burden has been a subject of bipartisan debate. The median indebtedness of a medical student who carried loans was $205,000 in 2023 according to the AAMC – or more than $50,000 short of the limit placed by congressional Republicans. House Republicans argue that uncapped student loan access has driven up the cost for expensive professional degrees, and that limiting federal loans would help drive down the cost of tuition. Dually, Republicans have argued that if students need more financing they can go to the private market. 'It is extremely costly to get a medical degree,' said Sara Robertson, spokesperson for Republicans on the House committee on education and workforce, which drove the proposal. 'Reforms in the bill will help put downward pressure on prices at medical schools so that future medical students can pay lower tuition costs, thereby making medical school more accessible to individuals from all backgrounds.' Robertson argued that, although the bill would limit how students can earn credits toward loan forgiveness during residency, it would allow them to defer interest and that private student loans would become available. 'For borrowers who do need to borrow more than the bill's loan limits, private student loans – particularly for medical students – will be widely available and often have interest rates,' said Robertson. However, because of relatively high earnings, medical students are also among some of the least likely students to default – limiting government risk. An average of 8.15% of all student loan debt is in default at any time, according to the Education Data Initiative, while just over 1% of osteopathic medical students miss loan payments, according to AACOM. Further, economists who have studied the issue – including those whose work Republicans have cited – warned there could be unintended consequences to altering these programs. 'The private loan market looks very different than it did in the years before Grad Plus,' in 2006, said Lesley Turner, an economist and associate professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy. Turner and her co-authors wrote a paper which found that graduate loans, unlike loans for four-year degrees, likely raise the cost of graduate tuition. Robertson cited the paper to Axios. Turner said the Republican bill proposes a far lower limit for federal student loans than in 2006, the time before the Grad Plus program was created. Aggregate loan limits adjusted for inflation and for health-related programs, such as medical degrees, were 'almost $300,000 … so almost double the limit the House proposed.' 'This isn't going back to where we were in 2006, this is going back to that and then cutting it in half,' Turner said. 'It's not clear that the private student loan market would fill in that gap.' Turner's co-author, labor economist Jeff Denning at the University of Notre Dame, said he had 'mixed feelings' about the proposal. 'Uncapped borrowing is probably not a great policy,' said Denning, 'but capping it might have these unintended consequences particularly for high tuition programs including medicine.'
