Canada Post rejects union's request for binding arbitration
Canada Post has rejected a request by the union for binding arbitration, with the Crown corporation saying it would be 'long and complicated.'
The Crown corporation said in a statement Sunday that it was seeking a 'timely and fair resolution' that would ensure employees would 'have a voice' through a vote.
'The union's proposal to send the matter to binding arbitration would do the opposite,' Canada Post said, adding it could take more than a year.
In a response to the rejection, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) expressed its disappointment.
'This refusal constitutes yet another demonstration that CPC (Canada Post Corporation) is not interested in a reasonable outcome to this round of negotiation,' the union wrote in a news release. 'A forced vote may fail to end the labour conflict and risks further division, prolonging uncertainty for all parties.'
Story continues below advertisement
The union had made the request Saturday after the Crown corporation asked Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu a day earlier to direct the postal workers' union to hold a vote on the 'final offers' the national mail carrier presented last week.
0:33
Canada Post sends 'final offer' to union amid financial struggles
In a statement Friday, Canada Post said it was not possible to reach tentative agreements through negotiations 'given the level of impasse and CUPW's negotiating position.'
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Such a vote would effectively adopt the final offers presented by Canada Post as a new collective agreement, in a method similar to a membership-wide ratification of a tentative deal.
CUPW said Saturday that a 'government-imposed vote' would not bring about an end to the labour dispute, adding it would be 'another unwarranted government intervention.'
Officials with the union had met with Hajdu and Secretary of State for Labour John Zerucelli on Friday.
Story continues below advertisement
In a post on X on Friday evening, Hajdu said she urged both parties to work together to find an agreement that 'maintains a strong and lasting postal service,' adding that her office was reviewing the order by Canada Post for a vote and federal mediators would remain available to continue work at the negotiating table.
But the union said on Saturday that arbitration was the best path forward.
'At this time and in these circumstances, only arbitration can end the ongoing labour dispute fairly and expeditiously,' the union said.
The union and Canada Post have been trying to negotiate a new contract for more than 18 months. There was also a month-long strike last year.
That strike was ended when then-labour minister Steven MacKinnon asked the Canada Industrial Relations Board to order workers back on the job if it agreed with his determination that there was an impasse in negotiations.
10:53
CUPW reviewing Canada Post offer amid overtime ban
MacKinnon had also ordered an industrial inquiry commission to review the structural issues of the dispute, which were laid out in a report released last month that made several recommendations, including to phase out door-to-door letter delivery for individual addresses.
Story continues below advertisement
Canada Post is 'facing an existential crisis: It is effectively insolvent, or bankrupt,' the report from the Industrial Inquiry Commission said.
The Crown corporation earlier this week posted a nearly $1.3-billion operating loss for 2024, while revenues fell by $800 million, or 12.2 per cent, compared with 2023.
Last year's strike contributed to a 'net negative impact of $208 million' towards Canada Post's $841-million loss before tax, the latest annual report said.
When the corporation presented its offers on Wednesday, it said in a news release that the final offers were 'designed to move negotiations forward and return certainty and stability to customers, Canada Post's employees, and all Canadians.'
— with files from Global News' Sean Boynton and Uday Rana
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
19 minutes ago
- Global News
BC Hydro issues new call for baseload power supply
British Columbia's power utility wants to boost the province's baseload electricity generation capacity in a bid to meet the province's growing demand from residents and industries. Baseload capacity refers to constant and stable power sources, with Energy Minister Adrian Dix announcing BC Hydro's request for expression of interest from companies to provide geothermal or hydroelectric projects to expand long-term power capacity and meet peak demand. 2:12 BC Hydro selects 9 new wind power projects BC Hydro has also launched a second request, seeking partners who can deliver 'market-ready technologies' for boosting power conservation in homes and buildings across the province. Story continues below advertisement Dix says both requests are aimed at matching B.C.'s growth potential with stable and affordable electricity supply. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy BC Hydro has been dealing with a long-term drought that forced the province to import electricity last fiscal year. 2:15 BC Hydro rates going up 7.5 per cent over next 2 years The Crown utility says 13,600 gigawatt hours of power was imported in 2024 — about 22 per cent of all B.C's power — but that the province has been a net electricity exporter for eight of the last 15 years. The utility last year issued a call for power from renewable sources, later selecting nine wind and one solar project — but these are distinct from baseload projects because they rely on what BC Hydro calls 'uncontrollable conditions.'
Global News
22 minutes ago
- Global News
Ford says blockades ‘wouldn't be very wise' as government moves to pass Bill 5
Ontario Premier Doug Ford says First Nations groups who blockade critical infrastructure will be 'dealt with appropriately' as tensions peak over his controversial mining legislation, with expectations it could pass today. Among other changes, Bill 5, or the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, will create so-called special economic zones where a range of laws, ranging from municipal approvals to environmental rules or even labour law, won't apply. The proposed law has sparked protests from First Nations leaders at Queen's Park who fear it will infringe upon their rights. They have threatened that if the bill passes, more protests will follow, including the possible blockade of highways, railways and mines. On Wednesday, Ford addressed the potential for protests if his legislation passes and warned Indigenous leaders not to disrupt infrastructure around the province. 'You can't break the law, simple as that,' the premier said. 'If any of us were to go stand and block the highway — they need to move on or they'll be dealt with appropriately. They cannot just break the law, and I don't think the people of Ontario would be there supporting them.' Story continues below advertisement He added the protests 'wouldn't be very wise.' 1:46 First Nations members protest Ontario mining bill at Queen's Park In the face of some of the backlash from First Nations groups, the government introduced a number of amendments to parts of the legislation, including a change to the law's preamble. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The proposed legislation has had an increasingly bumpy ride toward being passed into law, despite the Progressive Conservatives' significant majority at Queen's Park. When Bill 5 made its way to committee last week, the Ontario NDP and Liberals banded together to filibuster proceedings and force an extra day of committee hearings on the legislation. That day came on Tuesday when the Liberals tabled 4,000 amendments to the law in an attempt to block the government from making its own changes to the bill. They partly succeeded, with only 14 of the province's 26 amendments passed. Story continues below advertisement The move was designed to force the province to hit pause, rather than pass its law without the amendments it pledged to show it was listening to concerns. On Wednesday, however, Ford blamed the Liberals for 'playing politics' and appeared to indicate he would pass the bill without all the changes. 'It's a shame that they want to play politics and try and run out the clock and now allow us to put in amendments, but what I can assure you, with Indigenous communities across Ontario, we're going to have (a) duty to consult, we're going to respect treaty rights,' Ford said. The Progressive Conservatives have fast-tracked parts of Bill 5 with a motion to allow it to pass its third and final reading with only one hour of debate. That should allow MPPs to pass the bill into law sometime on Wednesday or Thursday. 8:17 First Nation leader says Bill 5 will spark protests, blockade of Hwy. 400 Opposition politicians, as they've tried to slow the legislation, have warned that its special economic zones will create 'no-law' areas, suggesting they could be used for a variety of projects. Story continues below advertisement Ford himself appeared to indicate last week that he would eventually designate Highway 401 and nuclear power plants as special economic zones where laws can be sidestepped in order to speed up construction. 'We're down to the final hours before the government intends to impose a vote on Bill 5 and pass this law,' Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles said on Wednesday morning. 'This bill should not be going to a vote, there has not been proper consultation. The idea, as the premier says all the time, you are going to consult after the fact just doesn't cut it.' The NDP, Liberals and Greens are all calling on Ford to abandon the bill entirely.
Global News
42 minutes ago
- Global News
U.S. ‘can't fight a war' without American steel, Trump tariff chief says
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Wednesday defended the doubling of steel and aluminum tariffs by claiming the United States 'can't fight a war' without domestic production of those materials. Lutnick made the comments while denying the immediate real-world implications that steep tariffs will have on U.S. manufacturing during testimony in front of the U.S. Senate appropriations committee that focused in part on U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff policy. 'The big issue is, you can't fight a war without steel and aluminum production in America,' Lutnick said during an exchange with Democratic U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, who was asking if he or Trump consulted with the Pentagon before raising those tariffs. 'If you don't have the ability to make your own steel and aluminum, you can't fight a war, and that is what the president's doing. He's trying to make sure that we make sufficient steel and aluminum to protect our defence.' Story continues below advertisement 'Which I certainly support,' Shaheen said, to which Lutnick replied, 'Sounds like we exactly agree.' 'But I don't agree on the way it's been done,' Shaheen responded, 'because we're not going to have the steel that we need immediately to provide the supplies that we need immediately. So we need to do a little better planning before we put in place those kinds of tariffs.' Trump signed an executive order Tuesday that raised tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from 25 per cent — a rate put in place three months ago — to 50 per cent, effective Wednesday. 2:34 Why is Trump doubling steel and aluminum tariffs? In her exchange with Lutnick, Shaheen highlighted concerns from a ball bearing manufacturer in her state that supplies the U.S. aerospace industry. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy While she didn't name the company, she said it has only one domestic steel supplier, with the rest of its materials sourced from Canada and the Indo-Pacific. Story continues below advertisement 'Those (foreign suppliers) have been eliminated under the tariffs,' she said, adding that the company is facing both rising costs and production lead times that have grown from 20 weeks to two-and-a-half years. 'What was the determination about how you address those kinds of extended lead times for companies that are producing equipment that's critical to our national security?' she asked. 'It's really a cost issue, not an access issue,' Lutnick replied. 'Well, not according to this company in New Hampshire,' Shaheen said. 'It's an access issue for them.' 'Well, that would be illogical since it's just a tariff, which is monetary,' Lutnick said. 'It's not a sanction. It's just a monetary one.' Canadian steel and aluminum producers — as well as other sectors affected by Trump's various tariff regimes, like automakers — have said higher price points for their products have led to cancelled U.S. contracts. 2:06 Canada ponders response to Trump's latest steel tariffs threat The Canadian Steel Producers Association said last weekend that doubling tariffs to 50 per cent 'essentially closes the U.S. market to our domestic industry for half of its production' and will create 'mass disruption' to North American supply chains. Story continues below advertisement Trump and Lutnick have said tariffs on countries and industries are meant to drive manufacturing back to the U.S. by raising the cost of foreign goods. The tariffs on steel and aluminum specifically were imposed under national security concerns. Trump administration officials have focused particularly on China, warning Beijing could cut off supplies if the trade war escalates. White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett told ABC News on Sunday that China is 'dumping' cheap steel products into the U.S. and other countries 'because it prepares them to win a war, because they're the only ones who can make steel.' 'If we have cannons but not cannonballs, then we can't fight a war,' Hassett said. 'We have to have a steel industry that's ready for American defence.' U.S. defence and aerospace manufacturers have relied on Canadian steel and aluminum for decades — including in wartime. Canada supplied raw materials, components and fully built military vehicles and equipment to the U.S. during the Second World War, helping to bolster American military forces. It later did the same for U.S. forces in the Korean, Vietnam and Middle East wars, as it has for Britain and other allies. To this day, Canadian steel and aluminum is used to build American aircraft, missiles, space technologies and other equipment. Story continues below advertisement The Canadian government has vowed to bolster its own domestic defence industry with Canadian-made steel and aluminum in an effort to protect those industries from Trump's tariffs and move away from U.S. reliance. Defence Minister David McGuinty told a conference of defence contractors last week that the government's goals for boosting the Canadian sector will match the speed at which production ramped up during the Second World War. Lutnick on Wednesday continued to insist that higher tariffs and related costs are a separate issue from supply, and even offered to explain 'how steel works' to Shaheen after the public testimony. 'The company that I've been talking to in New Hampshire understands how it works,' Shaheen responded, 'and they have a problem. They don't need you to explain it to them. They know because they've been in business for years.'
