Has the Royal College of Psychiatrists killed the assisted suicide bill?
How do you make assisted suicide safe? In recent months, a large part of Kim Leadbeater's answer has been to point to the involvement of psychiatrists. Having a psychiatrist sign off each death, Leadbeater said, would 'add expertise'. They would be part of a much-touted 'multidisciplinary' approach. In particular, they would be able to check that applicants met the threshold of the Mental Capacity Act.
There's just one problem. The psychiatrists themselves appear to think Leadbeater's bill is a dangerous mess.
I'm paraphrasing, of course. But last night's statement from the Royal College of Psychiatrists, in which they identified nine major problems with the legislation and said they 'cannot support' it, is a major blow to the bill's credibility.
For one thing, it is a reminder of the amateurishness which has been such a mark of this whole saga. Originally, Leadbeater's bill required a High Court judge to sign off every case. She dropped that requirement under pressure from the Ministry of Justice, who told her it was unworkable.
The replacement system, an 'expert panel', has no judges, and none of
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Parents of 17-year-old launch High Court battle to stop teen changing gender
The parents are separately seeking a judicial review of their GP's role Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE parents of a 17-year-old have launched a High Court bid to block their child from changing gender. They took the highly unusual move after the child forged their mother's signature to get hormone replacement therapy on the NHS. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up The teen was born a boy but identifies as a girl and is being backed in court by their GP. The parents insist the child lacks the mental capacity to consent to the treatment. In court papers they say no proper assessment of the teen's mental and physical health has been done. They also fear grave psychiatric harm if the child is allowed to continue with 'an inappropriate, negligently given, life-altering treatment'. READ MORE ON TRANS RIGHTS VANDAL PROBE Police hunt for trans-rights activists who defaced statue of suffragist The case is believed to be the first of its kind. The parents are separately seeking a judicial review of the GP's role in prescribing HRT. The Royal College of GPs previously stated medics should not prescribe gender-affirming hormones to patients under the age of 18. The child, who lives with their parents, started HRT last October, ahead of a referral to specialist gender services. London's High Court was told treatment began four weeks after the child forged their mum's signature on a self-assessment form. Keir says 'woman is an adult female' & insists he's 'pleased' by court trans ruling after years of woke dithering Mr Justice MacDonald said the child 'emphasises the law gives her permission to make her own decision'. The court heard the child, described as 'eloquent, articulate, and sensible' instructed a solicitor and is happy and doing A-levels. The child told the court: 'I live in two opposite worlds — one in my household, where I am seen as less than, and the other outside the home where I am calm and grounded.' Case adjourned until a later date.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Parents of 17-year-old launch High Court battle to stop teen changing gender
THE parents of a 17-year-old have launched a High Court bid to block their child from changing gender. They took the highly unusual move after the child forged their mother's signature to get hormone replacement therapy on the NHS. The teen was born a boy but identifies as a girl and is being backed in court by their GP. The parents insist the child lacks the mental capacity to consent to the treatment. In court papers they say no proper assessment of the teen's mental and physical health has been done. They also fear grave psychiatric harm if the child is allowed to continue with 'an inappropriate, negligently given, life-altering treatment'. The case is believed to be the first of its kind. The parents are separately seeking a judicial review of the GP's role in prescribing HRT. The Royal College of GPs previously stated medics should not prescribe gender-affirming hormones to patients under the age of 18. The child, who lives with their parents, started HRT last October, ahead of a referral to specialist gender services. London's High Court was told treatment began four weeks after the child forged their mum's signature on a self-assessment form. Keir says 'woman is an adult female' & insists he's 'pleased' by court trans ruling after years of woke dithering Mr Justice MacDonald said the child 'emphasises the law gives her permission to make her own decision'. The court heard the child, described as 'eloquent, articulate, and sensible' instructed a solicitor and is happy and doing A-levels. The child told the court: 'I live in two opposite worlds — one in my household, where I am seen as less than, and the other outside the home where I am calm and grounded.' Case adjourned until a later date. 1
Daily Mail
15 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people
Labour support for legalising assisted dying appears to be falling as more MPs publicly question the law change. The Commons will next week debate changes to the plan to allow terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. But fresh concerns have been raised about the The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that is being led through Parliament by backbencher Kim Leadbeater. Opponents have complained the Bill does not have enough protections and has been rushed through, with the criticism coming days after two royal medical colleges voiced their doubts on the legislation in its current form. And now even supporters of the principle of legalising assisted dying are questioning the process. Labour MP Markus Campbell-Savours, who voted for the bill in a preliminary vote last year, told the BBC he now planned to vote against it because in its current form it crossed his 'red lines for protecting the vulnerable'. 'I want to see safeguards that will ensure that assisted dying is not overextended to include those in situations where there are alternative ways to improve the quality of their lives,' said Campbell-Savours. 'I would also be very concerned if legislation produced a situation where people who considered themselves a burden on their families and friends felt pressured to end their life.' The Commons will next week debate changes to the law allowing terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. And fellow Labour MP Josh Fenton-Glynn told the broadcaster he will vote against the bill, having abstained last year. 'We see quite a few of the amendments which are specifically aimed at stopping coercion being opposed by the supporters of the bill,' he said. 'I don't think chances to make the bill safer have been taken.' At the end of November last year, the Commons backed the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill by 330 votes to 275, a majority of 55 votes. But campaigners believe enough have changed their mind to put its chances of becoming law onto a knife-edge. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The terminally ill person would take an approved substance, provided by a doctor but administered only by the person themselves. The implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years from royal assent, rather than the initially suggested two years. If the Bill was to pass later this year that would mean it might not be until 2029, potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's parliament, that assisted dying was being offered. A Government impact assessment published last month estimated that between 164 and 647 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10. The establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million to £13.6 million per year, the document said. It had 'not been possible' to estimate the overall implementation costs at this stage of the process, it added. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years.
