logo
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge gives me battery anxiety. Here's the proof.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge gives me battery anxiety. Here's the proof.

C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
When we first picked up the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, we marveled at its delicately thin frame. However, our wonder quickly turned to concern once we saw the phone's 3,900mAh battery capacity. That's not tiny, but it's a pretty conservative cell for a 2025 flagship smartphone, especially one as tall and wide as the Galaxy S25 Plus.
For comparison, the S25 Plus houses a sizable 4,900mAh cell, while even the compact Galaxy S25 nudges ahead of the Edge with 4,000mAh. But it's also worth noting that the Edge features a larger display with a higher QHD resolution and a more demanding 200MP camera — factors that could all draw more power than those in the regular S25.
Samsung itself claims the Edge should have battery life somewhere between the Galaxy S24 and S25, but our testing has found this to be rather optimistic. Let's take a look at the results from our automated battery longevity tests, all conducted at a consistent display brightness of 300 nits. For comparison, we also tested both models of the S24, as well as the S25 and S25 Plus.
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Unfortunately, the Galaxy S25 Edge underperforms across the board. It clocks fewer minutes than the Galaxy S25 in every test and fares worse than the Galaxy S24 series in most categories — except for our Zoom call test, where it beats the Snapdragon version of the Galaxy S24. It also matches the Exynos model in the 4K recording and Zoom tests. The only consistent result across the board is in camera capture time, where all phones performed similarly. Otherwise, the performance gap is significant and well outside the margin of error. The Edge's battery life is clearly inferior to its siblings.
In fact, the Edge's real-world battery life is far worse than the seemingly minor 100mAh difference with the compact Galaxy S25 would suggest. On average, I calculate a roughly 20% reduction in video recording and playback longevity compared to the regular S25, and 27% worse performance in Zoom call duration. Web browsing fared a bit better, with only about an 8% decline, but that's still worse than the battery size would lead you to expect.
The Edge's beefier specs drain the 3,900mAh battery even faster than the S25.
Software optimization may play a role, but the Edge's larger, sharper display undoubtedly draws more power than the regular S25. Combined with the smaller battery, this is a recipe for disappointing screen-on time.
Ryan Haines / Android Authority
Setting aside the comparisons for a moment, let's focus on screen-on time itself. Based on our tests, the Galaxy S25 Edge delivers about four and a bit hours of constant content capture, seven to eight hours of moderate use (like web browsing and video calls), and up to 17 hours of offline 4K video playback. These figures aren't terrible in isolation, but fall an hour or two behind its siblings. And keep in mind that this is under ideal, out-of-the-box conditions. Add background tasks, heavy data use, or gaming, and things quickly deteriorate.
Cutting it fine is an understatement, there's no headroom for aging battery health here.
Samsung has built the Edge with a battery capacity that clearly cuts it very fine for a full day of use. While the Galaxy S25 Edge might manage modest usage today, consider how it will perform after two or three years, especially at a price point of $1,100. A modest decline to 90% of its original battery capacity after two years could already spell trouble; a drop to 80% will have you reaching for a charger before the day is over.
Additionally, we noticed the thin metal frame heating up frequently during use, which not only accelerates battery degradation but can also cause the battery to discharge inefficiently and increase self-discharge. This might explain why the phone seems to perform particularly poorly in demanding tests, like our Zoom call, and why Samsung has stuck to sluggish 25W charging again.
Either way, it didn't take a crystal ball to predict battery concerns with the Galaxy S25 Edge, but now we have the data to prove it. If you plan to keep your next phone for a few years, you might want to steer clear of Samsung's ultra-thin flagship.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Get a Google Pixel Fold for a mere $500!
Get a Google Pixel Fold for a mere $500!

Android Authority

time23 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

Get a Google Pixel Fold for a mere $500!

Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is fantastic, but not everyone needs the latest and greatest, especially when the retail price is a whopping $1,799. It's on sale right now, but it's still $1,499! I don't feel very good about spending that much on a phone, but $500? That sounds more like it. The previous-generation Google Pixel Fold is just $499.99 on Woot!, and it is still a pretty awesome phone! Buy the Google Pixel Fold for just $499.99 ($1,299.01 off) This offer is available from Woot!. You have to keep in mind that this is a refurbished device, but the deals website mentions that these units are in A+ condition. They are 'sourced from a returns program' and have been very lightly used. They are inspected and in perfect working condition. You'll even get a 12-month warranty! There is a limit of three units per customer. Google Pixel Fold (Refurbished) Google Pixel Fold (Refurbished) Google enters the fold Google is hitting the foldables market in style with the Google Pixel Fold. The pricey book-style phone brings Google's elite photography smarts to the folding form factor, plus the Tensor G2 chip, an IPX8 rating for water resistance, and a huge 7.6-inch AMOLED 120Hz internal display. See price at Woot! Save $1,299.01 If you can get past the fact that these are refurbished, you are in for a really nice deal. Before the Pixel 9 Pro Fold launched, the Google Pixel Fold was among the best foldable phones. While there is a newer model now, that is all that's changed! The Google Pixel Fold is still a nice foldable handset. It looks and feels great, offering an aluminum frame and Gorilla Glass Victus construction. Of course, the highlight here is that large internal display, which measures 7.6 inches. This is an OLED panel with a 2,208 x 1,840 resolution and a smooth 120Hz refresh rate. And if you don't feel like unfolding the phone all the time, you can use the external display, which measures 5.8 inches. It has a Full HD+ resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate. Pixel Fold While it is older, the performance is still pretty good, thanks to the Google Tensor G2 and 12GB of RAM packed inside. The one downside is that it only has a three-year update promise, so it should get up to Android 16. That said, that still gives it a couple of years of life or so. Not to mention, it did get a security update promise of five years, which means it will stay secure for much longer. Because it is a Pixel, you'll get a clean UI and some really nice Pixel-exclusive features. It also has a decent camera system, and during our tests, we were able to easily get about a full day of battery life on a full charge. This is a really affordable way to get into the foldable smartphone game. So make sure to sign up for the offer while you can! I am honestly considering it, too.

Generative AI Rewriting The Rules Of Retail
Generative AI Rewriting The Rules Of Retail

Forbes

time37 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Generative AI Rewriting The Rules Of Retail

Generative AI is quietly rewriting the rules of brand discovery and consideration. Large Language Models now guide shoppers through every step of the journey—surfacing options, comparing features, and even narrowing choices—often without the consumer noticing. While the share of purchases influenced by these AI 'concierges' is still small, it's growing at a remarkable pace. Brands that learn how to show up in this new, AI-curated path-to-purchase will be best positioned to fill (and widen) the top of the funnel. Accenture's Consumer Pulse Survey 2025 shows nearly one in ten consumers already rank the technology as their most trusted source of what to buy. And over a third of active users—defined as people using gen AI tools at least weekly for personal and/or professional reasons—consider it 'a good friend'. It signals a huge shift in consumer attitudes. But it doesn't end there. As the technology advances, it's not only able to advise shoppers, but, increasingly, can carry out tasks on their behalf. This is the true promise of agentic AI. Big picture? From the moment a question is asked of a chat-based assistant to the final decision on a product, gen AI is taking on the role not only of search engine, but a full-service concierge for the modern shopper. Disruption, yes, but also opportunity For retailers and consumer brands, this is both a challenge and an invitation. Do nothing, and risk being misrepresented—or worse, left out of the conversation altogether. It's why actively engaging with the consumer LLM ecosystem is non-negotiable. It's also important to look beyond the short-term disruption and focus on the deeper revenue opportunity. Accenture's Consumer Pulse Survey reveals consumers are 1.7 times more likely to accept a higher price point from a brand that delivers emotionally or experientially engaging experiences. The implication is clear: when AI curates experiences that feel personal, relevant, and timely, it opens the door to deeper relationships and greater revenue streams. Becoming discoverable The ecosystem around gen AI is already forming. It's not just the foundational models themselves but also the interfaces, data sources such as product catalogs and customer reviews, and partnerships that define how a brand shows up in AI-mediated interactions. For example, when a customer asks, 'What's the best moisturizer for sensitive skin under $50?' AI's response is not only shaped by historical information from the public internet but increasingly live product data—specifications, ratings, availability, and even brand sentiment. As consumers increasingly think of LLMs as trusted personal shoppers, brands must reimagine their digital strategy. This means allowing the LLM ecosystem to find you in terms of products, inventory, and even prices. Gone are the days of locking down your digital website to not allowing 'scraping' if you want to be recommended and served up by these shopping agents. Get it right and your brand becomes not just discoverable but recommended. Not just included but prioritized. Welcome to the Recommendation Era Search is giving way to suggestion. Retailers now have the opportunity to embed branded, AI-powered advisors directly into their own channels. Instead of forcing shoppers to hunt for SKUs on your website, invite them to ask real questions: 'what should I wear to a summer wedding?' or 'which after-school snack is the healthiest for my kids?' Generative AI can listen, reason with your product and customer data, and deliver tailored answers in seconds. Curating these conversational experiences today will define how customers discover, trust, and buy from you tomorrow. Gen AI-powered store staff Amid all the excitement around digital commerce, it's important not to overlook another of gen AI's profound impacts: the in-store experience. Armed with AI copilots, retail associates can now spend less time on repetitive tasks—inventory checks, scheduling, and so on—and more time engaging customers. In this way, LLM-powered automation isn't just about driving efficiency. It's about elevating empathy. And strengthening job satisfaction. When store staff have instant access to product knowledge, customer preferences, and contextual prompts, they become more effective. They can turn their stores into curated, personalized, consultative sales channels; more showroom, less storeroom. It's a win-win for employees and consumers alike. Gen AI: Commerce's Next Storefront Generative AI isn't just another tool—it's the new nervous system of commerce, wiring together discovery, comparison, and conversion while rewarding brands that speak with relevance, clarity, and purpose. Falling behind isn't inevitable, but inaction is risky. Today's large-language-model platforms are hard-wiring tomorrow's shopping habits, and the companies feeding those models now will reap the rewards later.

Watch Live as Japanese Startup Attempts Moon Landing After Failed First Mission
Watch Live as Japanese Startup Attempts Moon Landing After Failed First Mission

Gizmodo

timean hour ago

  • Gizmodo

Watch Live as Japanese Startup Attempts Moon Landing After Failed First Mission

The Resilience lander has spent the past six months traveling to the Moon, with plans to touch down in its far northern region. Japanese company ispace is aiming for a Thursday landing—its second attempt to reach the lunar surface. Resilience is set to land on June 5 at 3:24 p.m. ET, aiming for a smooth touchdown near the center of the Mare Frigoris region (which roughly translates to the sea of cold). The landing attempt will be streamed live on ispace's YouTube channel, beginning around one hour before the scheduled touchdown. You can also tune in through the feed below. Tokyo-based ispace launched its second mission to the Moon on January 15. Resilience hitched a ride along with another lander headed to the Moon. Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost landed on the Moon on March 2, while Resilience took a much longer route. Resilience first operated in an elliptical transfer orbit before using a lunar flyby to move into a low-energy transfer trajectory that will then enable it to attempt a soft landing. The lander has successfully checked off all of its orbital maneuvers and will remain in a low lunar orbit until the big day, according to ispace. For its landing attempt, Resilience will automatically fire its main propulsion system to gradually decelerate and adjust its altitude to begin descent from its current orbit toward the lunar surface. The Resilience lander is carrying a small rover, named Tenacious, to Mare Frigoris, located in the Moon's far northern regions. It's also packed with science instruments, mainly from commercial space ventures in Japan, designed to explore the lunar surface. This is ispace's second attempt to land on the Moon, although the first was unsuccessful. In April 2023, the Hakuto-R Mission 1 (M1) Lunar Lander plummeted towards the Moon and crashed on its surface. The company later revealed that, during the lander's descent toward the lunar surface, Hakuto-R estimated that it was very close to zero altitude when it was roughly 3 miles (5 kilometers) above the surface. As a result, the lander slowed itself down during its descent, eventually running out of fuel and free-falling onto the Moon. Hakuto-R M1 was carrying both commercial and government-owned payloads, including a tiny, two-wheeled transformable robot from the Japanese space agency. Members of the Japanese startup are optimistic about their second go at a Moon landing. 'We have leveraged the operational experience gained in Mission 1 and during this current voyage to the Moon, and we are confident in our preparations for success of the lunar landing,' Takeshi Hakamada, founder and CEO of ispace, said in a statement. The Moon has claimed a number of landers in the past few years as more commercial companies attempt to touch down on its rough surface. Texas-based startup Intuitive Machines crashed not one, but two landers, with both Nova-C and Athena ending up lying on their sides.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store