logo
The FA stopped me playing football because I'm trans

The FA stopped me playing football because I'm trans

Metro01-05-2025

This morning, I received an email from the Football Association (FA) – along with approximately 19 other trans women football players – that means I can no longer play the game I love.
Instead, they offered me six free sessions of online talking therapy, then suggested: 'You might be willing to consider moving your enjoyment of affiliated football into coaching or being a match official.'
It came about after the organisation announced it was banning transgender women from playing women's football in England, starting from June.
Obviously, the first feelings that came was pain, sadness, and finally anger – fuelling a desire for change.
The FA's ruling is wrong, hypocritical, and a return to the dark ages when women's football was mistreated or even banned.
I came out as trans six years ago at 24.
Coming from a Catholic family in France, it was quite hard at first, but my partner at the time and my siblings supported me greatly. Eventually, my parents came around too and are now fully supportive.
I started hormones a little later and, today, I feel like my body is in a good place and I like the person I see in the mirror.
With thousands of members from all over the world, our vibrant LGBTQ+ WhatsApp channel is a hub for all the latest news and important issues that face the LGBTQ+ community.
Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications!
Dear Fae,
We are writing to you today because we have made the decision to change our policy regarding your participation in women's football.
We have considered the Supreme Court's ruling and taken legal counsel, the outcome of this for the FA means that transgender women can no longer play in the women's game in England from the 1st June 2025.
This is not a decision that we have taken lightly, and we know that this news will be deeply disappointing. In the immediate aftermath of this news to help support you through this, we have partnered with Sporting Chance to provide you with free, fully confidential, online talking therapy with specially selected therapists, should you wish to do so. Up to six sessions can be provided to you and to do this you simply need to contact Sporting Chance by email at support@sportingchanceclinic.com
It is our hope that you will still want to stay involved in the game. Our mixed football format is currently being developed, whilst it is in this phase there are several pilots taking place and depending on where you live, we may be able to help you get involved with these. We are hopeful that from the season after next this format will be more readily available across England. Or you might be willing to consider moving your enjoyment of affiliated football into coaching or being a match official, we welcome that and there are routes to do this. If you are interested in such opportunities, please speak to your local County FA who can discuss these opportunities with you.
We do understand that this will be difficult for anyone who simply wants to play the game they love, so if you would like to speak to us about this, and explore further support, then please do not hesitate getting in touch by replying to this email.
The FA
Around 11, I fell in love with football during the 2006 Champions League Final, where Arsenal took on Barcelona in Paris. A couple of months later, I subsequently watched France heartbreakingly lose the World Cup final to Italy.
My love of the game translated to the pitch and I started playing then too.
I moved to the US and found myself playing there throughout my teens and early 20s, mostly for fun.
But when I started transitioning, I stopped altogether. I became really uncomfortable playing with men and I was really scared of joining a women's team for fear of rejection.
I just wanted to play a game I loved, for fun with my peers, but I was hesitant.
Eventually, after moving to the UK in 2019, I discovered Clapton Community FC in London in a mixed community tournament who told me about Open Access, an amazing inclusive space for women and non-binary people who are beginners or returning to football.
I jumped at the opportunity.
It felt so good to play again in a judgement-free and supportive environment. Eventually, I joined the Clapton CFC women's team and played with their development team, until my hormone levels were in the right place for first team football.
I then moved to Hackney Women's in the same grassroots division, the London and South East Division One North where I truly thrived as a player.
Throughout it all, no matter what team I've played with, or who I play against, my teammates and my opponents have always been extremely supportive of me as a trans woman. I have never had a remark or issues with anyone on the pitch.
Then I got the email this morning that will change my life.
The FA told me that transgender women can 'no longer play in the women's game', offering to provide 'free, fully confidential, online talking therapy with specially selected therapists'. The most dreadful part was suggesting I consider becoming a coach or a match official while a 'mixed football format is currently being developed'.
It's clear to me that the FA didn't speak to women football players. It also didn't ask trans women – or the cis women that play with them – how they felt, but instead used a single court decision to cave pressure from politicians who use my identity as a political football.
It could and should have shown moral leadership instead.
As far as I know, there are only 20 FA-affiliated trans women players in England out of 2.5million women players. It is a ridiculous number.
I say to everyone who thinks we are a threat or taking up undue space: how come there are only 20 of us, and how come we don't all play for the top teams in the Women's Super League? It's because – like any other player – trans women come in all shapes and sizes, strengths, and abilities.
For me, this decision is yet another example of how society refuses to see us as the women we are.
The time has come for people to actually open their eyes and see that there are trans women in all parts of society and that we pose a threat to no one. We want to live our lives, to be accepted for who we are, and not who you think we should be. More Trending
I hope that the FA will be able to recognise that this decision was taken in the heat of the moment and change their minds.
At the end of the day, banning trans women is something I don't see from anyone who is actually playing the sport. It is deeply harmful to every woman who plays football and does nothing for the benefit of the game we all love.
In 1921, the FA banned women's football for 50 years, so we know that 'For All' doesn't always mean it – let's not go back to that dark time.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing James.Besanvalle@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Gossip about Sydney Sweeney and her co-stars is sexist
MORE: Best things to do in London this long weekend including Cinco de Mayo celebrations
MORE: America's place in the world has crumbled with shocking speed under Trump

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Women's final abandoned over safety amid Palestine protest, says club
Women's final abandoned over safety amid Palestine protest, says club

BBC News

time3 hours ago

  • BBC News

Women's final abandoned over safety amid Palestine protest, says club

A women's regional cup final was abandoned over "a perceived risk to safety" when fans refused to remove flags and banners showing support for Community were playing Dulwich Hamlet Reserves in the final of the London and South East Women's Regional Football League (L&SERWFL) Trophy, which was hosted at Gallagher Stadium, the home of National League South men's side Maidstone of both sides displayed pro-Palestinian flags and banners for the game on Sunday, amid the ongoing conflict with game kicked off as scheduled but after 20 minutes, with Clapton leading 2-0, the match was paused after a request for the flags and banners to be moved was rejected. Maidstone United issued a statement, external that said "the match was abandoned by league and match officials, in consultation with the stewarding team, for reasons of a perceived risk to safety and with regard to clear stadium regulations and FA guidelines."This was because spectators refused requests to remove non-football related banners and flags."Maidstone United is a football club serving the local community. Ensuring a peaceful and safe environment for spectators in the stadium is a priority. The club does not engage in politics of any kind."Ground regulations typically ban flags and banners which carry political messaging, in line with guidance from governing bodies Fifa and Football Association rules, clubs can be sanctioned if fan behaviour is deemed improper or has the potential to ground regulations refer to the banning of flags and banners if they can be used as weapons, or "interfere with the viewing of spectators", though go on to say spectators should follow FA and National Football League rules and regulations, and not conduct actions which "could reasonably be construed as, constituting a source of danger, nuisance or annoyance to any other person".Football's laws of the game prohibit political messaging on kits and equipment, and it is not uncommon for this principal to be applied more widely.A statement from Clapton issued after the game said management at the venue objected to the presence of a Palestine flag among their support and a banner displayed by the Dulwich player Tammy Hymas told BBC Sport: "An official from Maidstone came on the pitch and said the game had to stop, as they no longer consented to the stadium being used while political material was present."The game was stopped. As I understand, there was a suggestion the match could continue behind closed doors, with no fans."As a team we refused that offer, we said we wanted to show solidarity, so we went into the stands and joined the fans."Hymas added the action had the support of Jewish members of the club's fanbase who were present at the Clapton supporter, who wanted to be known as Max, said: "When the match was abandoned, Dulwich Hamlet supporters came over to stand with us, and for a moment, it felt genuinely powerful. I've never seen something like it in football - it was beautiful. As a Jewish supporter of Clapton CFC, I feel proud of what the team and the fans stood for."I had so many emotions. At first I was shocked - it just seemed absurd. We were there to watch football. The players wanted to continue. The fans wanted to continue. The responsibility lies with the stadium - and I'll be asking for my money back."After an announcement at Gallagher Stadium saying the match was abandoned, a joint protest took place outside the stadium with both Dulwich and Clapton Community, which describes itself as "a members-owned, members-run football club", said in a statement, external that "32 women were denied the opportunity to play the L&SERWFL Trophy final".It said players and fans were "united in their support and concern for Palestinians" and added: "Showing that support with a flag or banner is no reason to abandon a cup final."Dulwich Hamlet chairman Ben Clasper said in a statement, external that his club had "seen no evidence that our fans have behaved in any way other than the peaceful and dignified manner that we would expect from them, in accordance with the values of our club and that the banners on display were not new, are not in breach of any laws or rules and have been to many games before this final".He added: "We are very disappointed that the L&SERWFL Trophy final has ended in this fashion, and we look forward to a full explanation as to how this was allowed to happen."The London FA told BBC Sport it was "gathering all relevant information and working closely with the appropriate parties".It added: "As this matter is ongoing, we will not be making any further comment at this time."

EXCLUSIVE Non-league football in TURMOIL: Clubs hit out at 'unjust' punishments which have ruined title charges and RELEGATED teams... as FA admits system is built on 'outdated' tech
EXCLUSIVE Non-league football in TURMOIL: Clubs hit out at 'unjust' punishments which have ruined title charges and RELEGATED teams... as FA admits system is built on 'outdated' tech

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Non-league football in TURMOIL: Clubs hit out at 'unjust' punishments which have ruined title charges and RELEGATED teams... as FA admits system is built on 'outdated' tech

Non-league clubs across England are in uproar against an 'unjust' system which sees them punished for fielding ineligible players - despite being 'unaware' they're suspended. Title battles and relegation scraps have been settled by points deductions, with at least 13 clubs from the seventh to 10th tiers of English football directly impacted. Teams claim that a faulty FA admin system fails to notify them when a player is suspended for misconduct in Sunday league, which carries over into non-league. This has led to clubs fielding players who are banned while apparently unaware of it, only to be hit with points deductions and fines months down the line. The Whole Game System (WGS), the portal which deals with the admin, is being replaced next season after the FA admitted it is 'built on outdated technology which can no longer keep up the requirements of our users'. Mail Sport has spoken with insiders at multiple teams who feel let down, while sources fear other clubs have got away with the same offence not being flagged. The stance of leagues and the FA? Take more care - you're responsible for your players. The firecest battle involved Lydd Town, which is seeing lawyers wade in. Lydd are protesting a four-point deduction which will see them relegated from the Southern Counties East League Premier Division, the ninth tier of football. Relegation would mean expulsion from the FA Cup, a mass exodus of players, and a drop in attendances, the club says. Manager Ryan Smith is taking their case to an FA hearing at Wembley on June 13 to try and get it overturned. If that happens, Snodland Town would be relegated instead. 'We're being punished off the pitch for something beyond our control. This isn't just a points deduction—it's a betrayal of the game's integrity,' Smith told Mail Sport. 'The highest level we've ever reached—the FA Cup—is now at stake. We will not be silenced; we will not back down. We'll fight this injustice with everything we've got—for the players, the fans, and our club.' Lydd had played Charlie Dickens in seven matches despite the fact he was suspended from all football for a misconduct charge he picked up in Sunday league. Smith argues they were never made aware of the situation and Dickens' Sunday league side, Egerton, even wrote to the league to accept responsibility and admit they never told the player of his suspension. 'Never in 25 years have we had a charge for playing an inelegible player until now,' Smith added over the phone. 'We won 14 games out of our last 18 and were celebrating a great escape. But we only found out (about the punishment) three days before the end of the season.' The league's disciplinary commission disagreed and were 'satisfied' that the suspension would have been showing on the Whole Game System for multiple weeks. This is one of many cases, though in most the clubs have backed down. Lydd Town were the only club who would speak on the record. There is also a fear that other sides have committed the same offence but gone unpunished. An anonymous source well acquainted with football in Kent describes one situation where the league only became aware an ineligible player had featured because they were notified by a man walking his dog who recognised him. In the Combined Counties Premier League South, also the ninth tier, Jersey Bulls and Redhill have missed out on the title after points deductions. AFC Whyteleafe have been promoted on 95 points, with Jersey Bulls and Redhill being made to settle for play-off positions on 93 after being docked three each. Jersey Bulls mistakenly played Toby Ritzema in a 4-0 win against Tooting and Mitcham after misunderstanding a suspension. They voluntarily forced him to sit out for two matches beforehand after he reached 10 yellow cards, with one of those coming in the FA Vase. The FA admitted earlier this season that the Whole Game System was unfit for purpose Clubs hit with points deductions Seventh tier (non-league step three) Isthmian League - Premier Division: Cray Valley -3 Eighth tier (non-league step four): Northern Premier League East Division: Grimsby Borough -3, Brighouse Town -3 (relegated as a result) Southern League South Division: Tavistock (-1) Ninth tier (non-league step five): Combined Counties League Premier Division South: Jersey Bulls -3 (missed out on title), Redhill -3 (missed out on title) Northern Counties East League Premier Division: Albion Sports -3 (missed out on play-offs) Southern Counties East League Premier Division: VCD Athletic -1, Lydd Town -4* (relegated if FA appeal fails) Tenth tier (non-league step six): Northern League Division Two: Bedlington Terriers -3 (relegated anyway) Northern Counties East League Division One: Dronfield Town -3 (relegated anyway), Appleby Frodingham -3 (relegated anyway) Southern Counties East League First Division: Rochester United -6 *Seventh-tier Matlock Town have also been deducted three points and are relegated, but Mail Sport understands this was not related to the Whole Game System. But the FA Vase booking did not actually count towards his total of 10, so when he did subsequently reach that threshold, the club were unaware and played him against Tooting and Mitcham. Redhill have been punished for the same offence and therefore Whyteleafe, who finished third, have been promoted. Elsewhere, Albion Sports have missed out on the play-offs of the Northern Counties East League Premier Division, while Brighouse Town have been demoted from the Northern Premier League East Division, both after three-point deductions. Mail Sport contacted both to clarify the circumstances which have led to their docks, but neither got back. A tenth-tier club, Rochester United of Southern Counties East Division 1 (SCEFL 1), accepted a six-point deduction with 'disappointment' after twice fielding Max Morgan - despite not knowing a ban had crossed over from Sunday league. The club wrote: 'Rochester United at all times have never sought to deny that the player played, our mitigation has always been that we never knew he was suspended, a fact that was examined in detail and found credible by an independent FA Disciplinary Panel back in January. 'Sadly SCEFL declined to hear the same body of evidence despite repeated offers, gave misleading information on the appeals process, and generally thwarted all discussions on the fallibility of notification systems that are being retired at the end of this season.' Mail Sport has contacted the Kent FA for comment. An FA spokesperson told Mail Sport: 'The Whole Game System successfully administers football across over 900 leagues, 18,000 clubs, and 1.5 million players annually. 'Whilst suspensions are administered via the system, clubs are ultimately responsible for checking the status of suspensions and any cards issued are processed in accordance with FA Rules and Regulations.'

West Ham hit with huge fine for homophobic chanting by fans against Chelsea that was caught on video
West Ham hit with huge fine for homophobic chanting by fans against Chelsea that was caught on video

Scottish Sun

timea day ago

  • Scottish Sun

West Ham hit with huge fine for homophobic chanting by fans against Chelsea that was caught on video

The FA criticised both West Ham and Chelsea in its ruling HAMMERS RAP West Ham hit with huge fine for homophobic chanting by fans against Chelsea that was caught on video WEST Ham have been hit with a £120,000 fine after homophobic chants by fans during the Prem defeat at Chelsea in February. The Hammers were charged failing to control supporters in March for the 'mass chanting' of a number of visiting fans during the 62nd minute of the game at Stamford Bridge. Advertisement 1 West Ham have been fined £120,000 for homophobic chants Credit: Alamy FA beaks added that the chants were of a discriminatory nature, with West Ham admitting responsibility within four days of the charge being laid. Social media clips uploaded by traveling supporters were evidence of the concerted chants, lasting at least 40 seconds, directed at Chelsea players and fans. The three member FA disciplinary commission ruled: 'The evidence suggests there was a very significant number of West Ham supporters involved in the homophobic chanting. 'It can properly be categorised as 'mass chanting'. Advertisement 'This conclusion is supported by the fact that the post-match complaint was based on the chanting being clearly audible at the match and the video footage that depicts the chanting clearly and loudly by many West Ham supporters. 'The words used by the offending spectators referenced a negative attitude towards the LGBT+ community and a perceived association of that community with Chelsea FC. 30." In his letter to the panel, West Ham club secretary Andrew Pincher conceded there was an 'obvious risk of such offending behaviour' from travelling fans. Both clubs were criticised for failing to 'respond' to the homophobic chanting during the match. Advertisement This meant that 'none of the offending spectators were therefore identified, ejected and/or arrested for this behaviour'. The commission also ruled that any measures the Hammers had taken beforehand 'were plainly not adequate to prevent such abuse and then to detect a wide range of culprits'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store