Massive Study Links 15 Factors to Early Dementia Risk
While dementia is much more common in older adults, hundreds of thousands of people are diagnosed with young-onset dementia (YOD) each year, and an extensive study published in 2023 sheds some considerable light on why.
Most previous research in this area has looked at genetics passed down through generations, but here, the team was able to identify 15 different lifestyle and health factors that are associated with YOD risk.
"This is the largest and most robust study of its kind ever conducted," said epidemiologist David Llewellyn from the University of Exeter in the UK, when the results were published in December 2023.
"Excitingly, for the first time it reveals that we may be able to take action to reduce risk of this debilitating condition, through targeting a range of different factors."
The research team analyzed data collected on 356,052 people aged under 65 in the UK.
Low socioeconomic status, social isolation, hearing impairment, stroke, diabetes, heart disease, and depression were all associated with a higher risk of YOD.
Vitamin D deficiency and high levels of the C-reactive protein (produced by the liver in response to inflammation) also meant a higher risk, as did having two of the ApoE4 ε4 gene variants (a genetic scenario already linked to Alzheimer's disease).
The researchers described the relationship between alcohol and YOD as "complex".
While alcohol abuse led to an increased risk, moderate to heavy drinking correlated with a reduced risk – possibly because people in this second group are usually healthier in general (bear in mind that those who abstain from alcohol often do so on medical grounds).
Higher levels of formal education and lower physical frailty (measured through higher handgrip strength) were also associated with a lower YOD risk. This all helps to fill in some of the knowledge gaps around YOD.
"We already knew from research on people who develop dementia at older age that there are a series of modifiable risk factors," said neuroepidemiologist Sebastian Köhler from Maastricht University in the Netherlands.
"In addition to physical factors, mental health also plays an important role, including avoiding chronic stress, loneliness, and depression."
While the results don't prove dementia is caused by these factors, they help build a more detailed picture. As always in this kind of research, knowing more about the causes can help develop better treatments and preventative measures.
Many of these factors are modifiable, which offers more hope for those working to find ways to beat dementia rather than just manage it.
Ultimately, dementia may be something we can reduce the risk of by living healthier lives.
"Young-onset dementia has a very serious impact, because the people affected usually still have a job, children, and a busy life," said neuroscientist Stevie Hendriks, from Maastricht University.
"The cause is often assumed to be genetic, but for many people we don't actually know exactly what the cause is. This is why we also wanted to investigate other risk factors in this study."
The research has been published in JAMA Neurology.
A version of this article was first published in January 2024.
Mattresses Could Be Exposing Kids to Dangerous Chemicals While They Sleep
Just 15 Extra Minutes of Sleep Is Linked to Brain Benefits in Young People
Study Reveals The Optimal Number of Daily Steps to Offset Sitting Down
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
KLOTHO NEUROSCIENCE, INC. ANNOUNCES AN APPROACH TO INCREASE LONGEVITY AND HEALTHY LIFE SPAN - REPLACE A SILENCED GENE CALLED ALPHA-KLOTHO ("α-KLOTHO")
Recent clinical and pre-clinical studies and analysis indicates the potential to increase lifespan and reduce age-associated degeneration in multiple organ systems has be realized with a focus on the human gene called Klotho. NEW YORK, June 9, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: KLTO), a U.S.-based biogenetics company announced the findings of pre-clinical studies indicating the potential of elevating Klotho gene expression to simultaneously reduce the age-associated degeneration in multiple organs, increasing both life and health span. Pioneering discoveries by Professor Makoto Kuro-O in 1997 showed that Klotho concentrations in the blood were directly associated with lifespan of mammals – the lower the Klotho blood levels the shorter the lifespan. Kuro-O's laboratory then published the first evidence that genetic over expression of the full-length form of Klotho in mice, increased in lifespan of mice of up to 30%-40% longer compared to the normal mouse lifespan. Since then, the Klotho protein has gained much attention because of its ability to influence key biological pathways involved in metabolism, inflammation and tissue repair, which are closely linked to the aging process. A series of experiments led by Joan Roig-Soriano and colleagues, published in the February 2025 edition of Molecular Therapy, highlights the promising role of the naturally occurring secreted form of the Klotho protein ("s-KL") and its effects on healthy aging mice and mice with a rapidly aging phenotype. Key observations were that, while aging is a major risk factor for many pathologies, including cognitive decline, neuroinflammation, sarcopenia, and osteoporosis, the secreted protein s-KL has emerged as a potentially promising therapeutic anti-aging molecule due to its many biological effects involving multiple pathways related to cell injury, stress, and inflammation. The s-KL was administered using an adeno-associated virus serotype 9 delivery vector (AAV9) that expressed the secreted KL protein isoform and efficiently increased the concentration of s-KL in serum, resulting in a 20% increase in lifespan. Dr. Joseph Sinkule, the CEO of Klotho Neurosciences (KLTO) commented that "KLTO has secured an exclusive worldwide license for s-Kl from Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) and Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA) in Spain. As a result, we have the exclusive use of patents issued in the USA, Europe, and China covering a secreted splice variant of mammalian Klotho referred to as s-KL, as a treatment for neurodegenerative and age -related disorders. Professor Makoto Kuro-O is also a scientific advisor to KLTO. This recently published paper provides further credence to our development of s-KL as a treatment to reduce age-associated degeneration where, as a company, KLTO has a particular focus on neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. The results disclosed in the paper show the potential of elevating s-KL protein expression, resulting in the reduction of age-associated degeneration in multiple organs, increasing both life and health span". About Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: KLTO), is a biogenetics company focused on the development of innovative, disease-modifying cell and gene therapies using a protein derived from a patented form of the "anti-aging" human Klotho gene (s-KL), and it's novel delivery systems to transform and improve the treatment of neurodegenerative and age-related disorders such as ALS, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's disease. The company's current portfolio consists of its proprietary cell and gene therapy programs using DNA and RNA as therapeutics and genomics-based diagnostic assays. The company is managed by a team of individuals and advisors who are highly experienced in biopharmaceutical product development and commercialization. For more information, contact:Investor Contact and Corporate Communications - Jeffrey LeBlanc, CFOjeff@ Website: Forward-Looking Statements: This press release contains forward-looking statements. These statements are made under the "safe harbor" provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words "believe," "project," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "strategy," "future," "opportunity," "plan," "may," "should," "will," "would," "will be," "will continue," "will likely result," and similar expressions. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the forward-looking statements in this press release include descriptions of the Company's future commercial operations. Forward-looking statements are predictions, projections and other statements about future events that are based on current expectations and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause actual future events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this press release, such as the Company's inability to implement its business plans, identify and realize additional opportunities, or meet or exceed its financial projections and changes in the regulatory or competitive environment in which the Company operates. You should carefully consider the foregoing factors and the other risks and uncertainties described in the documents filed or to be filed by the Company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") from time to time, which could cause actual events and results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Copies of these documents are available on the SEC's website, All information provided herein is as of the date of this press release, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, except as required under applicable law. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Klotho Neurosciences, Inc.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) on Business Model Mastery's Substack. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on LLY. Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)'s share was trading at $765.68 as of 5th June. LLY's trailing and forward P/E were 62.30 and 35.09 respectively according to Yahoo Finance. A picture of a pharma technician preparing an IV injection of a biopharmaceutical product. Eli Lilly is no longer just a pharmaceutical giant—it's becoming a platform company that's reshaping the very structure of global healthcare. At the heart of this transformation is tirzepatide, a dual-action molecule marketed under separate brands for diabetes and obesity. This single drug now accounts for over a quarter of Lilly's total revenue, with the diabetes version generating $11.5 billion (up 330% YoY) and the obesity variant reaching $2.3 billion in its first year—a historic ramp-up. These are not just growth numbers; they're margin-rich results, with 85 %+ gross margins and minimal marketing spend due to entrenched trust among endocrinologists. Crucially, tirzepatide is protected by a fortress of patents through 2036 and beyond, giving Lilly a durable edge in two massive markets. Unlike peers, Lilly owns its injectable manufacturing end-to-end, having invested over $5.5 billion in internal capacity, giving it unmatched agility and control while rivals struggle with supply constraints. Its sales force and deep prescriber relationships, built over decades, have only grown more powerful thanks to a new direct-to-consumer platform that streamlines initiation and adherence. Meanwhile, the company is reinvesting aggressively, with $11 billion (24% of revenue) spent on focused R&D spanning Alzheimer's, oncology, and rare diseases. Its pipeline—anchored in metabolic, neurodegenerative, and immune disorders—builds on existing strengths, accelerating commercialization. Competition exists, but Lilly's molecule consistently outperforms, and its infrastructure outscales. With two-thirds of sales still U.S.-based, global expansion represents the next lever. In sum, Lilly's model—a convergence of science, scale, and system—positions it as more than a pharma company. It's a precision biology platform with extraordinary strategic depth and long-term compounding potential. Previously, we covered a bullish thesis on Eli Lilly (LLY) by Kontra on Substack in May 2025, which aligns with Business Model Mastery's analysis, emphasizing the company's leadership in obesity and diabetes care. Both highlight tirzepatide's explosive growth, margin strength, and Lilly's massive investment in capacity and R&D. Kontra focuses more on near-term financial results, pipeline expansion, and regulatory catalysts, while Business Model Mastery frames Lilly as a precision biology platform with structural advantages—like end-to-end manufacturing and patent longevity—that support durable outperformance. Together, they reinforce Lilly's status as a long-term compounder with deep moats and global runway. Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 119 hedge fund portfolios held LLY at the end of the first quarter which was 115 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the risk and potential of LLY as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. This article was originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Big Data Can Make America Healthier. How to Do It Right
Credit - Ezra Bailey—Getty Images Big data can help make Americans healthier, and the Trump Administration has stated—in its recently released Make America Healthy Again report and elsewhere—that building a national big-data platform is one of its primary goals. As scientists who use large data sets to study health, we're excited about its potential and the willingness of the federal government to invest in it, particularly since big data has been underutilized in the U.S. compared with other developed countries—and since the number of ways it can be used grows nearly daily. It's a huge opportunity. But there are lots of concerns when assembling sensitive health data and combining it with other sensitive data, like credit scores, tax records, employment, educational records, and more. Some of those concerns with the Administration's plans have already surfaced. The Administration's first goal of assembling big data to studying autism has left some worried that if used inappropriately, such data could lead to harm, rather than help, for those with autism. Others worry that big data could be used to perform and justify shoddy research that supports predetermined conclusions without adhering to rigorous scientific methods—a concern reinforced by the discovery that the Make America Healthy Again report cited non-existent sources to support its claims. So how can we reap the benefits of big data while minimizing its risks? Here are some guiding principles: The health care system already possesses health data on millions of Americans. Medical records are now almost always digitized, permitting doctors' notes, medical imaging, laboratory tests, insurance claims, and more to be linked (in theory) across doctors' offices, hospitals, nursing homes, and any other place people receive care. However, data collected about a patient in one setting often doesn't get connected to data from other settings—making it hard for researchers to get a full picture of what, exactly, is happening to each of us within the larger health care system. Read More: Gun Injuries of All Kinds Go Up During Hunting Season The federal government also has data on us that can be connected to health care data to answer important questions. For example, comprehensive and detailed data on Americans' occupations linked with health, insurance, and other data could help shed more light on relationships between our work and our health—helping to better answer curious questions like why taxi drivers are less likely to die from Alzheimer's disease or why female physicians don't outlive their male colleagues. The first step of making big data more helpful is to simply link the data—which, while possible, is difficult to accomplish without centralized effort. Once linkages have been made, data can be anonymized so that those studying sensitive questions aren't privy to confidential information about specific individuals. In addition to governmental data, many other sources of data can provide insights into our health. For example, smartwatches not only have data on how our hearts are beating (e.g., they can identify abnormal heart rhythms like atrial fibrillation), but they can also identify subtle changes in mobility that might be predictive of early neuromuscular diseases like Parkinson's disease. Meanwhile, grocery stores have data on the foods we eat, and with increasing interest in how diet affects our lives, these data could be linked to detailed measures of health. Read More: Could the Shingles Vaccine Help Prevent Dementia? Similarly, social-media platforms possess data that can offer insights into changes in our mental health, and through large-scale analysis of online photos could even identify, in real time, early visible markers of disease. These are moonshots, of course, and whether we want to use data in this way is an open question. But the potential to improve health could be large. Creating a way for scientists to link outside data to existing government and health data—while responsibly maintaining individual anonymity after the linkage—could open many novel research opportunities. Keeping all of these data sources organized, secure, and accessible to scientists is a tall order. Researchers who use big data often dedicate substantial resources to finding the data they need, organizing it, and ensuring its accuracy; the better the database is maintained, the easier it is for researchers to actually perform their analyses. The secure online platform where Medicare and other government health care data are currently accessed has been described by researchers as 'tedious and prone to system errors' and in need of major improvements. Meanwhile, security concerns have led the government to stop letting researchers store the data on their own secure servers, the easiest and most cost-effective way to actually work with the data. Access to Medicare data by researchers has become prohibitively expensive, costing about $30,000 a year or more for a single user to work on one project using the online platform. Read More: Why We Can't Rely on Science Alone to Make Public Health Decisions Proposals to drastically cut medical research funding have been reported, and if passed, these research funding cuts will come at the cost of discoveries to improve health that will never be made. High-quality research of any kind requires investment, whether it's in a biology lab under a microscope or working with data on powerful computers. A new data platform is only as valuable as researchers' ability to access it in a functional and cost-effective way. Any roadmap to designing a national data platform that links together health care and other sensitive data must consider the many valid concerns about collecting data in the U.S., including privacy concerns and how data will be used. The Pew Research Center finds that large majorities of Americans say they are concerned about how the government uses data collected about them (71%), while also admitting that they have little to no understanding of what the government even does with such data (77%). Here are some strategies—in addition to many of the cybersecurity and privacy safeguards already in place—to both protect the data and help earn the public trust: Mistrust and unease with government data collection is readily traceable to historical abuse of Americans' data (as well as recent allegations of improper access), so it's not surprising that many are wary of the Trump Administration's plans. Ensuring data cannot be weaponized by the government against individuals is perhaps the single biggest barrier to creating a useful database, but it can be done. Those currently using federal health care data must already undergo training and comply with very high data-security standards. Misuse of the data—such as even attempting to figure out the identity of an anonymous individual in the data—or failure to protect patient privacy can lead to criminal penalties. A platform of sensitive data without well-delineated restrictions on who can use it and what they can use it for is a recipe for problems. Other ongoing efforts by the Administration to compile data under the vague goal of 'increasing government efficiency' have been met with pushback and lawsuits from organizations concerned about data being used against members of the public. Current use of federal health data also requires researchers to provide the government detailed plans to justify the use of specific data. This allows the government to ensure that no more data than is needed to answer the specific question is provided to researchers. Read More: Why Do Taxi Drivers Have a Lower Risk of Alzheimer's? Researchers must also obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board prior to accessing and analyzing data, a second checkpoint. These boards, which exist in light of egregious failures of medical research ethics in the 20th century, help ensure that analyses are designed to minimize risk to patients—even if it is only their data, and not their bodies, at risk. Transparency into who is using this sensitive data and what exactly they are doing with it can engender trust between researchers and the American public. Just like researchers already do for clinical trials, those accessing the data platform should specify their plans in advance, and those plans should be easily and publicly available. Transparency around which data were accessed and what computer code was used to analyze it not only promotes trust, but such data- and code-sharing practices among researchers make it easier to appraise the quality of the work, identify mistakes, and root out misconduct. We can only assume that Americans' unease with governmental data use stems from knowledge that, as with all powerful tools, linked data has the potential to be used in potentially harmful ways. But when in the hands of qualified scientists using rigorous scientific methods and privacy safeguards, a robust real-world data platform like this could lead to new discoveries about how all of us can lead healthier lives. Contact us at letters@
