Big grocery wants Ontario to lift ban on 'private label' wine, beer
Social Sharing
Premier Doug Ford's next move to reform alcohol retail in Ontario could be allowing supermarket chains to sell their own private-label wine and beer, such as Costco's Kirkland Signature brand.
The government recently began consulting with the industry about making further changes to Ontario's rules on booze sales.
As part of the consultations, big grocery is lobbying for Ontario to end its ban on supermarkets selling their own-brand alcohol products, CBC News has learned.
Current provincial regulations prohibit grocery stores from selling any brands of beer or wine in which they have "a direct or indirect financial interest."
Small wineries in the province fear the consequences of lifting that ban.
"Allowing private label wine in grocery, big box and convenience stores would be a severe blow to Ontario's wine industry," said Michelle Wasylyshen, president and CEO of Ontario Craft Wineries, which represents more than 100 wine producers.
WATCH | How the LCBO makes money for the Ontario government:
Here's how the LCBO brings in $2.5 billion for Ontario annually
11 months ago
Duration 3:40
The LCBO earns nearly 80 per cent of its revenue from its retail outlets, all currently closed by strike, the corporation's latest annual report shows. CBC's Mike Crawley breaks down how the LCBO currently turns a profit and how things are expected to change with the Ford government's reforms — including the premier's plan to sell select alcohol in Ontario convenience and grocery stores.
Wasylyshen says while craft wineries deeply value their working relationship with the grocery stores, Ontario's private-label ban needs to stay in place so that locally-produced wines are not pushed out by the big supermarket chains.
"This is a black and white issue for us, backed by data and previous experience. There is no grey zone," she said in an email to CBC News.
B.C. also bans private-label sales
Canada's other major wine-producing province, British Columbia – where it's a $3.75 billion-a-year industry – also bans supermarkets from selling their own brands.
The Retail Council of Canada, which represents all the large supermarket and big-box chains including Costco, Loblaws, Walmart and Sobeys, says its members in Ontario are interested in selling their own brands of alcohol.
"Private label increases competition, lowering prices for customers, because brewers and vineyards need to indirectly compete with the lower retail prices of private label brands," said Sebastian Prins, the Retail Council's director of government relations for Ontario, in an email to CBC News.
Prins says the province's wine industry would remain protected by provincial regulations requiring supermarkets to allocate certain portions of shelf-space to Ontario-made products.
He also says private-label sales could benefit grape growers in Ontario because the retailers would be looking for new sources for their wine.
But with cross-border trade tensions remaining high, and the LCBO currently not stocking U.S. products, a spokesperson for Ford says private-label sales are not currently planned as part of the government's modernization of alcohol retailing.
'Supporting Ontario growers' is Ford's priority
"Our priority right now is supporting Ontario growers and supporting Ontario-made products," said Ford's director of media relations, Grace Lee.
The push on private-label sales comes less than a year after Ford sped up the timeline for allowing convenience stores to sell beer, wine and ready-to-drink cocktails. That move is costing taxpayers at least $612 million, including $225 million of compensation paid to the mega-breweries that own The Beer Store for the expanded retail competition.
In April, Ford announced a shift in pricing rules so that convenience stores now get their products supplied at a 15 per cent discount from the LCBO's retail price, giving them a potentially higher margin on wine and beer than grocery stores, whose discount remains at 10 per cent.
The Retail Council and the Canadian Federation of Independent Grocers wrote a joint letter to Ford last month asking for a number of changes to the province's booze marketplace, including the ability to sell private-label alcohol.
The chain and independent supermarkets also raised concerns about the mandate that all grocery stores selling beer and wine must start accepting returns of empty cans and bottles in 2026, a requirement not imposed on convenience stores.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
7 minutes ago
- National Post
Ottawa considering 'combination of approaches' to 20% military pay hike
OTTAWA — Defence Minister David McGuinty's office says it's considering a 'combination of approaches' to boosting pay for armed service members, including introducing retention bonuses for 'stress trades.' Article content 'This investment represents an almost 20 per cent increase to the overall CAF compensation envelope,' McGuinty's spokesperson Laurent de Casanove said in an email statement to The Canadian Press. Article content Article content 'The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces are actively working on how best to implement this investment, looking at options that include a combination of approaches such as retention bonuses for stress trades, increased starting salaries for junior members, and a broad-based salary increase.' Article content Article content While McGuinty's recent public commitment to grant the Canadian Armed Forces a '20 per cent pay increase' won praise within the defence community, it has also led to confusion — and some experts are saying they want to read the fine print. Article content Military pay scales are complicated and are based on rank, profession, deployment and other conditions. There are many ways to roll out a boost in compensation. Article content Charlotte Duval-Lantoine, a fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, said she thinks this will not amount to an across-the-board pay hike. Article content 'What is clear to me from this statement is that they are looking at all the options,' she said. 'We're still in that big question about what it looks like because a pay raise versus specialty pay versus an adaptation of the compensation package overall — not in salary — are not the same thing.' Article content Article content She said the way the pay pledge was communicated initially was 'risky' since the details were not readily available, and that has led to confusion among military members and expectations of a blanket pay hike. Article content Article content Gary Walbourne, former ombudsman for the Department of National Defence, called McGuinty's promise 'vague at best.' Article content 'There's nothing clear in this message,' he said. 'A 20 per cent increase overall to CAF compensation envelope, what does that mean? Is it coming in benefits? … Is it going be on a cyclical basis? What's the percentage increase? Is it based on seniority, rank, merit?' Article content The former watchdog for military personnel said it sounds like the Liberal government wants to implement a pay boost quickly, but 'the mechanisms that they apply to it is going to complicate it and once the bureaucrats get their hands on it, well, I can see a slowdown coming.' Article content If CAF members don't see a 20 per cent pay bump after the minister's announcement, he said, it will be 'deja vu all over again' for military personnel who have been let down in the past by lofty promises followed by implementation that 'sucks big time.'
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Hidden costs of home ownership that most people forget to budget for
Personal finance contributor Christopher Liew breaks down some of the most commonly forgotten costs of owning a home, so you can budget smarter, plan ahead, and step into homeownership with confidence. (gopixa / Getty Images) Christopher Liew is a CFP®, CFA Charterholder and former financial advisor. He writes personal finance tips for thousands of daily Canadian readers at Blueprint Financial. Are you planning to become a homeowner in the near future? One of the biggest mistakes that prospective buyers make is to focus solely on the estimated mortgage payment, while forgetting about the host of additional ownership expenses that can easily mount up to hundreds of extra dollars per month. Below, I'll break down some of the most commonly forgotten costs of owning a home, so you can budget smarter, plan ahead, and step into homeownership with confidence. It's not just about the mortgage A recent report from Equifax Canada showed that an increasing number of homeowners are missing their mortgage payments. This is something that you really want to avoid if you want to keep your credit in good standing. If you're a first-time buyer who's used to renting where you live, it's easy to start shopping for homes by their estimated mortgage price, the same as you may shop for apartments based on your monthly rental budget. When you make the jump from being a renter to a homeowner, though, you'll be required to take on the full financial burden of many of the same responsibilities that your landlord used to take care of on their dime. Overlooking these expenses can quickly stretch your budget and turn homeownership from a dream into a financial strain, trapping you in a living situation that you find difficult to afford. What is considered a hidden cost in home ownership? Each house is going to come with various associated expenses based on a number of factors, including: How old or new the home is What type of neighbourhood is the house in The property under and around the home The type of dwelling (condo vs house) Some properties are lower maintenance, while others require constant upkeep. With this in mind, here are the potential expenses to watch out for as you begin your home-shopping journey. 1. Home insurance Home insurance isn't legally mandated in Canada, but if you finance your purchase with a mortgage, your lender will nearly always require it, especially if your down payment is less than 20%. This protects their investment until you fully own the property On top of that, if your down payment falls below 20%, you'll also need mortgage loan insurance, often called CMHC insurance when provided by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. It's required by law for high-ratio mortgages (i.e., those with more than 80% loan-to-value) and allows you to borrow up to 95% of the purchase price 2. Property taxes Another inescapable expense is going to be your annual property tax. Failure to pay your property tax can result in your home being taken away by the government. The amount you'll be taxed is usually determined by the current estimated value of your property, which ca fluctuate significantly from one year to the next. 3. Everyday repairs If you live in a recently built home, you likely won't have too many repairs to worry about, and much of the building and appliances may be covered by a limited warranty if a hiccup occurs. However, if you live in an older home, you'll need to budget for maintenance and repairs such as: Plumbing leaks Electrical repairs Roof or window leaks Locks and door hinges Railings, banisters, and stairs If you're a DIY type of person with the tools, time, and knowledge to do your own repairs, you can save a lot of money here. If not, then you could easily find yourself paying $1,000 or more every year in simple household repairs. 4. Increased heating and cooling costs If you're coming from renting a small, well-insulated apartment, you're going to notice a sizable increase in your monthly heating and cooling costs. Larger homes require more power to heat and cool. There are a number of ways you can better insulate your home and reduce energy costs (some of which are also tax-deductible), but this is yet another expense you'll foot the bill for. 5. Roof replacement A classic shingle roof will typically need to be replaced every 10 to 15 years. When purchasing a house, it's a good idea to ask the realtor or seller when the last time the roof was replaced. Depending on how big the roof is, replacement can cost anywhere between $5,000 on the low end to $20,000 or more on the high end. 6. Pest control and prevention If you want to prevent a costly infestation, you'll want to periodically treat your home and property for pests. Compared to some of the other expenses on this list, pest control is more affordable. A pest control company will typically visit your home on a monthly or quarterly basis, spray a few pesticides, and be on their way in less than an hour. 7. Appliance upgrades Again, if you have a newer home, you likely don't need to worry about appliance upgrades. However, if you're purchasing an older home with older appliances, you need to weigh the possibility that appliances will need to be repaired or replaced in the near future. Most appliances such as refrigerators, dishwashers, stoves, washers, and dryers have an average lifespan of 10 to 15 years when well cared for, but each can cost upwards of $500 or more to replace with a brand-new unit. Finding the right home within your budget All in all, between various monthly expenses and building an emergency savings account for major repairs, you could easily end up paying an extra $300 to $500 per month in addition to your mortgage. This means that a home with a $2,500 mortgage could really end up costing you $3,000 or more each month, skewing your annual budget by $6,000 per year. Unlike renting, where you can easily downgrade and move to a cheaper unit at the end of your lease, you're stuck with your home and all of its expenses unless you want to go through the tedious and lengthy process of selling your home. To ensure you don't end up with more home than you can afford, create an estimated list of expenses for each home you're considering, and then add that to the estimated mortgage price. More from Christopher Liew:
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
If Canada is seeking an ideal nation-building project, it should invest in First Nations infrastructure
Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak is national chief of the Assembly of First Nations. At a time of growing global uncertainty – amid trade disruptions, rising inflation, climate change and international instability – Canada is looking for ways to strengthen its economy, create good jobs and build lasting resilience. Investing in First Nations infrastructure directly supports these national priorities and represents one of our greatest collective nation-building opportunities. Every person in Canada deserves clean water to drink, reliable infrastructure to support their families and a strong foundation to build a future. Yet for far too many First Nations, these basic needs remain out of reach owing to generations of underinvestment. According to the Assembly of First Nations' report "Closing the Infrastructure Gap," an estimated $349.2-billion is needed to bring First Nations infrastructure in line with the rest of Canada by 2030. Delays would only increase the cost and limit the potential returns. And there would be significant returns. Additional research, supported by the Conference Board of Canada, shows that improving First Nations infrastructure would generate $635-billion in economic output, boost GDP by $308.9-billion, and create 330,000 jobs annually across Canada over seven years. Prime Minister Mark Carney has even acknowledged the 'potential economic opportunity' of closing the infrastructure gap. On the campaign trail, Mr. Carney argued that doing so would, on its own, have a larger positive impact on Canada's economy than the negative effects of Donald Trump's tariffs, underscoring both the urgency and the scale of this opportunity. New federal legislation would cut internal trade barriers, advance 'nation-building' projects Beyond the economic data, these investments would also mean that children could sleep safely in their own homes, enjoy clean water in every community, use reliable transportation to access high-quality healthcare and education services, and take advantage of connectivity that allows young people to fully participate in Canada's economy. This would be nation-building in the fullest sense. First Nations are not waiting. Across the country, First Nations are already leading major nation-building projects, from the Clear Sky Connections broadband project linking 63 Manitoba First Nations, to new water systems in Listuguj Mi'gmaq territory, to the Squamish Nation's Sen̓áḵw housing project in Vancouver. These projects meet urgent needs while driving growth, clean energy, and digital connectivity that benefit the entire country. They show what's possible when communities have the resources to build. But to fully close the infrastructure gap nationwide, sustained federal investment is essential. Opinion: Canada needs to attract private investment in infrastructure – and Indigenous communities hold the key As governments put forward legislative proposals to advance major infrastructure projects, proposals that come at the expense of First Nations rights are not the path forward. Any development must respect inherent and treaty rights as recognized and affirmed by the Constitution, and must reflect the Crown's duty to consult and obtain free, prior, and informed consent, as affirmed in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. Today marks National Indigenous Peoples Day and the four-year anniversary of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. Yet instead of advancing reconciliation, Canada is pushing legislation like Bill C-5 without hearing from First Nations rights holders. At this week's AFN National Virtual Forum, leaders raised serious concerns about the bill's impact on First Nations rights. Chiefs called for that same urgency to be directed toward the infrastructure our communities actually need – homes, schools, clean water, roads and internet. Chartrand on Bill C-5: 'We do have to have consent from Indigenous rights holders' Fast-tracking development while sidelining rights-holders doesn't advance reconciliation – it undermines it. Attempts to override rights and exclude First Nations from decision-making reflect a narrow and incomplete vision of nation-building, and risk sidelining one of Canada's most transformative opportunities for shared prosperity. The path forward is not to build first and address rights later. True national interest requires full participation and consent of First Nations rights-holders from the start. Canada must prioritize sustained investments in First Nations-led infrastructure that strengthen community resilience and contribute directly to Canada's economic, climate and long-term sustainability priorities. By any measure, investments in First Nations infrastructure meet the definition of national interest. The government's own proposed framework includes priorities like economic growth, resilience and clean growth, all of which would be directly advanced by such investments. If Canada is serious about building a stronger, more secure and more prosperous future, let's start with fast-tracking the construction of new homes, modern schools and clean water systems in First Nation communities. Let's fast-track internet access, all-season roads and community infrastructure that has long been neglected. Let's work in true partnership, through full consultation, shared legislative development, and recognition that Canada's future is tied to the success of its First Peoples. That is how you build a country – by ensuring the foundations are strong for everyone. The future of Canada depends on it.
