
Cases of imported typhoid fever reach record high in Britain
Imported cases of typhoid fever have reached a record annual high in Britain, driven in part by the spread of a drug-resistant variant of the disease in Pakistan.
At least 702 imported cases of typhoid and paratyphoid fever, bacterial infections which can kill one in five if left untreated, were detected in 2024, according to data from the UK Health Security Agency.
The UKHSA did not say how many people had died as a result of the diseases, which typically causes fever, headache, fatigue and muscle ache, but can also lead to severe complications including internal bleeding in the digestive system.
The figures represent an eight per cent increase on the year before and the highest number recorded annually in modern times.
The vast majority of cases found in the UK are acquired in South Asia, in countries with poor sanitation and limited access to clean water – including India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, which have the highest rates of typhoid globally.
The disease is caused by Salmonella bacteria which spreads through contaminated food or water. Paratyphoid fever, a close cousin of typhoid, is caused by a different strain of Salmonella and can be harder to treat.
Cases of typhoid have increased worldwide over the last decade, due in large part to the rise of antibiotic-resistance – where bacteria develops the ability to resist the medicine used to treat them because of repeated exposure.
In Pakistan, a mutant strain of typhoid known as the XDR variant emerged and began to spread in 2016. It is resistant to almost all forms of treatment.
Of the roughly nine million people who contract typhoid each year globally, the vast majority are now infected by a drug-resistant strain.
While there is a typhoid vaccine, those at high risk of contracting the disease typically require a booster every three years to fight off the disease – something that can be difficult to get in low-income countries with weaker healthcare systems.
While most cases are now contacted abroad, typhoid was once a major public health issue in Britain, killing roughly 16,000 people every year in the 1800s.
The disease affected not only those in overcrowded slums and workhouses, but also in palaces – Prince Albert died of typhoid fever at the age of 42.
It is also not the first time Typhoid has crossed international borders – one of the most famous victims of the disease was an Irish cook, Mary Mallon, who infected hundreds of people on her emigration to America.
As an asymptomatic carrier of the disease, she unknowingly infected – and killed – swathes of people she worked alongside in domestic households on America's East Coast, as well as the wealthy families she cooked for.
The cook was eventually forced into quarantine by authorities, where she remained for 26 years until her death.
The term 'typhoid Mary' is now synonymous with the spread of the disease.
To prevent infection when travelling abroad, the UKHSA recommends washing your hands before eating and taking care to avoid unsafe water supplies. They also recommend vaccination, which is available at all GP surgeries.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Rotherham widower continues wife's epilepsy fundraising legacy
A widower from Rotherham has said he is determined to continue his wife's legacy raising awareness about the dangers of epilepsy, a year on from her Scott died in May 2024 of sudden death in epilepsy syndrome, a rare disorder affecting about one in 1,000 people with Scott said that before her death, his wife had campaigned for the charity Epilepsy Action, but often found people did not take the illness seriously, something he said "must change".Mr Scott said: "I want to get the message out there that this isn't trivial. This is serious." He said his wife had "fought to give epilepsy a fair hearing, but I don't think people really appreciated it"."After what's happened, it's now very difficult to argue with," he added. Ms Scott suffered her first epileptic seizure at school at the age of 12 while she was in front of a computer screen. She was later diagnosed with photosensitive epilepsy, also known as visually sensitive epilepsy, a condition where seizures are triggered by flashing or flickering 16, she also developed juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, a common form of epilepsy characterised by sudden muscle to Ms Scott's mum, Cairon Turner, it was a "frightening experience" for her daughter, but it never stopped her."She was a whirlwind and did everything she wanted to. She went on music tours abroad with school, she even went with her friend to Spain after GCSEs," she Turner said the prospect that epilepsy could end her daughter's life was something that she had considered, but refused to dwell upon."It's always at the back of your mind," she explained."Each time she had a seizure it was there, but we never spoke about it."A number of times we had the call and came tearing down here to her home and I wondered what we would find." Mr Scott, who works on the railways, said that since his wife's death he had been forced to take on the role of sole parent for his three-year-old son. He admitted that the "responsibility can weigh heavily" at times."It can be relentless. I still have to work full time and you can never switch off. Others can help but the buck stops here: he's my son," he said."I'm very aware he's already gone through such a lot, and making sure his life is the best it can be is now the most important thing to me."Mr Scott said he had gone on his own fitness journey in a bid to raise money for Epilepsy Action, losing four stone (25kg) in the said he also regularly ran 10 miles (16km) and swam three times a week, and planned to take part in The Great North Run to raise money for the charity in September."I'd rather I wasn't in this position," he said."But I feel a responsibility to carry on Jo's work and to try and get that message out there that this isn't trivial, this is serious, and it needs to be better understood."He added: "What I am trying to do is to do all I can to stop other families going through this." Epilepsy Action primarily supports people with epilepsy with a helpline and also offers a befriending and counselling Smith, the charity's CEO, admitted that "raising awareness without scaring people unnecessarily" was important."People can die from epilepsy, but it is still rare," she said."About 600,000 in the UK have epilepsy and every day three people die from sudden unexpected death in epilepsy - so that is something people need to be aware of."However, Ms Smith acknowledged epilepsy was still a mystery condition for many people."Because it's actually a range of conditions, people don't always take it as seriously as they should," she said."People know about flashing lights, but that's really only one small percentage." Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
I'm Ozempic curious, but women are being shamed whatever we do
Whether it's 'I'm on Ozempic', revealed in a hushed tone, or 'Are they on Ozempic?' in response to someone suddenly looking amazing, the whos, whats, and whys of the new 'skinny pen' have taken over our lives. I can hardly go to a dinner or a work event without being met with an 'Oh, I couldn't possibly' as I hand a sharing plate around. Friends and colleagues are suddenly not eating, not drinking, and not talking about anything apart from the effects of Ozempic or Mounjaro. It's infiltrated our lives so much that we don't even wait for confirmation anymore before letting ourselves speculate. Social media pictures are swapped and dissected to guess whether X's weight loss is due to an injectable. Anecdotes about hair falling out and muscle wastage are rapidly shared, alongside other stories of so-and-so looking and feeling amazing now that she has lost two stone. And it is leaving women like me more confused than ever. I'm very much someone who thinks 'each to their own, you do you' – but there is an effect on those of us not taking Ozempic. I've never been a typically 'skinny' girl. I've always had curves – and I've (for the most part) loved them. I've had moments where I've been so happy and comfortable with my body, loving how it looks – and other times when I'm so upset with my less-than-gazelle-like legs. I work in the food industry as a writer and love it (both the industry and the job itself). It's a genuine source of enjoyment for me, and whenever I've gone through stressful or sad moments in my life, I've never not wanted – or been able – to eat. Not eating, for me, signals desperation and joylessness, and I don't want that in my life. However, I'm also someone who can definitely eat: watch me at a buffet and you'll see – my appetite is not small, nor is it contained. And now, I do wonder if suppressing it slightly wouldn't be all that bad… I also think back to the difficult feelings of the 'nothing tastes as good as skinny feels' era in my teen years. I've always had a really healthy relationship with food, but I've also always known that I need to balance my largely healthy diet with exercise. It suddenly feels quite odd to be confronting these age-old qualms in my thirties. And I think this is because the conversation around Ozempic is no longer about whether someone is taking it – it's about why they're not. There is this creeping social commentary, a murmur you can feel more than hear: well, why wouldn't you, if you could? Why wouldn't you want to do what all these other people are doing – especially when they're dropping a dress size and looking 'better' and feeling great? And I am suddenly finding myself wondering if sticking my fingers down my throat is less damaging than injecting myself with a so-called weight-loss drug. As if questioning it internally wasn't damaging enough, Ozempic has now taken over the weight-loss conversation entirely. It's the topic du jour in an era where we aren't meant to judge body shapes (in particular, women's bodies). But while we strive to be kinder and live in a world where every body type is accepted – we suddenly find ourselves more obsessed and judgmental of other people's bodies and their choices than ever before. One young woman, who wishes to remain anonymous, shared that before taking Mounjaro, she was feeling miserable and that without it, the secret formula to being significantly smaller was essentially not enjoying life. 'A few of my friends were in a similar position to me and had already started taking Mounjaro, and they loved it. Not only did they lose weight, but they said they'd never felt better, which for me was really the point.' They recommended an online pharmacy that didn't require any photos. 'I was only one point off the 30 BMI required to buy Mounjaro at that point, so I thought, if everyone else is doing it, why not? I fudged the numbers and it arrived a few days later.' And the effects? She says, purely positive. 'After a year, I'm much happier – and much smaller. I've made some lifestyle changes: eating smaller portions, semi-regular exercise, lots of walking, and drinking a lot less. Many of those are side effects of the drug anyway.' She says all the 'food noise' has stopped and she is no longer counting every calorie or dealing with the feelings of obsession and shame around that, too. 'I feel less stressed knowing that if I've overindulged, it won't take me as long to rectify.' However, the stigma of relying on a drug to do this remains undeniable. 'Some [friends] have asked me why I went on it in the first place. My answer is simple: I did it for me, not anyone else. I didn't do it for a partner; I didn't do it because I was being brainwashed by social media. I've never had body dysmorphia or an eating disorder. I wanted to enter my thirties the healthiest I could possibly be, so I could avoid health issues in the future and live longer. 'I won't be on it forever… For me, this is a short-term fix, not a lifelong commitment. There's lots of scaremongering about regaining the weight when you come off it, but I'm not worried because I've had a few weeks off every now and then and have not seen any weight gain or change in my appearance.' The confidence Ozempic and other similar drugs bring is undeniable, which makes it even more unnerving for those like me standing on the sidelines. Women I know who are on it report that being lighter means they feel healthier – which means they feel happier, which probably shows. There's a strange, unspoken competitiveness in the air. The kind where a friend shows up three sizes smaller and you're hit with an involuntary pang of comparison, followed by a flurry of questions: did she stop eating? Is it Ozempic? She looks better, but does she actually feel better? Any side effects? Is her hair falling out? And, internally, you are left with the final haunting question: should I do the same? But even when those you know are boasting amazing results, there's still stigma and shame around it, so some people are still keeping their syringe secret. But the most damaging thing about it all is that we're not just talking about other people's bodies more than ever before – we're judging them, and ourselves, more harshly than ever. These drugs have created a whole new category of pressure – not just to be thin, but how you get there. It's like there's a hierarchy now: natural slimness, then skinny via 'clean eating', and then chemically assisted skinny. And people are shy about being in that last bracket because of the 'obesity drug' label, even if it's the most effective. It's not without a price, either. Only those with extreme weight or health problems are being prescribed these by NHS doctors. Others are forking out an average of around £250 a month – with some spending thousands on it and planning to be on it for life. It's no surprise that the maker of weight-loss drug Wegovy has recently become Europe's most valuable firm, dethroning the French luxury conglomerate LVMH. As women, we are used to being pressured – physically, emotionally, and socially. But this is a new kind of tightrope. One where you can't win either way As women, we're used to being pressured – physically, emotionally, and socially. But this is a new kind of tightrope. One where you can't win either way. Lose weight without Ozempic, and people assume you're lying. Lose weight with it, and you're accused of cheating. Stay the same, and suddenly you're questioning everything about your body. This pressure comes from friends and partners, too, even if unintentionally. As we comment more freely on other women's bodies and any noticeable changes in weight – even if we aren't directly suggesting slimming down – that's often the message that's received. We've gone back several steps when it comes to self-love and acceptance. I might say I love my curves, but I'd be lying if I didn't admit my brain is also hyper-fixated on the bloated food baby I'm nursing from my delicious dinner last night. And when someone shows off a toned body, I immediately question whether this was a legitimate workout and diet plan – or Ozempic. This isn't about health. It's about optics. Suddenly, being average-sized – a UK 12 or 14 – isn't acceptable; something can always be 'improved'. So... truthfully, we haven't come far at all and, like with many things relating to women, we seem to be going backwards. But this feeling isn't just limited to women. One man I know acknowledges the reason he doesn't talk about being on Ozempic is because of 'so much negative stigma of it being the cheater's way to lose weight' – it's not the Men's Health way of doing things. These drugs do make it easier and are easy to get hold of, but the complex feelings that come with them don't make it feel like an easy thing to do. This isn't a face serum. It's a drug with real consequences. One that hasn't been prescribed to most who are taking it, and yet some people are throwing it into their weekly routine like it's a new mascara. These drugs might be easier to access than a GP appointment – but there are many like me standing on the sidelines, not quite sure if we should take it, even when we can. How can you make a truly informed decision about your body when everything you're hearing is second-hand, half-truths, or filtered through someone else's Instagram highlights? And for those of us attached in some way to food – loving it, writing about it, creating content around it – there's another layer of cognitive dissonance. How can I wax lyrical about a tasting menu when half the table is nibbling one amuse-bouche and calling it a night? Or is the industry moving on, not just professionally but aesthetically? I don't have all the answers – but I do know I'm tired of being made to feel like my hunger is a flaw. So, should I be on it? I don't know. I'm still undecided. Because while a quieter appetite (and slimmer figure, I cannot lie) might sound appealing, so does actually enjoying a meal. While a flatter stomach might win the Instagram algorithm, so might honesty. The pressure to be smaller in a summer of skinny – even in this supposedly body-positive era – is not the same as a personal choice. It's a collective weight we're all carrying, one that feels like it is getting heavier by the day.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Children in England growing up ‘sedentary, scrolling and alone', say experts
Children are growing up 'sedentary, scrolling and alone' because of a dramatic decline in play in their lives, say a panel of experts who have spent a year investigating play and childhood in England. The government should ban 'no ball games' signs, raise the digital age of consent to 16, restore play to the education system and put in place a statutory 'play sufficiency duty' for local authorities, say the panel, who are urgently calling for a cross-departmental national play strategy backed by an annual £125m of funding. The experts leading the Raising the Nation Play Commission report, the entrepreneur Paul Lindley and former children's commissioner Anne Longfield, say that failure to provide children with the spaces they need outside the home is leading to a huge loss of outdoor play and independence. Lady Longfield, executive chair of the Centre for Young Lives, said: 'Too many of our children are spending their most precious years sedentary, doomscrolling on their phones and often alone, while their health and wellbeing deteriorates. It is no coincidence that the least happy generation, the generation with the highest rates of obesity and rising ill health, is the generation that plays less and less. The commission brought together 19 experts, from doctors to play campaigners, to act as commissioners and then held a series of evidence sessions hearing from children, parents and professionals around the country. One of the key arguments experts made is that the rise in time spent on smartphones and gaming devices is being driven not just by the ubiquity of screens themselves, but by the loss of alternative ways and places for children to play. From traffic-dominated streets to the huge decline in youth clubs and loss of funds for playgrounds, experts pointed to the decline in neighbourhood spaces where children could actually play freely. Ingrid Skeels, co-director of Playing Out, was one of the 19 commissioners and has spent 15 years campaigning for children to have safer streets to play on. 'The findings here confirm what we have been warning for years – children are being driven indoors by a lack of safe spaces to play, move and socialise freely. We can't just blame overprotective parents and screens – we have to make the outside world a place children can play in real life. It's brilliant to have this in-depth, rigorous report confirm what we have heard from families for years, now it's time for action.' Children themselves also gave their thoughts to the commission through a youth panel. A girl in year 7 in London told the commission that children should go outside and be exposed to some risks, saying: 'If you don't let your child out at some point, your child is never gonna learn … parents should give their children a bit more freedom and free will so that children will be aware of the real world.' Young people described local play spaces that are limited, costly, or have been removed. 'There's not much to do and the things that there are cost a lot of money,' said one panellist. Children also repeatedly told the panel that there isn't enough time in the schoolday to play, and described how school work dominated life outside too. 'The reason we don't have time to play', one year 7 child said, 'is because we've got stress, we're doing homework. All the homework Monday to Friday, we've got massive lines […] at lunch and break with barely any time to do anything. I feel like we should have a bit longer so we have more time to go outside and stuff'. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Last year the Guardian reported that shrinking outside space at schools and less time in the day for play are having a damaging impact on children's wellbeing and physical health. The chairs and commissioners also looked at 'better' practice in countries where children play more widely. In Finland the commission met the Ministry of Education and Culture, who described how 'play is a backbone throughout the schoolday as it is in childhood more widely'. Guidance in Finland recommends that children should have a 15-minute break for every 45 minutes of learning, with studies showing shorter lessons with more frequent breaks increase attentiveness. Lindley said:'[A]s this report shows, in England we've made it incredibly hard for children to play. 'We have visited countries where children's play is at the heart of government strategy – embedded across education, health, local government and beyond – because it is seen as the central fabric of life. All of this is within our grasp in this country, but England needs a national play strategy to make it happen.' Asked about the report, a government spokesperson said: 'We recognise the vital importance of play and access to nature as part of children's development and wellbeing as we strive to create the healthiest and happiest generation of children ever. 'Through our 'plan for change', we are setting young people up to achieve and thrive – both inside and outside the classroom. We have given hundreds of thousands of children the tools to turn their grey school spaces green as part of our National Education Nature Park, we are opening up grassroots sports to all with £100m investment in facilities.'