The One Question Everyone in D.C. Is Asking After Trump's Election Meltdown
Who is next out of the door?
That is the question being asked at the White House as a major vibe change in the political landscape was being felt all the way from Washington D.C. to the Great Lakes and way beyond.
Not to Greenland. Not yet. But the tectonic shift overnight has shaken up everything before it.
For the first time in almost five months, the Democratic Party is smiling again, Donald Trump's hibernating Republican opponents are waking from their slumber, the DOGE wrecking ball is whiffing, and Emperor Elon Musk is about to be out on his own and fumbling for his clothes.Who would have thought that an Upper Midwest state famous for beer and cheese would cause such a cataclysm in American politics?
The winds of change were already gathering after the two-month Trump tornado that will leave the nation irrevocably changed, whatever happens next.
Judges were balking, DOGE math wasn't adding up, and folks around the country were realizing that they were the ones losing their jobs.
But a 10-point thumping in a race between two candidates nobody outside Wisconsin's judicial system had ever heard of in a battleground state that Trump had appeared to have conquered has caught everybody's attention.
Including President Trump.
Trump and Musk both stuck their necks out to make the failed case for conservative Judge Brian Schimel, but only one got the chop.
Musk splashed out $25 million of his own cash and took a Badger State weekend break only to return to Washington and find he was dispensable.
One night can be a lifetime when the vibe shifts. The president had a ready-made fall guy in his chainsaw slasher. Nobody ever thought the partnership would last, not even Trump and Musk.
But while much of the media was playing Wisconsin as Musk's mea culpa, the truth was quite different.
The importance of Wisconsin's state Supreme Court election was illustrated by the $100 million spent to try and bamboozle the electorate to pick the right (or left) side.
The Democratic Party focused on demonizing Musk. He'd lost people jobs, he wore T-shirts in the Oval Office, he drove a Tesla, and, worst of all, he was as rich as Croesus.
The Republicans, on the other hand, campaigned on Trump as the hero of change who would make America wealthy again and hand people the cash to buy as much beer and dairy as their hearts desired. Red caps were de rigueur.
The Dems clearly wounded Musk, perhaps even fatally, as a political force.
But the Republicans also hurt the president. Voters didn't drink the MAGA Kool-Aid and it was suddenly very clear for the world to see.
Trump was vulnerable.
It is a message that reverberated across the sleeping Democratic Party giant on Wednesday. Even two Democratic House losses in Florida were sufficiently benign to celebrate with a glass or two of warm champagne. It was deep, deep red state. The losses were not so bad that the losers couldn't claim a moral victory.
Fresh from his November election victory, Trump had little reason to fear the consequences when he picked Matt Gaetz for attorney general and Mike Waltz as national security adviser. Both had safe seats.
Two months later, it wasn't looking such a great idea (it took a couple of days to work out he was onto a loser with Gaetz, who quickly dropped out in a welter of bad publicity). The Democrats outspent Trumper Republican Randy Fine to half the majority in Waltz's old seat, even if Jimmy Patronis took Gaetz's place with relative ease. It wasn't the cakewalk the GOP expected.
Trump was already trying to plug the cracks by forcing Elise Stefanik to drop her UN plans and defend her House seat.
The hint of chaos ahead was beginning to feel more like Trump 1.0 shambles—where an unending revolving door became a feature, not a bug—rather than the controlled aggression of the 2.0 administration.
His first term was marked by one scandal after another. Author Michael Wolff sat and listened in the White House and soon had enough crazy content for a best seller.
In the relentless destruction of his second go around, Trump and Musk directed their troops with a focused energy. If there was any resistance, it was contained.
For two months.
But the vibe feels different now.
Cory Booker set a record for the longest Senate speech in history, talking for 25 hours without a bathroom break. That was 25 hours of trash-talking Trump—and suddenly buoying up Democrats. All this happened while Wisconsin's people were voting their discontent. The gleeful comeback feeling among Democrats was summed up by a meme from The Wire. MAGA has made 'we are so back' a meme; Democrats now found their own.
Trump's control on the Capitol was loosening. His power couldn't stop Booker any more than he could force voters in Wisconsin to bend to his will.
A money man to his core, the president can't control the markets either. His tariff plan will hold him hostage to fortune. He can't sign an executive order and make stocks rise.
Uncertainty is kryptonite to Wall Street. The changing vibe is being felt there, too. Liberation Day is all well and good but you tend to feel a little less free when your 401k is in the toilet.
In Washington on Wednesday morning, the deficit hawks in the House were spreading their wings and biting back at Mike Johnson's (and Trump's) spending bill. Stop the tax cuts, they told the president. What about the deficit? They felt emboldened. They felt the vibe.
Trump feels it, too.
And you can be sure he doesn't like it.
So who's next out the door?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
Supreme Court limits outside access to DOGE records
The Supreme Court has reined in a lower-court order that allowed a watchdog group wide-ranging access to records of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency. The high court's majority said a judge's directive allowing Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to examine DOGE's recommendations for cost savings at executive branch agencies was 'not appropriately tailored.' In a two-page order Friday, the Supreme Court said such access was not a proper way to resolve an ongoing dispute about whether DOGE is a federal agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act or operates as a presidential advisory body that does not have to share its records with the public. 'Separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal Executive Branch communications,' the court's majority wrote. All three of the court's liberal justices indicated they disagreed with the decision, but none provided an explanation of her views.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Over the finish line': Tuberville says passing spending bill bolster economic growth
ALABAMA (WHNT) — As the Big Beautiful Bill is under consideration in the Senate, an Alabama Senator says his top priority is to get the spending bill passed. U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville said Thursday the legislation is likely to undergo some significant changes while in the Senate, but he said his ultimate goal was to get the bill over the finish line. Alabama Agriculture Commissioner Rick Pate to run for lieutenant governor 'The number one priority in this bill is getting the jobs and tax cuts done,' Tuberville said. The spending bill has received criticism from conservatives over the past few days, including the former head of the Department of Governmental Efficiency. Elon Musk has called the bill an 'abomination,' posting on social media platform X about how the spending bill will significantly increase the national debt. 'The problem that Elon Musk looks at, I look at it different,' Tuberville told members of the press on Thursday. 'Number one, the way to grow this country is to get the tax cuts done and that tax cuts are in this bill and we need to make them permanent.' Tuberville said he and his colleagues have complained that Democrats spend too much money. He said he wants to cut back on how much can be cut from this bill. 'There's a lot of things the federal government, in this bill, is trying to send down to the states,' Tuberville said. 'We can't afford it in Alabama. We can't afford to pick up the tab for a federal government agency that was started years ago by the federal government. We don't need it in the state.' Tuberville said he is looking to the future to make changes. 'Remember, we will do another reconciliation after this,' Tuberville said. 'We have two more in the next year and a half, so whatever we don't get done in this bill, hopefully we can get done in the next.' The president has given Republicans in the Senate a tight deadline to pass the spending bill, asking them to have it on his desk by July 4th. The Tax Foundation estimates the bill passed by the House of Representatives will add more than $2 trillion to the national deficit over the next 10 years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chris Hayes: Trump's 'secret police': Masked agents' sweeping immigration raids raise concern
This is an adapted excerpt from the June 5 episode of 'All In with Chris Hayes.' The term 'secret police' invokes a kind of haunting specter. When we see representations of it in movies or history, we immediately identify it with a certain kind of regime: One that tramples people's liberty with no accountability. We associate it with authoritarian governments and dictatorships like the former Soviet Union, where people, usually armed, could wield the authority of the state but were, themselves, totally unaccountable in the same way. Whatever issues there are with American policing — and there are many — at least our police officers have names on their uniforms and badge numbers. But now, in the era of immigration under Donald Trump, one cannot help but notice that in clip after clip, interaction after interaction, the people enforcing the president's policies have all the qualities that one would associate with the concept of 'secret police.' In videos, these individuals are usually masked and either wearing plain clothes or irregular uniforms. They won't give their names or say what agency they're with. Watching it feels wrong, weird, alien and menacing. It does not feel like these law enforcement officials are subject to the authority of a democratic government. It's so striking, in scene after scene, to see regular people asking masked agents, 'Who are you?' and 'What are you doing?' and not receiving an answer. That's what we saw play out in one of the first videos of this kind to be made public: The arrest of Columbia student and lawful resident Mahmoud Khalil. In that video, you can see plainclothes officers apprehending Khalil in the lobby of his building. The officers pointedly refused to identify themselves or what agency they were with. 'We don't give our name,' one man said, after handcuffing and detaining a legal resident of the United States. Not long after that, we got video of the arrest of Tufts University graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk, who was snatched off the street by masked agents and led away in handcuffs. In New Bedford, Massachusetts, there was the chilling scene from last month in which masked agents broke a car window and forcibly removed a man they say was in the country illegally. Just last weekend, in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, masked agents detained an apparently undocumented gardener at his place of work. In San Diego that same weekend, residents tried to hold back what appeared to be militarized agents who were reportedly executing an immigration raid on local businesses. We've also got allegations of all kinds of lies, manipulation and subterfuge. Eyewitnesses in Tucson, Arizona, allege agents posed as city utility workers as part of an arrest attempt. There have been reports of agents performing wellness checks on children, which critics say is a trap for immigration enforcement. All this feels like something distinct from the normal forms of policing and law enforcement that we're used to. As the writer M. Gessen, who was born in the then-Soviet Union, put it in a column for The New York Times: 'The United States has become a secret-police state. Trust me, I've seen it before.' 'The citizens of such a state live with a feeling of being constantly watched. They live with a sense of random danger,' Gessen wrote. 'Anyone — a passer-by, the man behind you in line at the deli, the woman who lives down the hall, your building's super, your own student, your child's teacher — can be a plainclothes agent or a self-appointed enforcer.' This administration is treating people as if they have no rights, as if they can be rounded up at whim without any due process. That is the legal theory of the Trump administration. It believes that immigrants in this country don't have rights, even though that's very clearly not true. The Constitution is clear on this, and precedent is clear on this: Immigrants have due process rights. But the Trump administration seems to believe the state can do whatever it wants to people. According to Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, the agents in these videos are wearing masks for their own safety. 'They wear a mask because they're trying to protect themselves and their families,' Homan said on Fox News. 'Agents are getting doxed every day, their pictures and phone numbers being put on telephone poles. These leftists are following and filming when they go home from work at night.' In a statement to NBC News about these recent immigration crackdowns, Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said, 'Under Secretary Noem, we are delivering on President Trump's and the American people's mandate to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens and make America safe.' This article was originally published on
