Pentagon chief warns of imminent China 'threat', pushes Asian allies to hike defence spending
SINGAPORE: US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned on Saturday (May 31) that the threat from China was real and potentially imminent as he pushed allies in the Indo-Pacific to spend more on their own defence needs.
Hegseth, speaking for the first time at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia's premier forum for defence leaders, militaries and diplomats, laid out how the Indo-Pacific region was a priority for the Trump administration.
"There's no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent," Hegseth said, in some of his strongest comments on China since he took office in January.
He added that any attempt by China to conquer Taiwan "would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world", and echoed Trump's comment that China will not invade Taiwan on the president's watch.
China views Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to "reunify" with the democratic and separately governed island, by force if necessary. It has stepped up military and political pressure to assert those claims, including increasing the intensity of war games around Taiwan.
Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future.
"It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo Pacific," Hegseth said.
But his comments on allies needing to increase spending is likely to cause consternation among partners, even though experts said Hegseth would face a relatively friendly audience in Singapore.
China's Defence Minister Dong Jun has decided to skip the major Asian security forum and Beijing has sent only an academic delegation.
Hegseth has previously taken aim at allies in Europe for not spending more on their own defence. In February, he warned Europe against treating America like a "sucker" while addressing a press conference at NATO headquarters in Brussels.
On Friday, while delivering the keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue, French President Emmanuel Macron said Hegseth was justified in asking Europe to increase its defence spending.
"It's hard to believe, a little bit, after some trips to Europe that I'm saying this, but thanks to President Trump, Asian allies should look to countries in Europe as a new found example," Hegseth said.
"It doesn't make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defence in the face of an even more formidable threat, not to mention North Korea."
"STEPPING UP"
Spending on weapons and research is spiking among some Asian countries as they respond to a darkening security outlook by broadening their outside industrial partnerships while trying to boost their own defence industries, according to a new study by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, the organisation that runs the Shangri-La Dialogue.
The spike comes even as the nations spent an average of 1.5 per cent of GDP on defence in 2024, a figure that has remained relatively constant over the last decade, it said.
Hegseth suggested during his speech that allies in Europe focus on security on the European continent, so that Washington could focus on the threat posed by China in the Indo Pacific, alongside more participation by allies in Asia.
"We're pushing our allies in Europe to own more of their security – to invest in their own defence ... Thanks to President Trump, they are stepping up," Hegseth said.
But some of the Trump administration's early moves in the Indo-Pacific have raised eyebrows. The US moved air defence systems from Asia to the Middle East earlier this year as tensions with Iran spiked - an effort which took 73 C-17 flights.
Hegseth, a former Fox TV host who has spent much of his first months in office focused on domestic issues, spoke to the international audience about issues that he has frequently talked about when in the United States, like "restoring the warrior ethos".
"We are not here to pressure other countries to embrace or adopt our politics or ideology. We are not here to preach to you about climate change or cultural issues," Hegseth said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
US debt is 'sound', no concerns about US dollar's reserve role, Taiwan's central bank says
TAIPEI :Taiwan's central bank said on Sunday that U.S. government debt is "sound" and still favoured by investors, and there are no worries about the U.S. dollar's position as the leading international reserve currency. U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff announcement on April 2, which led to a market rout, including in U.S. Treasuries, has cast doubt over the dollar's safe-haven status. Trump's has made complaints about a strong dollar which have also triggered speculation that Washington wants an adjustment lower in the U.S. currency. Taiwan's $582.8 billion in foreign exchange reserves are more than 80 per cent made up of U.S. Treasury bonds, according to the island's central bank. The central bank, responding to what it said were market concerns about U.S. bonds and the U.S. dollar, said on its website there was no cause for alarm. "There are still no concerns about the U.S. dollar's position as the leading international reserve currency," it said. "U.S. public debt is stable and has good liquidity, and its function as a store of value is still favoured by investors." The central bank also called on the media and market commentators not to speculate about the foreign exchange rate, given the Taiwan dollar's surge since last month against the U.S. currency on speculation Washington had asked Taipei to let it strengthen as part of tariff talks. The central bank has repeatedly denied that the United States has made that request. In its Sunday statement, the central bank said its inspection teams had found that some foreign investors, whom it did not name, had transferred large sums into Taiwan dollar deposit accounts ostensibly to invest in Taiwan stocks. But no such investments took place, it said, adding foreign investors must use remitted funds to invest in domestic securities if that is what they have declared the money for "and not use the funds to speculate on the Taiwan dollar's exchange rate".
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Duelling Diplomacies: India and Pakistan offer competing narratives at defence forum in Singapore
SINGAPORE: Fresh off their nerve-jangling, four-day conflict in May, top Indian and Pakistani military delegations have been making the rounds at the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, billed as Asia's premier defence forum. While much of the attention was on US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's first visit to the gathering since taking up his post, and his warnings of the "imminent" threat he says is posed by China - along with China's response that the Americans should not "play with fire" and make "groundless accusations" - the longstanding tensions between these nuclear-armed neighbours also grabbed attention. India blames Pakistan for a deadly terror attack on tourists in the part of the disputed region of Kashmir that it controls, while Pakistan denies any involvement and says India has presented no proof. And just as these nations sit next to each other geographically, some of their top generals sat in neighbouring conference rooms inside the Shangri-La Singapore, taking part in simultaneous sessions late on Saturday (May 31) afternoon on topics ranging from defence innovation solutions to regional crisis-management mechanisms. "What India has done is politically they have drawn new red lines of the tolerance against terror," said General Anil Chauhan, Chief of Defence Staff with the Indian Armed Forces. "That should bring about some lessons for our adversary also and, hopefully, they learn that this is a limit of India's tolerance. We've been subjected to this proxy war and terror for the past almost about two decades, or maybe more, and we've lost a lot of people and ... we want to put an end to it.' General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee of the Pakistan Armed Forces, warned of what could happen should another clash occur, especially given that the fighting took place not just in the disputed region of Kashmir, but also in Pakistan itself. "The strategic stability with the lowering of this threshold to the dangerous levels if next time such a conflict occurs and the cities are targeted first and the borders become irrelevant mostly, so what you will see is that there could be a chance - I'm not trying to create an alarm but I'm speaking based on logic - there could be a possibility that before the international community intervenes because of the restricted or constricted times window, the damage and destruction may have already taken place." FROM CONFLICT TO DIPLOMATIC BLITZ Aside from last month's clash, which saw India strike Pakistani targets but also admit to losing an unspecified number of fighter jets during its "Operation Sindoor", the nations have fought four major wars since their independence in 1947. In the wake of the recent hostilities, both sides have moved from weapons to words, with India dispatching several delegations to visit more than 30 capitals in Asia and around the world. A similar effort by Pakistan is set to start on Jun 2. CNA spoke to a member of the multi-party Indian delegation that visited East and Southeast Asia during a stop in Singapore on May 27. Congress party leader and former Indian external affairs minister Salman Khurshid agreed with the views that the effort is unprecedented. "It is an innovation, in a sense. And the fact that there are multi-party delegations, seven of them across the world, to all members of the (UN) Security Council and prospective members of the Security Council. In that sense, it is unprecedented, and we've got enormous support," he said. "You might even put it as something that has started, something that will at least ensure that our narrative is carried right through." And that narrative is firmly focused on India's accusations that Pakistan isn't doing nearly enough to snuff out terrorism. "The fact remains that talking to them (Pakistan) hasn't worked. Therefore, we are not talking to them now. We've said clearly, put an end to terrorism and then everything can follow. As long as you don't put an end to terrorism, no talks, nothing, no communications, no trade. That's the bottom line that we've drawn for them." But Pakistan's General Sahir Shamshad Mirza told CNA in a wide-ranging interview that Pakistan is in fact taking on terrorism on its soil and working to tackle cross-border terrorism from groups based in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan. "Why would Pakistan know or be involved in this (Kashmir) incident, when Pakistan's number one is consolidating its fight against terrorism," he asked on the sidelines of the Shangri-La dialogue. "We are on an upward path in our economy." Mr Mirza said terrorism has cost his country hundreds of billions of dollars and tens of thousands of lives. He alleged India lashed out, "without any investigation, without any initial inquiry, internal inquiry, without any shred of evidence". CONVENTIONAL AND UNCONVENTIONAL WEAPONS India and Pakistan's 96-hour confrontation was seen as a test of the rivals' respective weapons systems, including India's French-made Rafale fighter jets and Pakistan's Chinese-made J10-C jets, armed with Chinese-made missiles. But the top generals on both sides have said their military forces can pick and choose when it comes to their firepower. "India doesn't depend on one nation for its defence needs,' said General Chauhan during his session. "It's a number of capabilities which were put together, and most of these capabilities were put to good effects.' Pakistan's General Mirza told CNA his capabilities include weapons from China and many other places. "I have the military equipment from US. I have the military equipment from Turkiye. I have the military equipment from Italy. I have the military equipment from UK," he listed. "We have the equipment from all equipment-producing countries." In addition, both sides relied on drones while also facing serious threats in the form of disinformation. But global concern was firmly fixed on the unconventional weapons they both possess, the ones that can cause widespread destruction and loss of life. The countries continue to maintain that the use of nuclear weapons was never on the table, with Pakistani officials, including General Mirza to CNA, dismissing reports that Islamabad called a meeting of the National Command Authority, the body that oversees Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. However, General Mirza said what is seen as an ambiguous policy on nuclear weapons would become less ambiguous, "if you enable a capability to one country and deny a capability to another country". "The tools of modern conflict, they are artificial intelligence, electronic warfare, cyber, precision, firepower and weapons," he said. "If there is a yawning gap in either of these, or two of these, so this will place the other country at a disadvantage. So, when a country is at a disadvantage - at the moment we are not, let me be clear - if that goes beyond a proportion, it puts a stress." TRUMP, TRADE AND A TORN-UP WATER TREATY US President Donald Trump has said repeatedly that he used the issue of trade access to broker the India-Pakistan ceasefire, most recently on Friday. "I think the deal I'm most proud of is the fact that we're dealing with India, we're dealing with Pakistan and we were able to stop potentially a nuclear war through trade as opposed through bullets," he said. India has denied Mr Trump was the deciding factor, and has said it was talk between the neighbours' militaries and not tariffs that made the difference. Pakistan sees things differently. "Sadly, the Indians have not, I think, accepted that President Trump was there in the ceasefire. It was actually brokered by President Trump," General Mirza told CNA, while also noting that many other nations played a role. "It was thanks to the US that they finally were able to affect their ceasefire." But the truce is not the end of this dispute. New Delhi has suspended the decades-old Indus Waters Treaty, which is meant to govern the use of rivers that mainly flow through India and are critical for Pakistan's agriculture and water supply. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has vowed that, "India's water will flow for India, stay for India, and serve India." But not observing the agreement, which was brokered by the World Bank and signed in 1960, is a red line for Pakistan. "For 240 million people, most of which is an agrarian society, if you stop, hold or lower, slow the flow of water, if you are at my place, what would you do?' asked General Mirza.
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
China blasts Hegseth as defence minister avoids Singapore forum
[BEIJING] China lodged a protest over Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's speech at a defence forum in Singapore on Saturday, even as Beijing chose not to send its top military diplomat to the annual event. Hegseth chided China during the Shangri-La Dialogue, noting how the nation didn't send a high-profile representative to the gathering. It was the first time Beijing hasn't sent a defence minister to the forum since 2019, depriving China from conducting diplomacy with top military officials from around the globe and pushing its vision for regional security. In a statement on Sunday (Jun 1) responding to Hegseth's speech, China's Foreign Ministry called the US 'the true hegemonic country in the world and the primary factor that undermines peace and stability in the Asia Pacific region.' It added that the US 'must never play with fire' regarding Taiwan, after Hegseth warned that conflict over the island 'could be imminent.' Departing from tradition, this year's Sunday programming didn't begin with a session focused on China, which is typically when the nation's chief military diplomat rebuts any accusations floated by speakers from the US and other allied nations the day before. The only session featuring a Chinese delegate this year saw him sidestep questions on the absence of Defence Minister Dong Jun, who attended a year ago. 'Every time we send the delegation on different levels – this is completely a normal work arrangement,' Rear Admiral Hu Gangfeng, vice president of the National Defense University, said at a panel on Saturday. 'It'll not affect our explanation of our national defence policies, ideas and communication with others or enhancing mutual trust.' In an X thread on Sunday, Chinese envoy to New Zealand Wang Xiaolong slammed Hegseth's remark a day earlier on Taiwan. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'If this is not sabre-rattling or fearmongering, then nothing is,' Wang wrote. 'It will be a stretch of imagination to think that many, if any at all, in the region would buy that unfounded, self-centric and delusional rhetoric,' he added. The Chinese Embassy in Singapore has posted twice on Facebook since the start of the forum. It hit back at French President Emmanuel Macron's remarks that the global response to Russia's war in Ukraine should inform how the world might react to a Taiwan invasion, rejecting the comparison as 'unacceptable.' It also criticised Hegseth's speech, labelling China as an imminent threat. 'Mr Hegseth repeatedly smeared and attacked China and relentlessly played up the so-called 'China threat,'' the embassy wrote. 'As a matter of fact, the US itself is the biggest 'troublemaker' for regional peace and stability.' China's embassy in Singapore rarely comments publicly on the Shangri-La Dialogue, usually staying behind the scenes to coordinate with the visiting Chinese delegation. Chinese military delegates were still active in asking questions in sessions. Senior Colonel Zhang Chi, an associate professor at the National Defence University, asked Hegseth about how the US would choose between allies and Asean when its multilateral frameworks do not include South-east Asian countries. But outside of sessions, they stayed mum. It's a contrast to last year, when China held a record number of press briefings and its university delegates had roundtable discussions with the media. Beijing hasn't officially explained why it downgraded its representation at this year's event. However, signs of frustration surfaced during a session on Sunday. Senior Colonel Lu Yin, a professor at the PLA's National Defense University, attempted to ask a question at the forum but noted beforehand that her query about cooperation didn't seem to fit the atmosphere of the Shangri-La Dialogue. 'It seems that labeling China, blaming China, verbally attacking China are political right here,' she added. Da Wei, director of the Center for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University, said it wasn't ideal for China to miss an opportunity to send a defence minister to the forum and have exchanges with other countries. Given that Dong has travelled to the region and Europe before, he said, 'this loss is probably not that huge.' Singapore's Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing also described it as a missed opportunity for China. 'If China perceives that the world does not respect China sufficiently, or do not understand China sufficiently, then it is incumbent upon China to use every opportunity possible, including the Shangri-La Dialogue, to get its voice heard, to make clear a stance, and to help others to understand why it's doing what it is doing,' Chan said on Sunday. BLOOMBERG
