
Laid Off Metaverse Engineer Says He Is DoorDashing and Living in a Trailer
A software engineer has revealed that, while he once made six figures at a metaverse company, his recent layoff means he's been thrust into a life of relative precarity, which involves DoorDashing, selling stuff on eBay, and living in a trailer.
Shawn K's layoff some twelve months ago (his legal name is 'K') has landed him in a situation that, a few years ago, would've seemed relatively unheard of for a seasoned software engineer. However, in the age of AI, Shawn worries that his situation may become more normative, as tech companies race to replace their workers with algorithms.
In an email to Gizmodo, Shawn provided more details about his layoff, which appears to have been at a company called Virbela, which is owned by eXp Realty. Virbela says it offers metaverse solutions for remote work through the creation of 'engaging virtual spaces that replicate real-world dynamics and social interactions.' Shawn said that, in the months prior to his termination, his work at the company became increasingly AI-based.
'Different orgs move at different rates with technology, and within our company, we were very forward-thinking and early-adopting with AI,' he said. 'In the first year that ChatGPT was released, the average developer on the team was seeing productivity increase of 3x-10x with ai assistance,' he said, adding that it 'reached a point where it became inevitably clear that it was no longer going to be 'business as usual'.'
'On my team, we made a hard pivot to have nearly every developer on the team focus on integrating AI features into the existing software product,' Shawn revealed. He added that, not long afterward, during a 'frenzied peak' of AI enthusiasm, the company 'let go a portion of the developers across all the teams in the company, including on my team.' He added: 'I couldn't really estimate on the percentage of the dev staff laid off, but it was all around the same time across multiple teams.'
It's unclear whether the specific catalyst for Shawn's termination was AI or not. Gizmodo reached out to Virbela for more information. That said, if that's the case, it wouldn't be unheard of. Over the past two years, tech companies have gone through historic rounds of layoffs, as many of those firms have pivoted towards automation. Multiple reports show that software workers at companies like Panasonic and Microsoft are losing their jobs, as companies seek tools that can automate code-writing.
Shawn has been writing about his unfortunate 'displacement' by automation on his personal Substack, ShawnfromPortland, which details his struggles since getting laid off. He says that he makes less than $200 a day through food deliveries and that he has also resorted to selling random personal items on eBay.
Shawn's situation is complicated, as he also owns multiple properties. He says, however, that owning property doesn't necessarily make him wealthy. His mother, who is disabled, lives on one of the properties and has nowhere else to go. The other properties, which were bought when things were going well for Shawn, pose financial difficulties were he to attempt to sell them right now, he says. He currently lives in a small trailer on one of the properties in upstate New York.
'I'm now in the trailer because something has shifted in society in the last 2.5 years,' Shawn writes. 'Something that caused myself and a large portion of the talented dev teams [to be] let go at a time when our company and parent corp were doing great.' That 'something' would appear to be what Shawn has referred to as the 'great displacement,' an economy that is trending further and further towards automation and away from human labor.
AI also seems to be screwing Shawn when it comes to the job hunt, as he suspects his resume is being vetted by algorithms that sift for AI-related buzzwords. 'In this last year, I interviewed with close to 10 companies, getting as far as a 4th round interview twice and several second and third rounds, but not getting any offers,' the out-of-work engineer says. 'I suspect my resume is filtered out of consideration by some half-baked AI 'candidate finder service' because my resume doesn't mention enough hyper-specific bleeding-edge AI terms.'
Shawn has also been forced to study AI so as to be more competitive in the current software market. 'I have spent 2 to 5 hours per day in the last year consuming AI news, papers, and podcasts, and constantly thinking and reflecting on the latest AI trends,' Shawn reveals. 'I have built about 10 small 100% AI-generated codebases in the last year as personal learning exercises, and any time there is free access to any new AI tool, I go out of my way to try it out.'
Still, Shawn seems to be firing applications off into the abyss, and says that he's nearing his 900th application, with no signs of a job offer. 'This article isn't for sympathy or to make me feel better by making excuses,' he writes. 'I'm sharing my real-life story of how I went from a highly valued technologist to basically nothing in the course of a year or two with the rise of AI.'
In an email, Shawn also shared that the job hunt in the software industry has never felt so grim. He noted that he's 'been in the game for a long time, and the vibes have never been the way they are now.'
Ominously, he added: 'I don't think my story is unique, I think I am at the early side of the bell curve of the coming social and economic disaster tidal wave that is already underway and began with knowledge workers and creatives. It's coming for basically everyone in due time.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amazon wants to become a global marketplace for AI
Amazon Web Services isn't betting on one large language model (LLM) winning the artificial intelligence race. Instead, it's offering customers a buffet of models to choose from. AWS, the cloud computing arm of Amazon (AMZN), aims to become the go-to infrastructure layer for the AI economy, regardless of which model wins out. By making customer choice a defining principle, AWS hopes to win out against rivals that have aligned closely with specific LLM providers — notably Microsoft (MSFT), which partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI ( 'We don't think that there's going to be one model to rule them all,' Dave Brown, vice president of compute and networking at AWS, told Yahoo Finance. The model-neutral approach is embedded into Amazon Bedrock, a service that allows AWS customers to build their own applications using a wide range of models, with more than 100 to choose from. Brown added that after Chinese startup DeepSeek surprised the world, AWS had a fully managed version of the disruptive model available on Bedrock within a week. Two years after its launch, Bedrock is now the fastest-growing service offered by AWS, which accounted for over 18% of Amazon's total revenue in the first quarter. It's why Amazon CEO Andy Jassy sees Bedrock as a core part of the company's AI growth strategy. But to understand the competitive advantage AWS hopes to offer with Bedrock, you have to go back to its origin story. Bedrock dates back to a six-page internal memo that Atul Deo, AWS's director of product management, wrote in 2020. Before OpenAI's ChatGPT launched in 2022 and made 'generative AI' a household term, Deo pitched a service that could generate code from plain English prompts using large language models. But Jassy, the head of AWS at the time, didn't buy it. 'His initial reaction was, 'This seems almost like a pipe dream,'' Deo said. He added that while a tool that makes coding easy sounds obvious now, the technology was 'still not quite there.' When that project, initially known as Code Whisperer, launched in 2023, the team realized they could offer the service for a broader set of use cases, giving customers a choice of different models with 'generic capabilities' that 'could be used as a foundation to build a lot of interesting applications,' according to Deo. Deo noted that the team steered away from doubling down on its own model after it recognized a pattern of customers wanting choice in other AWS services. This led to AWS becoming the first provider to offer a range of different models to customers. With this foundational approach in mind, Amazon renamed the project Bedrock. To be sure, the model-agnostic approach has risks, and many analysts don't consider Amazon to be leading the AI race, even though it has ramped up its AI spending. If there is ultimately one model to rule them all, similar to how Google came to dominate search, Amazon could risk further falling behind. At the beginning of the year, Amazon and its peers Meta (META), Microsoft, and Google parent Alphabet (GOOG) expected to spend $325 billion combined, mostly on AI infrastructure. To keep pace, Amazon has hedged its bets with its own technology and one LLM provider in particular: Anthropic. In November 2024, AWS doubled its investment in Anthropic to $8 billion in a deal that requires Anthropic to train its large language model, Claude, using only AWS's chips. (For comparison, Microsoft has invested over $13 billion into OpenAI.) The $8 billion deal allows Amazon to prove out its AI training infrastructure and deepen ties with one LLM provider while continuing to offer customers a wide selection of models on Bedrock. 'I mean, this is cloud selling 101, right?' said Dan Rosenthal, head of go-to-market partnerships at Anthropic. 'There are some cases where it's been very clear that a customer wants to use a different model on Bedrock for something that we just frankly don't focus on, and that's great. We want to win where we have a right to win.' Amazon also launched its own family of foundational models, called Nova, at the end of 2024, two years after the launch of ChatGPT. But competition and expectations remain high: Revenue at AWS increased 16.9% to $29.27 billion in Q1, marking the third time in a row it missed analyst estimates despite double-digit growth. The Anthropic partnership also underscores a bigger competition AWS may be fighting with chipmakers, including Nvidia (NVDA), which recently staged a $1 trillion rally in just two months after an earnings print that eased investor concerns about chip export controls. While Amazon is an Nvidia customer, it also produces highly effective and more affordable AI chips based on power consumed (known as 'price performance'). On Bedrock, AWS lets clients choose whether to use its own CPUs and GPUs or chips from competitors like Intel (INTC), AMD (AMD), and Nvidia. 'We're able to work with the model providers to really optimize the model for the hardware that it runs,' Brown said. 'There's no change the customer has to make.' Customers not only have a choice of model but also a choice of which infrastructure the model should run and train on. This helps AWS compete on price — a key battleground with Nvidia, which offers the most expensive chips on the market. This 'coopetition' dynamic could position Amazon to take market share from Nvidia if it can prove its own chips can do the job for a lower sticker price. It's a bet that Amazon is willing to spend on, with capital expenditures expected to hit $100 billion in 2025, up from $83 billion last year. While AWS doesn't break out its costs for AI, CEO Andy Jassy said on an earnings call in February that the 'vast majority of that capex spend is on AI for AWS.' In an April letter to shareholders, Jassy noted that 'AI revenue is growing at triple-digit YoY percentages and represents a multibillion-dollar annual revenue run rate.' Sign in to access your portfolio

Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI claims to have hit $10B in annual revenue
OpenAI says it recently hit $10 billion in annual recurring revenue, up from around $5.5 billion last year. That figure includes revenue from the company's consumer products, ChatGPT business products, and its API, an OpenAI spokesperson told CNBC. Currently, OpenAI is serving more than 500 million weekly active users and 3 million paying business customers. The revenue milestone comes roughly two and a half years after OpenAI launched its popular chatbot platform, ChatGPT. The company is targeting $125 billion in revenue by 2029. OpenAI is under some pressure to increase revenue quickly. The company burns billions of dollars each year hiring and recruiting talent to work on its AI products, and securing the necessary infrastructure to train and run AI systems. OpenAI has not disclosed its operating expenses or whether it is close to profitability. This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Arkansas Supreme Court releases proposed rule for artificial intelligence
The Arkansas Supreme Court building in Little Rock. (John Sykes/Arkansas Advocate) The use of artificial intelligence in legal documents could violate Arkansas law or court rules, according to a proposed administrative order issued by the state Supreme Court last week. Specifically, the proposed order addresses the use of confidential court data with generative artificial intelligence. AI models retain data inputted by users of AI products, such as ChatGPT, in order to continue training the large language models that exploded into public use only a few years ago, the order notes. 'Anyone who either intentionally or inadvertantly [sic] discloses confidential or sealed information related to a client or case [to a generative AI model] may be violating established rules,' the proposed order reads, specifically citing Arkansas Supreme Court Administrative Order Number 19, the Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct and the Arkansas Code of Judicial Conduct. Additionally, the proposed order prohibits anyone with internal access to the state's court system, CourtConnect, from 'intentionally exposing our state courts' internal data to a GAI.' The proposed order provides an exemption to this prohibition if approval is granted by the Supreme Court's Automation Committee to engage in 'a research and analysis project related to the use of generative AI tools and general AI for the benefit of our courts.' The proposed order does not appear to address questions of broader use of AI by attorneys within the state court system. Judges in courtrooms across the country in recent months have expressed frustration with attorneys who have filed briefs and other documents bearing citations to nonexistent or irrelevant cases as a result of so-called 'AI hallucinations,' leading to sanctions in some cases. As reported by the Alabama Reflector, for example, lawyers who were being paid millions by the Alabama Department of Corrections to defend it against lawsuits filed by prisoners in the state system were called out by an inmate's attorneys for making up legal citations 'out of whole cloth' in a lawsuit where their client alleged being stabbed repeatedly while in restraints. The federal judge presiding over the case said that the incident showed that sanctions levied by other courts had proven 'insufficient' to deter lawyers from filing documents with improper or made up citations created by AI. 'That causes me to consider a fuller range of sanctions,' Judge Anna M. Manasco said. The Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Automation created a subcommittee to 'study the use of AI in the courts.' The introduction to the proposed order notes that as the committee continues its work, it will make recommendations. The comment period for the proposed administrative order ends on Aug. 1. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX