logo
Somebody Down There Likes Me by Robert Lukins review – a dispiriting imitation of Succession

Somebody Down There Likes Me by Robert Lukins review – a dispiriting imitation of Succession

The Guardian13-02-2025

Last week, the folks at Simon & Schuster in the US announced that they are no longer requiring their authors to scrounge and grovel for blurb quotes from literary luminaries (AKA friends, frenemies and coerced idols). Down with nepotism and unpaid labour! Up with democratic dust jackets! Begone hyperbole! Dazzling. Luminous. Tour de force. Good riddance to you all, you florid, empty guff.
While we're at it, I'd like to request another puffery-related moratorium: can we please, for the love of dark academia, stop comparing novels to Donna Tartt's The Secret History? And not only for the sake of readers, who will inevitably be disappointed, but for the writers whose work is nobbled by the comparison. Tartt's bacchanalian debut was a literary lightning bolt. Let's just accept that it won't strike twice.
The latest author to fall victim to the Tartt curse is Robert Lukins, whose third novel, Somebody Down There Likes Me, is set in Connecticut and includes a character called Mouse (missing, presumed dead). The Secret History was set in Vermont, and included a character called Bunny (dead, presumed missing). Here endeth the grand similarity: WASP nests and furry nicknames. The comparison does Lukins absolutely no favours (for starters, he has not written a campus novel – surely the threshold requirement).
Somebody Down There Likes Me has also been likened to the HBO television series Succession, which is far more apt. A little too apt. Although it's set in 1996 – a tale of analog plutocrats – Lukins's new book feels dispiritingly imitative. The cultural bandwagon is passing, and this novel is hitching a ride.
Meet the Gulch family: a clan of blunt force metaphors and late-capitalist tropes. There's addle-brained Fax Gulch, the source of the family money (largely obsolete). His ruthless wife, Honey, is the brains of the operation (she knows how to catch flies). Their insufferable son Lincoln: a 'gold-plated bad boy' and proto tech-bro ('I'm a block of blunt iron but I am going to hone myself into a blade'). And their estranged daughter Kick, who is the only one of the bunch with any kind of moral fight in her (echoes of Succession's Shiv, if mostly in name).
Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning
The word gulch is a synonym for chasm, and also for a ravenous gulp. This is a story of both: ethical ravines and insatiable greed; a prequel for our self-satirising Trumpian present. (Fax built his fortune with $999,999 and 'would become a millionaire under his own steam'.) It begins with the end in sight: Honey has received word via her pet FBI informant that the Gulch empire is about to fall. And so she gathers the family together, coaxing Kick back home for the first time in a decade, to share the news and prepare to be unified in the face of public disgrace. Or at least that's the official plan. A reckoning is brewing, as reckonings are want to do.
Have Honey and Fax cooked the books, enslaved a vast workforce of children, or vanished a whistleblower or two? We'll never know the details of their corporate sins. 'We've made some mistakes that are going to be judged illegal,' Fax explains to his kids, who ask no follow-up questions. What we know is that Honey does not consider them to be mistakes: 'There was no useful difference between the business of a criminal and non-criminal nature,' she thinks to herself. 'The two were as Good and Bad as each other, in that they were neither.'
Perhaps – like the shark in Jaws – Lukins thinks that the lurking monster is more potent than the reveal. It's certainly not hard to fill in the gaps ourselves. We have plenty of examples: dynasty after rotten-hearted dynasty. But there's something lazy – rather than pointed – about the vagueness in Somebody Down There Likes Me. Cultural shorthand, not cultural critique. That feeling only intensifies over the course of the Gulch family's last interminable week together as they sneer and scheme and float in the indoor pool (in place of Chekhov's gun, we have Gatsby's swimming pool). Mostly they chew on the cud of their psyches like indolent, Wagyu cows, masticating on their secrets – such as the fate of missing Mouse (the girl who roared).
Sign up to Saved for Later
Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips
after newsletter promotion
It's all very Bonfizzle of the Vanities. And that's the true mystery of this novel. Plenty of writers have been here before: Fitzgerald, Cheever, Updike, Wolfe, Yates, Ford, Roth, Easton-Ellis, Franzen (and that's just the great American dick-swingers). Why Lukins seems so intent on joining their company – retreading this compacted ground – is hard to fathom. It's a dispiriting swerve, for Lukins is capable of extraordinary quiet and grace (see his gorgeous 2018 debut, The Everlasting Sunday). But here is yet another trendy tale of feckless, all-American cruelty: Kieran Culkin outtakes with a soundtrack by Lana Del Rey.
If cashed-up spite is what Lukins really wants, there's an abundance in his own back yard. Imagine if this novel was set in the red dust of iron ore country. Or aboard the champagne-tacky deck of the Australia-II. Or on a dinosaur-infested golf course. Imagine what we might learn about our own national psyche if we chewed on that instead.
Somebody Down There Likes Me by Robert Lukins is published by Allen & Unwin

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Guide #195: How Reddit made nerds of us all
The Guide #195: How Reddit made nerds of us all

The Guardian

time11 hours ago

  • The Guardian

The Guide #195: How Reddit made nerds of us all

It only ended a few years ago, but Westworld already feels a bit of a TV footnote. A pricey mid-2010s remake of a 70s Yul Brynner movie few people remembered, HBO's robot cowboy drama lumbered on for four lukewarm seasons before getting cancelled – with few people really noticing. Still, when it premiered, Westworld was big news. Here was a show well-placed to do a Game of Thrones, only for sci-fi. Its high production values were married to an eye-catching cast (Evan Rachel Wood, Ed Harris, Thandiwe Newton, Jeffrey Wright) and it was run by the crack team of Lisa Joy and Jonathan Nolan, who promised they had a playbook for how the whole show would shake out. This, of course, was an important promise in that immediate post-Lost period, where everyone was terrified that they would be strung along by a show that was 'making it up as they went along' (as a Lost defender, I have to say at this point that they weren't 'making it up as they went along', but that's an argument for another newsletter). But even the best laid plans, and the most tightly plotted of TV shows, have a way of unravelling. The first inkling I had that Westworld might not be TV's next big series was when fans of the show on forum/social media hybrid Reddit started correctly guessing how plotlines would pan out. Twist after twist in the show's first season were predicted, sometimes a week early or more, by Redditors well-versed in the rhythms and tropes of telly, or otherwise just willing to go above and beyond in the search for the most minuscule of clues. Things got so bad that, in the second season, Joy and Nolan were forced to rewrite the script to alter a plotline the Redditors had already rumbled. It was a sign not just of Westworld's fragility, but the strength of Reddit and its users, who were able to make even seasoned showrunners quake in their boots. Reddit has, of course, comfortably outlasted Westworld. This month, the site – immodestly self-described as 'the front page of the internet' – celebrates its 20th birthday. It's an anniversary that sits in the shadow of a more seismic 2005 web debut: YouTube, which celebrated its own birthday back in February. But Reddit's impact on popular culture, though not at YouTube's 'we've replaced TV' levels, has been sizeable. That Reddit's arrival came in lockstep with an era of intense fandom and parasocial relationships doesn't seem coincidental. Fan forums existed long before Reddit – from message boards for bands and solo artists to the acid-tipped TV show chat on the still-missed Television Without Pity – but Reddit organised and supercharged these communities. Suddenly, just about any enthusiasm big or small, Marvel movies to musical microgenres, could be discussed under one roof, freely and openly. Such freedom and openness come at a cost, and Reddit's – misogyny, racism, conspiracy theories, threats of violence – have been widely documented. (Though, in contrast to so many social media platforms these days, Reddit has done a pretty decent job in cleaning up its act over the past decade). Pop-culturally, it's a place where fan enthusiasm can occasionally curdle into something more unpleasant (witness the long and messy history of the Rick and Morty subreddit). But too often discussion around Reddit has zeroed in on its less salubrious aspects and overlooked what a remarkable space it can be. Supported by some truly heroic moderation, it is one of the last outposts for that old internet – hobbyist, collaborative, more than a little eccentric. As this Atlantic defence puts it, Reddit is 'simultaneously niche and expansive' – which means you can use it as superficially or deeply as you wish: whether you're asking for a new TV recommendation, or getting detailed advice on building a hurdy-gurdy. In a sense, it has mainstreamed obsessiveness. Where once these hyper-specific communities were hidden away from the wider world, now they're accessible to anyone seeking them under one giant Reddit umbrella – almost 100 million people actively use the site every day. I'm not really one of them. At best, I'm a Reddit lurker – never bold enough to properly dive in and post – but, as someone who writes about pop culture, I find it endlessly useful. It's where I go if I want to get to the bottom of a puzzling Severance plot point on the show's endlessly insightful subreddit, or discover a lost 70s paranoid thriller on the extremely useful r/Movie Suggestions. And lord knows how many bands I've discovered on boards like the massive r/indieheads (3.6 million members and growing). Fittingly, when I last looked in on r/indieheads, I was greeted with users marking Brian Wilson's death by discussing his influence on the chillwave genre (with the song All I Wanna Do), exactly the sort of informed, spirited, geekish back and forth you'd hope for. Sign up to The Guide Get our weekly pop culture email, free in your inbox every Friday after newsletter promotion That spirit seems to, for now, have held despite a stock market flotation that some justifiably worried would ruin the site. Perhaps that fear will one day come to pass. Or maybe not. Maybe Reddit is too big, too singular, too defiantly peculiar to be blandified by big business. Let's hope we're still celebrating it in another 20 years' time, as it topples another pedestrianly plotted TV show. If you want to read the complete version of this newsletter please subscribe to receive The Guide in your inbox every Friday

Kim Cattrall reveals she turned down Sex And The City FOUR TIMES because of 'self-inflicted ageism' - after declining role in axed third film
Kim Cattrall reveals she turned down Sex And The City FOUR TIMES because of 'self-inflicted ageism' - after declining role in axed third film

Daily Mail​

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Kim Cattrall reveals she turned down Sex And The City FOUR TIMES because of 'self-inflicted ageism' - after declining role in axed third film

Kim Cattrall has revealed she turned down her famous role of Samantha Jones in Sex And The City four times when it was first offered to her. The actress, 68, is best known for playing the sexually liberated PR woman on the HBO show but bosses had a hard time getting her to sign up. Speaking to The Times, Kim explained she originally turned down the part because, at 41, she didn't believe audiences would find a woman that age sexy. 'Self-inflicted ageism' she said. 'Well, that changed — 40 became sexy. It became, 'Man, let's have more of that.'' On the show, Samantha had a preference for casual flings over relationships, but Kim insisted she is the exact opposite. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the Daily Mail's showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. 'I'm the antithesis of her [Samantha] in many ways. I'm a serial monogamist, and then some,' she said. She has been in a relationship with BBC audio engineer Russell Thomas since 2016 after they met while Kim recorded an essay about insomnia for BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour. Speaking about him during the interview, Kim said the couple have had 'so much fun' during their years together. The actress is known for roles in 80s films like Mannequin, Porky's and Police Academy but she's fine with being most closely associated with Samantha. 'I created a fantastic character that I loved, and I put a lot of love in it and if I'm remembered only for that, then that's really OK,' she said. Kim played Samantha for all six seasons of the show and reprised the role again in the Sex And The City feature films released in 2008 and 2010. Kim memorably declined to appear in a third film in 2016 with reports claiming she was unhappy with Samantha's storyline of being sexted by a teenage boy. In an interview on Piers Morgan Uncensored, she claimed she was never friends with her former co-stars Sarah Jessica Parker, Cynthia Nixon and Kristin Davis. 'We've never been friends - we've been colleagues. And in some ways that's a very healthy place to be, as you have a clear line between your professional life, and your personal, too,' she said. Kim added that she thought Sarah specifically, 'could have been nicer' to her. There was then a very public falling out between the two women after Sarah reached out to express her condolences when Kim's brother died in 2018. In a scathing Instagram post, she wrote: 'Your continuous reaching out is a painful reminder of how cruel you really were then and now. Let me make this VERY clear. (If I haven't already). You are not my family. You are not my friend.' She then shared a link to a New York Post article titled 'Inside the mean-girls culture that destroyed 'Sex and the City'. There was then a very public falling out between the two women after Sarah reached out to express her condolences when Kim's brother died in 2018 After making clear she had no desire to play Samantha again, Kim was not asked to return for the spin-off show And Just Like That. She did however, make a cameo in the second season finale where she spoke to Sarah's character Carrie on the phone. Kim filmed her cameo in a car and reportedly did not see or speak to any of her former co-stars during filming. She was reportedly paid an eye-popping $1M to reprise her role for the 70-second cameo which was negotiated directly by Max chairman-CEO Casey Bloys. May 2008: SJP defended Kim when she was asked whether she supported her decision to delay the filming of the first SATC movie due to salary disputes December 2009: Kim and Cynthia Nixon attend SJP's premier for Did You Hear About The Morgans? in a show of support and SJP tells Elle that she wouldn't have done the SATC film without Kim January 2010: In an interview with the Mail, Kim expressed her exasperation over the never-ending feud rumours saying 'People don't want to believe that we get on' May 2010: Kim admits that 'sometimes feelings get hurt' during grueling filming hours due to the amount of time the women spent together August 2016: SJP wishes Kim a happy 60th birthday and addresses her as her 'old friend' October 2016: Kim once again defends feud rumours but admits not every day working together is easy or perfect September 2017: SJP confirmed a third SATC movie... and then announced it was happening Willie Garson, who played Carrie's BFF Stan tweeted, 'Disappointed for all crew holding on for negotiations to conclude for their jobs, and of course, for the fans. Leave it at that. #Truth.'

Netflix Baby Reindeer star Richard Gadd filming in Glasgow for new BBC drama
Netflix Baby Reindeer star Richard Gadd filming in Glasgow for new BBC drama

Daily Record

time14 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Netflix Baby Reindeer star Richard Gadd filming in Glasgow for new BBC drama

Scottish actor Richard Gadd will be filming in the west end of the city later this month in a new project in collaboration with the BBC and HBO. Richard Gadd is set to make a splash in Glasgow for a new filming venture with the BBC. The Netflix Baby Reindeer star, who rose to fame for his performance in the dark comedy series, is taking on a new project in collaboration with HBO. The Fife-born actor will feature in upcoming series Half Man, which will be filmed across Glasgow's west end. Crews are reportedly set to descend on areas of Dumbarton Road later this month. ‌ Locals in the area have been warned of the upcoming shoot, which could result in traffic disruptions and parking restrictions. Mam Tor Productions has indicated that it will be working on a series named The Clinch. ‌ But this coincides closely with details surrounding Half Man, which is currently being filmed in the city and falls under the Glasgow-based production umbrella, according to Glasgow Live. Half Man delves into the lives of brothers Niall, portrayed by Jamie Bell from Billy Elliot, and Ruben, played by Richard Gadd himself. A dramatic turn of events at Niall's wedding, precipitated by Ruben's unexpected arrival, triggers a violent outburst that propels viewers through the siblings' tumultuous history. The series, set in and around Glasgow, spans nearly 40 years from the 1980s to the present day. In a letter to local residents in the Glasgow area, Mam Tor Productions described the show as an "ambitious dark comedy-drama" set in and around Glasgow that "will capture the wild energy of a changing city". The drama "covers the highs and lows of two brothers' relationship, from meeting as teenagers to their falling out as adults," including "all the good, bad, terrible, funny, angry, and challenging moments along the way". ‌ Gadd expressed his excitement, as he said in a statement ahead of his new gig: "I am delighted to confirm I will be playing Ruben in the newly crowned Half Man for the BBC/HBO alongside the incomparable Jamie Bell. When I wrote the show, I did it with him in mind, never thinking for a second we would manage to land him." He continued: "So I could not be happier for everything that has come to pass in getting him on board. He is one of the greatest actors of his generation and I am so looking forward to seeing what he does with the role. Thanks to all the staff at the BBC, HBO, and Mam Tor Productions for making it all happen. I cannot wait to work with you all in the months ahead." The eagerly anticipated series will feature six 45-minute episodes and is set to premiere in 2026, available on BBC iPlayer, BBC One and BBC Scotland in the UK, and across the pond on HBO in the USA.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store