Former CIA director says people must understand ‘how dangerous a world we live in right now' in the wake of Trump's Iran strike
Leon Panetta, the former director of the CIA during Barack Obama 's first term, has warned that President Donald Trump 's decision to bomb Iran – and the intelligence disputes surrounding it – only serve to emphasize 'how dangerous a world we live in right now.'
Panetta, 86, who also served as Bill Clinton 's chief of staff and currently co-hosts the foreign policy podcast One Decision, told The i Paper: 'I don't think there's any alternative but to understand how dangerous a world we live in right now.
'Not only because of the adversaries that are out there – whether it's China, or Russia, or North Korea, or Iran, or terrorism – but also because of the concerns about leadership, and whether or not the U.S. will exercise the right kind of leadership in a dangerous world.'
After Israel launched air strikes against Iran on Friday June 13 as part of its Operation Rising Lion offensive, intended to stop Tehran developing a nuclear weapon, Trump initially kept his distance before dropping bunker-busting bombs on three Iranian uranium enrichment sites over the weekend.
In the run-up, the president dismissed the significance of his own Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard briefing Congress in March that Iran was not currently advancing its efforts to build a weapon of mass destruction.
He also sidelined her from Situation Room meetings discussing the conflict but offered no evidence of his own to contradict her assessment.
The president and his administration have since attacked The New York Times and CNN for reporting on a U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency assessment that found the damage done to the Fordo, Natanz, and Esfahan facilities was not as severe as Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had indicated.
Responding to those tensions, Panetta said: 'There's no question that when the U.S. president makes a statement that our intelligence assessments are wrong and doesn't believe our own intelligence, that creates a very dangerous moment.
'It undermines the work of our intelligence professionals who really are focused on trying to provide the president with the truth. When the president questions their credibility, that certainly undermines their morale, I'm sure.
'But secondly, it also creates a real problem for the president, because if he rejects the intelligence he's receiving, then what will be the basis for the decisions that he makes in the future, and that is a very scary prospect.'
The former official added: 'I have always been confident about our intelligence assessments with regards to Iran… The fundamental question is: did they make a decision to proceed with developing a weapon? And I think our intelligence indicates that that still was not the case.'
For Panetta, the episode provides the latest example of Trump's 'unpredictability' as a leader, which poses a risk to America's NATO allies, who met this week in the Netherlands, at a time of heightened international unease.
'It really does rest with our European allies to do everything necessary to make sure that NATO is prepared militarily, to be able to respond if necessary,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Spy chief Tulsi Gabbard faces new crushing blow after Trump sidelined her over Iran nuclear strikes
Tulsi Gabbard is facing another blow after President Donald Trump sidelined her during the Iran nuclear strikes. Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, the Republican chairman of the Intelligence Committee, has proposed legislation to slash the size of her agency in half. 'ODNI was intended to be a lean organization to align America's intelligence resources and authorities, not the overstaffed and bureaucratic behemoth that it is today,' he said in a statement announcing his proposal. Cotton's bill - if passed - would provide a sweeping overhaul of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), including cutting its staff from 1,600 to 650. It would also shutter the National Intelligence University, a federally chartered research university dedicated to national security. There are indications Trump would sign it into law. He's privately mulled scrapping the ODNI because of his frustrations with Gabbard, The Atlantic reported. And that would hamper Gabbard's political ambitions. Her allies told the magazine that Gabbard sees the director of national intelligence role as a stepping stone to a second run for the presidency after her failed attempt as a Democrat in 2020. Trump has had an uneasy relationship with Gabbard, particularly after she posted a video to social media earlier this month describing her visit to Hiroshima, Japan, and warning of the dangerous threat of a nuclear war. The president berated her for the video, reported The New York Times, saying that a discussion of nuclear annihilation would scare people and she shouldn't discuss it. That meant Gabbard was already on thin ice when Trump began to look at striking Iran's nuclear sites. She had privately expressed concern about the fears of a wider war. And Trump flat out said 'she's wrong' when he was asked about Gabbard's testimony in March that Iran had not decided to build a nuclear weapon. While Gabbard was in the Situation Room during the strike, she became sidelined in the aftermath of the attack. And Gabbard didn't join the classified intelligence briefing for senators on Thursday nor did she join the one for House members on Friday. Her defenders say she is still doing important work for the administration. She has publicly supported the airstrike and she has defended Trump's declaration that Iran's nuclear capabilities were destroyed. 'New intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed,' she wrote on X. But that doesn't mean the two are close. And Gabbard's position is not helped by Trump's inherent distrust of the intelligence community, which goes back to his first presidential campaign and allegations Russia interfered to help him win the White House. A Trump ally told The Atlantic the president appreciates Gabbard's political appeal to disaffected Democrats but doesn't seek her advice on foreign policy or national security. 'She's a nonplayer,' the person said. 'When I want to call someone to influence Trump, I don't even think of her.' Her position in Trump's world was precarious from the start, given her position. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is a smaller agency with a short-lived history. It was created to improve coordination among U.S. spy agencies after the September 11 attacks. It oversees all of the country's 18 intelligence services, including the CIA. But CIA director John Ratcliffe served in Trump's first term and has his own strong relationship with the president. Gabbard has already cut the agency by 25% in line with Trump's efforts at slashing the size of the federal government.
Sky News
22 minutes ago
- Sky News
US Supreme Court curbs injunctions that blocked Trump's birthright citizenship plan
Donald Trump's administration will be allowed to take steps to implement its proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship in the US following a decision by the Supreme Court. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the latest version. Under the current rules, nearly anyone born on US territory has automatic citizenship rights - commonly known as "birthright citizenship". But, on his first day back in the White House, Trump signed an executive order aimed at ending that right. A series of lawsuits followed, with district courts issuing nationwide injunctions aiming to block the order from taking effect. The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to take steps to implement its proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship, handing a major win to the government. The court granted a request by the Trump administration to narrow the scope of nationwide injunctions imposed by judges so that they apply only to states, groups and individuals that sued. That means the birthright citizenship proposal can likely move forward at least in part in the states that challenged it, as well as those that did not. The Supreme Court decision was on cases filed in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state. The policy remains blocked for now in one additional state, New Hampshire, as a result of a separate lawsuit that is not before the Supreme Court. Please refresh the page for the latest version.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Supreme Court OKs fee that subsidizes phone, internet services in schools, libraries and rural areas
The Supreme Court on Friday upheld the fee that is added to phone bills to provide billions of dollars a year in subsidized phone and internet services in schools, libraries and rural areas. The justices, by a 6-3 vote, reversed an appeals court ruling that had struck down as unconstitutional the Universal Service Fund, the charge that has been added to phone bills for nearly 30 years. At arguments in March, liberal and conservative justices alike expressed concerns about the potentially devastating consequences of eliminating the fund, which has benefited tens of millions of Americans. The Federal Communications Commission collects the money from telecommunications providers, which pass the cost on to their customers. A Virginia-based conservative advocacy group, Consumers' Research, had challenged the practice. The justices had previously denied two appeals from Consumers' Research after federal appeals courts upheld the program. But the full 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, among the nation's most conservative, ruled 9-7 that the method of funding is unconstitutional. The 5th Circuit held that Congress had given too much authority to the FCC and the agency in turn had ceded too much power to a private entity, or administrator. The last time the Supreme Court invoked what is known as the nondelegation doctrine to strike down a federal law was in 1935. But several conservative justices have suggested they are open to breathing new life into the legal doctrine. The conservative-led court also has reined in federal agencies in high-profile rulings in recent years. Last year, the court reversed a 40-year-old case that had been used thousands of times to uphold federal regulations. In 2022, the court ruled Congress has to act with specificity before agencies can address 'major questions,' in a ruling that limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to combat climate change. But the phone fee case turned out not to be the right one for finding yet another way to restrict federal regulators. President Donald Trump 's Republican administration, which has moved aggressively to curtail administrative agencies in other areas, defended the FCC program. The appeal was initially filed by President Joe Biden 's Democratic administration. ___
