logo
GOP breathes secret sigh of relief as courts put brakes on Trump tariffs

GOP breathes secret sigh of relief as courts put brakes on Trump tariffs

Yahooa day ago

Republican lawmakers are breathing a sigh of relief that the courts are putting the brakes on President Trump's trade war, which has pummeled markets, created economic uncertainty and taken a bite out of Trump's own approval ratings.
It's unclear who will win the final legal battle, which could end up in the Supreme Court.
But Republicans for now are mostly hoping Trump takes a political win in the form of judicial decisions that could hold back his trade war or even put the tariffs on ice.
'I'm sure that Republican senators are secretly rooting for the Supreme Court to uphold the lower-court decision,' said Brian Darling, a GOP strategist and former Senate aide.
He said GOP lawmakers are 'quietly applauding the decision' by two courts Wednesday and Thursday to halt Trump's tariffs 'because it saves them from having to deal with the tariff issue, which has proven to be unpopular.'
'They're very happy about the decision as long it takes it off the table for a long period of time and doesn't commence another round of tariffs by different means,' he said.
In a way, these courts were taking actions that most Republicans couldn't, given the potential political costs of GOP senators taking Trump head-on over trade.
'Clearly, tariffs is an important issue for President Trump personally. It's something he's talked about and he's been pushing for a long, long time,' Darling said. 'Most Republican senators have no reason to go and talk about a tariff decision that blocks tariffs because they know it's not going to go over well on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.'
One Republican who has been vocal in his criticism of the Trump tariffs is Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.).
He applauded the court's ruling, arguing that the Constitution gives Congress, not the president, exclusive authority to tax imports.
'I have said time and time again that the Founders wanted to prevent one person from having unilateral control and decision-making powers. That's why the power of the purse and the ability to tax lie with Congress, not the president,' Paul posted on social platform X.
The two decisions that went against Trump took place Wednesday night, when the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled the president had exceeded his authority to impose tariffs, and on Thursday, when a second federal court issued a separate ruling on similar grounds. Both decisions said he could not cite emergency economic powers to impose his tariffs.
However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit later Thursday lifted the first ruling blocking Trump's tariffs.
The Trump administration is expected to appeal the decisions to the Supreme Court, which could weigh in as soon as Friday.
GOP lawmakers have said for months they want to give Trump room to strike deals with foreign trading partners but with June only a few days away, the president has yet to show significant progress in his trade talks, other than a deal with the United Kingdom that did little to calm the financial markets.
The three judges on the trade court who issued the summary judgment found that Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 to impose tariffs, blocking the reciprocal tariffs he imposed on almost every country in the world before later lowering them to 10 percent for a period of 90 days.
The trade court also blocked the tariffs that Trump levied separately against Canada, Mexico and China in response to what the president identified as threats posed by drug-trafficking and illegal immigration.
Senate Republicans who had criticized or expressed skepticism about Trump's tariff policies stayed mostly quiet Thursday in response to the court ruling, but GOP strategists say they are breathing a sigh of relief.
A senior Senate Republican aide warned that Trump was risking his reputation on the economy by wielding tariffs as a weapon against trading partners, a tactic that has started to depress corporate earnings projections for the rest of 2025.
Target, one of the nation's biggest retailers, last week cut its sales outlook for the rest of the year, citing weaker discretionary spending and consumer uncertainty because of tariffs.
HP, the information technology company, cut its annual profit forecast Wednesday because of 'tariff-related costs.' Its shares plunged 14 percent before gaining back some ground later in the day.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has long expressed skepticism of using tariffs to build up the domestic economy.
But he has muted his personal views on tariffs since becoming Senate GOP leader in January, telling reporters since then: 'I think everybody knows my views on tariffs.'
At the same time, he noted that Trump won a decisive victory in the 2024 presidential campaign after running on a promise to use tariffs to negotiate better deals for the United States.
Thune asked constituents at a public meeting last month to give Trump time to strike trade deals, urging patience 'to see what kind of deals he can strike.'
Thune's home-state colleague, Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), has warned that tariffs are pinching farmers in South Dakota.
Rounds told The Hill in March that while many farmers in South Dakota are 'really strong Trump supporters,' they wanted him to communicate to the president 'what tariffs are going to do' to their businesses.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) last month called tariffs a 'tax on American consumers.'
'I think it is a mistake to assume that we will have high tariffs in perpetuity. I don't think that would be good economic policy. I am not a fan of tariffs,' he told Fox Business host Larry Kudlow.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who faces a tough reelection race next year, said Trump and his top advisers need to show progress on trade deals before the end of June to create more certainty for businesses, warning that otherwise Republicans could face political headwinds in the election year.
'At the end of the day, the voters are largely driven by the question, 'Are you better off than you were fill-in-the-blank years ago?' And clearly if we have this kind of froth next year than it's a real challenge for Republicans,' Tillis said last month.
The North Carolina senator, however, has to tread carefully on the issue as he faces a potential primary challenge next year.
Tillis on Thursday pushed back against media reports about the TACO trade on Wall Street, in which speculators buy the dip in prices after Trump announces a new round of tariffs on the premise that 'Trump always chickens out' and then eases them.
'The media is citing 'unnamed' Wall Street hacks to attack President Trump,' he posted on social media. 'They've clearly never run a business or learned why adaptability is the key to success. Complex negotiations are not a straight line.'
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, on Wednesday was a rare GOP lawmaker who defended Trump's authority to levy tariffs in the wake of the trade court's ruling.
'I think it's pretty clear that the president has tariff authority. Congress gave it to him. You can debate whether that was a prudent move or not, but I think it's pretty clear that he has tariff authority,' he told Fox News host Laura Ingraham.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New order by California judge protects some Venezuelan TPS holders from deportation
New order by California judge protects some Venezuelan TPS holders from deportation

Miami Herald

time19 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

New order by California judge protects some Venezuelan TPS holders from deportation

A federal judge has granted protection from deportation and work permits to as many as 5,000 Venezuelans who have Temporary Protected Status. U.S. District Judge Edward E. Chen in San Francisco on Friday granted an emergency motion filed by Venezuelan plaintiffs following last week's Supreme Court ruling that the Trump administration can deport some Venezuelans on TPS while a challenge wends its way through the courts. Chen's order involves two key dates: Jan. 17, 2025, when Alejandro Mayorkas, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security at the time, extended TPS for Venezuelans until next year, and Feb. 5, when the new DHS secretary, Kristi Noem, announced she was revoking the extension. In an 11-page ruling, Chen ordered the government to uphold the rights of TPS holders who received government documentation — such as work permits and/or TPS renewals — under Mayorkas's extension between between those two dates. 'If DHS granted that extension, it must honor it and comply with the court's order,' said Emi MacLean, a senior staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union who is among the lawyers representing the Venezuelans in the case. During Thursday's hearing, the government estimated that about 5,000 Venezuelans re-registered for TPS or work permits, a figure Chen referred to in his ruling. 'What we do know is that two of the named plaintiffs in our case do benefit from the order,' MacLean said. 'We also have named plaintiffs who fall outside the scope of Judge Chen's ruling—for example, those who received an automatic extension but only after February 5th. Additionally, we know there are people who made the effort to re-register but didn't receive any official notice in time to benefit from it.' The plaintiffs are represented by the Center for Immigration Law and Policy at UCLA School of Law, the ACLU Foundation of Southern California and the National Day Laborer Organizing Network. Noem revoked TPS protections for roughly 350,000 Venezuelans effective April 7 — stripping their right to work and exposing them to potential detention and deportation. Many affected individuals live in South Florida. After the Supreme Court ruling, Homeland Security updated its TPS guidance but has yet to clarify how it will implement the decision. On March 31, Chen blocked the Trump administration's attempt to revoke deportation protections for Venezuelans just days before their legal status was set to expire. Chen ruled that Venezuelan nationals with TPS could suffer 'irreparable injury' without a stay on their deportations. In April, a federal appeals court upheld Chen's stay, rejecting the government's request to lift it. However, on May 19 the Supreme Court issued a ruling favoring the Trump administration by allowing the termination of TPS to proceed while the case is litigated. The Supreme Court did not rule on the merits of the lawsuit, which was filed by seven Venezuelans and the National TPS Alliance in federal court in San Francisco. The high court clarified that its order does not prevent ongoing challenges to Noem's decision to cancel work permits and other official documents set to expire on Oct. 2, 2026.

Appeals court keeps pauses on Trump's mass firings at 21 agencies
Appeals court keeps pauses on Trump's mass firings at 21 agencies

Miami Herald

time23 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Appeals court keeps pauses on Trump's mass firings at 21 agencies

May 31 (UPI) -- An three-judge federal appeals panel has kept in place a lower court's decision to pause the Trump administration's plans to downsize the federal workforce through layoffs. Late Friday, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision denied an emergency motion by the federal government to stay U.S. District Judge Susan Illston's order on May 9 that halted terminations at 21 agencies. The layoffs are called reductions in force, or RIFs. In a 45-page ruling, the appeals court in California wrote the challengers likely will win the case on the merits. The appeal panel said the Trump executive order on Feb. 13 "far exceeds the President's supervisory powers under the Constitution." The Trump administration has also asked the Supreme Court to decide and has not acted. "A single judge is attempting to unconstitutionally seize the power of hiring and firing from the Executive Branch," White House spokesman Harrison Fields told CNN in a statement. "The President has the authority to exercise the power of the entire executive branch - singular district court judges cannot abuse the power of the entire judiciary to thwart the President's agenda." Ruling for the plaintiffs were Senior Circuit Judge William Fletcher, an appointee of President Bill Clinton and Lucy Koh, selected by President Joe. Consuelo Maria Callahan, an appointee of President George W. Bush, wrote in her dissent that "the President has the right to direct agencies, and OMB and OPM to guide them, to exercise their statutory authority to lawfully conduct RIFs." Fletcher wrote: "The kind of reorganization contemplated by the Order has long been subject to Congressional approval." Illston, who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and serves in San Francisco, had backed the lawsuit by labor unions and cities filed on April 28, including San Francisco, Chicago, Baltimore and Harris County in Houston. She questioned whether Trump's administration was acting lawfully in reducing the federal workforce and felt Congress should have a role. "The President has the authority to seek changes to executive branch agencies, but he must do so in lawful ways and, in the case of large-scale reorganizations, with the cooperation of the legislative branch," Illston wrote after hearing arguments from both sides. "Many presidents have sought this cooperation before; many iterations of Congress have provided it. Nothing prevents the President from requesting this cooperation -- as he did in his prior term of office. Indeed, the Court holds the President likely must request Congressional cooperation to order the changes he seeks, and thus issues a temporary restraining order to pause large-scale reductions in force in the meantime." The coalition of organizations suing told CNN said after the appeals decision: "We are gratified by the court's decision today to allow the pause of these harmful actions to endure while our case proceeds." After Trump's executive order, the Department of Government Efficiency submitted a Workforce Optimization Initiative and the Office of Personnel Management also issued a memo. During Trump's first 100 days in office, at least 121,000 workers have been laid off or targeted for layoffs, according to a CNN analysis. There are more than 3 million workers among civilian and military personnel. Some of them have taken buyouts, "including those motivated to do so by the threat of upcoming RIFs," according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. That includes 10,000 at the Department of Health and Human Services through RIF as part of a plan to cut 20,000 employees. That includes 20% of the workforce of the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The agencies, run by Cabinet-level personnel, sued were Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Justice, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Justice, Labor, State and Treasury, Transportation, Veterans Affairs. The Education Department, which Trump wants to dismantle, was not listed, but 50% of the workforce has been let go. Six additional agencies with statutory basis elsewhere in the United States Code were named: AmeriCorps, General Services Administration, National Labor Relations Board, National Science Foundation, Small Business Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. Elon Musk, who officially left Friday as special White House adviser, was named in the suit. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Video of People ‘Leaving Early' From Trump Rally Questioned
Video of People ‘Leaving Early' From Trump Rally Questioned

Miami Herald

time24 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Video of People ‘Leaving Early' From Trump Rally Questioned

A viral video claiming to show attendees leaving early at a President Donald Trump rally in Pennsylvania on Friday has sparked debate online. On multiple occasions in the past, people have posted videos to X, formerly Twitter, claiming to show people leaving Trump rallies early. But the latest video has come under scrutiny, even from the president's critics. Trump has long been known for his tendency to exaggerate crowd sizes at his rallies and public events, a pattern that dates back to his very first days in office. The video, shared by the left-leaning account Patriot Takes, shows a group of four people appearing to exit Trump's rally in Pennsylvania on Friday before it had concluded. However, viewers and commenters on social media quickly pointed out that the footage captures only a tiny fraction of the audience. "I can't stand him, but come on, it was like four people," X user Rick Dorris wrote. Several other observers suggested that the individuals might simply be stepping out for a restroom break or refreshments rather than leaving altogether. Other images and videos from the same rally depict large crowds, reinforcing the notion that the majority of attendees stayed throughout the event. There have, however, been instances of larger numbers of people leaving early from Trump rallies in the past. Last year, there were multiple reports and videos of noticeable early exits at various Trump events. In one instance, a video posted to X appeared to show a small group of people leaving a Trump rally in November 2024. Washington Examiner reporter Samantha-Jo Roth, who posted the video, wrote, "In case anyone is wondering, there are in fact people leaving Trump's rally early. To be fair, many of them have been here since the AM." The post accumulated over 22,000 views. The host of ABC News' If You're Listening show Matt Bevan also shared videos from a Trump rally in Detroit, which he posted on November 1. He wrote, "Went to a little event in Detroit. Despite Trump's claim that nobody leaves early, many people left early. From about 25 minutes into his speech, there was a steady stream." In the comments, he added, "I should note, everyone in the room had been there for two hours before he came on." He also wrote that Trump was scheduled to come on at 4:30 and came on at around 4:45, and "people started leaving about 5:10-5:15." Meanwhile, in October 2024, former Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign shared a video on Truth Social of a Trump rally in Michigan, showing one crowded section and a larger empty area, mocking him over crowd size. "Trump: No one else can fill this place up (The room is mostly empty)," the Harris campaign wrote. Throughout the 2024 presidential campaign, rally crowd sizes and attendance were a point of contention between Trump and Harris, with the Republican frequently boasting about his turnout and jabbing Harris' while the then vice president countered by highlighting people leaving his rallies or empty sections. In September, The New York Times analyzed six rallies in August, finding that both candidates drew similar audience sizes. The Times analysis also found that of those six rallies, Trump spoke four times as long as Harris, writing that the longer duration of his rallies could contribute to the higher number of people leaving early, as based on photographs. The former president previously addressed the comments that supporters were appearing to leave his rallies early. At an event with broadcaster Tucker Carlson in Glendale, Arizona, in October, Trump said, "They don't leave and they're really well-attended, we can't get places big enough." In September, Trump also said to a rally crowd in Walker, Michigan, "The people that you see leaving-because nobody ever leaves, and when they do, I finish up quick, believe me." One X user commented: "Even as a Trump hater, I think these kinds of posts are useless, as evidenced in Nov. 24. You couldn't find him filling any arena, yet he won. Focus on the issues themselves and don't let the chuds pretend they care about working class." The White House has not yet commented on the video. Related Articles Bono Sparks MAGA Backlash After Joe Rogan AppearanceTrump's Approval Rating Hits Second-Term Low With Most Accurate PollsterDonald Trump Says He's Potentially Stopping 'Nuclear War' Through TradeSteve Bannon Says Elon Musk and Scott Bessent Had 'Physical Confrontation' 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store