I'm a marathoner and this 10-minute kettlebell workout is perfect for adding onto the end of runs
As a keen runner who finds it hard to fit in as much supportive strength training as I should be doing, I find short workouts you can do at the end of a run one of the most convenient options.
That's because I'm already in my sports kit and feel motivated to move after enjoying my run, so doing 10 to 20 minutes more training before I shower doesn't feel like a burden.
This strength workout for runners only takes 10 minutes and all you need to do it is one of the best kettlebells. It can also be done anywhere you have 10-15 meters of space to move, so doing it outdoors after your run is probably your best option.
The workout routine has been put together by Stephen Scullion, an Irish elite runner who competed in the marathon at the Tokyo Olympics.
Scullion is using a 17.5lb kettlebell for the workout, but use whatever weight is appropriate for you. I actually used a dumbbell for the session myself and it was fine, though a little unwieldy for the kettlebell swings in the workout.
The workout involves doing a series of lower-body focused moves like walking lunges and kettlebell swings, often broken up by plyometric exercises like single-leg hops, which are a great addition to any running-specific routine.
There isn't a particular strict structure to the session, so make sure you can see and hear Scullion as he demonstrates the moves and provides pointers on how best to do them. Take breaks as you need to — I just paused the video when I needed a breather so I didn't fall behind.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
I did the workout after an easy run, here are my main takeaways.
You need a runway of 10-15m to do some of the moves in the workout like calf walks and walking lunges, which is why it's a great session to do outside at the end of your run.
If you don't have a good spot to do it outdoors after your run, then you can do it inside but might have to turn around more often to complete the walking moves.
I loved the amount of plyometric moves you do in the workout, which include broad jumps and squat jumps as well as single-leg hops. I always like to include jumping moves in my workouts and I find that doing them after a run when my legs are warmed up is better than going into them a bit cold during standalone strength sessions.
Plyometric exercises are fantastic for developing the strength and power that will benefit you during runs, so make sure to follow Scullion's instructions for them regarding jumping as high as possible and trying to be as light on your feet as you can in between jumps.
The two main reasons I sometimes skip strength workouts during a hard week of running is that I can't find the time and don't want to work too hard on exercise that isn't running. I also dislike running when I have DOMS from strength sessions.
This workout is well-judged in that it doesn't take too long and doesn't wreck your legs, but still will have a beneficial effect in improving your lower-body strength and power.
While it is a benefit of this workout that it isn't too demanding, if you're getting serious with your strength training for running then you will probably want to also have some heavier weights sessions on your plan.
Classic compound lifts like squats and deadlifts are great for runners, and using heavy weights with those moves is needed to stimulate the growth that will benefit you on the run. Doing this workout a couple of times a week alongside a session with heavier weights would work well.
Many workouts for runners are just great core and leg sessions anyone can benefit from, but I'd say this routine is so focused on runners it's not one I'd add to my training plan if I wasn't into the sport.
The moves will make you stronger for other sports that involve running, of course, and it's no bad thing to improve your running strength and form in general, but there are probably sessions you could prioritize instead to get more general benefits, like this 10-minute full-body kettlebell workout.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
20 minutes ago
- USA Today
Some NFL players are excited about Olympic flag football. Others? Not so much.
Editor's note: This story is a part of a series by USA TODAY Sports called Project: June. We will publish at least one NFL-themed story every day throughout the month because fans know the league truly never sleeps. The idea of NFL players taking on the world in flag football just sounds cool, right? Players like Vikings star receiver Justin Jefferson loves the idea. He called it a "dream" in fact. And that's how it's been portrayed throughout much of the media since it was decided NFL players will take part in the 2028 Olympics in flag football. This is a great thing. Players are jacked. Let's go kick some flag football butt, America! But what if players aren't actually all that excited to be flag football Olympians? There was a recent extremely under-reported remark from Bengals star receiver Ja'Marr Chase. He was asked about flag football and maybe spoke for more players than people want to acknowledge. "I don't know how I feel about it, if I'm being completely honest,' Chase said, via WPCO's Marshall Kramsky. 'I want to know the timing for us, offseason, in-season. I want to know if we're getting paid. I want to know where we traveling every other week or every day, like all that plays a part, because we have an offseason, we have a life. Also, how long would that be? I don't know. There's a lot of questions to it." The key part of that quote: We have an offseason, we have a life. This doesn't mean that there are players who aren't excited about participating in the Olympics. There are and will be. It does mean there will be players who don't see the same level of excitement about it the league office and fans have. When Kansas City quarterback Patrick Mahomes was asked about Olympic flag football, he went all Roger Murtaugh from "Lethal Weapon:" 'I'll probably leave that to the younger guys. I'll be a little older by the time that thing comes around.' Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford just openly cracked up when asked about the Olympics. "You talking about coaching, or what?" he joked. Speaking of coaches, Denver's Sean Payton has been talked about as someone who could lead the team. On June 6 he asked about the possibility of coaching the flag team and he was, well, noncommittal. For now. 'I don't want to answer questions in 2028 when I'm focused on Friday,' Payton said, laughing. In part, what you're seeing, I believe, is that some players (and others) don't see flag football as a vital thing to do. Or at least not on the level of, say, Olympic basketball. The world had caught up to us in hoops (and even surpassed America) mandating the arrival of the Dream Team. Basketball was our game, not the world's, and we had to retake the sport from the clutches of others. That's not the case with flag football. There's no nationwide call to beat everyone in flag football. There's also no need for people to dive into this now. It's three years away. You also hear in Chase's remarks the union and labor part of this. Players know the NFL will find a way to make tons of cash off of this, and Chase, understandably, wants to make sure players get their share. I respect him for that. Again, others will get into the flag football groove. There's no question about that. 'I feel like it's always an honor to play for your country,' Falcons running back Bijon Robinson told Cory Muse of KVUE. 'Like, you always want to play for your country. I would love to show my skillset on that type of stage. 'So, I think it's going to come down to our schedule and where it lies, and if the teams even let us go. But I would love to play if given the opportunity. We'll see. I don't want it to affect my team and what we've got going here.' 'Yeah, I think it's great," Rams coach Sean McVay recently told reporters. "I think that is so far away from me. Coaching years are dog years, you know that. You hear Justin Jefferson come out and talk about, 'Man, that would be really cool.' That's awesome. Like I think you give guys the opportunity to say, 'Alright, well what's your preference on it?' And I think whatever our guys are…there's going to be the availability for maybe one guy on each team to be able to do that. "And if that's something that players say they want to be able to do, then I think it's a really cool experience for them to be able to be a part of while also acknowledging that man, there are some other guys that have been doing it. I'm not going to pretend to understand the nuances tactically and what that game entails, but I think it's good. I think it's great.' There's definitely that sentiment out there. Still, there could be a lot more complexity to this flag football story than we know.
New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
An MLB manager found value in long walks. Research suggests it's a ‘brain-changing power'
For most of his adult life, Bruce Bochy has been a walker. Long strolls, short saunters, usually along water. When he managed the San Francisco Giants to three World Series championships, he often wandered the city's steep hills with his wife, Kim. On the road, he kept a daily routine: An afternoon walk to the ballpark, no music, no podcasts, just his thoughts. Advertisement 'Sometimes we get caught up in the game,' Bochy said. 'We let that define us. That's a very important part of our life, but I don't want that just to be my sense of significance. It's family and health. So that's part of my way of trying to stay healthy. Not just physically, but on the mental side.' Bochy, 70, isn't as nimble as he once was. He possesses two new hips and an artificial knee. In his third year with the Texas Rangers, he walks slowly, a hitch in his deliberate gait. But he still believes in the power of a good walk — an hour of exercise, fresh air and contemplation, a peaceful break to mull lineup decisions, brainstorm tactics and ideas and think through tough conversations with his players. 'I felt like I did something,' Bochy said. When it comes to walking, Bochy is one of sports' biggest enthusiasts; he even wrote a whole book about walks. But he's hardly alone. Former Apple CEO Steve Jobs was famed for his walking meetings. Ernest Hemingway was said to walk around the Seine in Paris to solve writer's block. And the famed psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky sharpened their biggest ideas while on long, meandering walks. 'I did the best thinking of my life on leisurely walks with Amos,' Kahneman wrote in the 2011 book, 'Thinking, Fast and Slow.' In a world of Fitbits, iPhone health apps and other tracking devices, it might seem that walking's benefits are properly appreciated and understood. But Shane O'Mara, an Irish neuroscientist and writer, maintains that walking is a 'brain-changing power' which remains overlooked. At the very least, O'Mara is something of a walking evangelist. Whether you're an MLB manager, an executive, an elite athlete or anyone else, it can meaningfully improve your life. And if walking leads to more creativity and clearer thoughts, O'Mara pushes forward the following idea: Maybe it's something we should all be thinking about more. Bochy's walking habit has a familiar origin story. It started when his family got a dog, a black lab named Jessie. Bochy was managing the San Diego Padres and the task of walking the dog fell to him. Soon enough, he came to love the walks around nearby Poway, Calif., as much as he loved the dog. (And he really loved the dog.) Advertisement When Bochy joined the Giants in 2007, the ritualistic walks came with him. The benefits were consistent. One summer night in Milwaukee, after a brutal collapse against the Brewers, Bochy found himself sitting alone in his office, ruminating over the loss. Finally, he thought: I'm gonna walk home. It was maybe four miles, and it was late, and the Brewers' stadium is not exactly pedestrian-friendly. But when Bochy reached the team hotel, he felt better. Bochy kept up the routine as the Giants made World Series runs in 2010 and 2012, exploring cities and taking in San Francisco's neighborhoods. As it happened, those championship seasons came just as another Bay Area resident started thinking deeply about the value of walking. Marily Oppezzo was a dietitian and health researcher at Stanford in nearby Palo Alto, working on her PhD in educational psychology. Her doctoral adviser, Daniel Schwartz, was a believer in the 'walking meeting,' opting for discussions during strolls around campus. Oppezzo was interested in finding ways to integrate more exercise into the workplace. One day, during a conversation about her dissertation topic, Oppezzo asked Schwartz a question: 'Why do we do walking meetings?' Schwartz said they helped him think through new ideas. Oppezzo thought for a moment. Had anyone ever tested that? The question planted the seed for the first set of studies to measure if walking produces more creativity. In a series of experiments, Oppezzo and Schwartz asked 176 college students to complete different creative-thinking tasks while sitting, walking on a treadmill, walking outside through campus or being pushed in a wheelchair. In one example, the students had to come up with atypical uses for random objects, like a tire or a brick, a common marker of creativity. On average, the students' creative output increased by 60 percent when they were walking. Advertisement What made the results even more interesting was that it wasn't just about the environment surrounding the students. For years, writers and thinkers had theorized that the benefits of a walk stemmed from the stimuli we experience in nature — the changing views, the fresh air, the green space. But Oppezzo found something different. Yes, people saw an increase in creativity when being pushed through campus in a wheelchair. But people saw an even bigger increase when walking indoors on a treadmill. 'Walking beat it,' Oppezzo said. 'There was something about pushing through the space.' There were limits, though. While walking was ideal for divergent thinking — idea generation, daydreaming, making narrative connections — it was mostly useless when it came to convergent thinking, or the kind of focused thinking one needs for quick math in your head. It was an idea that Kahneman described in 'Thinking, Fast and Slow.' The next time you're on a walk with a friend, he wrote, ask them to do 23 x 78 in their head. They will almost surely stop walking. Oppezzo found the same in one unpublished study. The participants could not do quick math. 'People were just garbage at it,' she said. When Oppezzo and Schwartz's research was originally published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition in 2014, it inspired a short cycle of media attention. Oppezzo eventually gave a TED Talk. But there was also a second response. 'Everyone was like: 'Oh, we already knew this,' ' Oppezzo said. Scientists, though, were still trying to understand why. One day earlier this year, not long after speaking to Bochy, I went for a morning walk. The conversation with Bochy had sparked an idea for a story, but as I walked and listened to music, sipping from a cup of coffee, my mind began to wander, and a familiar process took root. A series of ideas began to collide, and a mental mapping process began, constructing the scaffolding for a basic story structure in my head. Advertisement As a writer, it's hard to describe how or why this happens. One of my friends, a fellow writer and walking enthusiast, once told me he thought of this experience as 'inactive work.' O'Mara, the Irish neuroscientist, says that 'walking is, paradoxically, a form of active idleness.' You are not focused on unlocking an idea; it just happens. Neuroscientists describe being in this mind-wandering state as part of the default mode network, one of the brain's primary networks. It's active when we reflect on our pasts or imagine our futures. It helps us conceive narrative and make sense of the world. A second major network is the executive control network, which is active when we are using more focused thinking and problem solving. We use this network when we are solving a math problem or searching for one correct answer. 'The ability to think creatively seems to be the combination of these two systems working together,' said Roger Beaty, the director of the Cognitive Neuroscience of Creativity Lab at Penn State University. 'So it's not just super spontaneous, random thinking, or all focused, logical thinking. But the synchrony of those two systems.' According to O'Mara, there are reasons that walking enables this toggling between mental states. Mild exercise can increase blood flow, boost our mood and enhance alertness. And bodily movement itself drives activity all over the brain. 'This activity allows ideas just below the level of consciousness to come into consciousness,' O'Mara said. But in most cases, walking is not the kind of exercise that can spike our heart rate. Nor are we overwhelmed by stimuli. There is a reason, after all, that we rarely daydream while sprinting or amid an intense basketball game. It's also why our minds don't wander as much if we walk while listening to a podcast or an audiobook. Advertisement O'Mara described the dynamic in his 2019 book, 'In Praise of Walking: A New Scientific Exploration.' The part of the brain that is active when we are walking, jogging or moving is the extended hippocampal formation, which is also the section that is active when we access memories. 'Mind-wandering allows the collision of ideas, while mind-focusing allows you to test whether it is nonsensical or interesting and new,' O'Mara wrote. 'The more we look, the more we find that the hippocampus plays a central role in both these activities.' Put another way: There are other possible inputs — or ways — to generate ideas. But walking acts as a useful catalyst. 'It is a simple hack,' O'Mara said. Scientists have continued to examine the relationship. In 2023, a creativity researcher at the University of Graz in Austria led a study that reinforced the findings from Stanford. Using sensors to track movement and mobile phone prompts to test a group of college students, the group was able to take research out of the lab and into a real-world environment. The group found that, on average, people who were more physically active had more creative ideas. In addition, a person's number of steps five minutes before doing a creative task was associated with an increase in the originality of their verbal ideas. 'If a person was walking more,' said Christian Rominger, the creativity researcher and lead author on the study, 'they were more creative.' In his prime, Bochy usually cruised past 10,000 steps per day. The number has become a benchmark for millions around the world. The origins were more marketing than science. The target dates back to the 1960s in Japan, according to I-Min Lee, a professor of epidemiology at Harvard who has researched step counts. After Tokyo hosted the Olympics in 1964, a company in Japan produced a pedometer device called a Manpo-kei, which translates to '10,000 steps meter.' Advertisement It was a nice round number — roughly equal to 5 miles — but research has shown that a better target may be 7,500 steps. O'Mara offers another guideline: 5,000 more steps than you're doing now. As the 19th-century Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard once said, 'Every day, I walk myself into a state of well-being and walk away from every illness.' For those who do it daily, walking is more than exercise. It is a time machine to the past, a window to our possible futures, a tool to sharpen our thoughts and ideas, our hopes and desires. For Bochy, it has always been a time to decompress. When he managed the Giants, he lived in a condo not far from the ballpark. His walk to work was short, less than 10 minutes. After games, win or lose, he would head into the night and walk home. (Illustration: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic; Mitchell Layton, Brace Hemmelgarn/Minnesota Twins / Getty Images)
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Olympics have big AI plans
The Olympics has a bold plan to use AI to make upcoming games in Italy and Los Angeles more efficient and to improve the experience for those watching on TV around the world. Why it matters: As one of the most watched and lucrative global events, the games have long served as a testbed for new technologies. The big picture: Ahead of last year's Paris Games, the International Olympic Committee unveiled a broad framework for AI use, to help in athlete training and event judging as well as to improve fans' experiences. However, AI played only a supporting role in Paris, with partners and sponsors using the event to showcase their chatbots and other technology. For next February's Winter Games in Italy, organizers hope AI can help streamline the time-consuming contingency planning and scheduling that comes with unpredictable snow conditions. For the L.A. Summer Games in 2028, the organizers hope AI will help manage more than three dozen sports taking place across a broad swath of Southern California (plus softball and canoeing in Oklahoma City). "For me, it is, 'How can we actually use AI to help the operations of the games globally?' Olympics CIO and CTO Ilario Corna told Axios in an interview. Zoom in: When it comes to the broadcasting of the games, AI is already speeding access to highlights from as many angles and athletes as possible, Olympic Broadcasting Services CEO Yiannis Exarchos told Axios. In Paris, OBS produced 11,000 hours of content, Exarchos said, with AI broadening the coverage and getting it to viewers faster. Using AI allowed those hours of footage to be sliced and diced into 97,000 separate highlight clips, in addition to the full coverage of each event. Not only could viewers choose to focus on a particular athlete in a particular sport, but broadcasters could create clips in different formats, such as horizontal video for social media. That's important to broadcasters around the world who spent millions or even billions to broadcast the games in their country. "It gave them the opportunity to be constantly pushing very, very fast, customized highlights for their own audience, on social, on digital, on their programs," Exarchos said. The use of technology was particularly noticeable with TV replays that made use of multiple cameras to show athletes in 3-D motion from multiple angles. As recently as a few years ago, it took around 20 minutes to generate a single such replay. "This made it practically useless for the live director," Exarchos said. With advances in AI and other technology, OBS was able to bring the creation of those highlights down to a matter of seconds, making it useful in live coverage. Viewers end up with a better understanding of an event's dynamics — whether it's a diver's moves, the spin on a ping-pong ball or the path of an archer's arrows. "But what I keep on insisting and reminding ourselves, starting with myself, is that this is not about technology," Exarchos said. "It's about using technology to tell the stories of the greatest athletes in the world." Between the lines: One reason the Olympics are able to push tech's boundaries is that they took the production of the raw videos for each sport in house in the 2000s with the creation of Olympic Broadcasting Services, which then distributes them to networks like NBC who've bought the rights. When each round of games had a different broadcaster in charge, they had to start from scratch each time. AI also has a role helping athletes and their coaches better understand their performances. In Paris, Alibaba and Omega partnered to help understand what's happening during hurdles races, not just in terms of the outcome, but also by tracking athletes' steps between each hurdle and other metrics useful in training. Corna said he'd like to see such practices spread to far more sports. Another job for AI could come in helping reduce the environmental impact of the games. In Paris, organizers used AI to help monitor energy use — spotting, for example, when one stadium left its lights on overnight and shutting them off. Using so-called digital twins of various stadiums and other venues cut down on the number of in-person visits by officials ahead of last summer's Olympics. In another case, AI helped identify a broken motor on a remote camera near the Eiffel Tower whose view kept unexpectedly drifting from its intended spot. Yes, but: One of the big challenges is ensuring that new technologies don't unduly benefit the richest countries.
