Artwork featuring JK Rowling's name taken off display to stop ‘tampering'
An artwork featuring author JK Rowling's name has been taken down by the National Trust, which wants to 'protect it from further tampering or damage'.
Visitors who went to Hardwick Hall in Derbyshire between April and November 2024 were invited to nominate a 'contemporary Virtuous Woman', whose name was then sewn into the fabric.
Since the project ended, the participatory artwork, A Virtuous Woman, has continued to be on display, featuring Rowling's name which was at an unspecified time 'stitched over by other participants'.
Last week on X, feminist campaigner Jean Hatchet said she had 'corrected' the work by taking off the stitching over Harry Potter author Rowling's name.
It follows criticism of Scotland-based Rowling's views on gender issues that have seen her called transphobic by activists, which she has denied.
A spokeswoman for the National Trust said: 'The artwork was open to contributions for eight months and closed in November when the piece was finished and put on public display.
'During the participation phase, JK Rowling's name was stitched onto the piece seven times and in two instances it was stitched over by other participants.
'At the time the artwork was completed and subsequently hung, JK Rowling's name appeared five times without any overstitching.
'We ask people not to damage or tamper with artworks once they are finished and on public display.
'The piece has been taken off display for investigation and to protect it from further tampering or damage. We take all claims and incidents of damage to items in our care seriously and investigate each one.'
Ms Hatchet criticised the response from the National Trust, saying she removed the 'stitching with the correct tool', took 'great time and care', and did not damage it.
The stitched names of British queens, artist Yoko Ono, former prime minister Baroness Margaret Thatcher, climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, and Taylor Swift among others appear not to have stitching over them on the recycled textile.
The work comes from artist Layla Khoo in association with the University of Leeds and National Trust, and is inspired by wealthy Elizabethan woman Elizabeth Talbot, known as Bess of Hardwick, commissioning a series of large embroideries featuring noble women from the ancient world, such as Cleopatra.
The trust had previously responded to criticism from the organisation, Women's Rights Network Derbyshire and Staffordshire, who advocated for 'a simple addition to their description', with a statement explaining why the crossing-out stitching on Rowling's name remains.
Responding on X, the trust said that it is a 'collaborative piece of art formed of participants' views from a variety of age groups, life experiences and beliefs', and 'any contributions to the piece have been made by those who chose to take part'.
'None of the views expressed or actions taken by participants represent the views of the National Trust, the artist or the University of Leeds,' the organisation said
Ellie Evans, from WRN Derbyshire and Staffordshire, criticised the artwork being covered up, saying the move would 'erase all the women'.
Khoo and the University of Leeds have also been contacted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Brooklyn Beckham family feud 'deeper than ever' despite brother Romeo's split from Kim Turnbull as it's revealed there is 'no way back'
The Beckham family feud is reportedly deeper than ever despite Romeo's recent split from his girlfriend Kim Turnbull. Kim, 26, had been at the centre of the rift after Nicola Peltz, 30, claimed that she felt uncomfortable around her, with sources close to the US heiress saying that Kim had dated Brooklyn when they were teenagers. However even with Kim now out the picture The Mirror have revealed it would take a 'small miracle' to fix the fall out and there is 'no going back'. A source told the publication: 'There are no signs of reconciliation, sadly. There is still a lot of hurt to process.' Sources close to Nicola previously insisted that as 'an outsider coming into the Beckham family, she has helped Brooklyn see the emotional abuse and toxic behaviour within'. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. Kim, 26, had been at the centre of the rift after Nicola Peltz claimed that she felt uncomfortable around her, with sources close to the US heiress saying that Kim had dated Brooklyn when they were teenagers And despite friends of David and Victoria describing these claims as 'patently untrue and ludicrous' there is reportedly no hope for peace talks. The source added: 'It was a low, low can you say such things about your own family. It will be interesting to see if Brooklyn and Nicola make any attempt to heal things now Kim is out of the picture.' MailOnline have contacted Brooklyn and Nicola's representatives as well as those of the Beckhams. It comes as it was also revealed that David is to be awarded a knighthood in the King's Birthday Honour's List after being snubbed for years. The former Manchester United and England star, who recently celebrated his milestone 50th birthday, will be confirmed as a 'Sir' when the list is released next week, according to The Sun. His wife and former Spice Girl Victoria Beckham will be known as Lady Beckham. On Wednesday The Mail revealed Romeo and Kim had parted ways. Friends said that things remain 'amicable' between the couple and that their parting is 'nothing to do' with Kim being blamed by Nicola for being the catalyst for the feud that has ripped the Beckham family apart. Kim and Brooklyn were undeniably close for a brief period – as photographs of them together at the time show - but suggestions that they were ever an item are wide of the mark, according to well-informed sources. This prior relationship was the reason Brooklyn and Nicola gave for not attending any of David's celebrations. That Kim has now been 'thrown to the wolves' as the reason behind the family row is 'deeply upsetting' to Brooklyn's parents and brothers. Earlier this week Brooklyn revealed that he's looking forward to starting a family with wife Nicola, as tensions continue to simmer between him and his parents. During a new PDA-packed video released by Glamour Magazine, the eldest son of Victoria and David gushed multiple times that he can see kids in his future, and that Nicola will be an 'amazing' mother. In the loved-up clip the pair couldn't hide their excitement about their future together as Brooklyn gushed: 'I see us when we have our kids,' and Nicola added: 'I see the future father of my kids.' Brooklyn and Nicola also hinted at the ongoing unrest with Brooklyn's family in the interview. The couple opened up about outside interference in their marriage and hinted at worsening relations with the Beckham clan, as they instead focused on the advice they'd received from Nicola's billionaire parents, Nelson and Claudia Peltz. Brooklyn appeared to deliberately omit mentioning his family, as he shared an alternative meaning behind the name of his hot sauce, Cloud23. The aspiring chef's representative told last week how the number 23 was a 'warm nod' to David, who wore number 23 while playing for Real Madrid and LA Galaxy, inspired by NBA legend Michael Jordan, in a touching move that appeared to be an olive branch to his father. However, in the new interview, Brooklyn failed to mention his father, simply stating: 'The 23 stands for our engagement date and my age back then.' Elsewhere in the interview, he and Nicola also seemed to hint at interference in their relationship and the ongoing reports of the family feud. When asked how they 'protect' their relationship in the spotlight, Brooklyn stated: 'Ignore the noise. Keep your head down, work hard, be kind. People are always going to talk. What matters is that we're happy together.' While Brooklyn was present at Victoria's 50th, both he and his wife failed to make an appearance at her 51st. More poignantly the couple did not attend his father David's 50th birthday celebration in May. And while his younger brothers Romeo and Cruz took to social media to pay their birthday tributes to their parents, on both occasions Brooklyn stayed silent. Brooklyn appeared to nail his loyalties to the mast when he posted an image on Instagram of himself and Nicola riding a motorbike, writing: 'My whole world x I will love you forever x I always choose you baby x you're the most amazing person I know xx me and you forever baby.' And amid the continuing fallout from their feuding it is clear that Brooklyn has now cast himself as the 'wife guy', someone who does everything as a tribute to his spouse, and that the Brooklyn/Nicola partnership is his new brand.
The Herald Scotland
18 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Reform and indy will be at the heart of our debate for years
Of course, by now you already know the result, so you'll know which of the following scenarios and their consequences are the most accurate. But let me start with what the national polls tell us ought to have happened, by-election peculiarities – which I'll come to – notwithstanding. The SNP should have won with around 33% of the vote, down significantly on the 46.2% it won in 2021, with Labour in a narrow second on around 28% of the vote. Reform should have come third with just under 20% of the vote, while the Conservatives should have collapsed to under 10% of the vote. The rest of the vote, around 10%, will have been split among the Greens, Liberal Democrats, and myriad minor parties and independents. But by-elections rarely work out this way, even when the national polls are accurate. Firstly, voters are more likely to have voted in protest than they are at national elections, which may well help Reform in this case. As Jamie, a service engineer from Hamilton, told a focus group run by More in Common, it's 'time to give someone else a chance,' even if he thinks Nigel Farage is an 'a***hole'. Read more by Mark McGeoghegan Secondly, turnout will likely have collapsed. In the Hamilton and Rutherglen West by-election in October 2023, turnout fell by 43% compared to the 2019 General Election. A similar decline here would see around 15,600 voters who would otherwise turn out in a national election stay at home instead. Given that voters turning out to vote Reform as a protest against both the SNP and Labour governments are likely to be more motivated than SNP and Labour voters, this may also advantage Reform. In fact, assuming predictions based on national polling would otherwise have been accurate, Reform's vote will only have to have been marginally more resilient for it to finish ahead of Labour and narrowly behind the SNP. Factor in that first peculiarity of by-election campaigns, and such a scenario is hardly far-fetched. On the eve of the by-election, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused the First Minister, John Swinney, and journalists of manufacturing Reform's competitiveness in the seat. Nothing could be further from the truth, and a Reform underperformance yesterday will have been more surprising than it coming second. It has demonstrated its strength in a succession of local by-elections, the latest of which saw it beat Labour to come second behind the SNP. Whether or not Reform came second yesterday, its performance will shape the narrative in Scottish politics going into next year's elections in conjunction with its UK-wide polling lead (it has led in 25 consecutive polls going back to the beginning of May) and strong results in recent local elections and Parliamentary by-elections in England. Ultimately, regardless of yesterday's result, the spectre of Nigel Farage looms over Scottish politics. There are three broad scenarios. Firstly, that Reform performed to its Scotland-wide polling, confirming that it is on course to win between 15 and 20 seats in next year's Scottish Parliament election. Secondly, that it did overperform, perhaps coming second, leading to the next 11 months to being dominated by the SNP seeking to present next year's elections as a choice between the SNP and Nigel Farage, and a bitter fight between Reform and Labour for status as the main challengers to the SNP. Thirdly, that it underperformed, in which case the SNP will be quick to emphasise divergence between Scottish and English politics. In any case, the SNP will use the prospect of a Reform government at Westminster to try to increase the salience of the constitutional question, attempting to return independence to the heart of the Scottish political agenda ahead of next year's elections and the following UK general election. It knows that that is its best bet for winning back pro-independence voters who have swung to Labour in recent years. Replacing Humza Yousaf with John Swinney may have stabilised the SNP's support, but the party not really recovered in any meaningful way. The longer Reform leads in UK-wide polls, the more likely that narrative will be to gain purchase among the independence-supporting electorate. Strong Reform showings in Scotland will reinforce the sense that they could win power in 2029; weak performances will emphasise the ways in which Scottish and English politics may be diverging. Both provide hooks for the SNP. The spectre of Nigel Farage looms large over Scottish politics (Image: PA) The bigger question is whether this leads to a change in the constitutional deadlock. Some recent polling suggests that support for independence may have edged up. Norstat recently recorded its first Yes leads in three years, finding Yes ahead by seven points in the wake of Reform's strong showing in the English local elections. Survation still has No ahead by two or three points, down from leads of seven or eight points a year ago. The data is not conclusive, and we should be cautious of hypotheticals around whether developments will change voters' minds – we had enough such polls around Brexit and Boris Johnson becoming Prime Minister that never bore out. But the prominence of Reform UK and Nigel Farage in UK politics is a gift to the SNP and the independence movement, regardless of how they performed yesterday or how they perform north of the Border in the coming year. If Anas Sarwar is frustrated with his opponents' and the media's "obsession" with Reform UK, he should get used to that feeling – they'll be at the heart of Scottish political debate for years to come. Mark McGeoghegan is a Glasgow University researcher of nationalism and contentious politics and an Associate Member of the Centre on Constitutional Change. He can be found on BlueSky @
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Natasha Hamilton reveals secret cancer battle in emotional Good Morning Britain interview - after mistaking warning signs for mosquito bite
Natasha Hamilton opened up about her secret skin cancer battle in an emotional Good Morning Britain interview on Friday. The former Atomic Kitten singer, 42, gave fans a health update as she spoke about her diagnosis of Basal-cell carcinoma -which she received last year - with hosts Kate Garraway, 58, and Robert Rinder, 47. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a type of non-melanoma skin cancer. Non-melanoma means it does not involve skin pigment cells. Kate pointed out: 'I was saying thankfully because we want to establish that you are now fine. You're cancer free and all is good, but you're a living health warning in a way.' Natasha said: 'I am. now I have to be really vigilant, I have to check my skin all the time. 'Since then I've had a few things appear where I've had to go back to the dermatologist, they're on the "watch list". From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. The 42-year-old thought that she had been bitten while on holiday, but then after four weeks, realised that it was something else (pictured) 'This is probably something I am going to have to keep an eye for the rest of my life.' The singer went on to explain how she was diagnosed with cancer. Natasha said: 'So I had been on holiday, I wasn't actually in the sun a lot, my baby was only about five months old and I was breastfeeding. 'One afternoon I had her on my lap, my back was in the sun and I burnt. 'I don't know if it was later that day or the next day, I had an itchy spot on my back, i thought it was a mosquito bite... 'I felt it, I went "oh mosquito bite". 'It wasn't until four weeks later when I was at home and it was itching I was like hang on a minute that seems a bit long for a mosquito bite. 'I asked my hub to have look and he went oh that's not a bite, he took a picture, I looked at it and I went I think I know what that is. 'Originally it had just been a dark freckle. 'I had on my back for many years, it wasn't raised it wasn't a mole. ' 'It was just a freckle.' Kate then asked her about her sunbed use from her Atomic Kitten days, to which Natasha said: 'People of my age will probably feel the same or remember, if you were going on a night out, you used a sunbed cos you wanted that sun kissed look to make yourself feel good, to give you a bit of confidence. 'If I was going to do something like Top of The Pops, or a big TV show, I'd want to look sun kissed, so we would go to the sunbeds. 'There was a sun bed shop facing the hotel that we stayed in all the time in London. 'I used tan accelerators and I can honestly say I don't think that there was ever a time when I went on a sun bed that I didn't burn, looking back now. 'I'm type one skin anyway, I'm not supposed to be in such intense sun.' The star also revealed that her mum has also had her own battle with skin cancer. Natasha explained: 'Two years previous, my mum had been suffering with a patch of dry skin that wouldn't heal. 'I wasn't anything ominous looking, it was a piece of skin. 'I said to her go and see a dermo, I'd done a lot of research previous. 'Initially she was told it was nothing and sent away. 'That was at the doctors, a year later, I saw it and it looked sore and aggravated, I said mum please ask them to refer you to a dermatologist. 'Straight away they said look it is skin cancer. 'She had a lot of cancerous sells burnt off her face, it was very painful for her.' Good Morning Britain airs weekdays from 6:00am on ITV. WHAT IS BASAL CELL CARCINOMA? Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a type of non-melanoma skin cancer. Non-melanoma means it does not involve skin pigment cells. BCC makes up more than 80 per cent of all forms of skin cancer in the UK and US. About 5.4 million basal and squamous cell skin cancers are diagnosed each year in the US and around 100,000 in the UK. It is mainly caused by overexposure to UV light from the sun or tanning beds. BCC can occur anywhere on the body but is most common on areas exposed to the sun, such as the face, neck and ears. The following people are most at risk: People with fair skin or hair Those who work outdoors People who use sunbeds Those with a personal history of the condition BCC is usually painless. Early symptoms often only include a scab that bleeds occasionally and does not heal. Some appear as flat, red, scaly marks or have a pearl-like rim. The latter can then erode into a ulcer. Others are lumpy with shiny nodules crossed by blood vessels. Most BCCs can be cured, however, treatment is complex if they are left for a long time. Treatment usually involves removing the cancerous tumour and some of the surrounding skin.
