CBI Cracks Down On Cybercrime: 9 Arrested, 8.5 Lakh Mule Accounts Uncovered
Last Updated:
CBI's inquiry found that over 700 branches of various banks across India had opened around 8.5 lakh mule accounts, often without proper KYC norms or Customer Due Diligence
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has launched a nationwide crackdown on cybercrime, conducting coordinated searches at 42 locations across five states: Rajasthan, Delhi, Haryana, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh. Dubbed Operation Chakra-V, the exercise aims to dismantle the infrastructure behind cybercrimes, particularly those involving mule bank accounts.
According to sources, CBI's investigation has revealed that organised scammers were using mule bank accounts to transfer proceeds of cyber frauds, including digital arrest scams, impersonation, fraudulent advertisements, investment frauds, and UPI-based financial frauds. These fraudsters were being aided by certain bank officials, agents, aggregators, bank correspondents, middlemen, and e-Mitras who were facilitating the opening of mule accounts.
CBI's inquiry found that over 700 branches of various banks across India had opened around 8.5 lakh mule accounts, often without proper KYC norms or Customer Due Diligence. Branch managers had also failed to conduct Enhanced Due Diligence on suspicious transaction alerts. Some banks had not sent acknowledgement letters to customers to verify their addresses.
During the searches, the CBI has seized incriminating documents, digital evidence, mobile phones, bank account opening documents, transaction details, and KYC documents. Nine accused individuals, including middlemen, agents, aggregators, account holders, and bank correspondents, were arrested for their involvement in opening and facilitating mule bank accounts.
The 9 arrested accused are:
Lovkesh Shakya (Delhi)
Savan Kumar (Delhi)
Vishal (Delhi)
Farman Beg (Uttarakhand)
Purushottam (Uttarakhand)
Shubham Kamboj (Uttar Pradesh)
Umardeen (Uttar Pradesh)
Yousuf (Rajasthan)
Ashok Kumar (Rajasthan)
The CBI's action is part of the Government of India's ongoing commitment to deal with cybercrimes and their perpetrators sternly. The agency is working to dismantle the infrastructure behind these offences and bring those responsible to justice.
First Published:
June 27, 2025, 03:23 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mithi desilting fraud: ED records statements of 5 civic officials, contractors
MUMBAI: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) this week recorded the statements of five persons as part of its money-laundering investigation into the alleged alleged fraud in desilting of the Mithi River, which caused a loss of over ₹ 65 crore to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC). Representative Image (Hindustan Times) Those whose statements were recorded included BMC engineer P Ramgude, civic contractor B Purohit and other civic officials and contractors, ED sources told Hindustan Times. Last week, the agency had recorded the statements of actor Dino Morea and his brother Santino Morea in the case. The ED's probe into the alleged fraud is at a preliminary stage and it is currently analysing the contents of all the statements recorded under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), sources said. The agency can seek further clarifications if required, the sources added. Earlier, on June 6, the ED carried out searches at 18 locations across Mumbai, Kochi and Thrissur in connection with the alleged desilting fraud. The locations searched included the residential and/or office premises of Dino and Santino Morea, Ramgude, Purohit, alleged intermediaries Jay Joshi and Ketan Kadam, and Matprop Technical Services Pvt Ltd, a Kochi-based company that rented out machinery and equipment for the desilting work. Cash worth ₹ 7 lakh was seized and 22 bank accounts/fixed deposits and a demat account were frozen during the searches. The ED is investigating if the Moreas were involved in the alleged fraud or linked to the proceeds of crime generated by other accused. The brothers have denied all allegations of their involvement in the case. The ED's probe is based on a case registered in May by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Mumbai police. The EOW had booked 13 people/ entities in the case, including three BMC officials, and it had questioned the Morea brothers last month. On June 7, the ED had said that its investigation and search operations prima facie indicated that the accused and others colluded to form a cartel with the intent of manipulating BMC's tenders related to the desilting of Mithi River. 'This action effectively conferred a monopoly in [the] award of desilting contracts of Mithi River and caused payments at inflated rates for desilting works, resulting in undue gains to the contractors and associated parties, thereby causing financial loss to the public exchequer,' the agency had said in a statement. The accused persons and entities and their associates concealed the undue financial gains by layering them through some shell companies, the agency had said. So far, the total amount seized or frozen in the case was over ₹ 1.25 crore, ED sources said. Certain digital devices and incriminating documents that appeared to be relevant for further proceedings under the PMLA have also been seized, the sources added.
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Citizens abroad for the long term are non-residents under FERA: HC
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Wednesday observed that persons staying abroad with no clear intention of returning to India would be treated as 'persons resident outside India' under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), and upheld a penalty of ₹ 1.4 crore against a family which purchased a huge amount of shares from an Indian company without prior appeal to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (Shutterstock) The case dates back to the mid-1990s, when a series of share transactions was carried out by the Shroff family and its company Sujay Trading Corporation Pvt Ltd. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on November 18, 1999, had served the family with a notice, stating that Shroff's daughters, who were residents of the United States, had purchased shares worth ₹ 16 lakh from a Mumbai-based company called Ditco Securities Pvt Ltd without taking prior approval from the RBI as prescribed under FERA. Remarking that the daughters were 'persons resident outside India' under FERA, the ED stated that they were married in the US and had been settled there for a few years. Highlighting their lack of intention of returning to India permanently and the purchase of shares from an Indian company without the RBI's approval resulted in the ED penalising them on October 30, 2000. The three daughters were charged an amount of ₹ 41 lakh each, ₹ 25.8 lakh was levied on their father, and ₹ 8.5 lakh on Sujay Trading Pvt Ltd, which was run by the parents. Aggrieved by this, the Shroff family approached the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, which upheld the conclusions reached by the ED and dismissed the appeals on November 18, 2005. Subsequently, the family appealed in the Bombay high court in 2006, challenging the orders passed by the ED and the appellate tribunal. The family contended that the daughters were not 'persons resident outside India' but were students pursuing their higher studies in the US. Therefore, there was no need for them to obtain permission from the RBI for the purchase of shares in an Indian company. Based on this defence, they submitted that there was no violation of any of the provisions of FERA. Highlighting the clear intentions of the Shroff daughters to settle in the US, the ED clarified that it had taken the decision after evaluating the relevant documents. It stated that the penalties imposed on the Shroffs were proportionate to the economic offence, and were legally sound. The division bench of Justices M S Sonak and Jitendra Jain upheld the decision of the ED and the appellate tribunal and observed that the daughters' prolonged stay in the US clearly reflected their intention to permanently settle abroad, thereby establishing them as 'persons resident outside India'. It held that the evidence, such as their marriage and their continued stay outside India since the 1980s, corroborated their intentions. The court further stated that merely holding an Indian citizenship or a student visa did not exempt them from the provisions of FERA. With no exemptions proven by the family, the bench held that there was no error in the findings by the authorities and upheld the penalties. 'Considering the magnitude of the transactions and the circumstances in which the same were carried out, there is no substance in the argument based on any alleged disproportionality in the penalty amounts, ' it added.
Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Court notice to Arthur Road Jail for not giving Jain food to inmate
MUMBAI: The city's famous Arthur Road Jail has been taken to task by a court for not taking care of the dietary needs of one of its inmates. At a time when vegetarian-non-vegetarian issues are enough to spark controversies, the dietary demand this time appears to be of the more stricter kind - Jain food. India, 17, personnel throng the gates of Arthur Road Jail on Friday, anticipating Sanjay Dutt's transfer from the jail to Pune's Yerawada Jail. in Mumbai.., India, on Friday, May 17, 2013. (Photo by Vijayanand Gupta / Hindustan Times) (Hindustan Times) A special PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering) court has issued a show cause notice to the superintendent of Arthur Road Jail for failing to provide Jain food to one of the accused incarcerated in connection with the Nashik Merchant Co-operative (NAMCO) Bank fraud case. Riteshkumar Shah, an Ahmedabad-based trader, had moved a plea before the court on May 9, 2025, seeking directions to the superintendent of the Arthur Road Jail, where he is lodged at present, to provide him Jain food. Acting on his plea, the court had on May 14 passed an order, directing the jail authorities to provide Jain food to Shah. Shah did not specify in his plea what constitutes Jain food. But, it is commonly known that Jain food is strictly vegetarian cuisine based on the principle of Ahimsa (non-violence), and includes plant-based foods and excludes root vegetables like onions, potatoes, garlic, etc. 'It appears that the accused is a follower of Jainism and wants the superintendent of Arthur Road Jail to provide him Jain food,' stated special judge AC Daga in his May 14 order. 'Considering the fact that the accused is a follower of Jainism, therefore, he is entitled to get a diet accepted by Jain religion. Accordingly, the superintendent of Arthur Road Jail is directed to provide Jain food to the accused while he is in (their) custody.' The court order was duly served. However, the jail authorities still did not serve Shah 'Jain food'. Hence, Shah's advocate on June 24 again moved a plea, stating that his client is yet to be provided Jain food as per his religious dietary requirement. 'As a result, he has been surviving solely on chapatis for more than a month, which has caused significant deterioration in his health,' stated the plea. It added that the act of refusal to provide Jain food violated Shah's fundamental right to follow his religion and requested the court to issue show cause notice to the superintendent of Arthur Road Jail for not complying with the court order. After hearing the plea, special judge Raju Rote on June 24 issued a show cause notice to the superintendent of the Arthur Road Jail, ordering him to file the reply by Friday, when the matter is scheduled to come up for hearing again. This has left the jail staff baffled, worried that this might set a precedent to ask for religion-specific diets. Until now, it was vegetarian and non-vegetarian. Tomorrow it could be halal-non-halal, kosher, vegan, etc. A senior jail officer, on condition of anonymity, said that there was no provision in the Jail Manual to provide any religious food to any person. 'There is no such provision in the manual to provide any specific food to inmates, like Jain food,' said the officer. 'Some foreign nationals lodged in our jails have problems with spicy Indian food and, therefore, we give them the food before adding chili powder and spices to it,' he added. Shah, who is currently in judicial custody, is alleged to be a close associate of the alleged mastermind behind the large-scale suspicious transitions made from NAMCO Bank accounts, Mehmood Abdul Samad Bhagad, also known as 'Challenger King'. It is alleged that Shah played a key role in creating multiple shell entities using identity documents of innocent people, which in turn were used to siphon off the money withdrawn as cash from the bank accounts. The ED has also started a money-laundering investigation based on a case registered with Chawani Police Station in Malegaon, Nashik.
