
Federal judge blocks Trump's move to bar international students from Harvard in major US education ruling
US court halts Trump's visa crackdown on Harvard's international students
A federal judge in Boston has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's latest attempt to prevent Harvard University from enrolling international students, marking a significant moment in the ongoing legal standoff between one of the world's most prestigious universities and the current US administration.
The ruling, handed down by US District Judge Allison Burroughs, ensures that Harvard can continue to host its nearly 7,000 international students — about one-quarter of its total enrollment — while broader legal proceedings continue.
The decision represents a critical win for the Ivy League school, which has been in legal conflict with the federal government over multiple policy decisions impacting academic freedom, international student mobility, and the university's operational autonomy.
While the ruling does not offer a permanent solution, it reinforces Harvard's position against what it claims are politically motivated efforts by the Trump administration to penalize the institution.
Court decision halts a second attempt by the administration
The legal battle intensified after the Department of Homeland Security revoked Harvard's certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program in May.
This would have forced thousands of students to either leave the country or transfer, severely disrupting their education. Harvard responded by suing the agency, alleging that the action was taken without proper procedure and in retaliation for the university's refusal to comply with the White House's demands on issues including campus protests, admissions, and hiring practices.
Just weeks later, President Trump issued a new proclamation attempting to bypass the court's temporary block, again aiming to prevent foreign students from attending Harvard.
Judge Burroughs intervened once more, temporarily blocking this second action as well, according to reporting by the Associated Press. Her latest ruling maintains that block, though she emphasized that the federal government still retains the authority to conduct normal reviews of international student programs.
Impact on students and institutional reputation
Harvard argued in court filings that the federal actions had created an atmosphere of 'profound fear, concern, and confusion' for international students, many of whom were left in limbo about their academic futures.
As reported by the Associated Press, Maureen Martin, director of Harvard's immigration services, said that many students had considered transferring due to uncertainty over their visa status.
The sanctions also harmed Harvard's global reputation, the university claimed, jeopardizing its ability to attract top talent. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the lawsuit stated, highlighting how crucial foreign scholars are to its academic mission.
Broader political tensions continue
This legal conflict is part of a broader dispute between Harvard and the Trump administration. As reported by the Associated Press, the government has already cut over $2.6 billion in research funding, canceled contracts, and even threatened the university's tax-exempt status. The administration demanded access to extensive records related to international students, claiming concerns about national security.
While Trump said in a Truth Social post that negotiations with Harvard were ongoing and that the university had been acting 'appropriately,' Harvard has held firm, with President Alan Garber stating that the university would not abandon its 'core, legally-protected principles,' as quoted by the Associated Press.
As the legal fight continues, Harvard says it is making contingency plans to support its international students, ensuring their education remains uninterrupted despite the political challenges.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Why US moved B-2 Spirit stealth bombers to Guam and how far is it from Iran?
The United States moved its B-2 bombers to Guam on Saturday, Reuters reported, citing two sources. This comes as tensions between Israel and Iran rose over the past week, with President Donald Trump weighing whether Washington should take part in Tel Aviv's strikes against Tehran. The White House has not confirmed why the bombers were deployed and if it is connected to the conflict in the Middle East. US moved B-2 Stealth Bombers to Guam on Saturday (AFP) The B-2 is equipped to carry the US's 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, which is designed to destroy targets deep underground. Washington has hinted that this weapon could be used to strike Iran's nuclear capability. One official told Reuters that no further orders had been given yet to move the bombers beyond Guam. Reports suggested that the move reduces sortie times compared to flights from Missouri, enhancing readiness for potential strikes. Read More: Nuclear watchdog warns of 'serious catastrophe' if Israel targets Iran's Bushehr reactor Guam's distance from Iran minimizes exposure to Iranian retaliation, unlike Middle Eastern bases, per However, some experts, according to NBC News, said that it was precautionary, noting no strike orders and ongoing diplomacy efforts by European leaders. Distance from Iran to Guam The approximate distance from Guam to Iran is 7,500 kilometers (4,660 miles). The B-2's unrefueled range of 9,000–10,000 kilometers allows it to reach Iran from Guam, though mid-air refueling, supported by KC-46 Pegasus tankers. Israel said on Saturday it had killed a veteran Iranian commander during attacks by both sides in the more than week-long air war, while Tehran said it would not negotiate over its nuclear program while under threat. Read More: 'Grossi will pay after...': Khamenei aide's blood-chilling threat to IAEA chief Israel says Iran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons, while Iran says its atomic program is only for peaceful purposes. Trump has said he would take up to two weeks to decide whether the United States should enter the conflict on Israel's side, enough time "to see whether or not people come to their senses," he said. (With inputs from Reuters)


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
US moves B-2 stealth bombers to Guam amid escalating Israel-Iran conflict: Report
The United States is moving B-2 bombers to the Pacific island of Guam, two US officials told Reuters on Saturday, as President Donald Trump weighs whether the United States should take part in Israel's strikes against was unclear whether the bomber deployment is tied to Middle East B-2 can be equipped to carry America's 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, designed to destroy targets deep underground. That is the weapon that experts say could be used to strike Iran's nuclear program, including The officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, declined to disclose any further details. One official said no forward orders had been given yet to move the bombers beyond Guam. They did not say how many B-2 bombers are being Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for and officials are closely watching to see whether the B-2 bombers will move forward to a US-British military base on the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia. Experts say that Diego Garcia is in an ideal position to operate in the Middle United States had B-2 bombers on Diego Garcia up until last month, when they were replaced with B-52 said on Saturday it had killed a veteran Iranian commander during attacks by both sides in the more than week-long air war, while Tehran said it would not negotiate over its nuclear program while under says Iran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons, while Iran says its atomic program is only for peaceful has said he would take up to two weeks to decide whether the United States should enter the conflict on Israel's side, enough time "to see whether or not people come to their senses," he was first to report this week the movement of a large number of tanker aircraft to Europe and other military assets to the Middle East, including the deployment of more fighter aircraft carrier in the Indo-Pacific is also heading to the Middle InMust Watch


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Fumed Sen. Alex Padilla blasts ‘petty' JD Vance for mistaking him for convicted terrorist: ‘He knows my name'
US Vice President JD Vance sparked controversy by accusing California authorities of being involved in recent violent immigration riots and referring to Democratic Senator Alex Padilla as 'Jose Padilla,' a name linked with a convicted terrorist. JD Vance's comments about California's immigration riots and misnaming Senator Padilla sparked controversy.(Getty Images via AFP) Vance accused Mayor Karen Bass and Governor Gavin Newsom of provoking violence by designating Los Angeles as a 'sanctuary city' while speaking on a tour of federal immigration enforcement operations during his visit to Los Angeles.'[They] have basically said that this is open season on federal law enforcement,' he stated. Vance also made fun of Alex Padilla, the first Latino US senator from California, who was just taken into custody during a demonstration. Jose Padilla, a convicted terrorist, was the moniker the Vice President used to allude to Senator Padilla. 'I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question. I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't a theatre. And that's all it is,' the US VP remarked. 'They want to go back to their far-left groups and say, Look, I stood up against border enforcement,' the Associated Press reported him as saying. Also Read: Tulsi Gabbard fiercely reacts after Donald Trump rejects her Iran assessment as 'wrong' Senator Padilla's spokeswoman reacts to Vance's remarks In a strong response, Senator Padilla's spokesperson emphasized that Padilla and Vance had previously served together. Spokesman Tess Oswald stated, 'He should be more focused on demilitarising our city than taking cheap shots.' Vance's comment, according to Governor Newsom, was 'not an accident,' implying that the name of well-known terrorist 'Jose Padilla' was purposefully dropped. 'The Vice President's claim is categorically false,' he asserted. Vance also faced backlash from Mayor Bass, who called his remarks 'utter nonsense' and a 'stunt.' 'He knows my name', says Padilla Padilla blasted Vance for calling him 'Jose', stating that he was forcibly removed from last week's Department of Homeland Security news conference since he wanted to create "theater" amid the city's turmoil triggered by ICE operations. During an appearance on MSNBC on Saturday, Padilla stated, 'He knows my name. He knows my name.' 'Look, sadly, it's just an indicator of how petty and unserious this administration is,' he added. 'He's the vice president of the United States. You think he'd take the situation in Los Angeles more seriously. Vance spokesperson gives clarification Later, a representative for Vance asserted that it was just a 'mix-up between two people who have broken the law.' Federal immigration sweeps began on June 6 and President Trump's deployment of hundreds of troops and Marines sparked the demonstrations. Trump, however, insisted that Los Angeles 'would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years' if the federal government didn't step in. On X, Newsom encouraged Vance to concentrate on California's wildfire victims. 'We are counting on you, Mr. Vice President,' he stated.