What I Spent: The wedding you actually get for £5,000, £20,000 or £50,000
The average wedding in the UK now costs £23,250 – almost £6,000 more than in 2021.
That doesn't tell the full story though, as according to Bridebook, a quarter of couples will spend less than £10,000 on their special day, while 10% have a budget of £5,000 or under.
Then, on the opposite end of the spectrum, 10% of nearlyweds are set to fork out over £38,000 for their 2025 nuptials.
But whether your budget is tight or pretty much nonexistent, it's can be difficult to find out what you actually get for your money.
So to take away the mystery and bust the taboo of talking marriage and money, Metro asked three brides what they spent on their recent weddings, as well as the advice they'd give to others tying the knot.
Catherine Ramm, 52, owner of Dorset Dried Flowers from Corfe Castle, Dorset, got married in 2023.
In total, she and her partner ended up spending less than £6,000 on a large wedding with 120 day guests and 300 evening guests.
As Catherine's a florist, she was able to do the bouquets and decor herself, while her now-husband is a farmer, meaning they saved on venue costs by holding their ceremony and reception on his land.
The pair's friends and family also donated services or helped out with mate's rates on everything from photography to toilets.
'We had no budget in mind when we started planning,' Catherine tells Metro. 'It just sort of evolved, and we had so many people wanting to be involved it was amazing.'
She's over the moon with how it all turned out, adding: 'People are still talking about it. We had an amazing time and I don't think we could have made it any better even if we had thrown more money about it.'
Although Catherine didn't specifically plan to spend so little on her big day, she does have some advice for others who want to keep costs down.
'Look at where you aren't prepared to compromise and where you are,' she says. 'There are places you can cut the corners and places you can't.'
Venue: £3,500
We paid £3,000 for the marquee on our own land and £500 for a generator. Toilets were donated by a friend.
Registrar/celebrant: £270
We got married officially on the Thursday at Poole registry office, which cost £270. On the Saturday, a friend of ours who is a celebrant did the ceremony as a favour.
Catering: £950
Alongside a hog roast which cost £650, one of our friends on the farm gave us venison, shot and butchered, as a wedding present.
We then had afternoon tea with sandwiches from local baker (£100), scones from local tea rooms (£100), sausage rolls made by a friend, and cupcakes from a local maker £100)
Photography and/or videography: £0
Photography was done by a friend who was a professional photographer years ago, and friends also shared their images.
Flowers and venue decor: £500
This was all done by me, so costs were minimal.
Invitations and stationery: £50
I made the invitations myself using a bespoke stamp which I had made by a company online, then some lovely paper and an ink pad.
Wedding cake: £100
A friend made this for the cost of the ingredients.
Entertainment: £210
We had a singer who was 'paid' with four nights free camping on the farm. The band were friends, so we got a discounted rate of £60. We also had a fire dancer which was £150.
Bride and groom attire: £120
My dress cost £100 in a sample sale, and my husband's suit was £20 on Vinted.
Bridal party and groomsmen attire: £11
My daughter's bridesmaid dress was £11 on Vinted, and the rest of our children wore suits and dresses they already had.
Transport: £0
We got around the venue on a farm buggy which we already had.
Rings: £0
My husband doesn't have one as he is a farmer, and he will lose it – it's also dangerous with machinery. Mine were my engagement rings – he got me three silver rings – and I just used these, as I don't need any more
Jasmine Granton, a 31-year-old Digital PR Consultant from Mansfield, got married to her partner of 12 years in November last year.
In total, they spent just under £19,000 on a wedding of 100 guests at the West Mill in Derby.
While she and her now-husband didn't have a set budget, they 'didn't want to spend a fortune' on the day itself, ideally keeping money aside for the month-long Vietnam honeymoon they'd always dreamed of.
'Deep down, we did want a big wedding though,' Jasmine tells Metro. 'And we both have large families so we were always going to have a guest count of around 100 – which inevitably brings the price up.'
The couple created a spreadsheet listing everything they might need with the maximum they'd be happy to spend on each point. But as anyone who's planned a wedding knows, some things were more expensive while there were other areas they managed to save.
'I feel so happy with what we got for our money,' says Jasmine.
'Making some pretty big decisions at the start – like having the wedding in winter on a Monday – meant we could make other decisions like booking a photographer and videographer we loved, because for us, the photography was so important.'
Alongside this, she kept costs down by making her own stationery, customising cheaper items, and doing a lot of the planning herself.
She recommends other brides and grooms-to-be stay true to what you want and 'don't pay for anything that you feel you're doing just for the sake of it' or 'compromise for other people'.
Jasmine continues: 'If you don't want a cake, don't have one. If you don't want that long distance friend who hardly makes the effort to see you, don't invite them.
'The biggest compliment we got (and still get) about our wedding was that it felt 'us', and that's because we prioritised the things that made us happy.'
Venue: £2,800
Our venue hire was around £2,500. We got married on a Monday in winter which drastically changed the cost, as I believe in peak wedding season it's closer to £9,000.
We also paid to stay in a large house with our family, but they paid for their rooms so this cost us around £300.
Registrar/celebrant: £450, including licences
Catering: £7,800
In total, food came to £5800 while drinks were £2,000.
Photography and/or videography: £2,400 for both
Flowers and venue decor: £600
I bought most of the decor – including candle holders, mirrors, and candles – secondhand from Facebook Marketplace (£300 in total) and did a lot of upcycling, such as turning the mirror into our welcome sign and seating plan.
We didn't have flowers around the venue, just lots of candles and mirrors as that's more our style. In terms of bouquets, I had dry flowers for me and my bridesmaids which came to £300.
Invitations and stationery: £70
I designed these all myself using Canva, so the only cost was for paper and printing.
Wedding cake: Roughly £30
We decided not to have one – who even eats it?! – but had a prosecco tower instead, which just cost us the amount of the few bottles of prosecco as the venue had a no corkage fee
Entertainment: £700
It was £600 for a singer in the day who did a music bingo which was such a party starter, and we somehow got a brilliant DJ for £100!
Bride and groom attire: £1,562
I bought my wedding dress from a website called Stillwhite – it had tags on and was unaltered but cost me £1000 instead of £1800. I then got my veil second hand for £12, my shoes were £50 and my jewellery was kindly gifted to me.
My husband's suit and shoes came to around £500.
Hair and makeup: £600
Bridal party and groomsmen attire: £1,300
ASOS suits for two best men and two groomsmen and three bridesmaid dresses came to £700.
Transport: £0
We didn't have any.
Rings: £300
Krissie Williams-Stewart, a 36-year-old homemaker from Coventry got married in December last year.
She and her now-husband Frankie spent £50,000 on their dream wedding, which was held at Merrydale Manor, Cheshire and had 91 guests in attendance.
'We had a budget in mind from the very start,' Krissie tells Metro. 'But I hadn't ever looked at anything wedding-related before, so I was completely clueless when it came to the real costs of anything.'
Although their big day ended up costing more than double the average, she says 'it was worth every single penny'.
'I have absolutely no regrets about what we got for our money,' adds Krissie. 'Our day was a complete fairy tale, and my vision completely came to life.'
In terms of advice, she stresses the importance of prioritising.
'Write down your non-negotiables and focus on those; and then see what you have left for all the other bits,' she explains. 'If your dream venue is expensive, then consider a weekday or slightly out of wedding season to get a better price.' More Trending
Keep an eye on the 'little things' and DIY what you can too, as personal touches from favours to table settings 'add up fast.'
Krissie continues: 'As tempting as it is to book everything, you really don't need to… Guests honestly enjoy mingling and having a chat with each other, so don't go overboard thinking you need entertainment for every second.
'We did this, and to be honest, it did make the day seem very busy, as there was so much going on all the time.'
View More »
'That being said, never ever skimp on the photographer,' she adds. 'These photos are for life, so it's definitely worth the investment.'
Venue: £13,000
Registrar/celebrant: £650
Catering: £12,000
It was £9,000 for food and drinks during the day and £3,000 for the evening.
Photography and/or videography: £3,700
The photographer came to £2,500 and the videographer was £1,200.
Flowers and venue decor: £5,350
We paid £4,500 for all the flowers – including bouquets. Other decorations were hired for £850.
Invitations and stationery: £400
Wedding cake: £300
Entertainment £4,300
A musician for the ceremony was £800, and for the reception was an additional £2,000. Additional entertainment came to £1,500.
Bride and groom attire: £5,400
My wedding dress was £3,500 and accessories were £1,000, while my husband's suit was £900.
Hair and makeup: £2,200
Hairdressing came to a total of £1,500 and makeup was £700.
Bridal party and groomsmen attire: £1,500
Alongside this, my husband also hand-built a watch for every groomsman and the father of the bride to complete the look!
Transport: £600
Rings £450
Wedding planner: £300
Do you have a story to share?
Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.
MORE: I'm a foodbank volunteer and have to throw away 20% of our donations
MORE: My fiancé drinks so much he falls asleep during sex — should I call off our wedding?
MORE: Getting married? Don't forget to think about your wedding jewellery and our top picks from Lily & Roo
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
14 hours ago
- Metro
I'm trapped on a pricey heat network and can't switch to a cheaper supplier
If you're paying over the odds for energy, the typical advice is to switch provider – but that's not an option for some. Around 500,000 people in the UK are connected to a heat network, a system that supplies multiple properties from a single central source rather than each individual home. London-based Alfonso, 39, is one of them. And like more than half of his fellow heat network customers, he feels his bills are too high. In this week's Metro's Money Problem, personal finance journalist and consumer champion Sarah Davidson gives him the no-nonsense advice he needs. Have you been ripped off by a romance scammer? Fighting with family or friends over who should pay for what? Struggling to get by despite a decent income? Or simply want to vent about how you've been treated by a major company? If you've got a money problem you'd like Sarah to look into, fill in this form or email providing as much detail about your situation as possible. No issue is too big or small, and all submissions will be treated with the strictest confidence. I moved into a new build rental flat last year and am really struggling with cost of heating and hot water. When we viewed the place, the letting agent mentioned it was part of an energy-efficient communal heat network, which sounded like a good thing. However, the reality has been very different. Not only are my bills much higher than in my previous place of around the same size, no-one seems to be able to give me any answers as to why. From what I can tell, the amount I pay is down to how much the operator bulk-buys the gas for, but my bills don't explain how this is decided, why my unit rate is more than Ofgem's price cap, or whether I'm paying for heating in hallways and other communal areas. It's so confusing. Normally I'd switch to a different provider but this isn't an option for heat network customers, so I'm effectively locked in. Aside from reducing my consumption even further (I'm already wearing jumpers and timing my showers) or moving somewhere new, it feels like I'm out of options. Is there anything else I can do? An interesting and important question Alfonso, thank you for raising it. The problem you're facing is a serious one and it's going to start mattering to more of us over the next few years, as in order to slash meet net zero, the government wants one in five British homes to ditch gas boilers and join a heat network by 2050. That's 6 million households across the country. For those who haven't yet come across them, a heat network is a single centralised source of heating, cooling systems and hot water that supplies multiple households – from a block of flats to an entire town. The theory is that the heat network can buy energy in bulk, thereby keeping costs down for each household. In practice, as you are clearly only too aware, that's far from the reality. There are several reasons for this. First, heat networks have been unregulated for years, making (some of) them effectively a wild west. Currently, there are no rules dictating how heat networks set their prices, why or when they can increase prices, or even what they charge for, so you may well be paying for heating communal areas without being aware. Second, as you correctly point out, they don't have to stick to the Ofgem energy price cap, and can charge whatever they like without explanation. This also means that when wholesale energy prices are very high – as they have been in recent years – heat networks will likely pass that extra cost straight onto homeowners and tenants. And third, not all heat networks are particularly efficient – they can lose an awful lot of heat in the process of transferring it from the central source to your home, meaning you are probably being lumped with the bill for that wastage on top of what you're actually using. Now, your question is what you can do to bring the costs of your heating down. For the moment, the answer is possibly not a huge amount more than you're doing already. However, if you haven't yet, try these options: Contact your landlord explaining the situation . Ask if they will agree to subsidise your heating bills for a period of time – they might even be prepared to take on some of the cost permanently if it means you stay a tenant. . Ask if they will agree to subsidise your heating bills for a period of time – they might even be prepared to take on some of the cost permanently if it means you stay a tenant. Tell your heat network you're struggling – they might be able to lower your bills temporarily or have some other form of support available. Don't hold your breath but do ask the question. – they might be able to lower your bills temporarily or have some other form of support available. Don't hold your breath but ask the question. Check whether your electricity is supplied centrally. Heat networks only provide heating, hot water and air cooling systems, and some buildings may allow individuals to switch electricity provider. Electricity is more expensive than gas, so switching to a cheaper tariff is likely to see you save. Additionally, being with a mainstream electricity supplier will also mean you're protected by the Energy Price Cap for this part of your bill. Take a look at the Energy Saving Trust or use any of the comparison sites to find the best deals on offer. The usual advice also applies: turn off appliances when not in use instead of leaving on standby; only use the washing machine and dishwasher when you've got a full load and run a lower temperature wash; shower rather than bath; use an air fryer or microwave to cook smaller portions instead of the oven. Consider asking your landlord to have a smart meter installed too, as that will give you an accurate real time view of the energy you're using and what it's costing you. This will help you understand where you can make tweaks to keep costs down. The other thing you can now do is complain – and with rather more teeth than you would have had just a couple of months ago. The law changed at the start of April, meaning you now have the option to challenge your heat network bills with the Energy Ombudsman. If you feel you've been unfairly charged and want to complain, you'll need to follow these steps. If you haven't had a response from your heat network after eight weeks or they send you a 'deadlock letter', you can take your complaint to the Energy Ombudsman which will investigate independently and may be able to force your network to give you some money back depending on what they find. Get some free help and advice from Citizens Advice if you live in England or Wales and from Consumer Scotland if you're north of the border. Write to your landlord (or managing agent) lodging a formal complaint. This should include evidence, perhaps using data from your smart meter to compare your usage and unit costs to some of the better deals on offer from other suppliers. They may be able to take this up with the heat network for you. If not, lodge your complaint with the heat network directly – they should have a formal complaints procedure on their website and on your bills. You could also contact your neighbours to see if they would also be prepared to join a complaint. Some buildings or communities have official residents' associations or Facebook groups. There can be power in numbers. More rules will start to come in from January next year, when the industry regulator Ofgem takes on responsibility for heat networks. This should mean customers get better service, more reliable energy supplies, fair pricing and bills that are easier to understand. More Trending Right now, that may be cold comfort for you, but it does at least hint at a fairer future for heat network customers. In the meantime, talk to your landlord. If it's a choice between them covering £20 a month of your heating bills or losing you as a tenant, I reckon they'll go with the former. Sarah Davidson is an award-winning financial editor and head of research at WPB View More » Got a money worry or dilemma? Email Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ MORE: Map reveals the cheapest London station to live near — where rents are £835 less than average MORE: What I Spent: The therapy you actually get for £100, £50, or free on the NHS MORE: Free school meals to be extended to 500,000 chilldren across the country Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Metro
2 days ago
- Metro
Rich people ‘will have robot butlers within five years - with one major flaw'
We've all had fears about it, right? That one day robots will come in and takeover the world? Well we could be getting that much closer, as one expert has predicted robotic butlers will be a common toy for the super rich by 2030. Right now, humanoids are making great strides (or sometimes, falling over), but are still not quite ready for mass adoption. The chief executive of a company which makes robots used in warehouses across the world says this is about to change, however. Romain Moulin, the founder of Exotec, told Metro that within five years, those with enough money to spare will have robots to wipe their floors and maybe even fold their laundry. It won't be because they are so good at the job, though: 'It's mostly for bragging to your friends,' he said. They will be an expensive novelty at first, and will work for far less time than Jeeves could before taking a break. 'I think the first one we'll see will be like a Roomba,' Romain said. 'It will be sitting in a corner of the room. You will have some friends over and you will tell that humanoid robot, 'Please clean my floor.' 'It will pick up a broom and start cleaning, and then will go back and sit on his chair charging, because he has ten minutes of autonomy. That stuff has high power consumption.' At a push, developments in battery tech might let it keep going for 20 minutes, but ultimately it's not going to last longer than a cordless vacuum. Romain's company makes the Skypod robot, a functional piece of tech serving companies including Gap, Carrefour, Uniqlo and Decathlon. He thinks that when it comes to warehouses, humanoid robots are destined for the scrapheap. 'Nobody has a convincing answer on why you would have legs instead of wheels for an industrial environment,' he said. 'Why would you want legs on a flat concrete floor? You will save half of your robot price by removing them.' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video He isn't convinced that humanoid robots are the answer for companies trying to be more efficient. By replicating the shape of a person, they're optimising something 'to run in the bush and pick apples in the trees' because humans were built for prehistoric survival, not packing parcels. But he does admit they are more useful in places where humans tend to be, such as hospitals, restaurants, or houses. Bringing a robot home isn't simple, though, as it's a much less regimented environment. 'Payload, autonomy, and safety are the biggest challenges,' Romain explained. 'If you increase the performance of your robot and you want it to lift heavier things, you are creating more chance to hurt someone.' He said that for a robot to be able to stand and walk around, its legs would have to weigh some 40kg, which is already enough power to do damage. Do you want a robot housekeeper? Humanoid robots are becoming more and more high profile, made by companies such as Tesla, which says their Optimus model will be 'capable of performing tasks that are unsafe, repetitive or boring'. This robot is expected to cost around $20,000, but Romain guessed that fully functioning humanoid robot capable of doing household tasks independently would be more like $200,000. While we're fascinated by robots that look like us, they are more complicated to programme than a box on wheels. Balancing is a particular issue, and if it goes wrong it can lead to disturbing scenes like this robot 'going berserk' in a Chinese workshop. Romain says this is likely to have been down to its sensors realising it was still not stable, so making bigger and bigger 'crazy' moves to try and fix the problem in a feedback loop. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video AI has allowed big advancements in robotics, as it is used to power their independent navigation. This is how Evri were able to test out a robotic dog to deliver parcels, and UK farmers have also embraced the tech with robot fruit pickers. You may not interact with them much yet, still, but they could become as commonplace as touchscreens for food orders soon. More Trending He said that he is concerned about the changes that are coming to the jobs market, with humanoid robots able to take on most unskilled work within 20 years, and computers just 'working alone' in offices. 'One human then will do the job of five humans now,' he said. Even though Romain works with robots them every day, though, he won't be putting a butler on preorder. 'I prefer human relations,' he said. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Why so many young Brits are being 'manipulated' into smuggling drugs MORE: 9 best BBQs and pizza ovens from Dunelm ideal for this bank holiday weekend MORE: Uber says it's ready to put robotaxis on UK roads by 2027
Metro
3 days ago
- Metro
What I Own: At 22 and 23, we bought a run down London four-bed for £910,000
Welcome back to What I Own – Metro's property series where we speak to homeowners about getting on the ladder. Nick Toteda and his long-term partner, Ant Cushion, originally bought a home in Canada, where Nick is from, before relocating in London. When they initially looked at their South West London four-bed in 2022, they were turned off by just how much work would need to be done. After a lot of reflection — and a second viewing — they decided to take a chance on a property that would need some TLC. They bought their house for £910,000, making it the last one on their street to sell for under £1,000,000. They've since spent a further £200,000 to renovate. Here's what they had to say about their property journey… You can access completely fee-free mortgage advice with London & Country (L&C) Mortgages, a partner of Metro. Customers benefit from: – Award winning service from the UK's leading mortgage broker – Expert advisors on hand 7 days a week – Access to 1000s of mortgage deals from across the market Unlike many mortgage brokers, L&C won't charge you a fee for their advice. Find out how much you could borrow online Mortgage service provided by London & Country Mortgages (L&C), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (registered number: 143002). The FCA does not regulate most Buy to Let mortgages. Your home or property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage. We're Nick (25) and Ant (26), a married couple and content creators. We share our life with our audience of more than 4,500,000. Our journey began with documenting our long-distance relationship between Canada and the UK. Since then, we've developed a love of renovating homes. We bought our property in South West London in 2022, but it needed a full renovation. After nearly a year of transforming it, which cost just under £200,000, we officially moved in, in 2023. We were incredibly lucky to secure the last house on our street to sell for under £1,000,000. Our property cost us £910,000. The house was in a derelict condition and had been sitting on the market for months. It had pretty much everything wrong with it except, thankfully, no foundational issues or subsidence. It was severely damp, almost every wall had blown plaster, and many of the original floor joists were completely rotten. There were places where you could feel the floors bowing beneath your feet. Despite all that, we tried to preserve as much original character as possible, such as the corbels in the entrance hallway and the cornices, but unfortunately, a lot of the original features were simply too far gone to salvage. We opted for a 20% deposit of £180,000. It was important to us that our monthly mortgage payments were manageable in the long term. Our mortgage is around £3,200 per month, and our other costs, such as insurance, heating, water, electricity, internet, and smaller household subscriptions like security systems, make up the remaining £500 to £800. We try to keep a close eye on everything, and we've found that being proactive with utilities and home maintenance helps keep costs from creeping up. We' both started working at a young age, so had about 10 years of savings each under our belts. Over time, we've also invested in ISAs and stocks, making sure our savings were growing rather than just sitting idle. In addition to that, we originally got on the property ladder in 2020 in Canada. Our first home wasn't in quite the right neighbourhood for us, so we sold it just four months later. Not long after, we bought another home, which we really loved. But then we decided to move back to the UK, and sold that home too. Luckily, both properties appreciated in value during the short time we owned them, which allowed us to gain some equity. That bit of financial growth within just a year made a big difference when it came time to buy again. As self-employed creators, getting a mortgage can often be more complex. Thankfully, working with a broker made everything so much easier. We had all our paperwork in place – two years of tax returns and solid credit scores. We ultimately got offered a great rate and LTV. The biggest hurdle was deciding whether Nick, who's Canadian, should also be on the mortgage. Including him would have increased our interest rate, because at the time, Nick's visa only had three months left on it. June might mark Pride Month, but the reality is that LGBTQ+ people still face issues accessing housing. Research from Stonewall shows that almost one in five LGBTQ+ people have experienced homelessness; these statistics increase to 25% of all trans people. The majority of these cases are caused by direct rejection from families over their LGBTQ+ identity, too, as 77% of people surveyed by akt said that 'family rejection, abuse or being asked to leave home' was the cause of their homelessness. Shortly before becoming homeless, more than 50% had their family members force them to stop expressing their LGBTQ+ identity, figures which rise to 64% for trans people and 55% for disabled people. The University of Stirling also finds that LGBTQ+ people have poorer housing outcomes than their straight and cis counterparts, too. Gay, lesbian and bisexual people specifically are less likely to own their own homes, while throughout the 1980s and 1990s, there were instances of gay and bisexual men having their mortgage applications refused because of the stigma tied to the HIV/AIDS crisis. We were only able to renew it within 30 days of expiring, but we needed to progress with our mortgage application. Due to the additional risk for the lender, we opted not to at the time to save money. We locked in a 3.48% fixed rate for five years, just as interest rates began to climb. Some of our friends managed to secure sub-3% rates shortly before us, but given the timing and the current market, we're content with what we secured. For us, it came down to creative freedom. We struggled to find properties that matched our personal taste within our budget. Owning meant we could use our passion for renovation and interior design to craft exactly how we wanted our home to look – we are also very mindful of the privilege it is to be able to do so. It was a big investment upfront, but one we believed would be worth it in the long run. We found it on Rightmove and had actually passed on it once because it felt like too much work. But something about it stuck with us. A month later, we were nearby and decided to view it again. We negotiated a price we could manage and made an offer that same day. The home had been on the market for months with multiple offers turned down, so we do feel a little serendipity was involved. We believe the home was built between 1897 and 1903, so its late Victorian to early Edwardian, and we wanted to stay true to the era, while adding personal touches. It definitely carries that charm, with high ceilings, original details, and great bones. We wanted to maintain period elements like mouldings, fireplaces, and windows, while layering in modern influences like our Scandinavian-style kitchen or modern arches. Ant: My favourite room is the dining room. It's our boldest room, and while I usually shy away from colour, it's a reminder that stepping out of your comfort zone can often lead to the most rewarding results. Nick: I love our kitchen. It's the heart of the home, where we wind down, cook together, and host friends. It feels warm and welcoming. Absolutely. The property was originally a four-bed, but we converted one of the bedrooms into an en-suite bathroom and a utility room. This made the home better suited to us, a family of two and a cat! After such a big renovation, we're enjoying the calm. That said, it's always tempting to tinker! There is potential to extend one day. Fortunately, we haven't encountered any major issues since renovating. But during the process? Plenty. It turned into a full-scale renovation. Damp, rotten floors, cracked walls, and blocked drains were just a few of the issues we had to overcome. Nearly every surface needed to be replaced or repaired. One of the biggest challenges, though, was hiring the right people. Finding the right tradespeople can completely determine how smoothly your renovation goes. For anyone self-employed, especially those who run their own company, it's worth exploring whether you can use your company's pre-tax profits to apply for a mortgage. It made a big difference in our borrowing ability. More Trending More broadly, don't rush. If something breaks, there's almost always a solution, and you learn so much along the way. Lastly, if you can consider buying the worst house in the best neighbourhood, you're going to be onto something great. It doesn't have to be the biggest project, just something to add value – that's how we've been able to grow on the property ladder. We really see this as our long-term home. We've never lived anywhere longer than a year before, and we've now been here for almost three. It's been a long journey to feel settled in a space we love, and we're incredibly thankful to finally be here. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ View More » MORE: Major US fast food chain to open in London Heathrow airport – a European first MORE: The 'eclectic' suburb with homes £63,000 cheaper than the UK average MORE: Rita Ora reveals empowering way LGBTQ+ fans have 'inspired' her new music
