Swinney government accused of twisting EHRC advice
The comments earned a stinging rebuke from Baroness Kishwer Falkner, the Chair of the EHRC, who said the Commission had made it "clear" to civil servants that public bodies should not wait for updated guidance before acting on the judgment.
The peer said she was "very concerned that our conversations with officials appear to have been misrepresented".
FWS told The Herald they were stunned by the claims from officials: 'At what point does this stop being ignorant incompetence and tip into wilful malpractice?'
Read more:
In April, the UK's highest court ruled unanimously that a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) does not alter a person's sex for the purposes of the Equality Act.
The judgment clarified that the terms 'man' and 'woman' in the legislation refer to biological sex, not acquired gender.
The EHRC then issued interim guidance in May related to trans people's use of facilities including including changing rooms and toilets, and participation in sports.
It also launched a consultation on changes to parts of its code of practice for services, public functions and associations, which is due to conclude on June 30. The watchdog is due to publish the updated code later this year.
While First Minister John Swinney initially welcomed the 'clarity' provided by the ruling, the Scottish Government has repeatedly said it is waiting for this further guidance before issuing new guidance of its own to Scotland's public bodies.
However, the EHRC has repeatedly said that the ruling applies now and that "those with duties under the Equality Act 2010 should be following the law and looking at what changes, if any, need to be made to their policies and practices".
For Women Scotland following the court ruling (Image: PA) After the meeting with the Equalities Directorate, FWS wrote to the EHRC to question the claims made by officials.
Baroness Falkner replied: "As you rightly point out, our public messaging has been that the law as set out by the Supreme Court is effective immediately.
"We have been clear in our public messaging and in direct conversations with duty-bearers, including the Scottish Government, that they should not wait for our guidance but should be seeking to update their policies and practices in the light of the new understanding of the law, taking their own specialist legal advice where necessary."
Earlier this week, FWS wrote to the Scottish Government's Permanent Secretary Joe Griffin calling for a full investigation, saying it was "extremely concerning that statements made by a senior government official to a third party about EHRC advice have been directly contested by the regulatory body itself".
In a letter to the campaigners on Friday, seen by The Herald, Mr Griffin did not challenge FWS's account of the meeting, and said his team would "revert in due course" with a fuller response.
He said the Government accepted the Supreme Court's judgment and "acknowledges the EHRC statement that duty-bearers should not wait for our statutory Code of Practice for Services, Public Functions and Associations to be in place to review their policies to ensure they are complying with the law as now settled by the Supreme Court".
This, he added, "aligns with the approach the Scottish Government has taken since the judgment was issued in April".
Read more:
In Holyrood on Wednesday, Mr Griffin was pressed by SNP MSP Michelle Thomson to name any concrete action the Government had taken since the ruling. Mr Griffin said only that the "short life working group" had been established to prepare for implementation. He could not identify any specific changes made to guidance or policy.
Asked whether the threat of legal action — including two formal pre-litigation notices issued by FWS and Sex Matters — had prompted a rethink, Mr Griffin insisted that his advice remained that it was appropriate to wait for final EHRC guidance.
Susan Smith from FWS told The Herald: 'After the rambling performance of the Permanent Secretary at committee, it was clear that the Scottish Government has done nothing to comply with the Supreme Court ruling.
'To justify this, the civil service has materially misrepresented the advice given by the EHRC. There is no justification for Ministers or civil servants to ignore the law, and these highly paid public servants and politicians should not sit on their haunches while grassroots women's groups with little power or funding explain to them the basic principles of law and professional standards. Scotland deserves better.
'To say we are shocked is an understatement. At what point does this stop being ignorant incompetence and tip into wilful malpractice?
'The only recourse open to us is to return to court. But given the Scottish Government resoundingly ignored earlier Court of Session rulings and is now seemingly intent on not implementing the UK Supreme Court judgment it appears largely futile and a further waste of taxpayers' money. Has the Scottish Government really put itself beyond the law?'
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: "The Scottish Government has been clear that we accept the Supreme Court judgment and that public bodies have a duty to comply with the law.
"Work is proceeding at pace to implement the ruling across Government. We have established a Short Life Working Group to ensure support and consistency in this.
"We expect public bodies to be analysing policies and procedures and this is what is happening. For example, Police Scotland this week issued interim guidance on searching, including searching of transgender people.
"The Scottish Government has also updated the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018 guidance to reflect the judgment in relation to the definition of 'woman' under the Equality Act and this is now published online.
"The recent changes to the Equality and Human Rights Commission's interim update demonstrate the complexity of this work and the need for extensive legal advice and consultation with stakeholders. We will continue to take this work forward at pace in a way which protects the rights of everyone in society.
"The Permanent Secretary has responded to For Women Scotland."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Feral seagulls 'close to killing a human' as stark warning issued to tourists
A warning has been issued after a child was left with "blood running down her face" in flurry of horrific attacks from the flying gulls with politicians calling for more to be done Feral seagulls are edging closer to killing a human, it's been claimed. n what is seen as the most alarming warning yet over the terrifying flying threats, a summit to deal with them is set to get off the ground. Former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross, who previously called a debate on the issue at Holyrood, told Parliament humans risk being killed over the "growing problem" of kamikaze-diving seagulls. The politician said: 'The strength of the cross-party support in my debate should be all the SNP government need to finally act before we see someone killed due to being attacked by a gull.' Adding fuel to the flames, Tory Rachael Hamilton claimed "aggressive" seagulls had attacked seven children in just one month in Eyemouth last year. She went on to highlight how one girl had gashes to her scalp and "blood running down her face" after a "divebombing attack," the Daily Star reports. The MP added: 'Aggressive seagull behaviour continues to cause a real concern amongst businesses, amongst tourists, amongst everybody that has anything to do along the harbour. 'And it is not just a seasonal nuisance. It is a serious, growing health risk. It's a safety risk, particularly for children and elderly residents.' The latest flap over gulls comes after the people of Moray in Scotland were dive-bombed by the birds. In one case, an elderly woman broke her leg during a gull swoop. But other ministers are urging Brits to hug a gull. MSP Jim Fairlie said a summit on tackling the scourge of demented seagulls should not 'demonise' the pests. His fellow Nationalist MSP Christine Grahame added: 'Language such as 'mugging' and 'menace' can be applied to us, or our counterparts, but it is not appropriate to demonise an animal simply looking for food. 'What we mustn't have is people versus gulls, or gulls versus people.' Highlands and Islands MSP Mr Ross said he has been 'inundated' with reports about the dangers of gulls from constituents. They included a couple in the village of Hopeman who were 'worried about going out of their home' due to the aggressiveness of the birds. Jeff Thornhill, a Moray pensioner, said he and his wife were 'dive-bombed' by gull on Monday morning while they were out for a stroll. Among the other victims of the birds is terrified Caroline Mackay, who has lived in the coastal town of Nairn for almost 50 years. She said: 'I know they are part of living beside the sea, and I accept that, but they are quite a danger.' Lucy Harding from Nairn Business Improvement District said they had received 85 reports of gull attacks in the last year alone.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Scottish troops set for relocation with high-readiness posting in Cyprus
The soldiers of 4th Battalion, The Royal Regiment of Scotland (4 SCOTS) have been based at Bourlon Barracks at the Catterick Garrison in North Yorkshire for the last 10 years. During that time they have been able to 'put down roots' – building families and friendships, and continuing 'proud' Scottish traditions including the Highland games. The new posting will see them relocate to the British Sovereign Base Area in Dhekelia, Cyprus, with the first flights scheduled for Saturday. Once there the battalion will stand ready to respond at short notice to emerging situations across the Middle East and North Africa. At the same time they will be tasked with supporting peacekeeping efforts and protecting key military infrastructure on the island. Captain Craig Taylor, who has been with the battalion throughout its time at Bourlon Barracks, said the move will be a 'big change' for the troops. 'We've had 10 solid years of stability here in Catterick. It's been a place where soldiers could put down roots, raise families, and grow professionally,' he said. 'Moving to Cyprus will be a big change for us, not just in terms of the climate. 'This is an exciting opportunity that soldiers have been training hard for. It's not a short-term tour or exercise – it's a full overseas posting which gives us the chance to experience new cultures and ways of life. 'Professionally, it sharpens our edge. We'll be held at high readiness to deploy anywhere in the region, and beyond which is of real strategic importance to the UK.' It is not the first overseas posting for the battalion, which has been involved in operations in the likes of Iraq, Afghanistan and Kosovo since its formation in 2006. Closer to home, 4 SCOTS also provided security support for the 2022 Commonwealth Games in Birmingham, provided emergency aid during the 2018 Saddleworth Moor wildfires, and took part in the national Covid-19 response. Despite being more than 2,000 miles from Scotland, the battalion intends to take its traditions with it, with events including regimental competitions and Burns Night celebrations remaining 'firm fixtures' in the calendar. Capt Taylor added: 'We're proud of everything we've achieved here. 'But now it's time to pack up, push forward, and embed our Scottish identity into a new location.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
The time Trump reviewed Citizen Kane and revealed too much of himself
Yet there are rare moments when this side reaches the surface, and it can feel quite startling, as if he has maybe revealed too much of himself. Times when he has spoken about his brother Fred, for one, whose alcoholism led to an early death that greatly influenced the trajectory of the younger Trump. Glimpses into his personal grief are fleeting, but they expose a man who, beneath his bravado, is deeply shaped by his fear of being rendered powerless. Read more: Think of all the great art we'll get from a Trump win… But there's an even stranger instance of Trump revealing his vulnerable side, and it's when, in 2002, he reviewed his favourite film – the 1941 Orson Welles-directed Citizen Kane. It's not hard to see why the film resonates so much with Trump. Its portrayal of Charles Foster Kane – a wealthy, ambitious, and arrogant media mogul whose life is marked by power, betrayal, and isolation – has drawn plenty of comparisons with the President. Throughout his review, Trump makes it clear that he sees Kane as a stand-in for himself. 'The wealth, the sorrow, the unhappiness, the happiness, just struck lots of different notes,' he muses. He finds solace in Kane's struggles with the pursuit of success and wealth, rather than the cautionary tale Welles intended, pointing out telling moments like Kane and his wife sitting further apart at the dinner table the more his power mutates and grows. It is transparent that Trump sees parallels to his own personal life in these moments, and he sees Kane as that rare someone who can actually understand him. 'In real life I believe that wealth does in fact isolate you from other people. It's a protective mechanism. You have your guard up much more than you would if you didn't have wealth.' His reading is rather revealing, even if he misses much of the film's subtext. Citizen Kane is a tragedy about a man who sacrifices love and humanity in pursuit of power, only to die alone, lamenting his lost innocence. Yet Trump doesn't recoil from Kane's fate; he relates to it. He recognises Kane's isolation not as a direct result of his actions and mindset, but as a protective mechanism. It is as if Trump sees Kane as a muse, a kindred spirit that he in some way must protect lest it reflect badly on himself. It's a telling inversion, where a critique of wealth and power is instead embraced as a necessary defence against a hostile world. Errol Morris, who directed the segment featuring Trump's review, later remarked on the strange dissonance between the film's intent and Trump's interpretation, the clash between the obvious meaning behind Kane's character and Trump's completely analogous take. 'If I were Donald Trump, I would not want to emphasise that connection with Kane. You know, a megalomaniac in love with power and crushing everything in his path. The inability to have friends, the inability to find love,' the documentarian observed. Read more: Trump film tariff proves Scottish film cannot afford to sell out to Hollywood Trump changes the reasons he loves Citizen Kane over time, and it always runs in sync with his own narrative. When speaking on the film during his 2016 presidential campaign, he focused on the sharp turn the media took against Kane, likening it to his own media onslaught at the time. In that reading, Kane becomes a fellow 'fake news' martyr, unjustifiably persecuted. Like most things with Trump, his reading of Citizen Kane is less about the film and more about himself. He doesn't see a warning; he sees a mirror. And in that reflection, he finds validation – even in the parts that should give him pause. The film explores how fetishising success can become a hollow pitfall in wait, yet to Trump, it just makes Kane a misunderstood man. It is peculiar that through the endless observations of Trump, the millions of words out of his mouth that have been documented and spread, we begin to get closer to how his internal world works through his grasp of a film's meaning and what becomes accidentally revealed through that. His relationship with Citizen Kane speaks loudly about his own relationship with power, where the spectre of tragedy is just an inevitability of that process. Of course, by the end of the review, the Trump we all know returns. Trump's reply when asked what advice he would give Kane, a man of a similar disposition? 'Get yourself a different woman'.
