logo
Government accused of ‘running scared' over bid to block sentencing guidelines

Government accused of ‘running scared' over bid to block sentencing guidelines

Yahoo07-05-2025

The Government has been accused of 'running scared of rather nasty right-wingers' over plans to block new sentencing guidelines.
New guidance from the independent Sentencing Council would have recommended a pre-sentence report (PSR) be sought before sentencing offenders from ethnic, cultural or faith minorities.
Pre-sentence reports provide information about the offender's background, circumstances of their offence, the risk they pose and suitability for certain types of sentence.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
The use of these reports has been linked to higher rate of community, rather than prison sentences.
The Government brought forward the Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reporters) Bill to block the new guidelines, arguing that it would lead to a differential treatment under the law and a 'two-tier' justice system.
The implementation of the updated rulebook has been put on hold to allow Parliament to consider this legislation.
However, supporters of the guidance argued that the UK already has a 'two-tier' justice system, due to entrenched racial bias.
The Lammy Review, published in 2017, found disparities in outcome across the justice system for those from minority backgrounds compared to their white counterparts, including in sentencing.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
As the House of Lords debated the Government's Bill during its second reading, Green Party peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb argued that politicians were trying to 'interfere' with the workings of an independent body.
She said: 'The Sentencing Council is an independent body that saw a problem and tried to do something about it.
'It has done what it was designed to do and now the Labour Government is running scared of these rather nasty right-wingers who are trying to interfere.
'I think it was Elon Musk, perhaps amongst others, who first said that Britain had a two-tier justice system.
'And he was right, that is exactly what we have, because some groups are worse treated than others.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
'We do not have equality under the law.
Green Party peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Stefan Rousseau/ PA credit)
'We've known about women being less fairly treated for decades, with women being imprisoned for things that men would not be.
'The Sentencing Council came up with the mildest of changes to address that issue and has been slammed for it….
'When the Government says it wants equality under the law, everybody wants that.
'But the difference is that I accept the evidence that we currently have a two-tier system of justice where you can end up receiving worse treatment because you're a woman or because of the colour of your skin.'
The Bishop of Gloucester, the Anglican bishop for prisons, branded the Bill 'theatrical' and unnecessary, brought on by 'am-dram politics'.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
The Rt Rev Rachel Treweek said: 'In a world of sufficient resources, there would be comprehensive pre-sentencing reports for everyone to which careful attention was paid in court.
'But if we have to prioritise PSRs, then it makes sense to prioritise those that we know are especially vulnerable or where there is evidence of disproportionate outcomes from the justice system.'
Referring to the Lammy Review, she asked: 'Does the Government believe the issues raised in the landmark report by the current Foreign Secretary almost eight years ago are now a thing of the past?
'Is there no role for judges in mitigating the issues raised in that report?
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
'The use of the Sentencing Council guidelines to apparently feed a culture war is distressing, and the allegation of two-tier sentencing based around race, religion, belief or cultural background is so damaging to public understanding…
'We cannot pretend that circumstances and characteristics do not matter.'
Prisons minister Lord Timpson (Ben Whitley/ PA credit)
However, unaffiliated peer Baroness Fox of Buckley hit back at the culture war argument, branding it a 'slur'.
She said: 'The popular critique of criminal justice as 'two-tier', that actually really resonated, particularly in relation to the sentencing post-last summer's riots, was sneeringly dismissed as a far-right conspiratorial myth by many ministers and politicians.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
'It was written off as some culture wars trope, and we've heard similar slurs here today.'
She criticised the 'tendency to try and use criminal justice to compensate for perceived racial unfairness and alleged social injustices'.
Responding, prisons minister Lord Timpson said: 'Implementing a sentencing guideline, which could lead to differential treatment before the law, puts trust in the legal system at risk, which is why we acted quickly to address this…
'The Government's objective is to help ensure equality before the law. We are clear that an offender should be judged by a court on an individual basis according to the particular facts and circumstances of their case.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
'It is not for the Sentencing Council to set in guidance that judgments should be made on the basis of personal characteristics like race or ethnicity.
'Any reference to preferential treatment for a particular cohort is unacceptable.'
He insisted that tackling disproportionate outcomes within the criminal justice system is 'a policy matter' to be determined by the Government, not judges.
However, he acknowledged the need to tackle inequalities and told peers that the Government has commissioned a review into data held by the Ministry of Justice on racial disparities and will 'carefully consider next steps'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says
No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says

No decision will be taken on the winter fuel allowance until the Autumn budget – dispelling speculation that the government would make an announcement on it at next week's spending review. Sir Keir Starmer last month announced his intention to give more people access to winter fuel payments, just months after Labour decided to means test the previously universal payment. But weeks later, chaotic government messaging had left millions of pensioners with no idea what the changes will look like or when they will be announced. Asked about the changes, Peter Kyle, the secretary of state for science, innovation and technology, told Sky News: 'These issues are going to be dealt with in the run up to the autumn where these decisions are going to be taken and announced. 'But this is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years.' Pressed on whether that means no details will be unveiled on winter fuel next week, the technology secretary said: 'I think what you're going to see is the overall spending constraints and allowances for each government department, and then each department is then going to start talking about how it's going to allocate those.' Last week, Rachel Reeves confirmed the expected U-turn on the controversial cuts would be in place for this winter, meaning that the government will be faced with a scramble to get the changes rolled out between the October budget and the winter months. While the chancellor had previously confirmed that they would not set out how the changes would be paid for until the autumn, there was a growing suggestion from the government that details on who the changes would affect could be set out at next week's spending review. The chancellor is expected to unveil a swathe of spending cuts on Wednesday as she attempts to walk the tightrope between delivering on the party's election promises and sticking within the bounds of her self-imposed fiscal rules. Mr Kyle's comments come days after pensions minister Torsten Bell confirmed there was no prospect of returning to a universal winter fuel payment for all, saying that '95 per cent of people agree that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that.' Winter fuel payments are a £300 payment to help with energy costs in the colder months. In July, the chancellor announced that pensioners not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits would no longer receive the benefit. As a result, just 1.5 million pensioners received the payment in winter 2024-25 – a massive drop from the 10.8 million pensioners who received it the year before. The cuts were deeply unpopular because they were seen as being disproportionately damaging to vulnerable people, and were criticised for leaving thousands of poorer pensions who were on the borderline missing out on the payment. In November, it was revealed that the government's own figures indicated it would force 100,000 pensioners into poverty in 2026. The policy was partly blamed for Labour's poor performance at the local elections – which saw them lose two-thirds of the council seats they had in 2021– as well as the previously Labour-held Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary seat to Reform UK. The cuts – combined with the £5bn welfare cuts and the party's decision to keep the two child benefit cap in place – have sparked growing concern over the direction of the government among Labour MPs.

Booker won't accept money from Elon Musk for campaign, but urges him to 'sound the alarm' on Trump-backed bill
Booker won't accept money from Elon Musk for campaign, but urges him to 'sound the alarm' on Trump-backed bill

Fox News

time42 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Booker won't accept money from Elon Musk for campaign, but urges him to 'sound the alarm' on Trump-backed bill

Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., told NBC News on Sunday that he wouldn't accept money from Elon Musk for his re-election campaign, but urged the former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) official to "sound the alarm" on the "big, beautiful bill" endorsed by President Donald Trump. "Meet the Press" host Kristen Welker asked Booker on Sunday if he would accept money from Musk after the billionaire and the president traded barbs. "I will partner with anyone like I did in the last Congress, putting my vote alongside of John McCain's, Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins to stop the tearing down of the Affordable Care Act. This is not about right or left. It's about right or wrong. And this bill is disastrous for the average American, driving up this cost. This bill is disastrous for our long-term economy. This is an American issue, and I welcome Elon Musk, not to my campaign, I welcome him right now, not to sit back and fire off tweets, to get involved right now in a more substantive way, in putting pressure on Congresspeople and senators to not do this," Booker said. Welker asked Booker again if he would accept money from Musk. "I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign, but I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know, sound the alarm, treat this like a Paul Revere moment. More Americans have to understand that if this bill passes, average Americans are going to see their costs skyrocket, as this president, again, pushes legislation that is indicative of his chaos, corruption and cruelty towards Americans," Booker said. Musk criticized the Trump-backed bill as a "disgusting abomination." "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk said in a post on X. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Welker also pressed Booker on the state of the Democratic Party, asking the liberal senator about former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre's decision to register as an Independent, which she announced along with a new book about her time in the White House. "Do you think Democrats have to distance themselves from the party brand in order to win?" Welker asked, noting some of New Jersey's gubernatorial candidates have also been critical of the party, ahead of the primary election on Tuesday. "I think the Democrats right now all across America should be less concerned about the Democratic Party and more concerned with the American people. There's a trust problem for Republicans and Democrats. Most Americans voted against both of the presidential candidates in the last election. We need to start standing up and show we're fighting for Americans right now," Booker responded. Booker also said he was going to endorse whoever wins the Democratic gubernatorial primary in New Jersey.

AI Insider Takes Us Inside Trump and Musk's Quiet Plan to Reboot America
AI Insider Takes Us Inside Trump and Musk's Quiet Plan to Reboot America

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

AI Insider Takes Us Inside Trump and Musk's Quiet Plan to Reboot America

BALTIMORE, June 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- New briefing reveals the creation of a secret AI system designed to reshape the country's infrastructure, governance, and future — starting July 1. Bestselling author and longtime tech analyst James Altucher has released a stunning new report that pulls back the curtain on what he calls 'the most important project in America today' — and it has nothing to do with Washington. According to Altucher, Elon Musk is building a system called Project Colossus — a privately operated supercomputer that's now being quietly positioned as the technological foundation of a new, AI-driven America. It All Started on Day One Altucher points to Donald Trump's very first executive action in office as the moment this project became possible. 'In one of his FIRST acts as President… Donald Trump overturned Executive Order #14110.' That single move, Altucher says, eliminated regulatory bottlenecks and opened the floodgates for full-speed development by private operators — especially Musk. Hidden in Plain Sight 'Right here, inside this warehouse in Memphis, Tennessee… lies a massive supercomputer Musk calls 'Project Colossus.'' Altucher reports that the machine is already live, powered by 200,000 of Nvidia's most advanced AI chips — with a tenfold upgrade scheduled for rollout by July 1. 'Making it the most advanced AI facility known to man.' The Mission: Replace the System According to Altucher, Colossus isn't just designed to speed up processes — it's meant to replace outdated decision-making structures altogether. 'AI 2.0… gives that knowledge to intelligent machines that I believe will solve our problems for us.' Altucher warns that while most Americans are focused on politics-as-usual, the real transformation is happening behind firewalls — with Musk writing the code, and Trump clearing the path. About James Altucher James Altucher is a computer scientist, entrepreneur, and bestselling author who has worked in artificial intelligence for over four decades. A contributor to IBM's Deep Blue and an early AI pioneer on Wall Street, his latest briefings reveal the hidden buildout of America's post-industrial, AI-powered infrastructure — and the forces quietly driving it. Media Contact:Derek WarrenPublic Relations ManagerParadigm Press GroupEmail: dwarren@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store