HC quashes 2019 notification of giving 10 marks under socio-economic criteria for Haryana govt jobs
The division bench of justices Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Meenakshi I Mehta held the state government's June 11, 2019 notification to be in violation of Articles of 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution.
Chandigarh, May 24 (PTI) The Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed the Haryana government's 2019 notification which gave up to 10 bonus marks to candidates under the 'socio-economic criteria' in the recruitment for government jobs.
As per the 2019 notification of the state government, up to 10 marks were to be allotted to candidates under the socio-economic criterion.
Maximum five marks were given to a candidate who does not have any family member in a government job and five additional marks were given if an applicant is a widow or belongs to nomadic tribes.
'We find that the selection process has been tainted on account of granting of bonus marks. If the bonus marks are deleted from the selection process, the meritorious candidates would have been selected.
'Such a selection which is solely based on acquiring bonus marks would be in violation of the principles of equality as enshrined under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
'By carving out an artificial class of applicants who would be entitled to five bonus marks (up to 10), the principles enshrined under Article 16 would stand violated. No other reservation, except the one as available under Article 15 and 16 of the Constitution, can be laid by any state,' said the bench in its May 22 order.
The court found that the state conducted the entire selection in a 'wholly slipshod manner'.
'The notification of granting the 10 bonus marks for socio-economic criteria and experience is not based on any rules framed under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution. It is also noticed that no data was collected before laying down such socio-economic criteria.
'We further find that once the reservations have already been provided statutorily under the EWS category, as well as on account of social backwardness by providing reservation for backward class, further granting benefit under socio-economic criteria would lead to breach of 50 per cent ceiling limit,' said the order while citing the Indira Sawhney Vs Union of India case.
The court stated, 'What cannot be done directly, cannot be done indirectly'.
The bench applied the theory of 'no fault' with regard to candidates who would be ousted from the merit list, though they had cleared the written examination and have been working for quite a long time now.
'We also notice that the candidates, who would have been appointed, went under a cumbersome selection process and their appointments were made in terms of the method and manner of selection as in the advertisement.
'Although, we have not approved the economic criteria adopted vide notification dated 11.06.2019, such appointments ought not be made to suffer,' stated the bench.
'We, therefore, save their appointments with a condition that they would have no claim for seniority in terms of the advertisement of 2019.
'We, therefore, find that notification dated 11.06.2019 to be in violation of Articles of 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution of India and the same is accordingly declared ultra vires and liable to be quashed and set aside,' it said.
The court further directed that the state would be required to publish a revised result, and on the basis of the revised result, the candidates who are found to be meritorious, would be entitled to be considered for appointment for the posts concerned advertised in 2019. PTI CHS VSD MNK MNK
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
President Trump deeply admires, respects India, we are going to have great relationship together: Commerce Secretary Lutnick
Washington, Jun 3 (PTI) The core population of India has drive and ambition and that's why its economy will always continue to thrive, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has said, underlining that President Donald Trump deeply admires and respects India and the two countries are going to have a "great relationship together." India has one of the most extraordinary economies, Lutnick said in his keynote address at the eighth edition of the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) Leadership Summit here on Monday. "The key that makes an extraordinary economy is the determination of the people. How much do your people care about being in business? How entrepreneurial are they? How much do they drive to be better for their families?" he said. "From what I know about India, the core population of India has that drive and ambition, and that's why the Indian economy will always continue to grow and thrive because it has that from the underpinning and so you can do things in India that many other countries, you just can't get done.' He added that while President Trump thinks 'America first', he does not think 'America only' or 'America exclusively'. 'First, he's got to take care of home so we're big and strong, but then he's going to take care of his allies. He's going to make sure he takes care of India, who he deeply, deeply admires and respects and we are going to have a great, great relationship together," Lutnick said. Responding to a question on Indian talent in the US against the backdrop of ongoing visa and immigration discussions, Lutnick said the success of Indian entrepreneurs in America, individuals of Indian nationality leading and running so many of the 'great companies' of America 'because they're fantastic entrepreneurs, fantastic business people, smart, thoughtful, educated in every way. 'But I think the ordinary path of immigration for America is changing. The Trump Card is coming out. I expect the Trump Card will create really an enormous opportunity for people to have the ability to come to America,' he said, referring to the USD 5 million 'Trump Gold Card', on the lines of a Green Card, that will fast-track the process for foreigners to live and work in the US. Lutnick said he feels 'we are going to be incredibly successful in India. So when people ask me, 'When are you coming to India?' I'd say, 'When I launch the Trump Card, I promise you I'm coming to India'.' He said it's a wonderful opportunity for people to be part of two economies - the Indian economy and the American economy, and people will be able to come to America and participate in America. 'Here's the key. You can become like a green card holder, the equivalent of it, it's the Trump Gold Card. You can do it that way and pay global tax, or you can keep everything the way it is and just pay US tax on US assets, and you pay nothing on your global assets and no inheritance tax, and none of that kind of stuff either. 'And that's what we're going to call it an international entrepreneur. That's a special category, and I think it will be very, very well received amongst the great people of India who want to participate and have the means to participate in America," he said. In response to a question on whether the US will be doing more to help push more manufacturing in India, Lutnick said America wants to bring advanced manufacturing back to the United States. 'That's a key industrial platform for us, to bring back domestic manufacturing and reshoring in America,' he said, adding that there are an enormous number of product categories that 'we are going to be delighted for India to produce.' He said that there will be a trade deal that says certain kinds of industries would be great for India to produce. 'And in fact, there are enormous numbers of industries that we'd really like to go to India. What happens is, you create the sort of trade deal that puts India in a unique position because it'll have a special relationship with the United States and certain industries. 'It will have a better tariff relationship than most other countries in the world, which means India will be the beneficiary of those kind of products,' he said, adding that some will need to be reshored to America but they'll be replaced with incredible opportunity for India, which has one of the most extraordinary economies. On whether he sees opportunities for collaboration between India and the US in areas such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and emerging tech, Lutnick said, 'Our idea is that we want to embrace our allies and our friends in a way that is much more open than the Biden administration, not even on the same hemisphere. 'So we love our allies. We want our allies to participate in the AI revolution with us. And if India is interested, which of course it is, and it wants to build giant data centres and be a part of that model, we are ready, willing and look forward to embracing India as a partner and friend in that path," he said.
United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
Trump files appeal to SC over federal mass firings
Washington, June 3 (UNI) The U.S. Trump administration has filed an appeal with the Supreme Court seeking to overturn the federal court's injunction that had prevented federal agencies from carrying out large-scale workforce reductions and reorganizations. In the appeal, U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer argued that "controlling the personnel of federal agencies lies at the heartland" of the president's authority, and "the Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the president does not need special permission from Congress to exercise" his core constitutional powers. On May 30, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected the Trump administration's appeal, upholding the temporary injunction issued earlier by Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The injunction barred federal agencies and the Office of Management and Budget from moving forward with broad-scale layoffs and structural reorganizations. The Ninth Circuit held that implementing extensive layoffs and reorganizations would seriously impair many areas, including the national food safety system and veterans' healthcare, and therefore such actions should be suspended while the litigation proceeds. On May 9, Illston issued a two-week temporary injunction requiring federal agencies to halt enforcement of the administrative order signed by President Donald Trump in February, as well as the subsequent memorandum issued by the Office of Management and Budget. She also ordered agencies to rescind any layoff notices issued under the president's order, to reinstate positions for employees placed on administrative leave, and to provide appropriate compensation. In her ruling, Illston stated that the president must obtain congressional approval in order to reform federal agencies. Agencies may not undertake mass reorganizations or layoffs without authorization from Congress. On May 22, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California further ruled to extend the injunction indefinitely. The Department of Justice filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit the following day. UNI XC GNK
Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Mau MLA Abbas Ansari disqualified from UP Assembly after conviction in hate speech case
Abbas Ansari, an MLA from Uttar Pradesh's Mau constituency and son of the gangster-turned-politician Mukhtar Ansari, has been disqualified from the Uttar Pradesh Assembly after a court convicted him in a hate speech case, the Hindustan Times reported on Monday. On Saturday, Chief Judicial Magistrate KP Singh sentenced Abbas Ansari, a member of the Om Prakash Rajbhar-led Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party, to two years in prison. The court held that while the Constitution granted the right to freedom of expression, it was not unrestricted. 'No one can say anything, anywhere, anytime,' Live Law quoted Singh as having said. 'There is no place for hate or provocative speech in the political field, and it becomes serious when the intention is to create disorder on the basis of religion and thus, influencing elections directly or indirectly.' The case pertained to a statement Abbas Ansari made during an election rally in Mau in March 2022, in which he told government officials that he would 'settle scores and teach them a lesson' after the elections, PTI reported. The Election Commission had imposed a 24-hour campaign ban on him after the remark, Maktoob Media reported. A first information report was filed against Abbas Ansari under the Indian Penal Code sections related to punishment for criminal intimidation, punishment for undue influence or personation at an election, obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, threat of injury to public servant, promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony, and punishment of criminal conspiracy. Apart from Abbas Ansari, the FIR also named more than 150 others, including his brother Umar Ansari and his election agent Mansoor Ahmed Ansari, according to Maktoob Media. The court on Saturday stated that Abbas Ansari had been found guilty of delivering a provocative speech, which was a serious offence. 'If senior officials appointed in the district, who are under the direct control of the Election Commission during the Model Code of Conduct period, are threatened with paybacks, then it certainly creates an indirect sense of fear among the voters as well,' Live Law quoted the bench as having said. A day later, the Uttar Pradesh Assembly issued a notification stating that Abbas Ansari had been disqualified, the Hindustan Times reported. Pradeep Dubey, the principal secretary of the Assembly, also said that the Mau seat had been declared vacant. Dubey added that the Election Commission had been informed about the vacancy and that it would issue a notification for holding an election. Abbas Ansari's father, Mukhtar Ansari, had a total of 65 cases against him and had been in jail since 2005 after he surrendered to the police in connection with a communal riot that took place in the town of Mau. On March 14 last year, he was sentenced to life imprisonment by a special court for MPs and MLAs in the 34-year-old Ghazipur fake arms licence case. This was his seventh conviction over 18 months. The gangster-turned-politician died in custody at the Banda Medical College in Uttar Pradesh on March 28, 2024. Hospital authorities said he died of a cardiac arrest. A week before his death, Mukhtar Ansari had told a court in the Barabanki district that his health had deteriorated after he was served food allegedly laced with poison inside the prison, reported PTI. He had alleged that he was poisoned 40 days earlier as well.
