Tokyo court orders dissolution of ‘Moonies' Unification Church
A court in Japan has ordered the Unification Church to be dissolved after a government request that was spurred by the investigation into the 2022 assassination of the former prime minister Shinzo Abe.
The church, founded in South Korea and nicknamed the 'Moonies' after its late founder, Sun Myung Moon, is accused of pressuring followers into making life-ruining donations, and blamed for child neglect among its members, although it has denied any wrongdoing.
The church said it was considering an immediate appeal of the Tokyo district court's revocation of its legal status, which would take away its tax-exempt privilege and require liquidation of its assets.
The order followed a request by Japan's education ministry in 2023 to dissolve the influential South Korea-based sect, citing manipulative fundraising and recruitment tactics that sowed fear among followers and harmed their families.
The Japanese branch of the church had criticised the request as a serious threat to religious freedom and the human rights of its followers.
The church called the court order regrettable and unjust and said in a statement that the court's decision was based on 'a wrong legal interpretation and absolutely unacceptable'.
The investigation into Abe's assassination revealed decades of cosy ties between the church and Japan's governing Liberal Democratic party. The church obtained legal status as a religious organisation in Japan in the 1960s during an anti-communist movement supported by Abe's grandfather, the former prime minister Nobusuke Kishi.
The man accused of killing Abe resented the church and blamed it for his family's financial troubles.
The church, which officially calls itself the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification, is the first religious group subject to a revocation order under Japan's civil code. Two earlier cases involved criminal charges: the Aum Shinrikyo doomsday cult, which carried out a sarin nerve gas attack on the Tokyo subway system; and Myokakuji group, whose executives were convicted of fraud.
Seeking the church's dissolution, the education ministry submitted 5,000 documents and pieces of evidence to the court, based on interviews with more than 170 people.
The church used manipulative tactics to make its followers buy expensive goods and donate beyond their means, causing fear, harm and seriously deviating from the law on religious groups, officials and experts said.
The cultural affairs agency said the settlements reached in or outside court exceeded 20bn yen (£103m) and involved more than 1,500 people.
The church, founded in Seoul in 1954, a year after the end of the Korean war, by Moon, a self-proclaimed Messiah who preached new interpretations of the Bible and conservative, family-oriented value systems.
It developed relations with conservative world leaders including US president, Donald Trump, as well as his predecessors Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush.
The church faced accusations in the 1970s and 1980s of using devious recruitment tactics and brainwashing adherents into turning over huge portions of their salaries to Moon. In Japan, the group has faced lawsuits for offering 'spiritual merchandise' that allegedly caused members to buy expensive art and jewellry or sell their real estate to raise money for the church.
The church has acknowledged excessive donations, but says the problem has lessened since the group stepped up compliance in 2009.
Experts say Japanese followers are asked to pay for sins committed by their ancestors during Japan's 1910-45 colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula, and that most of the church's worldwide funding comes from Japan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
US ‘is secretly planning to attack China from its South Korea base in the event of a Taiwan invasion'
American forces stationed in South Korea are prepared to respond to a potential Chinese invasion of the Taiwan Area. Speaking at a security conference in Singapore last month, US Defence Secretary Pete Hesgeth said: ' Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific,' adding that the Pentagon was 'reorienting toward deterring aggression by communist China.' This would mean that US troops stationed in South Korea, as well as Japan and the Pacific Islands of Hawaii and Guam, would play a part in acting as a credible deterrent against China for any potential attack on Taiwan. There are currently 28,500 American troops deployed to South Korea as part of the US long-term commitment to help defend Seoul from any attack from North Korea. No decision has been made on the number of troops deployed to South Korea, but any future footprint would be optimized not only to defend against Pyongyang but also to deter China. But this development could pose a challenge for South Korea, who have historically been opposed to the presence of US military. It also presents issues for the newly elected South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, who said he wants to engage with North Korea with the backing of US troops. It comes after China deployed dozens of warships and planes to encircle the island nation of Taiwan in menacing, large-scale war games last month. Chilling satellite pictures also revealed what appear to be Beijing's 'invasion barges' - gargantuan platforms that connect to form a mobile pier that could enable thousands of soldiers and hundreds of vehicles to land on Taiwan's shores. The multi-day military drills forced Taipei to respond by scrambling fighter jets and warships of their own to dissuade any overzealous members of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) from posing a serious threat. But these alarming exercises were just the latest addition to a worrying trend that has seen Beijing grow increasingly aggressive toward its island neighbour in recent years. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), headed by authoritarian President Xi Jinping, sees Taiwan as a renegade province to be brought back under Beijing's control, by force if necessary. Taiwan's elected Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presides over a self-governing, democratic society and has sought close ties with the US, hoping its political, military and economic heft will keep Xi's expansionist tendencies at bay. American deterrence, the reliance of China's export economy on the West and the cost of a military operation to seize Taiwan has led most analysts to suggest Beijing is more likely to use less direct means to pressure Taipei. But politicians, military chiefs and industry leaders the world over can no longer afford to ignore the prospect of a full-scale invasion - a scenario which would shake the foundations of the world as we know it and could well trigger a Third World War.
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Twisted fraudster lied to girlfriend about mum's death to con her out of thousands
The 'born again Christian' scammed a woman who met online before swindling another short-term partner out of an eye-water amount. A Scots-based fraudster told his girlfriend his mum was dead to con her out of more than £15,000 - despite her being alive and well to this day Andrew New, 36, also swindled money from his victim to buy Champions League final tickets on the empty promise that he'd repay her. New, who now lives in a Christian rehab facility in Motherwell but is originally from Wirral, was spared jail after a court heard the case had gone on for three years, giving him the time to "turn his life around" in Scotland, reports Liverpool Echo. On Thursday, Liverpool Crown Court heard that New had been in a relationship with Sarah Haslam between April and June 2022. During these 10 weeks, he repeatedly begged her to transfer money into his bank account, as well as those of a friend and his "Uncle Joe", for a "variety of fabricated reasons". Henry Riding, prosecuting, described how these reasons including having forgotten his credit card at petrol stations and wishing to purchase football tickets. Shockingly, she also gave him thousands of pounds under the impression that he needed to "make funeral arrangements" for his own mum in spite of her being "alive and well". New "promised to pay her back in due course, but never did". This led to him pocketing a total of £15,734.65 of Ms Haslam's money during a period of only two-and-a-half months. Reading a statement from the witness box, she tearfully said: "As a result of what happened to me, I'm exhausted both mentally and emotionally. I've told very few people what they did to me three years ago. I say they, because I can't say their name out loud. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. "This was a person I believed cared deeply for me. I now know I was manipulated by them. I gave this person everything I had. In return, I was controlled and coerced until they broke me. I've lost part of myself. "I considered myself a good judge of character. I now realise I was a pawn in their game, played by a first class method actor. I still struggle to understand how I let them do this to me. This person's narcissism led me to believe I could never do better. "Three years on, I still live the trauma. I felt like I had ruined my life. A day doesn't go by when I don't feel the hurt, pain and shame for not recognising what was happening to me." He was first arrested in June 2022, but it took more than a year befpre he even stepped foot in court. In August last year, New plead guilty during his first appearance before the crown court, but his case did not proceed to sentence until now due to ongoing proceeding against the two other men whose bank accounts were used as part of the scam. However, charges were dropped against them by the Crown Prosecution Service. New has four previous convictions for four offences, including being handed a two-year community order for fraud by magistrates in 2019. This came after he stole more cash in relation to "non-existent football tickets" from a woman who he met on Plenty of Fish. He also tried to procure further funds from his victim, who he's never met in person, so he could "visit an aunt, who he described as ill." Paul Becker, defending, told the court: "The defendant is sorry for what he has done. He did not know, first thing today, that the victim was going to be present. Having heard her victim personal statement, he is utterly ashamed of himself. "This is an unusual case. The delay, in some respects, helps the defendant, because he has been able to rebuild his life. He has moved to Scotland. He has been at a rehab centre for the last year. "He works six days a week helping people. Because he is working, he gets free accommodation. He has been able to move away from this area, from obviously problematic relationships and the addiction he has had. "He has stayed off cocaine. That was the blight of his life. He is utterly ashamed of what he has done. What he has done is disgraceful. He can only say that it was because of drugs. "He has an unattractive record. He has done his best since he moved away to try to turn his life around. If the defendant goes to jail today, he spends a few months in jail, he comes out on licence and he is back to square one. "Everybody wants Mr New to be rehabilitated, to stay off drugs, to stay away from a situation where he is essentially stealing and to be a working, productive member of society. My submission is that the defendant should be given a chance today." New admitted one count of fraud by false representation. Appearing in the dock wearing a navy blue body warmer over a beige long sleeved top, he was handed a 21-month imprisonment suspended for 20 months with 180 hours of unpaid work, a rehabilitation activity requirement of up to 20 days and a 12-month condition of residence. "What you did has caused her very significant financial difficulties. She is still now, three years on, repaying monies which you took from her. That has delayed her ability to buy her own home. "You are described as now showing insight into the consequences of your offending. You have accepted full responsibility. You had issues with the use of cocaine. You are now residing in a Christian rehabilitation facility. You now identify as a born again Christian. "You work on a charitable basis six days a week, paying for your accommodation. You act as a mentor. You have expressed remorse and shame and want to apologise to your victim. As Mr Becker puts it, you have rebuilt your life. You have tackled, or are in the process of tackling, your addiction, which underlines all of your offending. "The mitigation in your case all flows from one thing. That is the delay in bringing this case to resolution, a delay of around three years. It cannot be said that the delay is attributable to your actions. "That delay means that you can show that you have committed no further offences and allows Mr Becker to identify that you have turned your life around in that three-year period. That is very significant. "This is a case where appropriate punishment could only be achieved by an immediate custodial sentence. However, there is the significant issue in this case, which I am obliged to take into account. That is the fact that the offending is now three years old. "Had you been sentenced closer in time to the commission of this offence, I have no doubt that an immediate custodial sentence would have been the only correct disposal. You are not being sentenced close in time to your offending. "An immediate custodial sentence would mean a number of months in prison, the removal of your support network and, frankly, has the potential of unpicking the progress that has been made. You have come very close to going to prison today. If all the promises suggested on your behalf are not made out and you return to offending, this sentence will be activated."
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Harvard challenges Trump move to bar visas for international students
"The Proclamation denies thousands of Harvard's students the right to come to this country to pursue their education and follow their dreams, and it denies Harvard the right to teach them. Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard," the school said in the filing on June 5. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson called Harvard "a hotbed of anti-American, anti-Semitic, pro-terrorist agitators," claims that the school has previously denied. "Harvard's behavior has jeopardized the integrity of the entire U.S. student and exchange visitor visa system and risks compromising national security. Now it must face the consequences of its actions," Jackson said in a statement. Trump cited national security concerns as justification for barring international students from entering the United States to pursue studies at the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university. The suspension will initially be for six months but can be extended. Trump's proclamation also directs the State Department to consider revoking academic or exchange visas of any current Harvard students who meet his proclamation's criteria. In the court filing on June 5, Harvard said Trump had violated federal law by failing to back up his claims about national security. "The Proclamation does not deem the entry of an alien or class of aliens to be detrimental to the interests of the United States, because noncitizens who are impacted by the Proclamation can enter the United States -- just so long as they go somewhere other than Harvard," the school said. The Trump administration has launched a multifront attack on the nation's oldest and wealthiest university, freezing billions of dollars in grants and other funding and proposing to end its tax-exempt status, prompting a series of legal challenges. Harvard argues the administration is retaliating against it for refusing to accede to demands to control the school's governance, curriculum, and the ideology of its faculty and students. Trump's directive came a week after a federal judge in Boston, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs, announced she would issue a broad injunction blocking the administration from revoking Harvard's ability to enroll international students, who make up about a quarter of its student body. Harvard said in Thursday's court filing that the proclamation was "a patent effort to do an end-run around this Court's order." The university sued after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced on May 22 that her department was immediately revoking Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, which allows it to enroll foreign students. Noem's action was temporarily blocked almost immediately by Burroughs. On the eve of a hearing before her last week, the department changed course and said it would instead challenge Harvard's certification through a lengthier administrative process. Trump vs. Harvard: Trump bans Harvard from admitting new international students Nonetheless, Burroughs said she planned to issue a longer-term preliminary injunction at Harvard's urging, saying one was necessary to give some protection to Harvard's international students. Wednesday's two-page directive from Trump said Harvard had "demonstrated a history of concerning foreign ties and radicalism," and had "extensive entanglements with foreign adversaries," including China. The directive also said Harvard had seen a "drastic rise in crime in recent years while failing to discipline at least some categories of conduct violations on campus," and had failed to provide sufficient information to the Homeland Security Department about foreign students' "known illegal or dangerous activities." The school in Thursday's court filing said those claims were unsubstantiated. (Reporting by Nate Raymond, Steve Gorman, Daniel Wiessner and Costas Pitas; Editing by Caitlin Webber, Stephen Coates and Alexia Garamfalvi)
