logo
U.K. Expected To Ask Kosovo For Deal On Migration Deportation Hubs

U.K. Expected To Ask Kosovo For Deal On Migration Deportation Hubs

Forbes26-05-2025

The United Kingdom government under Prime Minister Keir Starmer is reportedly considering asking Kosovo to enter into an agreement for a so-called migration 'return hub' scheme, wherein failed asylum seekers would be deported from the former, to a reception center in the latter. Kosovo is understood to be on a list of nine countries, several of which are in the Balkans, the U.K. is considering for such a scheme, after Albania definitively ruled it out.
According to the U.K.'s Times newspaper, the U.K. is due to ask Kosovo, a small landlocked country which is currently a potential candidate for EU member status, to enter discussions over a return hubs arrangement. This news will take nobody who has been watching developments in the U.K. by surprise. Since coming to power in mid-2024, the government under Starmer and his Labour party have pursued various strategies to try to reduce overall migration to the United Kingdom, including ramped-up policing powers in the English channel, and a concerted effort to increase deportations.
In late 2024, Starmer visited Italy to discuss migration with his Italian counterpart Giorgia Meloni. While there, he praised Italy's controversial 'offshoring' arrangement with Albania, which has been beset by legal challenge since it began operations. In May 2025, Starmer also visited Albania itself, where he reaffirmed his intention to open up a similar scheme, though Albania has said it will not consider a deal with the U.K.
Despite their efforts to 'crack down' on irregular migration to the country, Starmer and his Labour party remain in a difficult position over the issue, as more stridently anti-immigration parties such as Reform UK make considerable electoral gains. The Labour party has done its best to win back voters from Reform, or stop them leaving, by presenting a 'tough' stance on migration and thereby being seen to address the concerns of voters. This strategy has come in for considerable criticism, both from NGOs and civil society groups, who have decried what they say is anti-immigrant rhetoric from the government, as well as from those same right-wing parties such as Reform and the Conservatives, who say the government is not doing enough on the issue.
The 'return hubs' idea is by no means unique in Europe. Alongside Italy, with its existing scheme, several other European nations are known to be exploring their own arrangements, with some German lawmakers from the now-ruling CDU bloc particularly vocal about it. The European Union's executive arm has introduced measures to lay the groundwork for such schemes, and also introduced measures to strip protections for people under deportation orders.
Return hubs such as the one the U.K. is pursuing are attractive to lawmakers for several reasons. There is the blunt effect of forcibly removing people from their territories, thereby giving politicians a concrete metric for showing they are acting on the matter. At the same time, such schemes are also argued to have a 'deterrence' effect, meaning that it's hoped people might be dissuaded from attempting the perilous journey to the U.K., for instance, if they think they will just mean they get sent elsewhere again.
Critics of such schemes argue that they are both inhumane and impractical. Migration commentators in the U.K. point out there is little empirical evidence for a deterrence effect, and that with the current state of the country's asylum system, it is very likely people will be deported who otherwise would have been granted shelter, with very little chance of redress once physically removed from U.K. jurisdiction.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Unsealed records in Abrego Garcia case offer few details that are new, unknown
Unsealed records in Abrego Garcia case offer few details that are new, unknown

Associated Press

timean hour ago

  • Associated Press

Unsealed records in Abrego Garcia case offer few details that are new, unknown

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the unsealing of several court documents in the lawsuit over Kilmar Abrego Garcia's deportation, rejecting the Trump administration's arguments that it would risk national security. U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in Maryland issued her order after media organizations, including The Associated Press, argued the public has a right to access court records under the First Amendment. Filings unsealed so far offer little information that's new or unknown publicly. Xinis described one document as 'relatively boilerplate.' It was a request by the Trump administration to temporarily halt discovery, an early phase of a lawsuit where parties share evidence. 'It does not disclose any potentially privileged or otherwise sensitive information for which a compelling government interest outweighs the right to access,' Xinis wrote. Xinis noted that some documents were public before the court was asked to seal them the next day. Those filings contained a back-and-forth between Abrego Garcia's attorneys and the U.S. government over efforts to return him from El Salvador. Trump administration lawyers often objected to answering questions, arguing that they involve state secrets, sensitive diplomatic negotiations and other protected information. For example, the U.S. attorneys mentioned 'appropriate diplomatic discussions with El Salvador.' But they wrote that disclosing the details 'could negatively impact any outcome.' Xinis also ordered the partial release of a transcript from an April 30 court hearing. Some of it will be reacted to protect potentially classified information. Wednesday's ruling was unrelated to the Trump administration pending invocation of the state secrets privilege, a legal doctrine often used in military cases. The administration has argued that releasing information about the Abrego Garcia matter in open court — or even to the judge in private – could jeopardize national security. Xinis is yet to rule on the state secrets claim. Abrego Garcia's attorneys have argued that the Trump administration has done nothing to return the Maryland construction worker. They say the government is invoking the privilege to hide behind the misconduct of mistakenly deporting him and refusing to bring him back. Abrego Garcia's deportation violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that shielded Abrego Garcia from expulsion to his native country. The immigration judge determined that Abrego Garcia faced likely persecution by a local Salvadoran gang that terrorized his family. Abrego Garcia's American wife sued over his deportation. Xinis ordered his return on April 4. The Supreme Court ruled on April 10 that the administration must work to bring him back. President Donald Trumptold ABC News in late April that he could retrieve Abrego Garcia with a phone call to El Salvador's president. But Trump said he wouldn't do it because Abrego Garcia is a member of the MS-13 gang, an allegation that Abrego Garcia denies and for which he was never charged.

Lawsuit Seeks to Release Family of Suspect in Colorado Attack
Lawsuit Seeks to Release Family of Suspect in Colorado Attack

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

Lawsuit Seeks to Release Family of Suspect in Colorado Attack

Lawyers representing the wife and children of the man charged with attacking an event honoring Israeli hostages sued the U.S. government on Wednesday, seeking to release the family from custody and block their deportation, according to a court filing. Hayam El Gamal, the wife of Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the Egyptian man accused of throwing Molotov cocktails at a crowd in Boulder, Colo., on Sunday, was arrested on Tuesday along with her five children by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials. The lawsuit was filed by Ms. El Gamal's immigration lawyers and others seeking to help the family. The suit says that Ms. El Gamal and her five children entered the United States on tourist visas in 2022. The children are between 4 and 17 years old, according to the lawsuit. The filing, in Federal District Court in Colorado, said that Ms. El Gamal 'was shocked to learn' that her husband 'was arrested for having committed a violent act against a peaceful gathering of individuals commemorating Israeli hostages.' Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, said her agency would be investigating what the family knew about the attack before it happened. 'Today the Department of Homeland Security and ICE are taking the family of suspected Boulder, Colo., terrorist and illegal alien Mohamed Soliman into ICE custody,' Ms. Noem said on social media on Tuesday. Later that day, the White House indicated in a social media message that the family could be deported imminently. On Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security said that ICE was 'processing Soliman's family members for removal proceedings from the U.S.' The filing on Wednesday said Ms. El Gamal was a network engineer who has lived in Colorado Springs for nearly three years and had applied for a U.S. work visa. Her husband, Mr. Soliman, also entered the country in 2022 with a tourist visa and quickly applied for asylum. His visa expired in early 2023, U.S. officials said, but he overstayed it. The lawsuit says that the family is part of his asylum application and that it is pending. It also includes emails that Ms. El Gamal purportedly sent to her immigration lawyer on Tuesday, the day she was arrested. 'Hi please call urgently Florence Colorado ice office,' one email reads. Eric Lee, one of the lawyers representing Ms. El Gamal, said the family was being detained at a family detention center in Texas. The lawsuit requests that a federal judge order the release of Ms. El Gamal and her family. 'Punishing individuals for the alleged actions of their relatives is a feature of premodern justice systems or police state dictatorships, not democracies,' Mr. Lee said in an interview. 'The detention and attempted removal of this family is an assault on core democratic principles and should provoke widespread opposition in the population, immigrant and nonimmigrant alike.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store