FairPlay expresses concern about price increases after Brazil poultry ban
It appears chicken importers are already exploiting consumers by raising prices due to South Africa's ban on the import of poultry from Brazil.
This is the view of FairPlay, an advocacy movement committed to combating dumping and predatory trade, which said it had been told that chicken importers were suddenly charging local meat processors 30% more for imported mechanically deboned chicken meat (MDM).
MDM is a paste used in the manufacture of processed meats such as polony and South Africa imports most of its MDM from Brazil.
'The price, we are informed, has gone up from about R20/kg to more than R30/kg. If this is true, it would be a scandalous and totally unjustified exploitation of South Africa's ban on the importation of poultry from Brazil because of a bird flu outbreak in that country,' FairPlay said.
It called on chicken importers and their representatives to deny this huge price increase in MDM, or to explain why it was happening.
The Brazil ban was announced on May 19. As poultry imports from Brazil can take up to six weeks to reach South Africa, Brazilian consignments reaching the country at the moment are not affected.
'So what is the justification for the price increase? Is this a case of make as much as you can while you can?'
FairPlay said the bird flu ban on Brazilian poultry will affect the supply of MDM in South Africa, and it will be up to meat importers to arrange alternative supplies.
It said importers could also encourage Brazil to apply to South Africa for a compartmentalisation agreement, which would allow the import of MDM from parts of Brazil not affected by bird flu.
TimesLIVE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
10 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Malema: Zuma's MK party wants to undermine EFF under the guise of ‘black unity'
EFF leader Julius Malema Economic Freedom Fighters leader Zuma has been advocating for the unification of so-called black parties to challenge the ANC and the On Wednesday Malema said Zuma was being hypocritical, given that his own MK party was founded quite recently (in December 2023). 'If you wanted to call for unity of people, you should have joined the EFF and not formed a parallel organisation,' Malema said outside the home of Malema questioned why the EFF was often the target of such calls for the unification of 'black parties'. 'Why is this unity of black parties only directed at the EFF? They never complain that the 'Every time it's the EFF. We are not going to allow that. You can see it's not black unity; it's an agenda to destroy the EFF. Why are they not giving you a report about black unity with the Parties such as The relationship between the two parties On Wednesday Malema said he would not work with Shivambu and did not want to involve himself in his problems, referring to 'Where was he going? He is not our problem. We are in parliament, we are working in parliament. If he comes into parliament, he will find us rolling,' Malema said of his former second-in-command's fate. 'The parliament now is run by young people; young people are running that thing. If he comes there and thinks he can impose himself on them, they are already ready for him. You can be rest assured that he will not do anything to undermine the superior logic of the EFF in that parliament.' Malema said his party would not be intimidated by the experience Shivambu brings to parliament for the MK party. 'If you are saying this person is going to be a holy spirit and be in every committee and boost the MK's presence in those committees, it's practically impossible,' he said. 'We do our work not because we want to outshine everyone but because we genuinely believe in this work and put a lot of effort into researching what we are going to speak about [in parliament].'
Mail & Guardian
10 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Environmental injustice is becoming the new normal – we must resist it
The Klipspruit river polluted by sewage and mine waste in Soweto. (File photo by Delwyn Verasamy) On this World Environment Day, I find myself reflecting less on trees, oceans, and plastic waste, and more on people's lack of access to clean drinking water and safe sanitation. More particularly, I am thinking about the ways in which systemic environmental injustice is becoming frighteningly normalised by the generalised state of dysfunction in municipalities across South Africa. It is a crisis that is now spreading across historic divisions of class, race, and geography. Whether you live in a township, a rural village, a flat in a so-called 'middle-income' area, or even in the leafy, wealthier suburbs, you are not immune. This crisis is becoming everyone's crisis. And yet, it's still the most marginalised and vulnerable who suffer first and most. I want to share just three examples I personally witnessed in the past month. These are not extreme or isolated events; they are the daily, grinding reality for a large portion of South Africans. They reflect a system of environmental neglect and both government and private-sector-driven pollution that is eroding people's rights and dignity. Orlando Women's Hostel At the Orlando Women's Hostel in Johannesburg, raw sewage has been overflowing from two blocked sewer lines for nearly seven years. The spill has created what can only be described as a lake – a festering, open swamp of human waste flowing past homes, into streets, and eventually into the already heavily polluted Klip River. Adult residents speak of summer days spent holed up indoors to keep out the flies, while children play outside next to the stinking swamp. When I reported it to Johannesburg Water, they unblocked one drain and left. The sewage kept flowing. I was then told it's a housing issue – the hostel falls under municipal housing, and the matter must be referred there. That's where accountability ends. Activists come, journalists come, yet nothing changes. This is not an accident – it's a systemic failure of the state; it is environmental injustice in its most direct and practical sense. A violation of the right to dignity, the right to health, and the constitutional right to a clean and safe environment. WaterWorks informal settlement The irony of the name is not lost on the people of WaterWorks, where water doesn't work at all. WaterWorks is an informal housing settlement. Residents rely on JoJo tanks that are sporadically filled and cleaned by Joburg Water – if at all. When I visited, the tanks hadn't been filled for three days. To make matters even worse, these tanks are scattered far apart, making them hard to access, especially for elderly residents who are forced to pay young people R10 to R20 per trip to carry water. This is money taken from already meagre SASSA grants. The toilets in WaterWorks are shared chemical units. One elderly woman related how one night she was suffering from diarrhoea but was too scared to walk alone in the dark at 2am to reach a toilet far from her house. Such daily realities chip away at one's dignity; basic human rights are made conditional, fragile, and unequal – tied to geography and class. Environmental justice is not just about having clean air and protecting flora and fauna; it's the ability to use a toilet safely and access water with dignity. Claremont council flats In Claremont, a small pocket of council flats has had no reliable water for nearly a decade. This cannot be explained by elevation, pressure, or some complicated infrastructure glitch. The community has tried to explain to city authorities that their water challenges are not related to recent maintenance issues or leaking reservoirs. The harsh reality is that Claremont's scattered blocks of flats have been – and remain – forgotten. All residents are asking is to be heard and for a proper investigation to be done. When I met residents, they simply wanted to be acknowledged, to have some short-term solutions implemented – like extra JoJo tanks – and, most of all, clear answers. In the meantime, they've adapted. They keep records of water outages not in months or years, but in life events. 'My firstborn is 11 – I came home from the hospital with no water.' 'My grandson is 6 – when we brought him home, I was fetching water with pots.' 'When my mother had a stroke, I had no water to wash her.' What this reveals so clearly is that the impact of environmental injustice is not abstract. It is intimate. It lives in our births, our deaths, our illnesses – and our everyday survival. What I have briefly outlined are just three cases, all taken within a period of just one month, in just one metro. Multiply that by every small town, every metro, every province, every forgotten township, every rural area – and you can start to see the scale of the crisis and the challenges we need to confront and change. On World Environment Day, we must challenge – in word and deed – the assumption that environmental issues are somehow separate from daily life. The environment is not somewhere 'out there.' It is our sewerage systems, our taps, our rivers, our toilets. And increasingly, those systems are failing – not because of nature or a few bad entities and officials, but because of systemic government mismanagement and indifference, grounded in the structural inequalities that remain deeply embedded in South African society. While environmental injustice is very much about the toxic waste that big industries dump into our rivers, it is also very much about what our own government consciously allows – or directly causes – in places where they think no one is watching, or where no one powerful lives. We simply cannot allow this to continue. If we are serious about justice – environmental, social, or economic – we need to hold all those entities and individuals responsible, accountable. The only way that is going to happen is if we come together, across the very same divisions of class, race, and geography that this crisis traverses. Power can belong to the people. Dr Ferrial Adam is the executive director of
The Herald
12 hours ago
- The Herald
Proteas star Rabada tested positive for cocaine, says Saids testing agency
Kagiso Rabada's month-long suspension after he failed a drug test was because the fast bowler tested positive for cocaine, the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (Saids) said. Rabada, who was with the Gujarat Titans when he returned home from the Indian Premier League in April, admitted failing a drug test and apologised for his actions. The 30-year-old, ranked No 2 in the Test bowler rankings, said he had returned an adverse analytical finding for the use of a recreational drug. Rabada had been tested in January when he was playing in the SA20 for MI Cape Town and Saids said in a report published this week that it detected the presence of Benzoylecgonine, a metabolite of cocaine. Rabada returned from his suspension to play two matches for Gujarat, who finished third in the standings. He is due to spearhead South Africa's bowling attack in the World Test Championship final at Lord's when they face Australia from June 11 to 15. Reuters
