logo
The Dismantle DEI Act won't create equality. It will maintain disadvantage

The Dismantle DEI Act won't create equality. It will maintain disadvantage

Yahoo22-04-2025

As someone who has spent the last several years helping justice-impacted individuals, especially Black and brown youth, find meaningful pathways in education and employment, I've seen up close what a lack of opportunity looks like — and what intentional inclusion can do to change that.
That's why the Tennessee House of Representatives' swift passage of the 'Dismantle DEI Act' (House Bill 622) by a 73-to-24 vote on April 17 should alarm everyone in the state, regardless of political affiliation. This wasn't just a vote. It was a clear refusal to engage in the democratic process over a matter that affects thousands of lives and futures across this state.
On April 22, the Tennessee Senate voted 27-6 to approve companion Senate Bill 1083. It now goes to Gov. Bill Lee for his consideration before becoming law.
Supporters of the bill argue that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts amount to discrimination − even calling them 'communist' and 'racist.' But let's step away from slogans and look at the facts.
A 2023 report by McKinsey & Company found that companies with diverse executive teams were 39% more likely to outperform their peers on profitability.
In higher education, DEI programs have led to increased enrollment and graduation rates among first-generation students, students of color, and low-income students − all demographics that are traditionally underserved in Tennessee.
That's not ideology. That's impact.
Tennessee's public universities serve a student body that is increasingly diverse. At the University of Tennessee at Knoxville, students of color made up more than 20% of the 2023 incoming freshman class.
DEI programs aren't about favoritism — they are about ensuring that all students, regardless of where they come from, have a fair shot at success.
Removing those supports doesn't create equality. It just maintains old systems that already disadvantage the few.
And if you want to talk about fairness, let's talk about how the bill was passed. There was no debate. No discussion. A quick procedural move was used to silence dissent. That's not transparency. That's suppression. If DEI is so dangerous, why not let it be debated openly on the floor?
As a Black business owner, a nonprofit founder, and someone who's successfully navigated reentry after over a decade behind bars, I know what happens when the system doesn't see you. I also know what happens when it finally does. I am a product of second chances and deliberate inclusion. The people I now serve − youth in crisis, men and women returning home from incarceration − are proof that inclusion works. Equity isn't about making people special. It's about making opportunity real.
By dismantling DEI, the legislature isn't protecting fairness. They're dismantling progress. And doing it without debate? That tells me they were never interested in listening to the people who would be most affected.
We deserve better. Our students, our workforce, our future — they all depend on it.
Tristan Buckner is the founder of Live X-perience, a nonprofit serving at-risk youth and justice-impacted individuals in Tennessee. He is also the developer of several reentry and workforce development programs for correctional facilities and returning citizens.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Tennessee's Dismantle DEI Act is dismantling progress | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion - Trump-Musk divorce threatens the president and the entire Republican Party
Opinion - Trump-Musk divorce threatens the president and the entire Republican Party

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Trump-Musk divorce threatens the president and the entire Republican Party

Few expected the relationship between President Trump and Elon Musk to survive four years, but the spectacular collapse of this partnership has shocked even seasoned observers with its speed and intensity. Now, as two of the world's most powerful men openly clash, there are seismic implications for the country as a whole and the Republican Party specifically. Put another way, not only does this fissure expose cracks in the GOP and MAGA coalition, it's also a considerable threat to Republicans' midterms hopes and Trump's signature legislation. The fight, which began two weeks ago when Musk expressed 'disappointment' with Trump's 'one big, beautiful' bill had initially been confined to disagreements over the legislation, rather than personal attacks. Then, on Thursday afternoon, it escalated in unprecedented, dramatic fashion. Following Trump's recent comment that he would have won Pennsylvania without Musk's help, Musk replied 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' That was just Musk's opening salvo against the man he spent roughly $300 million to get elected. The tech billionaire then went on a blistering war path. He claimed Trump was on 'the Epstein list,' supported impeachment — a touchy subject for the twice-impeached Trump — and claimed that tariffs would cause a recession. Not content with attacking Trump, Musk has also threatened to fund primary challenges to Republicans who support the bill, and has criticized both Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-La.). With unprecedented speed, Musk went from the man who could pour hundreds of millions into Republican coffers to Republicans' enemy number one. Influential commentator Steve Bannon pushed for Musk's deportation, claiming he's an illegal alien, and Trump threatened to cancel all government contracts with Musk's multiple companies, saying Musk 'went CRAZY.' Whether or not the rumors of an impending détente between the two is enough to heal the rupture remains to be seen, but it's unlikely that all of the pieces will ever get put back together. Given Musk's deep pockets and control of social media platform X, where he has a cult-like following, Trump and the Republicans now find themselves in a treacherous spot at a precarious time. Indeed, even before the dramatic escalation, Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' was in limbo in the Senate. As Alexander Bolton noted in this publication prior to Thursday's blowup, Trump's bill is 'losing momentum in the Senate in the face of blistering attacks from Elon Musk.' To that end, Musk's criticisms of the bill and threats to primary its Republican supporters has already led two House Republicans who voted for the bill, Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and John Rose (R-Tenn.), to come out against some of it. It appears that this fight has brought some Republicans back into Trump's fold. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), who had been opposed to the bill prior to its passage in the House, condemned Musk, saying he 'crossed the line.' And Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn), another House conservative, dismissed Musk's influence, saying he is 'just another shiny object.' For their part, Republican senators who may have had doubts about Trump's signature legislation now risk being seen as taking Musk's side and being disloyal to the president. However, it would be a mistake to overlook the implications of the breakup or the dangers for Republicans. If he wants, Musk could very easily fund primaries against vulnerable GOP House members, and his control of X gives him unprecedented influence over the media ecosystem. Further, Musk's influence among the Silicon Valley cohort that moved stridently to the right in 2024 could peel off a new group of Republican voters and donors. In that same vein, there are possible electoral consequences for Republicans, even if tempers between Trump and Musk cool down. Trump was counting on the bill's passage to be a significant political tailwind that would boost his polling numbers and Republicans' midterm hopes, particularly given the ongoing chaos over tariffs and trade policy. Now, whichever version of the bill eventually passes, Republicans look like the party of chaos. It is entirely possible that this ongoing feud dents voters' confidence in Republicans' ability to competently govern, something Democrats are clearly hoping for. As the Wall Street Journal reported, Democrats are 'reveling' about the fight, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) reposting Musk's attacks and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) taking digs at the 'GOP civil war.' To be sure, despite Musk's efforts, it remains likely that a version of Trump's 'one, big, beautiful bill' will still pass, but Republicans now have a bigger headache. Ultimately, divorces are always messy, but the Trump-Musk divorce is unprecedented, and it could not have come at a worse time for Republicans. With razor-thin margins in the House and the absence of Trump's much-touted trade bills, it poses the most significant threat to Republicans' midterm hopes, and by extension, the rest of Trump's term. Douglas E. Schoen and Carly Cooperman are pollsters and partners with the public opinion company Schoen Cooperman Research based in New York. They are co-authors of the book, 'America: Unite or Die.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Ayotte issues first veto as N.H. governor, keeping transportation mandatory for half-day kindergarten
Ayotte issues first veto as N.H. governor, keeping transportation mandatory for half-day kindergarten

Boston Globe

time37 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Ayotte issues first veto as N.H. governor, keeping transportation mandatory for half-day kindergarten

'To no longer require transportation for these children to and from these schools would place an undue burden on working families,' Ayotte said, lauding half-day kindergarten as a tool to help give students a strong foundation for success later in life. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up 'While school districts throughout New Hampshire should be actively looking for ways to effectively utilize their funding, this is a step in the wrong direction,' she added, referring to the legislation. Advertisement Ayotte vetoed HB 319 on Tuesday, according to an entry added to The bill's prime sponsor, Representative Keith Ammon of New Boston, said he respects Ayotte's veto authority, but was surprised by her decision. 'This bill, requested by the New Boston school board chair, would have saved our district $75,000 annually by eliminating an unfunded state mandate that forces our district to run nearly empty buses in the middle of the day,' Ammon said. Advertisement 'Unfortunately, the governor's first veto may send a chilling message to legislators trying to eliminate the many unfunded state mandates that drive up property taxes for New Hampshire families,' he added. The legislation had passed with a 204-171 vote in the House in March and a 13-8 vote in the Senate in May, which suggests lawmakers are unlikely to muster the two-thirds majorities needed to override the governor's decision. Aside from her first veto, Ayotte also announced Friday that she had signed 19 more bills into law, including legislation related to rights and complaints in special education (HB 76, HB 753, and HB 754), financial assistance for those victimized in cases of sexual assault or harassment while serving in the national guard (HB 62), and a requirement that public schools observe Constitution Day with patriotic exercises (HB 571). This article first appeared in Globe NH | Morning Report, our free newsletter focused on the news you need to know about New Hampshire, including great coverage from the Boston Globe and links to interesting articles from other places. If you'd like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday, Steven Porter can be reached at

House considers Trump cuts as Senate Republicans work on reconciliation bill
House considers Trump cuts as Senate Republicans work on reconciliation bill

Miami Herald

time39 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

House considers Trump cuts as Senate Republicans work on reconciliation bill

WASHINGTON - As Senate committees continue to release their proposals for the House-passed reconciliation package this week, the House plans to vote on President Donald Trump's proposals to rescind foreign aid and other spending, including for public broadcasting. 'The rescissions request sent to Congress by the Trump Administration takes the federal government in a new direction where we actually cut waste, fraud, and abuse and hold agencies accountable to the American people,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said in a statement. The path to House passage of the $9.4 billion package is still far from clear. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., has already indicated he would vote against the package if it includes cuts to the George W. Bush-era program known as the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR, which provides foreign aid to fight HIV and AIDS. 'I just want to make sure we're funding the medicine. We want to prevent AIDS, it's a noble program, it's George Bush's legacy. I put the marker out there; we'll see,' Bacon said in an interview with the New York Times. The rescissions package could be just the first of several from Trump and his Office of Management and Budget. The House also will take up bills this week targeting local operations in Washington, D.C. One measure would bar noncitizens from voting in local elections in the District of Columbia. Another seeks to overturn a D.C. policing overhaul law. While Republicans are often critical of public employee unions, police unions have long been an exception. Scalise's office says the bill would restore 'collective bargaining rights for MPD officers and a statute of limitations on disciplinary cases.' Senate Republicans are still working behind the scenes to draft their version of the reconciliation bill. The Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee released its text last week. The draft would shut off the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's funding stream from the Federal Reserve. The Senate process continues amid ongoing criticism from Elon Musk, the billionaire businessman who was until recently leading the White House office known as the Department of Government Efficiency, but who had a very public split from Trump over the last week. Musk has come out against the House-passed reconciliation measure, criticizing the debt and deficit effects of the bill (while also predicting that Trump's tariff agenda could lead to a recession in the back half of 2025). But Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said the spat largely playing out on social media platforms was not spilling over to the Capitol phone lines. 'We've got almost no calls to the offices, any Republican member of Congress. And I think that indicates that people are taking a wait-and-see attitude,' Johnson said on ABC's 'This Week.' The Senate is in the process of tweaking the product both to meet the needs of the chamber's budgetary rules, as well as the interests of GOP senators. Senate Democrats plan to keep up the criticisms of Republicans for potential cuts affecting health care services, including potential closures to rural hospitals. While the background work is underway, the Senate starts the week with additional votes to confirm Trump nominees. Also still on the to-do list is the stablecoin regulation bill that has been pending business for weeks. Committee work continues Another digital asset regulatory measure is on the agenda for the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday, with a new substitute amendment posted on Sunday. The committee plans to take up other bills, including housing legislation, at the same markup. The headline committee action for the week is Tuesday's kickoff of the regular appropriations markup process for fiscal 2026. The House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday will consider its subcommittee allocations, as well as the Military Construction-VA spending bill. The full committee is scheduled to mark up the Agriculture spending bill on Wednesday, as well as both the Homeland Security bill and the Defense bill on Thursday. Senate appropriators are continuing to hold subcommittee hearings this week. The agenda includes a Defense Appropriations Subcommittee hearing with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine scheduled to appear on Tuesday. Former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who chairs the Defense Subcommittee, has been a critic of Hegseth and voted against his confirmation. Also on the subcommittee are the other two Republicans who voted against Hegseth: Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who chairs the full committee, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. Another key hearing takes place Wednesday, when Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent scheduled to appear before the Financial Services Appropriations Subcommittee amid ongoing tax and trade debates, in which Bessent has emerged as a key negotiator. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store