Focus: Rio Tinto split with CEO Stausholm over conflicting priorities, sources say
May 28 (Reuters) - Rio Tinto's board and Jakob Stausholm agreed to part ways last week amid mounting concerns the CEO was reluctant to follow board priorities, including focusing on costs, after years of expansions in lithium, copper and iron ore, three sources said.
Rio (RIO.L), opens new tab, (RIO.AX), opens new tab, the world's second-largest listed mining company, surprised investors last week by announcing Stausholm would step down later this year when a successor is appointed.
No reason for Stausholm's exit was given, and sources said it was not tied to any scandal. The CEO had as recently as two weeks ago given no indication of his departure at a major industry conference in Spain, according to three sources who attended.
Reuters spoke with six people who were familiar with board considerations, or who had been briefed on them, or briefed by management. They agreed to speak on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal matters or private conversations.
Rio Tinto declined to comment for this story, while Stausholm did not respond to requests for comment.
Stausholm took the helm at Rio in 2021 at a low point in the company's history after his predecessor was sacked. The Dane started his tenure with a listening tour of the company's global portfolio, which stretches across every continent but Antarctica.
He led a turnaround in the miner's fortunes by resetting relationships in Guinea and Mongolia to bring its next wave of iron ore and copper projects online. Stausholm also inked three major lithium deals in the past year.
As his successes mounted, one source said Stausholm became more likely to push back on board suggestions and too quickly dismissed opportunities the board felt could have been better explored.
One of those opportunities included Stausholm's rejection of an approach by Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab executives last year seeking a potential merger, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Another related to reviewing options around the stake of its largest UK shareholder Chinalco, which came up with investor pressure for the miner to review its dual Anglo-Australian share market listing, said the first source.
While the board backed Stausholm's investments and strategic decisions, it held concerns that rising costs had to be dealt with now rather than in a few years' time, two of the sources said.
Rio's average headcount has climbed by 22% to around 60,000 people since Stausholm's appointment in 2021, according to its most recent annual report. Meanwhile, revenue has dropped more than $10 billion over that time, with prices of its key profit generator, iron ore, expected to fall further in coming years.
The board told Stausholm that he must put more focus on cost cuts and operational excellence, but he was resistant and they decided to part ways, three of the sources said.
"Nothing else changes. The board is happy with the growth options, they are happy with lithium, the strategy is the same," one source said.
Some investors criticised Rio for overspending on its $6.7 billion buy of lithium miner Arcadium after a plunge in prices for the battery metal. That deal was followed by more than $1 billion more in spending on two projects in Chile earlier this month.
With the lithium market in the doldrums, it will take years to know whether Stausholm's bet will have paid off, although demand projections for the metal are strong into the next decade.
Rio's lithium joint venture with Codelco "aligned with its growth and value creation strategy," Goldman Sachs (GS.N), opens new tab, which has a "buy" recommendation on the stock, said last week.
Rio investor Pendal Group has raised concerns about additional staffing costs at both Rio and larger rival BHP (BHP.AX), opens new tab, said Pendal investment analyst Jack Gabb. As recently as February, Stausholm said that costs "hadn't been a focus," Gabb said.
Rio's ballooning costs had been flagged internally for some time, including at a recent executive retreat in Australia by CFO Peter Cunningham, a source with direct knowledge said.
Despite those warnings, Stausholm saw himself as a strategic leader rather than a cost-cutter, with the board increasingly preferring the latter, the person added.
"Rio's got amazing assets, but a bloated bureaucracy, full of people looking for work to do. That's just not sustainable," the person said.
Of Rio's internal bench of potential successors, iron ore head Simon Trott, Chief Commercial Officer Bold Baatar, and aluminum division boss Jerome Pecresse are seen as potential replacements, all of the sources said.
Pecresse may have an advantage given his management style focused on cost-cutting, one of the sources said.
"Rio doesn't need another visionary right now," the source added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Serbian farmers vow to oppose Rio Tinto lithium project even after EU labels it strategic
GORNJE NEDELJICE, Serbia, June 5 (Reuters) - Zlatko Kokanovic, a farmer from Serbia's Jadar region, is determined to stop development of a Rio Tinto (RIO.L), opens new tab lithium project, identified this week as strategic by the European Commission as it aims to cut dependency on China for mineral resources. Lithium is a key component in batteries for electric vehicles and mobile devices. The mine in the Jadar valley would eventually meet 90% of Europe's lithium needs should it go ahead. But like thousands of protesters, including many other farmers, who have sought to block development of the project in recent years, Kokanovic is worried about pollution of farmland in a region where a majority of people live off agriculture. "There are some things the money cannot buy," Kokanovic, a father of five children who is one of the largest milk producers in Gornje Nedeljice and a leading activist in the region, told Reuters. "I want to tell them (Rio Tinto) not to try to develop the mine or there will be unrest," he added. Rio Tinto has not given a start date for the project, which is expected to produce 58,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate annually, but has pledged to develop the mine cleanly. "The project will be delivered to the highest levels of transparency, to the highest levels of environmental protection and human rights standards," said Chad Blewitt, Rio Tinto's managing director for the Jadar project. "The European Union and European Commission never substitute, they never sacrifice those high standards." Blewitt had told Reuters on Wednesday that the company is revising the cost of the project. Rio Tinto's lithium project has been contested by green groups for years and sparked massive street protests in EU-candidate Serbia in 2022. In 2021 and 2022, Serbian environmentalists collected 30,000 signatures in a petition demanding that parliament enact legislation to halt lithium exploration in the country. The government revoked all Rio Tinto's exploration licences in 2022, before the Constitutional Court overturned the decision last year and reinstated them. Government officials say the mine will boost Serbia's economy. How protesters can stop a project that has domestic and international approval is unclear. But recent student protests in Serbia, where hundreds of thousands have taken to the streets and succeeded in collapsing the government, show the strength of civil society in the Balkan country. Kokanovic remains determined. 'My message to them is not to even try (to excavate lithium in Jadar), unless they want this government to be toppled fast."
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
Do Trump's hardline tariffs and travel bans put off Brits from visiting the US?
Tariffs, travel bans, mass firings – if there's one thing you can be sure about with Donald Trump, it's that he'll make news. Constantly . That's even the case here in the UK, where most of his decisions have no direct impact. But is all that coverage having an effect on Brits hopping across the pond for a vacation? If you look at the dry numbers from the US National Travel and Tourism Office, you might think the answer is no. In January, the month of Trump's second inauguration, the number of UK visitors to the US was 5% higher than the previous January. February and April also saw more Brits going to the US than the same months in 2024, suggesting that far from putting people off, we may even be more keen to visit the country when it's run by Trump. ABTA, the British trade association for the travel industry, tells a similar tale. They 'haven't seen any significant changes in terms of UK-US travel post-Trump administration', a spokesperson told Metro, with 'no noticeable shifts away' from the States. But that may not be the full story. Australia-based tour company Intrepid Travel offers small-group trips to destinations as diverse as Nepal, the Galápagos Islands, Antarctica – and the United States. However, the latter has had a significant fall in interest over the past five months, with bookings from UK customers down 12%. That decline appears to be driven by one age group in particular: 21 to 30-year-olds, with whom bookings have fallen by almost a quarter. There was less of an impact for customers above that age bracket. Joanna Reeve, Intrepid's General Manager for the UK & Ireland, told Metro: 'While there is no way to know for sure what is causing the dip, negative perception of the US under the new administration could be playing a part in people's travel choices. 'New immigration rules and travel restrictions could be off-putting for potential visitors.' The country still remains popular overall, she said. According to the Office for National Statistics, the US was the sixth most popular country visited by UK residents in 2023 – though it wasn't far off Portugal and Greece in fifth and fourth place respectively. A survey for ABTA taken in summer last year – before Trump was elected, but while the presidential election campaign was in full swing – found the US came third after only Spain and France when people were asked where they planned to visit in the next 12 months. Even those who disagree with the direction of the Trump administration might want to consider visiting the US in order to mitigate its impact, Joanna suggested. She said: 'There are ways to travel there in a way that supports local people, like through supporting indigenous-led experiences. More Trending 'We're also encouraging people to visit and support the National Parks as they are facing huge cuts to their funding.' Interestingly, the attitude of young travellers with Intrepid – if they are indeed being put off by Trump – does not appear to reflect the broader UK. An Ipsos poll from just before Inauguration Day in January found 18 to 34-year-olds were the most likely age group in the UK to have a favourable view of the US President. However, 47% of Brits between those ages still disliked him compared to 31% who felt the opposite. Those aged 35 to 54 were 64% unfavourable, while 72% of those aged 55 or over felt the same. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Donald Trump roasts Elon Musk and suggests he has 'Trump derangement syndrome' MORE: Donald Trump's travel ban isn't actually about protecting Americans MORE: Fears of a serial killer prowling Texas after 38 bodies pulled from lake in three years
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE How a 'DOUBLE' pay rise is on its way for millions of Aussie workers next year
Low-paid Australian workers could be getting a huge 'double' pay increase of more than seven per cent in 2026 - with the likes of dry cleaners and restaurant staff to be the key beneficiaries. A major employer group has warned the potential pay spike could threaten the jobs of low-skilled workers, given it would follow the Fair Work Commission awarding a 3.5 per cent pay rise to 2.9million workers beginning on July 1 this year. That latest increase applies to workers on awards and the 200,000 Australians on the minimum wage. But a hidden clause in the industrial umpire's decision proposed scrapping a key employment classification, which could come into effect in July 2026. This would automatically grant a 3.6 per cent pay rise to the very lowest paid, regardless of the following annual wage review decision - because these workers will be moved on to a higher pay grade. This pay rise would also be on top of what the commission decides for an upcoming minimum wage increase in 2026-27. If it matched this year's 3.5 per cent increase, it would mean low paid workers are in line for a double-up pay increase of 7.1 per cent. Employer groups have warned the series of pay rises could lead to job cuts. But Tim Kennedy, the national secretary of the United Workers Union which represents the likes of cleaners and hospitality workers, said the minimum wage rise was about helping the lowest paid to survive. 'When workers can't afford rent, food or petrol, the wage floor is clearly too low,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'The decision is a lifeline, but we'll continue fighting until wages are genuinely liveable for everyone.' Professor John Buchanan, a labour market researcher at the University of Sydney, told Daily Mail Australia the Fair Work Commission had a 'very timid' approaching to making wage decisions. 'They are very keen to ensure that their decisions are not seen as irresponsible and potentially behind a jacking up or a prolonging of high interest rates,' he said. 'The minimum wage and the awards system is about what kind of civilisation we are. 'Wages policy isn't just about economic efficiency and equations in an econometric model. 'This is the signal we send to ourselves and our society about how we treat the most vulnerable in the labour market and by having a wages structure that ensures those at the lowest reaches can live some semblance of a decent life.' Australia's 200,000 minimum wage workers on the existing C13 classification will be getting $24.95 an hour from July 1, following the latest increase. Their weekly pay is going up by $32.10 to $948, which translates into a $1,669.20 annual increase for those putting in a 38-hour week. Those working full-time on the lowest pay will be getting $49,296 a year from next month. There is a 3.6 per cent gap between the C13 classification, which the Fair Work Commission wants to scrap, and the better paid C12 classification, which those on the minimum wage could be transferred on to in July 2026. Workers on the C12 classification will be getting $25.85 a hour from July 1 this year. That equates to $982.20 a week or $51,074 a year. Minimum wage earners, now on $24.10 an hour or $915.90 a week, would effectively have enjoyed a 7.3 per cent wage increase in four weeks' time had the C13 classification been scrapped immediately. The Australian Industry Group's chief executive Innes Willox said the Fair Work Commission's proposed classification change for those on the minimum wage would threaten jobs. 'This would impose major cost increases on many thousands of employers in the hospitality, restaurants, clubs, horticulture and pastoral industries,' he said. 'There is simply no justification for such a large increase in minimum wage rates for kitchen hands, glassies, farm hands, hotel cleaners and similar low-skilled jobs, on top of the annual wage review increase that would also apply. 'Such a move would threaten the livelihoods of many business owners and the jobs of many workers.' But Prof Buchanan said a big wage rise for the lowest one per cent of workers, on the minimum wage, was hardly unreasonable. 'I've been studying, following wages policy now, professionally, since 1985 and I can't remember a time when any employer group ever has said, "This is a sound wages decision",' he said. 'If we had been listening to them for 40 years, people would be living on poverty wages - they basically cry wolf so many times, they lose all credibility when they make that point.' ACTU secretary Sally McManus said lower-paid Australians deserved to be valued at work. 'We welcome the Fair Work Commission's recognition that the real value of award wages should be restored, particularly for lower-paid Australians,' she said. 'Feeling more valued at work creates the working conditions for more productive businesses and a more resilient economy.' A change in classification would affect workers on awards covering manufacturing, hospitality, restaurants, clubs, horticulture and dry cleaning and laundry. Minimum wage workers received an 8.6 per cent pay increase in July 2023 when the old C14 classification was scrapped and something similar could happen in July 2026. The latest 3.5 per cent increase was well above the 2.4 per cent headline inflation rate and above the overall 3.4 per cent increase in wages for all Australian workers in the year to March.
