Panetta: Trump contradicting intelligence assessments ‘a very scary prospect'
Former CIA director Leon Panetta described President Trump's recent remarks doubting the intelligence community while launching military action against Iran as 'very scary' on Thursday.
'It undermines the work of our intelligence professionals who really are focused on trying to provide the president with the truth — when the president questions their credibility, that certainly undermines their morale, I'm sure,' he told the London-based The i Paper.
'But secondly, it also creates a real problem for the president, because if he rejects the intelligence he's receiving, then what will be the basis for the decisions that he makes in the future, and that is a very scary prospect,' the former Obama-era official added.
Trump repeatedly rejected Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) Tulsi Gabbard's assessment of Tehran's nuclear capabilities amid the recent Israel-Iran military conflict and before the U.S. bombed three of Iran's major nuclear facilities over the weekend.
'Well, then my intelligence community is wrong,' the president told reporters Friday, when asked about Gabbard's assessment in March that Iran was not working to build a nuclear weapon.
After Trump's rebukes, Gabbard updated her analysis to align with the president's.
'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree,' she wrote in a post on social platform X.
The Trump administration has also rejected the Defense Intelligence Agency's leaked initial assessment of the blow to Iran's nuclear capabilities following the U.S. strikes.
'There's no question that when the U.S. president makes a statement that our intelligence assessments are wrong and doesn't believe our own intelligence, that creates a very dangerous moment,' Panetta, who is 86 and retired, said in his interview with The i Paper.
The former CIA director, who also previously served as Defense Secretary under then-President Obama, said the row raises questions about 'whether or not the U.S. will exercise the right kind of leadership in a dangerous world.'
'I have always been confident about our intelligence assessments with regards to Iran,' he said. 'The fundamental question is: did they make a decision to proceed with developing a weapon? And I think our intelligence indicates that that still was not the case.'
The White House didn't immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment on the remarks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
White House digs in on July 4 deadline for ‘big, beautiful bill' despite Senate setback
The White House on Thursday dug in on its expectation that Congress will pass the massive reconciliation package containing the president's key agenda items by next week, despite a major setback on Thursday from the Senate parliamentarian. 'We expect that bill to be on the president's desk for signature by July 4th,' press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at a press briefing. 'I know there was a ruling by the Senate parliamentarian this morning. Look, this is part of the process, this is part of the inner workings of the United States Senate, but the president is adamant about seeing this bill on his desk here at the White House by Independence Day,' Leavitt added. The Senate's referee rejected a plan to cap states' use of health care provider taxes to collect more federal Medicaid funding, a decision that struck a blow to Republicans' strategy for cutting federal spending in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The House has already passed its version of the reconciliation package. It must still get through the Senate, and any changes must go back to the House for approval before going to Trump's desk for his signature. The Senate parliamentarian's ruling could threaten one of the key provisions to offset federal spending costs. As a result, it could create consternation among fiscal hawks in the GOP who were already concerned the massive piece of legislation did not do enough to cut federal spending. Republicans could get around the parliamentarian's rulings by holding a simple-majority vote on the floor to establish a new precedent, expanding the scope of what is eligible under reconciliation. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said he would not overrule the parliamentarian over her decision. Leavitt said she had not spoken to Trump about whether he thought the parliamentarian should be removed over the decision.
CNBC
27 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump's mega bill hits roadblock. Here's what we know
CNBC's Emily Wilkins joins 'The Exchange' to discuss the uphill battle President Trump's mega bill faces to get senate approval.
Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
The clock's ticking on codifying DOGE cuts into law
Congress has until July 18 to pass a $9.4 billion DOGE cuts package. That includes cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting. It's running into resistance from GOP senators. With just over three weeks to go before a critical deadline, the push to codify DOGE cuts is hitting resistance on Capitol Hill. Several GOP senators sound skeptical about the $9.4 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funding that the Trump administration is asking Congress to approve, raising the prospect of a high-profile setback for the DOGE project just weeks after Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's public feud. The House narrowly approved the cuts, in part identified by Musk and the White House DOGE Office, earlier this month. The administration's troubles were evident at a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on Wednesday. Lawmakers in both parties highlighted the potential negative impacts of clawing back the funding as they heard testimony from Russell Vought, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget. "We have Native American radio stations in South Dakota. They get their funding through NPR, 90-some percent of what they use," Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota said at the hearing. "They will not continue to exist if we don't find a way to take care of their needs." Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the committee chair, also raised concerns about the $1.1 billion in public broadcasting cuts. Another moderate Republican, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, has previously said that she's opposed to the cuts because rural Alaskan communities depend on the funding. Several GOP lawmakers are also concerned about the $8.3 billion in foreign aid cuts. Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the former Senate GOP leader, broadly criticized DOGE efforts to cut wasteful foreign aid spending during his remarks at the hearing. "There's plenty of absolute nonsense masquerading as American aid that shouldn't receive another bit of taxpayer funding," McConnell said. "But the administration's attempt to root it out has been unnecessarily chaotic." Several of them have raised concerns in particular about cuts to PEPFAR, a global program to combat and treat HIV/AIDS, though the administration has insisted that life-saving programs will continue to receive funding. 'My biggest concern is that the appropriations process work' Democratic senators are expected to unanimously oppose the cuts, just as their counterparts did in the House. With the Senate divided 53-47, that means Republicans can only afford to lose three votes. The administration is using a process known as "rescission" to pursue the cuts, which allows the White House to ask Congress to claw back money it has already approved. The process has not been successfully used in over two decades, and the Senate rejected a rescission request in 2018, during Trump's first term. Lawmakers must approve the cuts within 45 days of the request — July 18 — or Trump is required by law to spend the money. The administration has said that this could be the first of several rescission requests. Democrats have argued that the prospect of constant rescissions threatens to undermine the bipartisan government funding process, where both parties agree to provisions in funding bills that they may not support in order to get enough votes to clear the 60-vote filibuster threshold in the Senate. Rescissions only require 51 votes in the Senate, raising the prospect that Republicans, led by the White House, could unilaterally strip out Democratic priorities after funding bills are passed. At least one Republican senator appeared to be listening to those arguments on Thursday. "My biggest concern is that the appropriations process work, and that Republicans and Democrats agree that the process will end up in a negotiated settlement," Rounds said. "If we get to the point where the Democrats look at this and say, 'We can put it in the bill, but they're not going to fund it, or they're not going to use it,' then there's no reason for them to work with us to get to 60 votes." Rounds said that he would "try to negotiate" with the administration about preserving public broadcasting funding, while Collins told reporters after the hearing that she wanted to see "fundamental changes" to the bill and was working on an amended version. If the Senate passes an amended version of the bill, the House would have to pass the measure again before the July 18 deadline.
