Woman who attacked two teens in Jacksonville road rage case could be deported
A woman was on trial Thursday for attacking two teenage girls in a 2024 road rage incident in Jacksonville. The encounter was recorded by one of the victims.
This all happened near Christ's Church Academy in Jacksonville.
In the video of the incident, the woman on the left is Jessica Goncalves. You can see and hear Goncalves and one of the teenage victims yelling at each other. It doesn't take long before it gets physical. Seconds later, you can see Goncalves grab one of the girls by her sleeve and yank her forward.
>>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<<
The two then become physical with one another and call each other crazy.
Goncalves then lunges at the person recording the encounter and grabs her phone away.
Action News Jax is not identifying the victims because of their age.
Goncalves is charged with two counts of battery. During Thursday's trial, both victims testified on the stand.
'She grabbed my phone out of my hand and pushed me,' said one of the victims.
[DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks]
'The first time it was as she was approaching me, she had put her arms out and she had touched my chest,' said the second victim.
The defense tried to make the argument that the girls also attacked Goncalves.
'So you want this court to believe that here you are with your friend, some lady as you describe, gets out of the car, comes over this way, takes your phone. You end up on the ground. You don't touch her, you don't kick her, you don't punch her,' said Robert Slama, Jessica Goncalves' attorney. 'I did not,' replied one of the victims.
An ICE spokesperson confirmed with Action News Jax that Goncalves is not in the country legally, and the outcome in this case could lead to an even larger legal issue for her.
An ICE spokesperson sent us a statement that reads:
Jussica Luana Goncalves is an illegalalien from Brazil who was encountered by the U.S. Border Patrol on May 1, 2021, near Otay Mesa, California. She was charged with inadmissibility per the Immigration and Nationality Act as an alien present without admission or parole and released on her own recognizance. On Feb. 16, 2025, 287(g)-designated immigration officers encountered Goncalves at the Duval County Jail in Jacksonville, Florida, after she was arrested for child abuse without great bodily harm. She has a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement immigration detainer and, upon completion of local charges, will be turned over to ICE.
[SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Action News Jax clarified with the spokesperson that he meant to say February 2024.
In court, Goncalves' lawyer Robert Slama argued that the trial was happening as a way to get Goncalves deported.
'You're aware that she's an immigrant, correct?' asked Slama to one of the victims.
'Yes,' said the victim.
'Is it your goal, last question for her to be deported?' Slama asked the victim.
'No,' the victim replied.
Goncalves was found guilty of two counts of battery.
Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
38 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Man pleads not guilty to hate crimes in attack on Colorado demonstration for Israeli hostages
DENVER — A man accused of hurling Molotov cocktails at a group of people who were demonstrating in Boulder, Colorado , in support of Israeli hostages pleaded not guilty Friday to federal hate crime charges. Mohamed Sabry Soliman was indicted earlier this week on 12 hate crime counts in the June 1 attack. He is accused of trying to kill eight people who were hurt by the Molotov cocktails and others who were nearby.
Fox News
40 minutes ago
- Fox News
Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn websites
Print Close By Alexandra Koch Published June 27, 2025 The Supreme Court of the United States on Friday upheld a Texas law requiring pornography websites to verify visitors' ages to protect minors from sexually explicit content online. Justices ruled 6-3 that requiring adults in Texas to verify their age does not violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, noting at least 21 other states imposed similar regulations on sexual material that could be harmful to minors online. Texas and other states prohibit the distribution of sexually explicit content to children in brick and mortar stores, but online content remains largely unregulated. 'WE WON': SOCIAL MEDIA ERUPTS OVER SCOTUS RULING DEALING 'FATAL BLOW' TO TRANSGENDER SURGERIES ON MINORS Lawmakers from the Lone Star State enacted a bill requiring certain commercial websites that publish sexually explicit content to verify the ages of those entering the site, which the justices upheld as constitutional, noting at least 21 other states imposed similar regulations on sexual material that could be harmful to minors. Those who visit sexually explicit websites will need to use government-issued identification or a "commercially reasonable method that relies on public or private transactional data." Sites can perform verification themselves or through a third-party service. SCOTUS RULES ON STATE BAN ON GENDER TRANSITION 'TREATMENTS' FOR MINORS IN LANDMARK CASE If website owners knowingly violate the law, the Supreme Court ruled the Texas attorney general can sue and collect a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day that the site is non-compliant. They can also collect an additional penalty of up to $250,000 if any minors accessed the covered sexual material as a result of the violation. TEXAS BILL PUSHES STRICTEST SOCIAL MEDIA BAN FOR MINORS IN THE NATION Justices wrote in their opinion that internet access has drastically changed since 1999, when only two out of five American households had a computer. In 2024, 95 percent of American teens had access to a smartphone, with 93 percent reporting frequent internet use. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan argued speech that is obscene for minors is often not obscene for adults. "So adults have a constitutional right to view the very same speech that a State may prohibit for children," Kagan wrote. "And it is a fact of life—and also of law—that adults and children do not live in hermetically sealed boxes. In preventing children from gaining access to 'obscene for children' speech, States sometimes take measures impeding adults from viewing it too—even though, for adults, it is constitutionally protected expression. "But what if Texas could do better—what if Texas could achieve its interest without so interfering with adults' constitutionally protected rights in viewing the speech H. B. 1181 covers? That is the ultimate question on which the Court and I disagree." CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Pornhub and other pornography giants have stopped service in Texas and other states where regulations are in place. Print Close URL
Associated Press
41 minutes ago
- Associated Press
What to know about prisoners crafting clemency petitions to capture Trump's attention
ASHLAND, Ky. (AP) — Clemency has come early and often in President Donald Trump's second term, prompting nearly 10,000 convicts to request pardons or commutations of their prison sentences. Trump has been criticized for wiping away convictions of political allies, former Republican officeholders and hundreds of people charged in the Capitol riot. In issuing such pardons and commutations, Trump has largely cast aside a process that historically has been overseen by nonpolitical personnel at the Justice Department who spent their days poring over clemency applications — thick packets filled with character references attesting to applicants' atonement and good deeds. Only those meeting strict criteria were then passed along to the White House. That approach has given prisoners like Chad Scott, a disgraced federal agent serving a 13-year sentence for corruption, hope at earning clemency by tailoring petitions to capture Trump's attention. Scott claimed, for example, that both he and the Republican president were victims of 'political persecution.' The former U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agent also noted that he and the president have survived gunshot wounds to the ear. Here are some key things to know about how Trump's approach is changing the world of clemency: Trump's approach to clemency has upended norms Legal experts say the flurry of petitions has been sparked by Trump's frequent grants of clemency since retaking office in January. The president has pardoned or commuted the sentences of more than 1,600 people. Many of those granted mercy have been the president's political allies, campaign donors and fraudsters who claimed they were victims of a 'weaponized' Justice Department. Among those receiving clemency are a pair of reality TV stars, a straw donor who gave $900,000 to Trump's first inaugural committee and a Virginia sheriff sentenced to 10 years for deputizing several businessmen in exchange for cash payments. It's just part of the way the president has upended how clemency is handled. In the past, career Justice Department lawyers weighed remorse, the severity of the crime and the amount of time a prisoner has already served. Then they passed along recommendations to the White House. The process at the Justice Department is being overseen by a vocal Trump supporter: The president tapped Ed Martin Jr. to be the Justice Department's pardon attorney. Martin is a former defense lawyer who represented Jan. 6, 2021, rioters and promoted false claims that the 2020 election had been stolen by Democrats. That approach — and Trump's flurry of clemency grants — has created 'a free-for-all' for those seeking pardons and commutations, said Liz Oyer, the Justice Department's former pardon attorney, who was fired in March. 'The traditional process and practices,' she told The Associated Press, 'all seem to have fallen by the wayside.' Convicts believe Trump might hear them out Optimism behind bars has never been higher, says Eric Sanchez Chaparro, a prisoner seeking a commutation for a drug and weapons conviction that carried a 19-year sentence. 'In many ways I feel like he has the same point of view that we've got,' Chaparro told the AP, noting both he and the president were convicted felons. Trump was convicted last year on New York state charges of falsifying business records related to hush money payments to a porn star. Jonathan E. Woods, an early Trump supporter and former Arkansas state senator, is seeking a commutation of his 18-year sentence for a bribery conviction. 'President Trump is viewed as someone as having a big heart, nonjudgmental and someone who has been put through hell by a very imperfect legal system,' Woods wrote to the AP. 'Inmates view him as someone who will listen to them in hopes of going home early to their loves ones.' Scott, the former DEA agent, raises and trains service and therapy dogs behind bars in Kentucky. He named one of his most recent canines, a Labradane, Trump. The White House says Trump is acting 'reasonably' and righting 'many wrongs' Trump is hardly the first president to generate controversy over how he handled such powers. President Joe Biden, a Democrat, prompted bipartisan outrage in December when he pardoned his son Hunter, sparing him a possible prison sentence for felony gun and tax convictions. Biden also was sharply criticized — mainly by Republicans — for issuing preemptive pardons to protect lawmakers, former officials and his family members from what he described as a potentially vindictive Trump administration. Administration officials say Trump decides on clemency requests after they're vetted by the White House Counsel's Office, the White House pardon czar and the Justice Department. Reviewers have been focusing on nonviolent, rehabilitated criminals with compelling references, the officials said. The White House is also considering petitions from those serving unjustified sentences and what the administration deems 'over-prosecution.' 'President Trump doesn't need lectures from Democrats about his use of pardons, especially from those who supported a president who pardoned his corrupt son, shielded Dr. Fauci from accountability for the millions who suffered under his failed COVID leadership and backed the infamous 'kids-for-cash' judge who profited from incarcerating children,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in an email. 'President Trump is using his pardon and commutation powers to right many wrongs, acting reasonably and responsibly within his constitutional authority.' Legal experts see it much differently. 'What these pardons signal — together with everything else — is that all bets are now off,' said Frank Bowman, a legal historian and professor emeritus at the University of Missouri School of Law who's writing a book on pardons. 'It's a grotesque misuse of constitutional authority of a kind that has never been seen in American history.'
