Maternity services review welcomed by bereaved Leeds parents
Parents who raised concerns about maternity care in Leeds have welcomed news it will be included in a national investigation.Health Secretary Wes Streeting announced the "rapid" inquiry on Monday, focused on the worst-performing maternity and neonatal services in the country.Amarjit Kaur and Mandip Singh Matharoo believe their daughter Asees, who was stillborn in 2024, would have survived had they received better care at Leeds General Infirmary (LGI). Ms Kaur said: "Something needs to be done – multiple governments have just let it slide for so many years."
Prof Phil Wood, Chief Executive at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, said he would welcome any investigation and would "fully support its focus on improving maternity safety".When Ms Kaur was 32 weeks pregnant, she visited LGI's maternity unit twice in 24 hours, each time telling staff she had ligament pain in her torso. She was sent home both times - but later underwent emergency surgery and a massive blood clot was found, exactly where she had described being in pain.The pair believe Asees would have survived if Ms Kaur had not been sent home earlier. On Monday it was confirmed that Leeds Teaching Hospitals (LTH), along with University Hospitals Sussex, would be among the trusts included in the investigation. "We do welcome the fact that there will be an inquiry done nationally," she said."We still do think that there needs to be a closer eye put on Leeds, so we welcome that [Streeting] says he will look at Leeds more specifically."LTH NHS Trust includes LGI and St James' University Hospital.Both hospitals had their maternity services downgraded from "good" to "inadequate" by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) last week. Concerns from staff and patients around quality of care and staffing levels led to unannounced inspections at the hospitals.Their ratings were changed because their failings posed "a significant risk" to women and babies, according to the CQC.
Fiona Winser-Ramm and Dan Ramm set up an online group for bereaved parents after the death of daughter, Aliona Grace, at LGI in 2020.Aliona died 27 minutes after she was born, with an inquest finding a "number of gross failures of the most basic nature that directly contributed" to her death.Mrs Winser-Ramm said they welcomed the review and the "continuing conversation around the maternity services here in Leeds".However, they both called for an independent inquiry to be held into services at LTH. Mr Ramm said: "We are resolute in continuing to call for that inquiry and today is essentially another day in that process."The big concern is that this will not go far enough, and that essentially after an initial rapid review we will be stranded in that limbo with no answers about culture and management and the problems that have been allowed to perpetuate in LTH for five plus years."
The investigation will consist of two parts. The first will urgently investigate up to 10 of the most concerning maternity and neonatal units, to give affected families answers as quickly as possible.The identify of these units has yet to be decided - although it was confirmed that there will be investigations into University Hospitals Sussex and Leeds Teaching Hospitals. These could form part of the 10 or be separate to them, the government said.The second part will undertake a system-wide look at maternity and neonatal care, bringing together lessons from past inquiries to create a national set of actions to improve care across every NHS maternity service.Prof Wood, from Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, said: "Our recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) reports have highlighted critical areas for improvement, and we've already taken significant steps to address these. "We remain committed to working closely with NHS England, the CQC, our staff and families who use our services, to ensure the highest standards of care in our maternity services."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
£2.2bn of ‘wasteful' NHS spending to be diverted to working classes
Wes Streeting will use a speech in Blackpool on Wednesday to set out how poorer communities will benefit from more medicines and equipment – and a bigger share of GP funding – under reforms in the upcoming NHS 10-year plan. The Department of Health said NHS leaders have spent recent months driving cuts to NHS spending, such as on 'back office' functions and agency staff, while reducing forecast deficits by health trusts. Around £2.2 billion previously set aside to plug financial holes will now be spent on staff, medicines, new technology and equipment in rural communities, coastal towns and working-class regions, according to the Department. Mr Streeting will say: 'The truth is, those in greatest need often receive the worst quality healthcare. 'It flies in the face of the values the NHS was founded on. The circumstances of your birth shouldn't determine your worth. 'A core ambition of our 10-year plan will be to restore the promise of the NHS, to provide first-class healthcare for everyone in our country and end the postcode lottery. 'Last year, we sent crack teams of top clinicians to hospitals in parts of the country with the highest waiting lists and levels of economic inactivity. 'It has seen waiting lists in those areas falling twice as fast as the rest of the country, helping get sick Brits back to health and back to work. 'Thanks to the reforms we've made to bear down on wasteful spending, we can now invest the savings in working-class communities that need it most. 'Where towns have the greatest health needs and the fewest GPs, we will prioritise investment to rebuild your NHS and rebuild the health of your community.' According to the Department of Health, GP surgeries that serve working-class areas receive, on average, 10% less funding per patient than practices in more affluent areas. Royal College of GPs data suggests practices in some of England's poorest areas have around 300 more patients per GP than the most affluent, it said. The Government now plans to review GP funding and the GP contract so working-class areas receive their 'fair share' of resources. The Department of Health pointed to 'years of neglect' in poorer communities, which it said often have the fewest GPs, the worst performing services and the longest waits. NHSE chief executive Jim Mackey is behind the drive to cut planned deficits. This year, deficit support funding will not go to systems that fail to meet their agreed financial plans and is being phased out entirely from 2026/27. Any struggling NHS trusts will now be required to set out activity and costs in a transparent way. Dr Amanda Doyle, NHS England national director for primary care, said: 'It is essential that GP practices serving our most deprived communities, where health challenges are often greatest, receive a fair share of resources that reflect their need.' Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chairwoman of the Royal College of GPs (RCGP), said: 'A patient's postcode and where they live should not determine the level of NHS care they receive, so a review of the funding formula for general practice – which currently does not account for health inequalities – is a good thing, something the college has campaigned for and is long overdue. 'Whilst GPs and our teams across the country are working under intense workload and workforce pressures, college research has shown that GPs in deprived areas are responsible for almost 2,500 patients per head on average, whilst those practising in more affluent areas tend to have patient lists of around 2,100. 'It can't be right that people in deprived communities – who often have more complex health needs and would likely benefit from health interventions most – are less likely to receive it, because their GPs' time is spread even more thinly. 'The RCGP has called for a review of all general practice funding streams so that more spending is channelled to areas of greatest need, so it's good to see the Government is listening. 'It's now vital that this review, announced today, is conducted in close collaboration with the British Medical Association as part of their negotiations for an improved contract, and an overall uplift to funding for delivering patient care in general practice.' She said the RCGP had 'heard rumours that the transfer of funding from secondary to primary care is set to be delayed until 2035 – something that would totally undermine the Government's aspirations to shift more care into the community and 'bring back the family doctor''. NHS Providers chief executive Daniel Elkeles said NHS trusts were 'playing a key role in generating the savings that will help underpin this commitment'. He said new funding approaches 'will need to reflect the ongoing financial and operational pressures trusts face as they work to ensure the quality and safety of care'. Mr Elkeles added: 'Our recent survey highlighted trust leaders' concerns over the impact of ongoing financial pressures. 'While the NHS must and will play its part in addressing health inequalities, it's important to recognise that the causes of ill health lie predominantly in wider societal issues including education, housing and transport. 'Therefore it's vital that we see a concerted and co-ordinated push across national and local government to deliver better health for all.' The Health Service Journal reported that, under the 10-year plan, patients may also be able to have a say on whether hospitals should get the full payment for their treatment. It said 'patient power payments' are expected to be trialled in a handful of areas.
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
World's most deadly diseases will be kept at new Surrey lab
The world's most dangerous diseases will be researched at state-of-the-art laboratories in Surrey. The brand new National Biosecurity Centre in Weybridge will aim to prevent future pandemics by keeping various incurable and fatal viruses in its facilities. It will be handed the highest classification of lab biosecurity, allowing researchers to study the deadliest diseases, known as biosafety level four pathogens, which include Ebola. This upgrade in rating gives it the same classification as the UK Healthy Security Agency base at Porton Down. But operations in Weybridge will take on a much wider scope, with the facility set to analyse a range of infected farm animals, not just rodents. The facility will also help prepare for the possibility of a terror attack involving biological weapons. Staff at the site will do their research in special self-contained suits with their own air supply, air locks, negative air pressure and disinfection showers, allowing them to safely handle the dangerous viruses. They will also analyse currently unknown diseases including Disease X, a hypothetical pathogen that will lead to the next pandemic. On Monday, the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs announced it would fund the labs with £1billion of taxpayer money, part of a larger £2.8bn revamp of the Government's premier animal disease centre. It comes after warnings from the National Audit Office that the Government was not properly prepared for a major outbreak of animal disease. Such diseases include bird flu, bluetongue and African swine fever and can pose serious threats to England's farming sector, food security, and wildlife, and are a major and increasing risk to public health. About 60 per cent of all known human infectious diseases can be transmitted from animals to people, and three quarters of emerging infectious diseases originate in animals, officials warned. The 'record' investment will complete the redevelopment of the crumbling animal science facilities at Weybridge, which the National Audit Office (NAO) recently warned was at 'very high' risk of site failure. Environment Secretary Steve Reed said: 'The first role of any Government is national security. 'That is why we are making a record investment into the nation's biosecurity capabilities and, in turn, our national security, after years of chronic underfunding. 'Farmers and food producers will now be better protected from diseases, our food security strengthened, and public health better safeguarded against future pandemics.' Jenny Stewart, senior science director at the Animal and Plant Health Agency, which runs the labs, said the funding was a 'vital milestone' in the delivery of the new facilities. 'Our scientists and specialists at Weybridge are at the heart of the UK's disease surveillance and response capability and provide a global centre of expertise,' she added. 'Investment on this scale will enable them to continue their critical work in modern, fit-for-purpose facilities, supported by the very latest technologies.' The Government said work was already under way at the Weybridge site, with the first interim labs to support science ready in 2027 and 2028, and the national biosecurity centre due to be operational in 2033-34.
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
£2.2bn of ‘wasteful' NHS spending to be diverted to working classes
Wes Streeting will use a speech in Blackpool on Wednesday to set out how poorer communities will benefit from more medicines and equipment – and a bigger share of GP funding – under reforms in the upcoming NHS 10-year plan. The Department of Health said NHS leaders have spent recent months driving cuts to NHS spending, such as on 'back office' functions and agency staff, while reducing forecast deficits by health trusts. Around £2.2 billion previously set aside to plug financial holes will now be spent on staff, medicines, new technology and equipment in rural communities, coastal towns and working-class regions, according to the Department. Mr Streeting will say: 'The truth is, those in greatest need often receive the worst quality healthcare. 'It flies in the face of the values the NHS was founded on. The circumstances of your birth shouldn't determine your worth. 'A core ambition of our 10-year plan will be to restore the promise of the NHS, to provide first-class healthcare for everyone in our country and end the postcode lottery. 'Last year, we sent crack teams of top clinicians to hospitals in parts of the country with the highest waiting lists and levels of economic inactivity. 'It has seen waiting lists in those areas falling twice as fast as the rest of the country, helping get sick Brits back to health and back to work. 'Thanks to the reforms we've made to bear down on wasteful spending, we can now invest the savings in working-class communities that need it most. 'Where towns have the greatest health needs and the fewest GPs, we will prioritise investment to rebuild your NHS and rebuild the health of your community.' According to the Department of Health, GP surgeries that serve working-class areas receive, on average, 10% less funding per patient than practices in more affluent areas. Royal College of GPs data suggests practices in some of England's poorest areas have around 300 more patients per GP than the most affluent, it said. The Government now plans to review GP funding and the GP contract so working-class areas receive their 'fair share' of resources. The Department of Health pointed to 'years of neglect' in poorer communities, which it said often have the fewest GPs, the worst performing services and the longest waits. NHSE chief executive Jim Mackey is behind the drive to cut planned deficits. This year, deficit support funding will not go to systems that fail to meet their agreed financial plans and is being phased out entirely from 2026/27. Any struggling NHS trusts will now be required to set out activity and costs in a transparent way. Dr Amanda Doyle, NHS England national director for primary care, said: 'It is essential that GP practices serving our most deprived communities, where health challenges are often greatest, receive a fair share of resources that reflect their need.' Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chairwoman of the Royal College of GPs (RCGP), said: 'A patient's postcode and where they live should not determine the level of NHS care they receive, so a review of the funding formula for general practice – which currently does not account for health inequalities – is a good thing, something the college has campaigned for and is long overdue. 'Whilst GPs and our teams across the country are working under intense workload and workforce pressures, college research has shown that GPs in deprived areas are responsible for almost 2,500 patients per head on average, whilst those practising in more affluent areas tend to have patient lists of around 2,100. 'It can't be right that people in deprived communities – who often have more complex health needs and would likely benefit from health interventions most – are less likely to receive it, because their GPs' time is spread even more thinly. 'The RCGP has called for a review of all general practice funding streams so that more spending is channelled to areas of greatest need, so it's good to see the Government is listening. 'It's now vital that this review, announced today, is conducted in close collaboration with the British Medical Association as part of their negotiations for an improved contract, and an overall uplift to funding for delivering patient care in general practice.' She said the RCGP had 'heard rumours that the transfer of funding from secondary to primary care is set to be delayed until 2035 – something that would totally undermine the Government's aspirations to shift more care into the community and 'bring back the family doctor''. NHS Providers chief executive Daniel Elkeles said NHS trusts were 'playing a key role in generating the savings that will help underpin this commitment'. He said new funding approaches 'will need to reflect the ongoing financial and operational pressures trusts face as they work to ensure the quality and safety of care'. Mr Elkeles added: 'Our recent survey highlighted trust leaders' concerns over the impact of ongoing financial pressures. 'While the NHS must and will play its part in addressing health inequalities, it's important to recognise that the causes of ill health lie predominantly in wider societal issues including education, housing and transport. 'Therefore it's vital that we see a concerted and co-ordinated push across national and local government to deliver better health for all.' The Health Service Journal reported that, under the 10-year plan, patients may also be able to have a say on whether hospitals should get the full payment for their treatment. It said 'patient power payments' are expected to be trialled in a handful of areas.
