Trump vs judiciary: 12 times US court blocked President's order
A US trade court blocked President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" import tariffs from going into effect. The court ruled that the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from nations that sell more to the United States than they buy. The Trump administration said it would appeal the ruling.
This is not the first time that the Trump administration and the judiciary have been at the loggerheads. There have been several occasions in the past when US judges objected to or put a halt to policies launched by Trump since he took office on January 20, 2025. Here are a few instances when this happened:
Earlier in March this year, US President Donald Trump's administration decided to revoke the temporary legal status of 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans in the United States.
The move, effective April 24, sought to cut short a two-year "parole" granted to the migrants under former President Joe Biden that allowed them to enter the country by air if they had US sponsors.
Later in April, District Judge Indira Talwani announced that she will block the POTUS from revoking the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans in the US.
On May 29, the judge ordered the Trump administration to resume processing applications from migrants seeking work permits or more lasting immigration status who are living in the country temporarily under "parole" programs.
A US judge had on May 24 temporarily blocked the Trump administration from revoking Harvard University's ability to enrol foreign students. The order provided temporary relief to thousands of international students who were faced with being forced to transfer.
Earlier this month, US District Judge Susan Illston extended a temporary block on a bid by President Donald Trump's administration to lay off hundreds of thousands of federal employees, saying he needed permission from Congress before restructuring the US government.
Mass layoffs is a key piece of Trump's plans to downsize or eliminate many federal agencies, pending the outcome of a lawsuit by unions, nonprofits and municipalities. On May 9, US District Judge Susan Illston blocked about 20 agencies from making mass layoffs for two weeks and ordered the reinstatement of workers who had already lost their jobs.
US District Judge Myong Joun had also blocked Trump's administration from carrying out his executive order to dismantle the US Department of Education and ordered it to reinstate employees terminated in a mass layoff.
The Trump administration was also blocked from firing workers and taking other steps to shut down federal agencies that fund museums and libraries, mediate labor disputes and support minority-owned businesses.
In April, US District Judge William Orrick blocked Donald Trump's administration from withholding federal funding from more than a dozen so-called sanctuary jurisdictions that have declined to cooperate with the Republican president's hardline immigration crackdown.
US District Judge Mary McElroy blocked President Donald Trump's administration from freezing billions of dollars in grants Congress authorised under climate investment and infrastructure laws of his Democratic predecessor, former President Joe Biden.
Judge McElroy in Providence, Rhode Island, had then issued an injunction at the behest of environmental groups who argued the Trump administration was unlawfully freezing already-awarded funding for projects to combat climate change, reduce pollution and modernize US infrastructure.
US District Judge Mary S. McElroy had in April temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's administration from cutting more than $11 billion in public health grants allocated to US states during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The grant funding was used by states to track, prevent and control infectious diseases, including measles and bird flu, as well as track mental health services and fund addiction treatment.
On March 15, Judge James Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order blocking deportations under Trump's executive orders. However, the administration proceeded with deportations to El Salvador, escalating tensions.
Later, US District Judge Brian Murphy in Boston issued a nationwide temporary restraining order designed to protect migrants subject to final orders of removal from being swiftly deported to countries other than those that had already been identified during immigration proceedings.
US District Judge Richard Leon in Washington struck down an executive order targeting law firm WilmerHale. The judge said Trump's order retaliated against the firm in violation of US constitutional protections for free speech and due process.
A US judge ordered that Indian researcher Badar Khan Suri not be removed from the country, following his arrest and threat of expulsion for alleged Hamas ties.
The detention of Suri, a postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown University in the US capital, came as fears mount in the academic world that freedom of research and speech is being challenged two months into US President Donald Trump's new term.
On March 20, a federal judge blocked Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency from accessing Social Security records as part of its hunt under President Donald Trump for fraud and waste, calling the effort a "fishing expedition."
A federal judge temporarily blocked the US military from enforcing President Donald Trump's executive order barring transgender people from military service while a lawsuit by 20 current and would-be service members challenging the measure goes forward.
US District Judge Ana Reyes in Washington found Trump's January 27 order, one of several issued by the Republican president targeting legal rights for transgender Americans, likely violated the US Constitution's prohibition on sex discrimination.
Later on May 6, a divided US Supreme Court allowed Trump's ban on transgender individuals serving in the military to take effect, putting thousands of active-duty troops at risk of removal. eed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
Why Elon Musk turned against Donald Trump and his ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' - Here are the 5 reasons
Once close allies, now at odds: Elon Musk's once-robust relationship with Donald Trump appears to be crumbling amid growing policy clashes, public criticism, and mounting fallout for Musk's companies. The turning point seems to be Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' a sweeping Republican legislative package that Musk claims undermines innovation and economic discipline. Here's a breakdown of the key reasons behind the falling out: Elon Musk's sharp break from Donald Trump finds its most immediate pain point in Tesla's bottom line: the proposed elimination of federal electric vehicle (EV) tax credits. Under current policy, buyers of new EVs are eligible for up to $7,500 in federal tax credits, with an additional $4,000 available for used EVs. These credits, part of the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, have been a critical incentive driving EV adoption—and by extension, Tesla's sales. But Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' backed by GOP lawmakers, aims to gut those incentives entirely for manufacturers that have already sold over 200,000 qualifying vehicles between 2009 and 2025. Tesla, by far the EV market leader, is directly in the firing line: the company sold over 336,000 vehicles in just Q1 of 2025 alone. According to JPMorgan analyst Ryan Brinkman, the removal of these credits could represent a $1.2 billion headwind for Tesla—a significant blow as the company battles slumping demand, falling profits, and political backlash from Musk's government role. So, Musk became increasingly vocal in criticising Trump's massive federal spending bill—nicknamed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Musk called the bill 'a disgusting abomination' and accused GOP lawmakers of abandoning fiscal responsibility. 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly… which increases the budget deficit… I don't know if a bill can be big and beautiful,' Musk told CBS previously. Musk's discontent escalated after Trump abruptly withdrew the nomination of private astronuat and his ally Jared Isaacman—as NASA Administrator. Trump cited 'prior associations' in his decision, which Musk might have seen as a betrayal. Isaacman had broad support in the space community and was seen as Musk's pick to align NASA policy with SpaceX's interests. His removal coincided with Musk's own exit as a 'special government employee' running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk said in support of Isaacman, signaling the depth of his frustration. Elon Musk's foray into federal governance as a 'special government employee' under the Trump administration has left a lasting dent in his personal and public image. What began as a high-profile effort to 'streamline government efficiency' quickly turned into a political and reputational minefield for the billionaire CEO. As head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk was tasked with cutting what the Trump administration called 'wasteful spending.' But the resulting actions—including mass layoffs in federal departments, rumored threats to Social Security and Medicare programs, and abrupt budget slashes—sparked widespread backlash. Despite Musk's repeated clarifications that DOGE had no authority over entitlement programs, public anger snowballed. 'It's a bit unfair because DOGE became the whipping boy for everything,' Musk told CBS. 'I've had people think DOGE is going to stop them from getting their Social Security check, which is completely untrue.' The political blowback triggered a sharp decline in Musk's public approval. Protests, online campaigns, and lawsuits followed, along with a string of death threats and acts of violence targeting both Musk and Tesla facilities. As public anger grew, Tesla became a target: Showrooms were vandalised Tesla vehicle sales plummeted Shares fell 50% from record highs Net worth dropped by $100 billion Musk lamented being made the scapegoat: 'DOGE became the whipping boy for everything... People thought it would stop their Social Security checks.' His candid remarks reflect a man caught between two identities—visionary entrepreneur and political appointee. 'I don't want to speak up against the administration,' he said, 'but I also don't want to take responsibility for everything this administration is doing.' Musk recently escalated pressure on the FAA to drop Verizon's $2.4 billion contract for air traffic control upgrades, claiming the system is failing. He offered Starlink as an emergency solution, suggesting the FAA should shift the contract to SpaceX. But critics flagged this as a possible conflict of interest—especially since Musk had been advising on federal spending.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cong meets governor, urges special assembly session
Patna: An 11-member delegation of the Congress, headed by state party president Rajesh Kumar, met governor Arif Mohammed Khan on Wednesday and urged him to convene a special session of the Bihar assembly over the alleged deterioration in the state's law and order situation, citing the recent rape and murder of a dalit girl from Muzaffarpur. "You are requested to invoke Article 175 of the Constitution in light of the deteriorating law and order and misgovernance in Bihar, and convene both houses to deliver a strong message," the Congress delegation demanded through their memorandum submitted to the governor. The Congress delegation also demanded a high-level probe into the incident to punish the guilty, besides providing justice and compensation to the victim's family. They also sought concrete and effective steps to prevent injustices against the dalit community and to ensure their social, economic, and security-related rights. The memorandum stated that currently, 6,799 crimes against SC-ST communities occur annually in Bihar, accounting for 13.16% of the country's total crimes. "The conviction rate for these crimes is only 8.6%, meaning nearly 90% of offenders go unpunished," it alleged. Citing the recent report of the Auditor General of India, the memorandum further raised serious concerns about Bihar's healthcare services and urged the governor to intervene in the matter. Later, Congress workers protested outside the residence of the health minister, Mangal Pandey, over the issue. A delegation of Jan Suraaj, led by its state president Manoj Bharti, also met the governor and handed over a memorandum.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's sweeping bill to cut taxes by $3.75 trillion but will burden millions of Americans. Check details
President Donald Trump's major legislative proposal currently moving through Congress is projected to cut taxes by $3.7 trillion while increasing the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next ten years, according to a report released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The CBO also estimates the bill would result in 10.9 million more people without health insurance, including 1.4 million undocumented immigrants currently covered under state-funded programs. Additionally, the package is expected to reduce federal spending by $1.3 trillion over the same period. This analysis arrives at a pivotal time, as Trump is urging lawmakers to finalize the legislation in time for him to sign it by the Fourth of July. As the official legislative scorekeeper for Congress, the CBO's assessment will be closely scrutinized by both lawmakers and analysts trying to grasp the full fiscal implications of the sweeping bill, which spans over 1,000 pages. In anticipation of the report, the White House and Republican leaders launched a preemptive effort to discredit the CBO's findings and cast doubt on its conclusions. It is estimated that 8.6 million people will lose health coverage due to Medicaid changes. SNAP (food stamp) participation would drop by 4 million monthly. ALSO READ: Under Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill, over 10 million more Americans projected to lose insurance Live Events Elon Musk calls bill 'disgusting abomination' Billionaire Elon Musk blasted the massive tax and immigration bill at the heart of President Donald Trump's agenda on Tuesday, calling the measure 'a disgusting abomination' that would burden the country with 'crushingly unsustainable debt.' Although Musk — who stepped down Friday as head of the US DOGE Service, part of Trump's cost-cutting initiative — had earlier voiced mild criticism of the bill, his recent posts on X, the social media platform he owns, marked his most pointed rebuke of the Trump administration to date. For months, Musk had acted as the president's close ally, often appearing alongside Trump in the Oval Office and urging the administration to rein in government spending. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted on X. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He wrote minutes later: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' That post appeared to confuse the annual deficit with the overall increase to the debt over 10 years. ALSO READ: Elon Musk attacks Trump's 'big, beautiful bill': Tesla CEO's sudden outburst explained Shortly after that, he wrote, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' The bill would extend tax cuts enacted during Trump's first term and make good on new campaign promises — including no taxes on tips or overtime wages — while devoting hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending to defense and immigration enforcement. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed Elon Musk's recent comments. 'The president is well aware of Musk's stance on the bill,' she said. 'It hasn't changed his perspective. This is a strong, ambitious piece of legislation, and he's fully committed to it.' ALSO READ: Elon Musk's DOGE army left 'drugs, roaches and rats' in 'trashed' offices: Bombshell report amid Ketamine claims The proposed law would roll back much of the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, which provided major federal tax incentives for electric vehicles, battery production, and solar energy — key areas for Musk's businesses. Tesla, in particular, has taken a hit amid declining enthusiasm for Musk's DOGE initiatives, reporting a 71% drop in profits in the first quarter. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) pushed back on Musk's criticism. 'With all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong about the One Big Beautiful Bill,' Johnson told reporters. ALSO READ: Social Security Fairness Act big update given on expanded benefits. Here's how it will impact millions of Americans The speaker said that he and Musk talked about the legislation and other topics for 20 minutes Monday and that the two appeared to end the phone conversation on common ground. 'Elon is missing it, okay?' Johnson added. 'And it's not personal. I know that the EV mandate [is] very important to him; that is going away because the government should not be subsidizing these things as part of the Green New Deal. And I know that has an effect on his business, and I lament that. … But for him to come out and pan the whole bill is, to me, just very disappointing, very surprising, in light of the conversation I had with him yesterday.' Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
