Third of businesses planning further job cuts after national insurance hikes
Many companies have also suggested they will cut back hours, freeze pay and hike prices in order to help cover increased tax payments.
S&W's business owners sentiment survey revealed around 20% of those quizzed said they have already reduced their staff numbers as a 'direct result' of the NICs changes which came into effect in April.
Last year, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in her autumn budget that employers' NICs would rise from 13.8% to 15%, while the threshold at which firms would start paying also increased.
Businesses face considerable challenges in the current economic climate and many owners are having to make difficult decisions to stay afloat Claire Burden, S&W
The increase came in at the same time as the jump in the national living wage and reduced business rates relief for some firms.
The survey found 33% of business owners said they were still planning further cuts to staff numbers after feeling the impact of the tax increase.
Firms said they were also looking to a series of other measures in order to offset the jump in their operating costs.
The survey of 500 UK business owners with turnovers of £5 million upwards also showed 46% of those surveyed said they were planning further price increases as a result.
Meanwhile, 35% of business owners said they planned to reduce staff hours and 29% said they were looking at freezing pay.
It comes as firms highlighted higher commodity and energy costs, as well as disruption from wider macroeconomic uncertainty.
Claire Burden, partner in consulting at S&W, said: 'Businesses face considerable challenges in the current economic climate and many owners are having to make difficult decisions to stay afloat.
'Given that salaries represent a considerable proportion of the overall cost base for most businesses, it is to be expected that many are looking closely at headcounts in response to the increased national insurance costs.'
Alex Simpson, partner in employer solutions at S&W, said: 'For most businesses, the extent of the employers' NIC change was a surprise.
'We anticipated an increase in the employers' rate, but the additional reduction to the earnings threshold was not expected and is expected to have a dramatic impact over time.'
A Government spokesman said: 'We are a pro-business government. We are protecting the smallest businesses from the employer national insurance rise, shielding 250,000 retail, hospitality and leisure business properties from paying full business rates and have capped corporation tax.
'We delivered a once-in-a-Parliament budget last year that took necessary decisions on tax to stabilise the public finances, including the NHS which has now seen waiting lists fall five months in a row.
'We are now focused on creating opportunities for businesses to compete and access the finance they need to scale, export and break into new markets.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
Vitol CEO sees slight drop in US oil output this year due to lower prices
KUALA LUMPUR, June 17 (Reuters) - The chief executive of top energy trader Vitol expects a slight reduction in U.S. oil production this year due to lower prices, he said on Tuesday. "With slightly lower prices ... we're beginning to see some impact on investment and production. And there's nowhere more obvious for that than within the U.S. and within the shale industry," Russell Hardy said at the Energy Asia conference.
The Herald Scotland
11 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
What's behind the drive to cut public spending 'waste'?
Why does the Scottish Government need to cut spending in this way? Mr Sousa explained: "The Scottish Government is not allowed to borrow cash to fund any day-to-day spending, so it must make sure that its spending matches its funding. "This includes the block grant, as well any additional tax revenues from devolved Scottish taxes (including income tax) and the transfer of funds for social security devolution. "The Scottish Government's more generous pay policy in recent years means that the average wage of public sector employees in Scotland is about 5% higher than the UK average. READ MORE: "Coupled with Scotland's larger share of employment made up of public sector workers, this creates significant pressure for the Scottish Government. "The Scottish Government's social security system is also forecast to cost £2 billion a year more than the block grant adjustments [from the UK Government], between both devolved payments and payments without an equivalent outside of Scotland. This must be paid from a Budget that is only modestly growing year-on-year. "If we project recent growth rates for expenditure on some of the largest areas – pay, procurement, funding for local government – and even under conservative paybill arrangements relative to recent years, spending would exceed the projected funding (using data from the SFC and applying that to the Spending Review settlement) by well in excess of £1 billion. "And that's before we take account – for example – of any grants to third sector organisations or subsidies to public and private companies in charge of delivering transport." How can the Scottish Government cut back on 'public sector inefficiencies'? Mr Sousa: "If the Scottish Government doesn't want to change social security or tax, that would mean discretionary [or reduced] spending. "It could mean fewer public sector employees – be it through redundancies or not filling vacant posts, although that runs the risk of not having the right skills to deliver the Scottish Government's priorities. "It could also mean a less generous public sector pay policy, although that of course means more difficulty in avoiding industrial action. It could also mean cutting back on procurement spending, which has been growing – even if we abstract from the pandemic peak – by 7% a year in cash terms in recent times. And it could also mean less funding available for councils – although given the pressures in local government, that might mean difficulties in delivering services and pressure on council tax." Is the Scottish Government's objective to cut waste by up to £1bn a year by 2029/30 doable? Mr Sousa: "Every government always want to cut inefficiencies and not impact on service delivery. "And of course there are things that could be better. Last week, the Fraser of Allander Institute highlighted that the UK Government's targets on efficiency stretch credulity in the Spending Review, and the Scottish Government's appear headed the same way. "It's inconceivable that the exact same services will be delivered by spending £1 billion less. Rather, the Scottish Government will need to prioritise what really is important. "To govern is to choose, and choices will be coming down the track. In some sense, the limits on borrowing the Scottish Government is subject to will make this hard to avoid by the end of the decade. The timetable doesn't seem impossible – but it'll take time to implement, and no doubt will mean real decisions about what to do and crucially what not to do."
Scotsman
11 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Pressure on Labour to deliver promised change as spending review ushers in 'new phase' of government
Keir Starmer told his Cabinet in advance that last week's spending review marked the start of a "new phase" for the government, in which it would deliver on its promise of change. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It was that promise which won Labour a massive Commons majority just under a year ago, bringing a decisive end to 14 years of Tory rule. But one of the new government's first acts, means-testing winter fuel payment for old age pensioners, proved a serious political mistake, alienating millions of voters and drawing accusations of a return to Tory austerity. Rachel Reeves delivering her spending review in the House of Commons | PA Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Chancellor Rachel Reeves has now effectively reversed the policy, restoring winter fuel payments to three quarters of pensioners. And she used the spending review to set out Labour's spending plan for the years ahead. These include billions of pounds to build affordable homes, major investment in public transport projects, a significant boost for the NHS to fund more appointments and an expansion of free school meals. In Scotland, the Chancellor gave the go-ahead for the UK's biggest supercomputer at Edinburgh University, as well as the Acorn carbon capture project in the North East. Ms Reeves points to lower interest rates and higher wages as evidence of an improving economy which allows the increased spending. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But there is also a change of tone, acknowledging the urgency of delivery. She spoke of Britain being renewed, but added: 'I know too many people in too many parts of our country are yet to feel it. The purpose of this spending review is to change that.' Economic experts, however, expect the extra spending will mean higher taxes when the Chancellor delivers her budget in the autumn. Labour promised at the election not to increase income tax, VAT, employees' national insurance or corporation tax. But, as they say, other taxes are available - and some in the Labour party and beyond believe a wealth tax ought to be a serious option to ensure those rich in assets as well as income pay their fair share. In her Commons speech, Ms Reeves rejected austerity and said she was making 'Labour choices'. That's exactly what many of her backbenchers want - and also many of the millions who voted the party into power last summer, looking for a clear move away from the Tories' approach. Now the pressure is on to deliver the promised change.
