logo
‘The flying bum': can a UK firm making huge airships finally get off the ground?

‘The flying bum': can a UK firm making huge airships finally get off the ground?

The Guardian24-02-2025

It's a dreary day in Bedford, but on a flight simulator the skies above San Francisco airport are blue and the wind is low. That is a good thing, because there is an amateur at the joystick of the world's biggest aircraft.
The flight simulator models trips by the Airlander 10, which is part airship, part aeroplane. If all goes to plan for its designer, Hybrid Air Vehicles (HAV), two dozen will be built each year from 2030 at a factory in Doncaster, South Yorkshire.
The virtual 98-metre aircraft noses its way into the air gently, responding gradually to adjustments to its heading about 300 metres (1,000 feet) over the city. This reporter is an old hand when it comes to crashing flight simulators, but the journey passes without incident, albeit with considerable help from one of the five people who has actually flown in the real thing.
Those flights astonished crowds when the prototype lifted off in Bedfordshire, an hour north of London, in 2016. The prototype was retired in 2019, after gathering enough data on flying and – once, not fatally – crashing.
HAV is now preparing to run the 'scale up' gauntlet: going from an eye-catching first model to building a factory employing 1,200 people, and then making airships capable of transporting 10 tonnes of cargo, or up to 130 passengers, at up to 90mph.
Tom Grundy, the HAV chief executive since 2019, says the Airlander can go 'in between the two extremes' of fast but polluting and expensive planes, and cleaner, cheaper but much slower ferries. For short plane journeys run by regional airlines, the costs of operation using an Airlander 'are at or below the cost of what they're operating today' with smaller passenger planes, he says.
The Airlander will not need miles of tarmac runway far from city centres, just a flat space about 200 metres across and a truck with a mooring mast.
'It doesn't have to be stuck to going between today's airports,' Grundy says. 'It can go into different places. And yet it's faster than moving around the world over the surface. It's faster than those ferry journeys. It can often be faster than a train journey, very often faster than a car journey. So providing this middle option.'
The European regional airline Air Nostrum has said it will buy 20 to carry passengers between Mediterranean islands. The luxury tour company Grands Espaces wants the craft to take passengers on jaunts over the Arctic. HAV has also looked at replacing ferries in the Scottish Highlands and across the Irish Sea between Belfast and Liverpool.
Unlike normal planes, weight is the key concern rather than volume. That should mean much more spacious seats for passengers, while luxury tourists will each have double bedrooms. Freight shipping is even more promising, with many customers who would value quicker journeys for bulky loads than ships, but with less expensive fuel burned than planes.
HAV is not the only company to spy a gap: France's Flying Whales is hoping to build a dirigible for cargo only, while Lighter than Air Research (LTA) is focusing on humanitarian missions.
They are all in the precarious startup phase. HAV has spent £140m since 2007, but the latest accounts showed just £400,000 cash on hand at the end of 2023. Other low-emission flight companies, including a clutch employing electric vertical take-off and landing, have run into difficulties recently. The German companies Lilium and Volocopter filed for bankruptcy in late 2024.
Yet HAV is aiming to spend a fraction of the cash of some aerospace rivals. It is seeking to raise £300m in equity funding, with the first chunk by the summer. (It is angling for part of the cash from the Labour government's national wealth fund.) That money, plus deposits on orders worth a notional £1.5bn, should make the company cashflow positive, Grundy says.
Grundy has brought several aircraft from design to flight in a career that includes fighter jet manufacturer BAE Systems and work on the Airbus A380, at 73 metres another leviathan of the skies.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Carbon reduction, in perhaps the hardest sector to decarbonise, was one motivator for Grundy joining HAV. The company claims emissions will be 90% lower than a conventional plane. That could get to 100%, as it plans to switch from internal combustion engines to hydrogen fuel cells to power the Airlander's four propellers.
The reason for the lower energy use is obvious – balloons float – but that only provides 60% of the lift, a 'headstart against gravity'. The Airlander is also an aeroplane: the shape of the balloon – made from a composite of Kevlar and two other materials – makes it a giant wing. That also saves on expensive – and finite – helium.
The Airlander started life as a project for the US Department of Defense, which wanted a surveillance aircraft. HAV says Airlanders will stay airborne for five days, making them 10 times cheaper than fixed-wing drones and easier to control than spy balloons. The company has a deal with BAE Systems to handle sales to military customers. Grundy declined to comment when asked if BAE or another technology partner, France's Dassault, could become investors.
HAV's designers came up with an innovative double-ellipsoid airframe that gives the wing shape without sagging when 10 tonnes hang in a gondola below it. The shape also provided its very unofficial nickname: the 'flying bum'.
'I think we've got more important things to do than be annoyed about that,' says Grundy when asked the inevitable. 'To feel the warmth, the engagement, and sometimes the humour of how people responded to that, it actually was quite powerful for me.'
The flying bum could also get much bigger: HAV is already planing a 50-tonne, 120-metre version for freight customers that could carry wind turbine blades up remote hills. Eventually Grundy wants to make a 200-tonne version that would blow past the A380's 84-tonne payload – and potentially open up the possibility of the world's biggest aircraft crisscrossing the Pacific.
The Hindenburg disaster in 1937, when the German airship's hydrogen balloon burst into flames over New Jersey, made lighter-than-air craft seem a thing of the past for a long time, but the sight of a 98-metre ship in the sky is also something out of sci-fi future. In real life the Airlander (filled with non-flammable helium) was enough to stop traffic whenever the prototype flew.
'I never thought I would be in the lighter-than-air space when I started my career,' Grundy says. 'I think airships have been very, very hard to make practical. I'm attracted to what we're doing here because it is practical. But once I got into it, you start to realise how many future visions that people have of the world include aircraft a bit like this.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nottingham Forest ‘write to Uefa over Crystal Palace Europa League decision' as they stand to benefit from Eagles ban
Nottingham Forest ‘write to Uefa over Crystal Palace Europa League decision' as they stand to benefit from Eagles ban

Scottish Sun

timean hour ago

  • Scottish Sun

Nottingham Forest ‘write to Uefa over Crystal Palace Europa League decision' as they stand to benefit from Eagles ban

Forest took necessary precautions to avoid a similar fiasco TRICKY TREES Nottingham Forest 'write to Uefa over Crystal Palace Europa League decision' as they stand to benefit from Eagles ban Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) NOTTINGHAM FOREST have reportedly written to Uefa over concerns about Crystal Palace taking part in the Europa League. Palace's historic FA Cup final win over Manchester City booked their place in Europe for the first time. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Crystal Palace's European dreams could be ruined over an ownership issue Credit: AFP 2 The Eagles lifted the FA Cup at Wembley to secure a Europa League spot Credit: Getty But complications around John Textor's stake in both Palace and French club Lyon have resulted in the South Londoners' spot being in doubt. Uefa rules on multi-club ownership prevent any two clubs controlled by the same person or group from competing in the same competition. Both Palace and Lyon have qualified for next year's Europa League, but the Ligue 1 side would have precedence as they finished higher in their domestic league. And now The Times state Forest made contact with European football's governing body to highlight the potential breach. Should Palace be kicked out of the Europa League, it is understood Nottingham Forest would be promoted from the Conference League and take the Eagles' Europa League place. Forest themselves made the necessary changes to their ownership structure when it became apparent both they and owner Evangelos Marinakis' other team Olympiacos could both qualify for the Champions League. THIS IS A DEVELOPING STORY.. The Sun is your go to destination for the best football, boxing and MMA news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSunFootball.

Nottingham Forest write to UEFA to 'express concern' over Crystal Palace
Nottingham Forest write to UEFA to 'express concern' over Crystal Palace

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Nottingham Forest write to UEFA to 'express concern' over Crystal Palace

Nottingham Forest have spoken to UEFA to express their concern over Crystal Palace's potential involvement in the Europa League as the FA Cup winners attempt to prove their breached no rules Nottingham Forest have written to UEFA to express concern over Crystal Palace potentially participating in the Europa League given the multi-club ownership rules that are in place. John Textor, the American businessman who has a 43 per cent stake in the Premier League side, also owns Lyon, who have qualified for Europe's secondary competition. The Eagles hierarchy have met with UEFA officials to try explain Textor's situation. ‌ Forest however can stand to gain if UEFA do choose to kick Palace out of the Europa League. The Nottingham outfit enjoyed a stellar year, challenging for the Champions League, but eventually having to settle for the Europa Conference League after finishing seventh. ‌ However they could be bumped up if Palace fall foul of UEFA's rules and the Times reports that they have been in contact with European football's governing body regarding the matter. Much may yet depend on whether Lyon themselves are allowed to play in the Europa League. UEFA's Club Financial Control Body (CFCB) disqualified Lyon from European competitions in December but allowed them to continue after the club met certain demands. However the French side are being 'carefully monitored' by the CFCB and could be disqualified from next season's Europa League for any breaches. It is understood that Palace case could end up at the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Forest could also take the matter to the courts if the Eagles are still deemed eligible. UEFA have previously been rigid in their application of their rules which could count against the FA Cup winners. Eagles shareholders Textor and David Blitzer want to put their shares in a blind trust to ensure the club can compete in Europe next season - but UEFA claim their request has come too late. UEFA rules state that such ­ownership changes must take place before 1 March to take effect in time for the following season. Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis has transferred his shares given his Greek club Olympiacos have qualified for next season's Champions League. ‌ Blitzer is also an owner of Danish club Brondby who qualified for the Conference League. It means there could be issues should Palace want to drop down into that tournament instead. Manchester City and ­ Manchester United both used blind trusts to remain compliant with UEFA's multi-club rules last season. Their partner clubs, Girona and Nice, also ­qualified for the Champions League and Europa League respectively. Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Nato chief says UK's defence spending plans not at odds with 5% goal
Nato chief says UK's defence spending plans not at odds with 5% goal

South Wales Argus

time2 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Nato chief says UK's defence spending plans not at odds with 5% goal

The Nato chief would not reveal the deadline for when he hopes Nato allies will reach the target as he spoke at London's Chatham House. He said he had a 'clear view' on when he thinks countries should get there but said he would keep it to himself. Countries that do not ramp up defence spending should 'learn to speak Russian', he said. Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte giving a speech at Chatham House during his visit to the UK (Yui Mok/PA) He had earlier commended the UK for plans unveiled in the strategic defence review last week as he met Sir Keir Starmer at Downing Street on Monday. Mr Rutte said the UK's goals to spend 2.5% on defence from April 2027 and then aim to get to 3% over the next parliament were not at odds with his own proposed target for the bloc. He has proposed members of the bloc spend 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence as part of a strengthened investment plan for the alliance. The target would require nations to raise core defence spending to 3.5% of GDP, while the remaining 1.5% is to be made up of 'defence-related expenditure'. He said every country is 'working in cycles' and that he was 'really impressed' with the UK's plans under the strategic defence review unveiled last week. 'I've seen sometimes in the British press that there is the defence review and now there is this proposal I made about the 5%, the 3.5% core and 1.5% defence and security-related spending. 'So then people are saying 'hey there is discrepancy', I don't think there is. Why not? Because every country is working in cycles to constantly update its own defence strategy.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (left) welcomed Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte to Downing Street (Jordan Pettitt/PA) He said it was not up to him to decide how countries get there, when asked if he believed Chancellor Rachel Reeves should raise taxes to meet defence spending commitments. 'I mean, what I know is that if we want to keep our societies safe… look, if you do not do this, if you would not go to the 5%, including the 3.5% core defence spending, you could still have the National Health Service, or in other countries their health systems, the pension system, etcetera, but you had better learn to speak Russian.' The upcoming Nato summit would focus on a 'credible path' to get to the 'longer-term goal' of reaching 5%, he said. The 5% goal is not 'some figure plucked from the air', he said. 'The fact is we need a quantum leap in our defence. The fact is we must have more forces and capability to implement our defence plans in full.' While he said the 'exact details are classified', Mr Rutte said there needed to be a 400% increase in air and missile defence. He said Russia could be ready to use force against Nato within five years. 'The new generation of Russian missiles travel at many times the speed of sound. The distance between European capitals is only a matter of minutes. There is no longer east or west. There is just Nato.' As he met with Sir Keir in the White Room of No 10, he commended the Prime Minister on the 'very good stuff' in the defence review. 'It is not only about the traditional things, of course we need them, like ammunition… there is also drones, innovation, building the defence industrial base. It is really broad, it is really making a big impression in Brussels I can tell you,' he said. Sir Keir described Nato as 'the most effective military alliance the world has ever seen' (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Sir Keir called Nato the 'cornerstone of our defence' and the 'most effective military alliance the world has ever seen', adding that the task of the upcoming summit was to make sure it serves that purpose for decades to come. Sir Keir also spoke to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Monday and the two leaders welcomed efforts by Nato allies to step up defence spending as well as Mr Rutte's suggestions to further boost it, a Downing Street spokeswoman said. The boost to the defence budget announced last week will be confirmed by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday, when she will set out the Government's priorities for the next three years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store