
Gibraltar not joining Schengen free travel area under deal with EU, says Lammy
The prospect of Gibraltar 'joining' the European Schengen free travel area was 'never on the table', the Foreign Secretary told the Commons.
The agreement on a 'fluid border' will allow travellers to cross by land without checks. Those flying into Gibraltar from the UK will face one check from Gibraltarian officials and another by the Spanish on behalf of the EU.
In a statement on the agreement, Mr Lammy said: 'Residents of Gibraltar and residents of nearby Spanish communities will be able to go about their daily lives as they have done before.
'For those arriving by air into Gibraltar's airport, there will be a dual border control check, in a model similar to French police operating in London St Pancras station.
'Ignore the fake news, Gibraltar will not be joining Schengen. This was never on the table. Immigration, policing and justice in Gibraltar will remain the responsibilities of Gibraltar's authorities.
'For products entering Gibraltar across its land border, there will be a unique goods and customs model, avoiding the need for onerous checks at the border.
'And with this pragmatic solution, flights will be able to operate from Gibraltar airport to across Europe, driving growth and jobs for the people of Gibraltar.
'This Government is showing that a pragmatic, positive relationship with the European Union pays off for the British public.'
The move could also see airlines start to add flights to Gibraltar from countries other than the UK in a boost to tourism.
Officials say a hard border would have been introduced under the EU's incoming exit and entry control system if no deal was reached, causing delays for some 15,000 people who cross the border every day as every individual passport was checked.
Talks on rules governing the border have been ongoing since Britain left the European Union in 2020.
An agreement for the future relationship between the EU and the UK in relation to Gibraltar is now a reality.
It is a historic agreement. pic.twitter.com/vN9tzDpe4r
— Fabian Picardo (@FabianPicardo) June 11, 2025
Conservative former minister Dame Harriett Baldwin asked: 'Can a British citizen flying from the UK to Gibraltar now be stopped by a Spanish official as they land?'
Mr Lammy replied: 'There will be a second line queue, as there is in St Pancras, and there will be Spanish border guards and police situated in that second line.
'And of course, if there was an alert, then at that point, not on their own, but at that point, there would be a hand-back facility with the Gibraltar police, so they are working alongside that Spanish team.
'And if there was an alert, then the individual would have a right to legal advice. They would be either be able to return to their country of origin, let's say the UK, or they would be able to voluntarily go over to Spain to face the questions they are facing.'
Deputy leader of Reform UK Richard Tice pressed the minister on whether Spanish border officials 'have an effective veto on the entry of a British citizen from the United Kingdom landing on British sovereign territory in Gibraltar'.
Mr Lammy said if Mr Tice flew to Gibraltar and there was an alert in the Schengen system 'he would be handed back to the Gibraltarians, where he might feel more comfortable'.
'He will be able to access his rights and the legal system that he says he feels comfortable with, which is ours, and he would be able to return to the United Kingdom, where no doubt the Spanish would seek to extradite him, and many in this House would be rather pleased,' he said.
Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel urged the Government to 'safeguard our defence and interest' and maintain operations of the UK's military facilities.
Gibraltar's airport is run by the Ministry of Defence and hosts an RAF base. The overseas territory also has an important naval facility.
Dame Priti said: 'Can he confirm that nothing will be agreed that infringes on our ability to operate the base? And will members of our armed forces be able to access Gibraltar without needing Schengen checks?'
She continued: 'Our principles have been that nothing compromises or infringes on the sovereignty and constitutional arrangements of Gibraltar, it is to remain British.'
Mr Lammy said he had insisted on a 'sovereignty clause' in the treaty, after both the UK and Gibraltar governments insisted the changes would not affect the British overseas territory's sovereignty.
He added: 'On the military base, it will continue to operate as it does today. There will be zero change. It's vital for UK national security, it's protected by this agreement, and that was a red line for us throughout these negotiations.'
Gibraltar was ceded to the UK by Spain in 1713 and the population is heavily in favour of remaining a British overseas territory.
The last time it voted on a proposal to share sovereignty with Spain, in 2002, almost 99% of Gibraltarians rejected the move.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
22 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Warning over assisted dying TikTok adverts as MPs further debate Bill
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has returned to the Commons for further debate, with an ad ban among the issues discussed. The Bill is undergoing a second day of report stage on Friday, with various amendments being debated and possibly voted on. Its third reading – where a vote is taken on the overall Bill – could take place next Friday. Opening debate, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater proposed an amendment to her Bill which would impose a duty on the Government to make regulations prohibiting advertisements to promote services relating to voluntary assisted dying should the legislation pass. She has previously said it 'would feel inappropriate for this to be something which was advertised'. Bill opponent and fellow Labour MP Paul Waugh warned of 'unspecified exceptions, which could make the ban itself worthless', adding he had put forward a tighter amendment to 'strengthen the Bill on this issue and to better protect the vulnerable'. Addressing the Commons, he said: 'Advertising works because we human beings are suggestible. Prone to messaging, visual clues and hints. Older people are bombarded with adverts for everything from stairlifts to care homes. 'One person's advert, though, is another person's public information campaign.' He added that unless Ms Leadbeater's amendment is tightened to limit the exceptions to a ban, social media ads on the issue in future would be possible. He said: 'Many in this House rightly try to protect teenagers from online harms. But the online harm of an ad for a website about assisted dying shared on TikTok could be a reality without the tighter safeguards in my amendment.' Other issues being debated on Friday include an amendment requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the Bill passing into law. Pledging her support for the amendment, which has been tabled by Liberal Democrat Munira Wilson, Ms Leadbeater said MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people. She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'. Ms Wilson's amendment is supported by Marie Curie, which said it is 'desperately needed as the end-of-life care system is in crisis, with huge gaps in services and a lack of NHS leadership on this vital part of our health and care system'. The beginning of Friday's session saw MPs add a new opt-out clause to the Bill. The amendment, meaning no person including all health and social care professionals, can be obliged to take part in assisted dying had been debated and approved last month, but has now been formally added to the Bill. The Bill passed second reading stage by a majority of 55 during a historic vote in November which saw MPs support the principle of assisted dying. Various media reports have indicated some MPs who voted in favour last year could withdraw their support amid concerns around safeguards and how much scrutiny the proposed legislation has received, while others might switch to supporting a Bill that backers argue has been strengthened over time. Opinion in the medical community has been divided, with the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) expressing concern, but some MPs who are doctors are among the Bill's strongest supporters. Seven RCPsych members, including a former president and vice president, have written to MPs to distance themselves from their college's concern, instead describing the current Bill as 'workable, safe and compassionate' with a 'clear and transparent legal framework'. Meanwhile, the Children's Commissioner for England has repeated her call for children's voices to be heard in the conversation, saying their views had been 'at best been sidelined, at worst written off entirely simply because they would not fall within the scope of the current scope of legislation'. Demonstrators both for and against a change in the law once again gathered outside Parliament to make their views known on the Bill. Disability campaigner George Fielding, representing campaign group Not Dead Yet UK, argued the Bill 'risks state-sanctioned suicide' but Claire Macdonald, director of My Death, My Decision said 'no-one should be forced to suffer, and the British public wants politicians to change the law on assisted dying'. In a letter to MPs this week, Ms Leadbeater said supporters and opponents appear in agreement that 'if we are to pass this legislation it should be the best and safest Bill possible'. She added: 'I'm confident it can and will be.' As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines.

The National
24 minutes ago
- The National
Unionists just don't view the status quo the same way we do
To those that have voted for Labour in Scotland and have never switched to the SNP, as well as Tory, Reform UK and LibDem voters, they don't see England, even politically, as a foreign country. Generally they don't have the burning antipathy that most of us lot have about being governed, and abused, by a much larger neighbouring country. In other words, as we would see it, they just don't bloody get it! READ MORE: SNP's losing strategy for by-election took the electorate for fools Clearly, if there was a totally fair press and media we would definitely get many more of them on board. However, the day we get a totally fair press and media in Scotland and the UK in respect of Scottish independence is the day pigs will be flying past my window and gieing me a knowing wink! Apart from the press, though, there are other factors. Somebody in the know clearly told Nigel Farage not to visit Hamilton, but to head for Larkhall, which let's just say is a place where there is an abundance of fans of Rangers Football Club. I guess we have to admit this was pretty clever as, generally, Rangers fans are not exactly associated with Scottish independence (I reckon that is one of the biggest euphemisms I've used in my life!) OK, so historically, that side of Scottish society has been overwhelmingly in favour of the Union and that can't be ignored. There is another aspect though. Many of us Scots, since time immemorial, have gone doon tae England tae make oor way in the world, for what we think is a better standard of living, and in many cases probably is. READ MORE: A large gulf has now developed between Yessers and the SNP Many don't come back, have bairns who end up having English accents and many of whom probably feel English, but leave behind family in Scotland that are proud as punch that their wee Johnny or Jeannie made good and made the family proud. Something tells me these ties to England won't dispose said family left back in Scotland to independence any time soon! Ye cannae upset the grandbairns! I've only touched on the factors that mean so many folk in oor great country are just totally addicted to being lorded over by the English state (although they don't see it that way, and that is the point!) So how can this mindset be changed? That's above my pay grade I'm afraid! Personally, I'm hauding oot fur oor young folk, far mair disposed tae independence, tae overwhelm Scottish public opinion at some point in the future, and make it happen. I'm almost 65 years old now, so reckon I probably won't witness this in my lifetime. But, hey, when it does, I'll be looking doon fae heaven (hopefully – fingers crossed!) and daeing the biggest fist pump in my life (well, maybe death!). Ivor Telfer Dalgety Bay, Fife SUSAN Forde's timely reminder of the sacrifice made by the 51st to help the Dunkirk evacuation proceed (Letters, June 12) should also remind all Scots (assuming they are the least bit interested) that between 1746 and 1940 the British establishment still held to the view attributed to James Wolfe. Post-Culloden he suggested that Highlanders would make a valuable contribution to British arms, yet if they were sacrificed it would be 'no great mischief'. No surprise, then, that the 51st were ordered to guard the retreat. Jim Butchart via email


Wales Online
25 minutes ago
- Wales Online
UK tourist missing after passport and belongings left in room
UK tourist missing after passport and belongings left in room Friends and family have not heard from Denis since Monday Denis Kopanev has mysteriously vanished from his Airbnb while on holiday A British tourist has vanished from his Airbnb while on holiday. Denis Kopanev was last seen leaving his accommodation on Monday, June 9. CCTV cameras filmed him leaving the property wearing beige jacket and trousers, a dark baseball cap, and a white shirt. Kopanev, who has Russian heritage and British citizenship, was staying at a condominium in the neighbourhood of Gávea in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Friends and family members have not heard from him since Monday. Kopanev, a financial analyst in London, was supposed to travel to São Paulo the following day to meet an American friend. They were then going to travel together to Fernando de Noronha, a volcanic archipelago about 215 miles off Brazil's north-eastern coast. The last location on his phone was at the Rodrigo de Freitas Lagoon near his accommodation in Rio. The 33-year-old never checked out of the property and his passport and belongings were left in the room. His disappearance was registered at the police station on Wednesday. According to Kopanev's best friend Benone Moura, he loved Brazil and visited the country often, including as recently as six months ago. Article continues below The friend said he never travelled without letting his friends and family know beforehand. Moura said he last spoke with him at around 5pm on Sunday. Family members contacted the British Embassy and filed a report, but have yet to receive any news. The case is being investigated by the Rio de Janeiro Whereabouts Discovery Unit (DDPA).